Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Radha Prosad Mullick v. Rani Moni Dassi: Affirming Daughters' Inheritance Rights under Indian Succession Act in the Absence of Valid Adoption

Radha Prosad Mullick v. Rani Moni Dassi: Affirming Daughters' Inheritance Rights under Indian Succession Act in the Absence of Valid Adoption

Date: Apr 24, 1906
Radha Prosad Mullick v. Rani Moni Dassi: Affirming Daughters' Inheritance Rights under Indian Succession Act in the Absence of Valid Adoption 1. Introduction The case of Radha Prosad Mullick v. Rani...
Limitation Bar in Execution of Mortgage Decree: Purna Chandra Mandal v. Radha Nath Dass

Limitation Bar in Execution of Mortgage Decree: Purna Chandra Mandal v. Radha Nath Dass

Date: Apr 12, 1906
Limitation Bar in Execution of Mortgage Decree: Purna Chandra Mandal v. Radha Nath Dass Introduction Purna Chandra Mandal v. Radha Nath Dass is a landmark case adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court...
Rescinding Colourable Benami Deeds When Fraud Fails: Analysis of Jadu Nath Poddar v. Rup Lal Poddar

Rescinding Colourable Benami Deeds When Fraud Fails: Analysis of Jadu Nath Poddar v. Rup Lal Poddar

Date: Mar 23, 1906
Rescinding Colourable Benami Deeds When Fraud Fails: Analysis of Jadu Nath Poddar v. Rup Lal Poddar Introduction The case of Jadu Nath Poddar v. Rup Lal Poddar, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court...
Imam Ali v. Baij Nath Ram Sahu: Landmark Ruling on Apportionment of Mortgage Liabilities and Statute of Limitations

Imam Ali v. Baij Nath Ram Sahu: Landmark Ruling on Apportionment of Mortgage Liabilities and Statute of Limitations

Date: Mar 17, 1906
Imam Ali v. Baij Nath Ram Sahu: Landmark Ruling on Apportionment of Mortgage Liabilities and Statute of Limitations 1. Introduction Imam Ali v. Baij Nath Ram Sahu is a significant judgment delivered...
Material Alteration and Forgery Vitiate Legal Bonds: Insights from Gour Chandra Das v. Prasanna Kumar Chandra

Material Alteration and Forgery Vitiate Legal Bonds: Insights from Gour Chandra Das v. Prasanna Kumar Chandra

Date: Feb 24, 1906
Material Alteration and Forgery Vitiate Legal Bonds: Insights from Gour Chandra Das v. Prasanna Kumar Chandra Introduction The case of Gour Chandra Das v. Prasanna Kumar Chandra was adjudicated by...
Interpretation of Debutter Property and Limitation under the Limitation Act in Shama Charan Nandi v. Abhiram Goswami

Interpretation of Debutter Property and Limitation under the Limitation Act in Shama Charan Nandi v. Abhiram Goswami

Date: Feb 18, 1906
Interpretation of Debutter Property and Limitation under the Limitation Act in Shama Charan Nandi v. Abhiram Goswami Introduction The case of Shama Charan Nandi v. Abhiram Goswami was adjudicated by...
Establishing Trustee Authority and Suit Maintainability: Insights from Budree Das Mukim v. Chooni Lal Johurry And Ors.

Establishing Trustee Authority and Suit Maintainability: Insights from Budree Das Mukim v. Chooni Lal Johurry And Ors.

Date: Feb 9, 1906
Establishing Trustee Authority and Suit Maintainability: Insights from Budree Das Mukim v. Chooni Lal Johurry And Ors. Introduction The case of Budree Das Mukim v. Chooni Lal Johurry And Ors.,...
Adverse Claimants Cannot Be Joined as Parties in Mortgage Enforcement Suits: Insights from Jaggeswar Dutt v. Bhuban Mohan Mitra

Adverse Claimants Cannot Be Joined as Parties in Mortgage Enforcement Suits: Insights from Jaggeswar Dutt v. Bhuban Mohan Mitra

Date: Feb 3, 1906
Adverse Claimants Cannot Be Joined as Parties in Mortgage Enforcement Suits: Insights from Jaggeswar Dutt v. Bhuban Mohan Mitra Introduction The case of Jaggeswar Dutt v. Bhuban Mohan Mitra...
Inherent Powers of Appellate Courts: Security for Decree Performance Post Execution

Inherent Powers of Appellate Courts: Security for Decree Performance Post Execution

Date: Dec 6, 1905
Inherent Powers of Appellate Courts: Security for Decree Performance Post Execution Introduction The case of Hukum Chand Boid v. Kamalanand Singh decided by the Calcutta High Court on December 5,...
Reaffirmation of Common Object in Rioting Under Section 147 IPC: Pares Nath Sircar And Others v. Emperor

Reaffirmation of Common Object in Rioting Under Section 147 IPC: Pares Nath Sircar And Others v. Emperor

Date: Aug 31, 1905
Reaffirmation of Common Object in Rioting Under Section 147 IPC: Pares Nath Sircar And Others v. Emperor Introduction The case of Pares Nath Sircar And Others v. Emperor, adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Kuloda Kinkar Roy v. Danesh Mir: Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries in Attachment Orders

Kuloda Kinkar Roy v. Danesh Mir: Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries in Attachment Orders

Date: Aug 23, 1905
Kuloda Kinkar Roy v. Danesh Mir: Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries in Attachment Orders Introduction The case of Kuloda Kinkar Roy v. Danesh Mir & Ors. adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Berhamdeo Pershad v. Tara Chand: Establishing Priority of Mortgagees in Surplus Sale-Proceeds

Berhamdeo Pershad v. Tara Chand: Establishing Priority of Mortgagees in Surplus Sale-Proceeds

Date: Aug 11, 1905
Berhamdeo Pershad v. Tara Chand: Establishing Priority of Mortgagees in Surplus Sale-Proceeds Introduction The case of Berhamdeo Pershad v. Tara Chand, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Calcutta High Court Establishes Procedural Lapses Do Not Invalidate Magistrate Jurisdiction Under Section 145 C.P.C.

Calcutta High Court Establishes Procedural Lapses Do Not Invalidate Magistrate Jurisdiction Under Section 145 C.P.C.

Date: Aug 8, 1905
Calcutta High Court Establishes Procedural Lapses Do Not Invalidate Magistrate Jurisdiction Under Section 145 C.P.C. Introduction In the landmark case of Sukh Lal Sheikh v. Tara Chand Ta, decided by...
Kurrutulain Bahadur v. Nuzbat-Ud-Dowla Abbas Hossein Khan: Establishing Accountability in Fiduciary Relationships

Kurrutulain Bahadur v. Nuzbat-Ud-Dowla Abbas Hossein Khan: Establishing Accountability in Fiduciary Relationships

Date: Jul 6, 1905
Kurrutulain Bahadur v. Nuzbat-Ud-Dowla Abbas Hossein Khan: Establishing Accountability in Fiduciary Relationships Introduction The landmark case of Kurrutulain Bahadur v. Nuzbat-Ud-Dowla Abbas...
Bhandi Singh v. Ramadhin Roy: Establishing Exclusive Jurisdiction and Res Judicata in Land Acquisition Cases

Bhandi Singh v. Ramadhin Roy: Establishing Exclusive Jurisdiction and Res Judicata in Land Acquisition Cases

Date: Jun 30, 1905
Bhandi Singh v. Ramadhin Roy: Establishing Exclusive Jurisdiction and Res Judicata in Land Acquisition Cases Introduction The case of Bhandi Singh v. Ramadhin Roy, adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Legal Commentary on Banu Singh v. Emperor: Admissibility of Conditional Pardon and Accomplice Evidence

Legal Commentary on Banu Singh v. Emperor: Admissibility of Conditional Pardon and Accomplice Evidence

Date: Jun 19, 1905
Legal Commentary on Banu Singh v. Emperor: Admissibility of Conditional Pardon and Accomplice Evidence Introduction Banu Singh v. Emperor is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Calcutta High Court on...
Dular Koer v. Dwarka Nath Misser: Establishing Judicial Discretion in Restitution of Conjugal Rights

Dular Koer v. Dwarka Nath Misser: Establishing Judicial Discretion in Restitution of Conjugal Rights

Date: Mar 8, 1905
Dular Koer v. Dwarka Nath Misser: Establishing Judicial Discretion in Restitution of Conjugal Rights Introduction Dular Koer v. Dwarka Nath Misser is a landmark judgment delivered by the Calcutta...
Joint Trial Legality under Section 233 Cr.P.C.: Insights from Abdul Majid v. Emperor

Joint Trial Legality under Section 233 Cr.P.C.: Insights from Abdul Majid v. Emperor

Date: Mar 3, 1905
Joint Trial Legality under Section 233 Cr.P.C.: Insights from Abdul Majid v. Emperor Introduction The case of Abdul Majid v. Emperor adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on March 2, 1905, serves as...
Establishing Bailee Responsibilities under the Indian Railway Act: Katary v. Secretary of State for India In Council

Establishing Bailee Responsibilities under the Indian Railway Act: Katary v. Secretary of State for India In Council

Date: Jun 10, 1904
Liability of Railway Companies as Bailees under the Indian Railway Act: Katary v. Secretary of State for India In Council Introduction The case of Jalim Singh Katary v. The Secretary Of State For...
Enlargement of Tenant's Rights by Relinquishment: Analysis of Peary Mohun Mondal v. Radhika Mohun Hazra

Enlargement of Tenant's Rights by Relinquishment: Analysis of Peary Mohun Mondal v. Radhika Mohun Hazra

Date: Dec 12, 1903
Enlargement of Tenant's Rights by Relinquishment: Analysis of Peary Mohun Mondal And Others v. Radhika Mohun Hazra And Others Introduction The case of Peary Mohun Mondal And Others v. Radhika Mohun...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert