Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Establishing the 12-Year Limitation Period for Mortgage Foreclosures: Analysis of Balaram v. Mangta Das

Establishing the 12-Year Limitation Period for Mortgage Foreclosures: Analysis of Balaram v. Mangta Das

Date: Jul 17, 1907
Establishing the 12-Year Limitation Period for Mortgage Foreclosures: Analysis of Balaram v. Mangta Das Introduction The case of Balaram v. Mangta Das adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on July...
Simultaneous Mortgages and Priority of Claims: Insights from Ram Ratan Sahu v. Bishun Chand

Simultaneous Mortgages and Priority of Claims: Insights from Ram Ratan Sahu v. Bishun Chand

Date: May 1, 1907
Simultaneous Mortgages and Priority of Claims: Insights from Ram Ratan Sahu v. Bishun Chand Introduction The case of Ram Ratan Sahu v. Bishun Chand, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on April...
Valuation of Relief in Declaratory Suits: Insights from Musst. Bibi Umatul Batul v. Musst. Nanji Koer

Valuation of Relief in Declaratory Suits: Insights from Musst. Bibi Umatul Batul v. Musst. Nanji Koer

Date: Apr 24, 1907
Valuation of Relief in Declaratory Suits: Insights from Musst. Bibi Umatul Batul v. Musst. Nanji Koer Introduction The case of Musst. Bibi Umatul Batul v. Musst. Nanji Koer, adjudicated by the...
Limits of Waiver in Judicial Property Sales: Preservation of Fraud Claims

Limits of Waiver in Judicial Property Sales: Preservation of Fraud Claims

Date: Apr 18, 1907
Limits of Waiver in Judicial Property Sales: Preservation of Fraud Claims Introduction The case of Dhanukdhari Singh And Anr. v. Nathima Sahu And Others adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Fink v. Secretary Of State For India (1907) - Landmark Ruling on Land Acquisition Compensation

Fink v. Secretary Of State For India (1907) - Landmark Ruling on Land Acquisition Compensation

Date: Apr 16, 1907
Fink v. Secretary Of State For India (1907) - Landmark Ruling on Land Acquisition Compensation Introduction The case of Fink v. Secretary Of State For India adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Gurdeo Singh v. Chandrika Singh: Establishing Res Judicata in Mortgage Proceedings

Gurdeo Singh v. Chandrika Singh: Establishing Res Judicata in Mortgage Proceedings

Date: Apr 11, 1907
Gurdeo Singh v. Chandrika Singh: Establishing Res Judicata in Mortgage Proceedings Introduction Gurdeo Singh and Ors. v. Chandrika Singh and Ors. is a landmark decision delivered by the Calcutta High...
Lala Hakim Lal v. Mooshabar Sahoo: Defining Fraudulent Conveyances Under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act

Lala Hakim Lal v. Mooshabar Sahoo: Defining Fraudulent Conveyances Under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act

Date: Apr 4, 1907
Lala Hakim Lal v. Mooshabar Sahoo: Defining Fraudulent Conveyances Under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act 1. Introduction The case of Lala Hakim Lal v. Mooshabar Sahoo, adjudicated by the...
Consent Requirement in Alienation of Joint Mitakshara Family Property: Banwari Lal & Ors. v. Sheo Sankar Misser & Ors.

Consent Requirement in Alienation of Joint Mitakshara Family Property: Banwari Lal & Ors. v. Sheo Sankar Misser & Ors.

Date: Mar 27, 1907
Consent Requirement in Alienation of Joint Mitakshara Family Property: Banwari Lal & Ors. v. Sheo Sankar Misser & Ors. Introduction The case of Banwari Lal And Ors. v. Sheo Sankar Misser And Ors. was...
Limits on Execution Against Joint Ancestral Property under CPC Sections 234 and 244: Amar Chandra Kundu v. Sebak Chand Chowdhry

Limits on Execution Against Joint Ancestral Property under CPC Sections 234 and 244: Amar Chandra Kundu v. Sebak Chand Chowdhry

Date: Mar 24, 1907
Limits on Execution Against Joint Ancestral Property under CPC Sections 234 and 244: Amar Chandra Kundu v. Sebak Chand Chowdhry Introduction The case of Amar Chandra Kundu & Ors. vs. Sebak Chand...
Clarification of Judicial Jurisdiction under Sec. 476 CPC in Begu Singh v. The Emperor Opposite Party

Clarification of Judicial Jurisdiction under Sec. 476 CPC in Begu Singh v. The Emperor Opposite Party

Date: Mar 24, 1907
Clarification of Judicial Jurisdiction under Sec. 476 CPC in Begu Singh v. The Emperor Opposite Party Introduction Begu Singh v. The Emperor Opposite Party is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Panchu Das v. Emperor: Landmark Judgment on Jury Directions and Evidentiary Standards

Panchu Das v. Emperor: Landmark Judgment on Jury Directions and Evidentiary Standards

Date: Mar 2, 1907
Panchu Das v. Emperor: Landmark Judgment on Jury Directions and Evidentiary Standards Introduction The case of Panchu Das v. Emperor (1907) adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court stands as a pivotal...
Re-defining Appearance and Re-admission of Dismissed Appeals under Section 558 CPC: Satish Chandra Mukerjee v. Ahara Prasad Mukerjee

Re-defining Appearance and Re-admission of Dismissed Appeals under Section 558 CPC: Satish Chandra Mukerjee v. Ahara Prasad Mukerjee

Date: Jan 31, 1907
Re-defining Appearance and Re-admission of Dismissed Appeals under Section 558 CPC Satish Chandra Mukerjee v. Ahara Prasad Mukerjee Court: Calcutta High Court Date: January 30, 1907 Introduction The...
Ensuring Precision in Land Acquisition and Franchise Rights: Insights from Maharaja Sir Rameswar Singh v. Secretary Of State For India In Council

Ensuring Precision in Land Acquisition and Franchise Rights: Insights from Maharaja Sir Rameswar Singh v. Secretary Of State For India In Council

Date: Jan 30, 1907
Ensuring Precision in Land Acquisition and Franchise Rights: Insights from Maharaja Sir Rameswar Singh v. Secretary Of State For India In Council Introduction The case of Maharaja Sir Rameswar Singh...
Gangadas Bhattar v. Jogendra Nath Mitter: Principles of Redemption in Conflicting Mortgage Claims

Gangadas Bhattar v. Jogendra Nath Mitter: Principles of Redemption in Conflicting Mortgage Claims

Date: Jan 29, 1907
Gangadas Bhattar v. Jogendra Nath Mitter: Principles of Redemption in Conflicting Mortgage Claims Introduction Gangadas Bhattar v. Jogendra Nath Mitter is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Calcutta...
Binding Nature of Solenama Agreements: Insights from Jasimuddin Biswas v. Bhuban Jelini

Binding Nature of Solenama Agreements: Insights from Jasimuddin Biswas v. Bhuban Jelini

Date: Jan 12, 1907
Binding Nature of Solenama Agreements: Insights from Jasimuddin Biswas v. Bhuban Jelini Introduction The case of Jasimuddin Biswas v. Bhuban Jelini adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on January...
Alternative Claims in Property Litigation: Reaffirming Suit Maintainability

Alternative Claims in Property Litigation: Reaffirming Suit Maintainability

Date: Aug 28, 1906
Alternative Claims in Property Litigation: Reaffirming Suit Maintainability Introduction The case of Narendra Nath Barari v. Abhoy Charan Chattopadhya adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on August...
Establishing Priority of Mortgagees: Jagatdhar Narain Prasad v. A.M. Brown (1906)

Establishing Priority of Mortgagees: Jagatdhar Narain Prasad v. A.M. Brown (1906)

Date: Jun 15, 1906
Establishing Priority of Mortgagees: Jagatdhar Narain Prasad v. A.M. Brown (1906) Introduction The case of Jagatdhar Narain Prasad v. A.M. Brown adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on June 14,...
Res Judicata and Property Rights in Mariamnessa Bibee v. Joynab Bibee

Res Judicata and Property Rights in Mariamnessa Bibee v. Joynab Bibee

Date: Jun 12, 1906
Res Judicata and Property Rights in Mariamnessa Bibee v. Joynab Bibee Introduction The case of Mariamnessa Bibee v. Joynab Bibee adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on June 11, 1906, centers...
Fraudulent Assignment and Insolvency: Insights from Jaffer Meher Ali v. The Budge Budge Jute Mills Co., Ltd.

Fraudulent Assignment and Insolvency: Insights from Jaffer Meher Ali v. The Budge Budge Jute Mills Co., Ltd.

Date: May 9, 1906
Fraudulent Assignment and Insolvency: Insights from Jaffer Meher Ali v. The Budge Budge Jute Mills Co., Ltd. Introduction The landmark case of Jaffer Meher Ali v. The Budge Budge Jute Mills Co.,...
Enforcement of Charges Executed by Benamdar Without Owner’s Consent: Insights from Royzuddi Sheik v. Kali Nath Mookerjee

Enforcement of Charges Executed by Benamdar Without Owner’s Consent: Insights from Royzuddi Sheik v. Kali Nath Mookerjee

Date: Apr 28, 1906
Enforcement of Charges Executed by Benamdar Without Owner’s Consent: Insights from Royzuddi Sheik v. Kali Nath Mookerjee Introduction The case of Royzuddi Sheik v. Kali Nath Mookerjee adjudicated by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert