Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Inherent Powers of Appellate Courts in Remanding Cases: Ghuznavi v. The Allahabad Bank Ltd. (1917)

Inherent Powers of Appellate Courts in Remanding Cases: Ghuznavi v. The Allahabad Bank Ltd. (1917)

Date: May 12, 1917
Inherent Powers of Appellate Courts in Remanding Cases: Ghuznavi v. The Allahabad Bank Ltd. (1917) Introduction The case of Ghuznavi v. The Allahabad Bank Ltd. decided by the Calcutta High Court on...
Admissibility of Admissions by Joint Claimants in Property Disputes: Insights from Ambar Ali v. Lutfe Ali

Admissibility of Admissions by Joint Claimants in Property Disputes: Insights from Ambar Ali v. Lutfe Ali

Date: Apr 24, 1917
Admissibility of Admissions by Joint Claimants in Property Disputes: Insights from Ambar Ali v. Lutfe Ali Introduction The case of Ambar Ali v. Lutfe Ali adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Jurisdiction and Judicial Discretion under Or. 12, r. 6: Insights from Premsuk Das Assaram v. Udairam Gungabux

Jurisdiction and Judicial Discretion under Or. 12, r. 6: Insights from Premsuk Das Assaram v. Udairam Gungabux

Date: Mar 29, 1917
Jurisdiction and Judicial Discretion under Or. 12, r. 6: Insights from Premsuk Das Assaram v. Udairam Gungabux Introduction The case of Premsuk Das Assaram v. Udairam Gungabux, adjudicated by the...
Inherent Jurisdiction and Remand Powers under CPC: Insights from Abdul Karim Abu Ahmed Khan Ghaznavi v. The Allahabad Bank, Ltd.

Inherent Jurisdiction and Remand Powers under CPC: Insights from Abdul Karim Abu Ahmed Khan Ghaznavi v. The Allahabad Bank, Ltd.

Date: Mar 12, 1917
Inherent Jurisdiction and Remand Powers under CPC: Insights from Abdul Karim Abu Ahmed Khan Ghaznavi v. The Allahabad Bank, Ltd. Introduction The landmark case of Abdul Karim Abu Ahmed Khan Ghaznavi...
Ramendra Nath Roy v. Brajendra Nath Dass: Precedent on Misjoinder of Parties and Causes of Action

Ramendra Nath Roy v. Brajendra Nath Dass: Precedent on Misjoinder of Parties and Causes of Action

Date: Mar 3, 1917
Ramendra Nath Roy v. Brajendra Nath Dass: Precedent on Misjoinder of Parties and Causes of Action Introduction The case of Ramendra Nath Roy v. Brajendra Nath Dass, adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Statute of Limitations in Surety Contracts: Insights from Brajendra Kishore Roy Chowdhury v. Hindustan Co-Operative Insurance Society

Statute of Limitations in Surety Contracts: Insights from Brajendra Kishore Roy Chowdhury v. Hindustan Co-Operative Insurance Society

Date: Jan 3, 1917
Statute of Limitations in Surety Contracts: Insights from Brajendra Kishore Roy Chowdhury v. Hindustan Co-Operative Insurance Society Introduction Brajendra Kishore Roy Chowdhury v. Hindustan...
Seth Dooly Chand v. Mamuji Musaji And Ors.: Establishing the Necessity of Unanimous Consent in Court-Ordered Arbitration

Seth Dooly Chand v. Mamuji Musaji And Ors.: Establishing the Necessity of Unanimous Consent in Court-Ordered Arbitration

Date: Nov 29, 1916
Seth Dooly Chand v. Mamuji Musaji And Ors.: Establishing the Necessity of Unanimous Consent in Court-Ordered Arbitration Introduction The case of Seth Dooly Chand v. Mamuji Musaji And Ors....
Budhu Lal v. Chattu Gope: Clarifying High Court Jurisdiction under Section 195 of the Criminal Procedure Code

Budhu Lal v. Chattu Gope: Clarifying High Court Jurisdiction under Section 195 of the Criminal Procedure Code

Date: Nov 28, 1916
Budhu Lal v. Chattu Gope: Clarifying High Court Jurisdiction under Section 195 of the Criminal Procedure Code Introduction Budhu Lal v. Chattu Gope is a landmark judgment delivered by the Calcutta...
Administration Suits and Court Fees: Insights from Shashi Bhushan Bose v. Manindra Chandra Nandy

Administration Suits and Court Fees: Insights from Shashi Bhushan Bose v. Manindra Chandra Nandy

Date: Aug 30, 1916
Administration Suits and Court Fees: Insights from Shashi Bhushan Bose v. Manindra Chandra Nandy Introduction The case of Shashi Bhushan Bose v. Manindra Chandra Nandy adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Syam Mandal v. Satinath Banerjee: Void Execution of Ejectment Decree Due to Lack of Notice

Syam Mandal v. Satinath Banerjee: Void Execution of Ejectment Decree Due to Lack of Notice

Date: Aug 4, 1916
Syam Mandal v. Satinath Banerjee: Void Execution of Ejectment Decree Due to Lack of Notice Introduction The landmark case of Syam Mandal v. Satinath Banerjee And Ors. decided by the Calcutta High...
Estoppel Doctrine Affirmed in Bhaiganta Bewah v. Himmat Badyakar

Estoppel Doctrine Affirmed in Bhaiganta Bewah v. Himmat Badyakar

Date: May 12, 1916
Estoppel Doctrine Affirmed in Bhaiganta Bewah v. Himmat Badyakar Introduction The case of Bhaiganta Bewah v. Himmat Badyakar was adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on May 11, 1916. This legal...
Temporal Conditions for Pre-emption Rights: Comprehensive Analysis of Nuri Mian v. Ambica Singh

Temporal Conditions for Pre-emption Rights: Comprehensive Analysis of Nuri Mian v. Ambica Singh

Date: May 12, 1916
Temporal Conditions for Pre-emption Rights: Comprehensive Analysis of Nuri Mian v. Ambica Singh Introduction The case of Nuri Mian v. Ambica Singh adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on May 11,...
Establishing the Admissibility of Settlement Conversations under Sections 18 and 23: Meajan Matbar v. Alimuddi Mia

Establishing the Admissibility of Settlement Conversations under Sections 18 and 23: Meajan Matbar v. Alimuddi Mia

Date: May 11, 1916
Establishing the Admissibility of Settlement Conversations under Sections 18 and 23: Meajan Matbar v. Alimuddi Mia Introduction Meajan Matbar v. Alimuddi Mia is a seminal judgment delivered by the...
Defining 'Revivor' under Article 183 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908: Insights from Chutterput Singh v. Sait Sumari Mull

Defining 'Revivor' under Article 183 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908: Insights from Chutterput Singh v. Sait Sumari Mull

Date: May 9, 1916
Defining 'Revivor' under Article 183 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908: Insights from Chutterput Singh v. Sait Sumari Mull Introduction The case of Chutterput Singh v. Sait Sumari Mull, adjudicated...
J.B. Ross & Co. v. C.R. Scriven: Upholding the Necessity of Evidence in Unliquidated Damages Cases

J.B. Ross & Co. v. C.R. Scriven: Upholding the Necessity of Evidence in Unliquidated Damages Cases

Date: Apr 20, 1916
J.B. Ross & Co. v. C.R. Scriven: Upholding the Necessity of Evidence in Unliquidated Damages Cases Introduction The case of J.B. Ross & Co. v. C.R. Scriven, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Interpretation of Notice Requirements under Section 77 of the Railways Act: Radha Shyam Basak v. Secretary Of State For India

Interpretation of Notice Requirements under Section 77 of the Railways Act: Radha Shyam Basak v. Secretary Of State For India

Date: Apr 12, 1916
Interpretation of Notice Requirements under Section 77 of the Railways Act: Radha Shyam Basak v. Secretary Of State For India Introduction The case of Radha Shyam Basak v. Secretary Of State For...
Public Right of Way and Title Proof in Adverse Possession Cases: Insights from Ram Chandra Sil v. Ramanmani Dasi

Public Right of Way and Title Proof in Adverse Possession Cases: Insights from Ram Chandra Sil v. Ramanmani Dasi

Date: Mar 14, 1916
Public Right of Way and Title Proof in Adverse Possession Cases: Insights from Ram Chandra Sil v. Ramanmani Dasi Introduction The case of Ram Chandra Sil v. Ramanmani Dasi adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Establishing the Validity of Talab Muasabat in Pre-emption Rights: Nuri Mian v. Ambica Singh

Establishing the Validity of Talab Muasabat in Pre-emption Rights: Nuri Mian v. Ambica Singh

Date: Jan 18, 1916
Establishing the Validity of Talab Muasabat in Pre-emption Rights: Nuri Mian v. Ambica Singh Introduction Nuri Mian v. Ambica Singh is a landmark case adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Cross-Objections in Appellate Proceedings: Precedents from Shib Chandra Kar v. A.C Dulcken And Others

Cross-Objections in Appellate Proceedings: Precedents from Shib Chandra Kar v. A.C Dulcken And Others

Date: Dec 22, 1915
Cross-Objections in Appellate Proceedings: Precedents from Shib Chandra Kar v. A.C Dulcken And Others Introduction Shib Chandra Kar v. A.C Dulcken And Others, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court...
Restoration of Suits and Right of Appeal: Analysis of Mathura Sundari Dassi v. Haran Chandra Saha

Restoration of Suits and Right of Appeal: Analysis of Mathura Sundari Dassi v. Haran Chandra Saha

Date: Dec 22, 1915
Restoration of Suits and Right of Appeal: Analysis of Mathura Sundari Dassi v. Haran Chandra Saha Introduction The case of Mathura Sundari Dassi v. Haran Chandra Saha was adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert