Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Establishing Standards for Witness Credibility: Emperor Prosecutor v. Satyendra Kumar Dutt Chowdhury

Establishing Standards for Witness Credibility: Emperor Prosecutor v. Satyendra Kumar Dutt Chowdhury

Date: Oct 14, 1922
Establishing Standards for Witness Credibility: Emperor Prosecutor v. Satyendra Kumar Dutt Chowdhury Introduction Emperor Prosecutor v. Satyendra Kumar Dutt Chowdhury Alias Satu Babu Accused is a...
Unified Partition Suits: Reinforcing Comprehensive Inclusion of Joint Property - Rajendra Kumar Bose v. Brojendra Kumar Bose

Unified Partition Suits: Reinforcing Comprehensive Inclusion of Joint Property - Rajendra Kumar Bose v. Brojendra Kumar Bose

Date: Aug 31, 1922
Unified Partition Suits: Reinforcing Comprehensive Inclusion of Joint Property Rajendra Kumar Bose v. Brojendra Kumar Bose, Calcutta High Court, August 30, 1922 Introduction The case of Rajendra...
Notice Requirements under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act: Insights from Assam Bengal Railway Co. Ltd. v. Radhica Mohan Nath

Notice Requirements under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act: Insights from Assam Bengal Railway Co. Ltd. v. Radhica Mohan Nath

Date: Aug 29, 1922
Notice Requirements under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act: Insights from Assam Bengal Railway Co. Ltd. v. Radhica Mohan Nath Introduction Assam Bengal Railway Co. Ltd. v. Radhica Mohan Nath is...
Affirming Founder's Rights as Shebait in Religious Institutions: Ananda Chandra Chakravarti v. Broja Lal Singh & Ors.

Affirming Founder's Rights as Shebait in Religious Institutions: Ananda Chandra Chakravarti v. Broja Lal Singh & Ors.

Date: Aug 22, 1922
Affirming Founder's Rights as Shebait in Religious Institutions Ananda Chandra Chakravarti v. Broja Lal Singh & Ors. (Calcutta High Court, 1922) Introduction The case of Ananda Chandra Chakravarti v....
Assessing Damages for Breach of License Agreements: Insights from F.T. Kingsley v. The Secretary of State for India In Council

Assessing Damages for Breach of License Agreements: Insights from F.T. Kingsley v. The Secretary of State for India In Council

Date: Aug 19, 1922
Assessing Damages for Breach of License Agreements: Insights from F.T. Kingsley v. The Secretary of State for India In Council Introduction The case of F.T. Kingsley v. The Secretary of State for...
Vacatur of Appellate Decree Upon Successful Review Under Section 105 of the Bengal Tenancy Act: Analysis of Gour Krishna Sircar v. Nilmadhab Saha

Vacatur of Appellate Decree Upon Successful Review Under Section 105 of the Bengal Tenancy Act: Analysis of Gour Krishna Sircar v. Nilmadhab Saha

Date: Aug 17, 1922
Vacatur of Appellate Decree Upon Successful Review Under Section 105 of the Bengal Tenancy Act: Analysis of Gour Krishna Sircar And Anr. v. Nilmadhab Saha And Ors. Introduction The case of Gour...
Succession and Participation Rights in Religious Trusts: Rambrama Chatterjee v. Kedar Nath Banerjee

Succession and Participation Rights in Religious Trusts: Rambrama Chatterjee v. Kedar Nath Banerjee

Date: Aug 15, 1922
Succession and Participation Rights in Religious Trusts: Rambrama Chatterjee v. Kedar Nath Banerjee Introduction Rambrama Chatterjee v. Kedar Nath Banerjee And Ors. is a seminal case adjudicated by...
Clarification on the Doctrine of Res Judicata: Isup Ali & Ors. v. Gour Chandra Deb

Clarification on the Doctrine of Res Judicata: Isup Ali & Ors. v. Gour Chandra Deb

Date: Aug 8, 1922
Clarification on the Doctrine of Res Judicata: Isup Ali & Ors. v. Gour Chandra Deb Introduction Isup Ali And Ors. v. Gour Chandra Deb is a landmark judgment delivered by the Calcutta High Court on...
Affirmation of Consent Decree and Limitation Principles in Property Recovery: Syama Charan Das v. Satya Prosad Choudhury

Affirmation of Consent Decree and Limitation Principles in Property Recovery: Syama Charan Das v. Satya Prosad Choudhury

Date: Jun 21, 1922
Affirmation of Consent Decree and Limitation Principles in Property Recovery: Syama Charan Das v. Satya Prosad Choudhury Introduction The case of Syama Charan Das v. Satya Prosad Choudhury,...
Vesting Debuttar Property in Religious Trusts: Analysis of Charu Chandra Pramanik v. Nahush Chandra Kundu

Vesting Debuttar Property in Religious Trusts: Analysis of Charu Chandra Pramanik v. Nahush Chandra Kundu

Date: Jun 3, 1922
Vesting Debuttar Property in Religious Trusts: Analysis of Charu Chandra Pramanik v. Nahush Chandra Kundu Introduction The case of Charu Chandra Pramanik v. Nahush Chandra Kundu, adjudicated by the...
Baidya Nath Dutt v. Alef Jan Bibi: Establishing the Integrity of Mortgage Transactions in the Presence of Fictitious Conveyances

Baidya Nath Dutt v. Alef Jan Bibi: Establishing the Integrity of Mortgage Transactions in the Presence of Fictitious Conveyances

Date: Jun 2, 1922
Baidya Nath Dutt v. Alef Jan Bibi: Establishing the Integrity of Mortgage Transactions in the Presence of Fictitious Conveyances Introduction The case of Baidya Nath Dutt v. Alef Jan Bibi And Ors....
Establishing the Limitations of Section 34 IPC in Joint Criminal Acts: Insights from Emperor v. Profulla Kumar Mazumdar

Establishing the Limitations of Section 34 IPC in Joint Criminal Acts: Insights from Emperor v. Profulla Kumar Mazumdar

Date: May 27, 1922
Establishing the Limitations of Section 34 IPC in Joint Criminal Acts: Insights from Emperor v. Profulla Kumar Mazumdar Introduction Emperor v. Profulla Kumar Mazumdar, adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Rekhabchand Doogar v. J.R D'Cruz: Defining Bona Fide Requirement in Landlord Evictions under the Calcutta Rent Act

Rekhabchand Doogar v. J.R D'Cruz: Defining Bona Fide Requirement in Landlord Evictions under the Calcutta Rent Act

Date: Feb 24, 1922
Rekhabchand Doogar v. J.R D'Cruz: Defining Bona Fide Requirement in Landlord Evictions under the Calcutta Rent Act Introduction Rekhabchand Doogar v. J.R D'Cruz is a seminal judgment delivered by the...
High Court Upholds Mandatory Certification of Standard Rent under Section 15 of Calcutta Rent Act, 1920

High Court Upholds Mandatory Certification of Standard Rent under Section 15 of Calcutta Rent Act, 1920

Date: Feb 22, 1922
High Court Upholds Mandatory Certification of Standard Rent under Section 15 of Calcutta Rent Act, 1920 Introduction The case of Re Allen Bros. & Co. v. Bando & Co. adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Biman Ckandra Dutta v. Promotho Nath Ghose: Establishing the Protective Scope of Section 18 in Limitation Law

Biman Ckandra Dutta v. Promotho Nath Ghose: Establishing the Protective Scope of Section 18 in Limitation Law

Date: Feb 17, 1922
Biman Ckandra Dutta v. Promotho Nath Ghose: Establishing the Protective Scope of Section 18 in Limitation Law Introduction Biman Ckandra Dutta v. Promotho Nath Ghose is a landmark judgment delivered...
Duty and Conduct of Legal Practitioners: Insights from Emperor v. Rajani Kanta Bose And Others

Duty and Conduct of Legal Practitioners: Insights from Emperor v. Rajani Kanta Bose And Others

Date: Feb 7, 1922
Duty and Conduct of Legal Practitioners: Insights from Emperor v. Rajani Kanta Bose And Others Introduction The case of Emperor v. Rajani Kanta Bose And Others delivered by the Calcutta High Court on...
Onus of Proof in Land Possession Suits: Rakhal Chandra Ghose v. Durgadas Samanta

Onus of Proof in Land Possession Suits: Rakhal Chandra Ghose v. Durgadas Samanta

Date: Jan 14, 1922
Onus of Proof in Land Possession Suits: Rakhal Chandra Ghose v. Durgadas Samanta Introduction Rakhal Chandra Ghose v. Durgadas Samanta is a seminal case adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Exclusive Jurisdiction of Land Acquisition Courts: Saibesh Chandra Sarkar v. Sir Bejoy Chand Mahatap Bahadur

Exclusive Jurisdiction of Land Acquisition Courts: Saibesh Chandra Sarkar v. Sir Bejoy Chand Mahatap Bahadur

Date: Dec 17, 1921
Exclusive Jurisdiction of Land Acquisition Courts Saibesh Chandra Sarkar v. Sir Bejoy Chand Mahatap Bahadur Court: Calcutta High Court Date: December 16, 1921 Introduction The case of Saibesh Chandra...
Recognition of Conspiracy as a Substantive Offense: Analysis of Abdul Salim And Ors. v. King-Emperor

Recognition of Conspiracy as a Substantive Offense: Analysis of Abdul Salim And Ors. v. King-Emperor

Date: Nov 15, 1921
Recognition of Conspiracy as a Substantive Offense: Analysis of Abdul Salim And Ors. v. King-Emperor Introduction The case of Abdul Salim And Ors. v. King-Emperor, adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Raja Sashikanta Acharya v. Raja Sarat Chandra Rai Chaudhuri: Defining the Scope and Calculation of Mesne Profits

Raja Sashikanta Acharya v. Raja Sarat Chandra Rai Chaudhuri: Defining the Scope and Calculation of Mesne Profits

Date: Aug 26, 1921
Raja Sashikanta Acharya v. Raja Sarat Chandra Rai Chaudhuri: Defining the Scope and Calculation of Mesne Profits Introduction The case of Raja Sashikanta Acharya v. Raja Sarat Chandra Rai Chaudhuri...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert