Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Jurisdiction and Withdrawal of Suits: Clarifying the Implications of Order XXIII Rule 1(2) in Hriday Nath Roy v. Ram Chandra Barna Sarma

Jurisdiction and Withdrawal of Suits: Clarifying the Implications of Order XXIII Rule 1(2) in Hriday Nath Roy v. Ram Chandra Barna Sarma

Date: May 21, 1920
Jurisdiction and Withdrawal of Suits: Clarifying the Implications of Order XXIII Rule 1(2) in Hriday Nath Roy v. Ram Chandra Barna Sarma Introduction The case of Hriday Nath Roy v. Ram Chandra Barna...
Clarification on the Applicability of Order XXI Rule 89 to Mortgage Decree Executions on the Original Side

Clarification on the Applicability of Order XXI Rule 89 to Mortgage Decree Executions on the Original Side

Date: May 13, 1920
Clarification on the Applicability of Order XXI Rule 89 to Mortgage Decree Executions on the Original Side Introduction The case of Virjibun Dass Moolji v. Bissesswar Lal Hargovind And Ors....
Clarification on Partnership Dissolution and Liability of Minor Partners: Insights from Haramohan Poddar v. Sudarson Poddar

Clarification on Partnership Dissolution and Liability of Minor Partners: Insights from Haramohan Poddar v. Sudarson Poddar

Date: Mar 20, 1920
Clarification on Partnership Dissolution and Liability of Minor Partners: Insights from Haramohan Poddar v. Sudarson Poddar Introduction The case of Haramohan Poddar v. Sudarson Poddar, adjudicated...
Establishing Testamentary Capacity and Authenticity of Wills: Analysis of Surendra Krishna Mondal v. Sreemati Ranee Dassi (1920)

Establishing Testamentary Capacity and Authenticity of Wills: Analysis of Surendra Krishna Mondal v. Sreemati Ranee Dassi (1920)

Date: Mar 8, 1920
Establishing Testamentary Capacity and Authenticity of Wills: Analysis of Surendra Krishna Mondal v. Sreemati Ranee Dassi (1920) Introduction The case of Surendra Krishna Mondal v. Sreemati Ranee...
Establishing Carrier Liability: India General Navigation v. Eastern Assam Co.

Establishing Carrier Liability: India General Navigation v. Eastern Assam Co.

Date: Mar 4, 1920
Establishing Carrier Liability: India General Navigation v. Eastern Assam Co. Introduction The case of India General Navigation and Railway Company Ltd. v. Eastern Assam Co. Ltd. adjudicated by the...
Jurisdictional Limits on Composite Mortgage Suits: Krishna Kishore De v. Amarnath Kshettry

Jurisdictional Limits on Composite Mortgage Suits: Krishna Kishore De v. Amarnath Kshettry

Date: Feb 18, 1920
Jurisdictional Limits on Composite Mortgage Suits: Krishna Kishore De v. Amarnath Kshettry Introduction The case of Krishna Kishore De v. Amarnath Kshettry adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Admissibility of Collateral Evidence in Criminal Cases: Insights from Emperor v. Panchu Das And Goberdhone Singh

Admissibility of Collateral Evidence in Criminal Cases: Insights from Emperor v. Panchu Das And Goberdhone Singh

Date: Feb 14, 1920
Admissibility of Collateral Evidence in Criminal Cases: Insights from Emperor v. Panchu Das And Goberdhone Singh Introduction The case of Emperor v. Panchu Das And Goberdhone Singh, adjudicated by...
Establishing Criteria for Perpetual Injunctions under the Specific Relief Act: An Analysis of Ram Kissen Joydoyal v. Pooran Mull

Establishing Criteria for Perpetual Injunctions under the Specific Relief Act: An Analysis of Ram Kissen Joydoyal v. Pooran Mull

Date: Feb 10, 1920
Establishing Criteria for Perpetual Injunctions under the Specific Relief Act: An Analysis of Ram Kissen Joydoyal v. Pooran Mull Introduction The case of Ram Kissen Joydoyal v. Pooran Mull,...
Invalidation of Municipal Election Due to Procedural Irregularities: Shyam Chand Basak v. Chairman Of Dacca Municipality

Invalidation of Municipal Election Due to Procedural Irregularities: Shyam Chand Basak v. Chairman Of Dacca Municipality

Date: Aug 29, 1919
Invalidation of Municipal Election Due to Procedural Irregularities: Shyam Chand Basak v. Chairman Of Dacca Municipality Introduction The case of Shyam Chand Basak v. Chairman Of Dacca Municipality...
Establishing Parameters for Fraud in Court Proceedings: Insights from Manindra Nath Mittra v. Hari Mondal

Establishing Parameters for Fraud in Court Proceedings: Insights from Manindra Nath Mittra v. Hari Mondal

Date: Aug 20, 1919
Establishing Parameters for Fraud in Court Proceedings: Insights from Manindra Nath Mittra v. Hari Mondal Introduction The case of Manindra Nath Mittra v. Hari Mondal adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Voidable Sales by Mortgagee Under Section 99 of the Transfer of Property Act: In Uttam Chandra Daw v. Rajkrishna Dalal

Voidable Sales by Mortgagee Under Section 99 of the Transfer of Property Act: In Uttam Chandra Daw v. Rajkrishna Dalal

Date: Aug 8, 1919
Voidable Sales by Mortgagee Under Section 99 of the Transfer of Property Act: In Uttam Chandra Daw v. Rajkrishna Dalal Introduction The case of Uttam Chandra Daw v. Rajkrishna Dalal was adjudicated...
Kali Dayal Bhattacharjee v. Nagendra Nath Pakrashi: Establishing the Doctrine on Partial Abatement in Appeals Due to Deceased Parties

Kali Dayal Bhattacharjee v. Nagendra Nath Pakrashi: Establishing the Doctrine on Partial Abatement in Appeals Due to Deceased Parties

Date: Jul 29, 1919
Kali Dayal Bhattacharjee v. Nagendra Nath Pakrashi: Establishing the Doctrine on Partial Abatement in Appeals Due to Deceased Parties Introduction The case of Kali Dayal Bhattacharjee v. Nagendra...
Ashutosh Mukhopadhya v. Haran Chandra Mukerjee: Establishing Fixed Rent in Maurasi Mokurari Kabuliyat

Ashutosh Mukhopadhya v. Haran Chandra Mukerjee: Establishing Fixed Rent in Maurasi Mokurari Kabuliyat

Date: May 17, 1919
Ashutosh Mukhopadhya v. Haran Chandra Mukerjee: Establishing Fixed Rent in Maurasi Mokurari Kabuliyat Introduction Ashutosh Mukhopadhya v. Haran Chandra Mukerjee is a landmark case decided by the...
Reaffirming the Non-Attachability of Provident Fund Moneys: Hindley v. Marwari (Calcutta High Court, 1919)

Reaffirming the Non-Attachability of Provident Fund Moneys: Hindley v. Marwari (Calcutta High Court, 1919)

Date: Mar 29, 1919
Reaffirming the Non-Attachability of Provident Fund Moneys Hindley v. Joynarain Marwari (Calcutta High Court, 1919) Introduction The case of C.D.M Hindley v. Joynarain Marwari, decided by the...
Jurisdiction of Arbitrators Requires Existing Dispute at the Time of Arbitration – Uttam Chand Saligram v. Jewa Mamooji

Jurisdiction of Arbitrators Requires Existing Dispute at the Time of Arbitration – Uttam Chand Saligram v. Jewa Mamooji

Date: Jan 16, 1919
Jurisdiction of Arbitrators Requires Existing Dispute at the Time of Arbitration – Uttam Chand Saligram v. Jewa Mamooji Introduction The case of Uttam Chand Saligram v. Jewa Mamooji was adjudicated...
Admissibility of Confessions and Witness Reliability in Joint Proceedings: Ah Foong Chinaman v. The King-Emperor

Admissibility of Confessions and Witness Reliability in Joint Proceedings: Ah Foong Chinaman v. The King-Emperor

Date: May 18, 1918
Admissibility of Confessions and Witness Reliability in Joint Proceedings: Ah Foong Chinaman v. The King-Emperor Introduction The case of Ah Foong Chinaman v. The King-Emperor adjudicated by the...
The Company v. Sir Rameswar Singh: Establishing Grounds for Staying Winding Up Petitions

The Company v. Sir Rameswar Singh: Establishing Grounds for Staying Winding Up Petitions

Date: Feb 6, 1918
The Company v. Sir Rameswar Singh: Establishing Grounds for Staying Winding Up Petitions Introduction The Company v. Sir Rameswar Singh is a landmark judgment delivered by the Calcutta High Court on...
Consistent Standard of Proof in Criminal Cases Affirmed Regardless of Crime Magnitude - Ashraf Ali v. Emperor

Consistent Standard of Proof in Criminal Cases Affirmed Regardless of Crime Magnitude - Ashraf Ali v. Emperor

Date: Jul 6, 1917
Consistent Standard of Proof in Criminal Cases Affirmed Regardless of Crime Magnitude - Ashraf Ali v. Emperor Introduction The case of Ashraf Ali v. Emperor, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Calcutta High Court Rules Printer and Publisher Liable for Contempt Due to Defamatory Publications

Calcutta High Court Rules Printer and Publisher Liable for Contempt Due to Defamatory Publications

Date: Jun 28, 1917
Calcutta High Court Rules Printer and Publisher Liable for Contempt Due to Defamatory Publications Introduction In the landmark case of Tarit Kanti Biswas, In Re, adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Establishing Jurisdictional Limits in Design Registration: Gammeter v. Boseck & Co.

Establishing Jurisdictional Limits in Design Registration: Gammeter v. Boseck & Co.

Date: May 23, 1917
Establishing Jurisdictional Limits in Design Registration: Gammeter v. Boseck & Co. Introduction The case of Ernest Otto Gammeter v. The Controller Of Patents And Designs And J. Boseck & Co....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert