Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Recognition of Attaching Creditors' Rights under Order XXI, Rule 90: Dhirendra Nath Roy v. Kamini Kumar Pal

Recognition of Attaching Creditors' Rights under Order XXI, Rule 90: Dhirendra Nath Roy v. Kamini Kumar Pal

Date: Jan 12, 1924
Recognition of Attaching Creditors' Rights under Order XXI, Rule 90: Dhirendra Nath Roy v. Kamini Kumar Pal Introduction The case of Dhirendra Nath Roy v. Kamini Kumar Pal (Calcutta High Court, 1924)...
Taxation of Income from Permanently Settled Estates: Insights from Emperor v. Probhat Chandra Barua

Taxation of Income from Permanently Settled Estates: Insights from Emperor v. Probhat Chandra Barua

Date: Jan 9, 1924
Taxation of Income from Permanently Settled Estates: Insights from Emperor v. Probhat Chandra Barua Introduction Emperor v. Probhat Chandra Barua is a landmark case adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Res Judicata and Limitation Periods in Property Disputes: Insights from Dwijendra Narain Roy v. Joges Chandra De And Others

Res Judicata and Limitation Periods in Property Disputes: Insights from Dwijendra Narain Roy v. Joges Chandra De And Others

Date: Jan 1, 1924
Res Judicata and Limitation Periods in Property Disputes: Insights from Dwijendra Narain Roy v. Joges Chandra De And Others Introduction Dwijendra Narain Roy v. Joges Chandra De And Others is a...
Najimunnessa Bibi v. Nacharaddin Sardar: Limitation Period in Execution Proceedings under Order 21 Rule 63 CPC

Najimunnessa Bibi v. Nacharaddin Sardar: Limitation Period in Execution Proceedings under Order 21 Rule 63 CPC

Date: Dec 20, 1923
Najimunnessa Bibi v. Nacharaddin Sardar: Limitation Period in Execution Proceedings under Order 21 Rule 63 CPC Introduction The case of Najimunnessa Bibi v. Nacharaddin Sardar was adjudicated by the...
Barendra Kumar Ghose v. The King-Emperor: Defining Grounds for Appeals to the Judicial Committee in Criminal Cases

Barendra Kumar Ghose v. The King-Emperor: Defining Grounds for Appeals to the Judicial Committee in Criminal Cases

Date: Oct 9, 1923
Barendra Kumar Ghose v. The King-Emperor: Defining Grounds for Appeals to the Judicial Committee in Criminal Cases Introduction The case of Barendra Kumar Ghose v. The King-Emperor Opposite Party,...
Affirmation of Jury Integrity and Judicial Restraint in Mamfru Chaudhuri v. Emperor

Affirmation of Jury Integrity and Judicial Restraint in Mamfru Chaudhuri v. Emperor

Date: Oct 4, 1923
Affirmation of Jury Integrity and Judicial Restraint in Mamfru Chaudhuri v. Emperor Introduction Mamfru Chaudhuri v. Emperor is a landmark judgment delivered by the Calcutta High Court on October 3,...
Enhancing Bail Considerations in Custodial Detentions: Insights from Nagendranath Chakrabarti v. King Emperor

Enhancing Bail Considerations in Custodial Detentions: Insights from Nagendranath Chakrabarti v. King Emperor

Date: Oct 2, 1923
Enhancing Bail Considerations in Custodial Detentions: Insights from Nagendranath Chakrabarti v. King Emperor Introduction Nagendranath Chakrabarti v. King Emperor is a landmark judgment delivered by...
Bail Considerations and Judicial Discretion: Insights from Nagendra Nath Chakravarti, In Re

Bail Considerations and Judicial Discretion: Insights from Nagendra Nath Chakravarti, In Re

Date: Oct 2, 1923
Bail Considerations and Judicial Discretion: Insights from Nagendra Nath Chakravarti, In Re Introduction The case of Nagendra Nath Chakravarti, In Re adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on October...
Interpretation of Section 34 IPC: Joint Liability and Common Intention in The King-Emperor v. Barendra Kumar Ghose

Interpretation of Section 34 IPC: Joint Liability and Common Intention in The King-Emperor v. Barendra Kumar Ghose

Date: Sep 27, 1923
Interpretation of Section 34 IPC: Joint Liability and Common Intention in The King-Emperor v. Barendra Kumar Ghose Introduction The King-Emperor v. Barendra Kumar Ghose is a seminal 1923 judgment...
Comprehensive Analysis of Bhupendra Nath Mukherjee v. Monohar Mukherjee: Establishing Principles for Receiver Appointment

Comprehensive Analysis of Bhupendra Nath Mukherjee v. Monohar Mukherjee: Establishing Principles for Receiver Appointment

Date: Aug 30, 1923
Comprehensive Analysis of Bhupendra Nath Mukherjee v. Monohar Mukherjee: Establishing Principles for Receiver Appointment Introduction Bhupendra Nath Mukherjee v. Monohar Mukherjee is a landmark...
Recognition of Stridhan Property in Joint Hindu Family Estates: The Landmark Judgment in Bhuban Mohini Dasi v. Kumud Bala Dasi

Recognition of Stridhan Property in Joint Hindu Family Estates: The Landmark Judgment in Bhuban Mohini Dasi v. Kumud Bala Dasi

Date: Aug 29, 1923
Recognition of Stridhan Property in Joint Hindu Family Estates: The Landmark Judgment in Bhuban Mohini Dasi v. Kumud Bala Dasi Introduction The case of Bhuban Mohini Dasi and Ors. v. Kumud Bala Dasi...
Implied Obligations of Employers and Justified Abandonment by Employees: Insights from Middleton v. Playfair

Implied Obligations of Employers and Justified Abandonment by Employees: Insights from Middleton v. Playfair

Date: Aug 29, 1923
Implied Obligations of Employers and Justified Abandonment by Employees: Insights from Middleton v. Playfair Introduction The case of L.W. Middleton v. Harry Playfair adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Enhanced Scrutiny in Copyright Infringement: Insights from Sita Nath Basak v. Mohini Mohan Singh And Others

Enhanced Scrutiny in Copyright Infringement: Insights from Sita Nath Basak v. Mohini Mohan Singh And Others

Date: Aug 16, 1923
Enhanced Scrutiny in Copyright Infringement: Insights from Sita Nath Basak v. Mohini Mohan Singh And Others Introduction Sita Nath Basak v. Mohini Mohan Singh And Others is a landmark case...
Landholder's Duty to Prevent Unlawful Assembly: Calcutta High Court's Ruling in Nripendra Bhusan Ray v. Gobinda Bandhu Majumdar

Landholder's Duty to Prevent Unlawful Assembly: Calcutta High Court's Ruling in Nripendra Bhusan Ray v. Gobinda Bandhu Majumdar

Date: Aug 4, 1923
Landholder's Duty to Prevent Unlawful Assembly: Calcutta High Court's Ruling in Nripendra Bhusan Ray v. Gobinda Bandhu Majumdar Introduction The case of Nripendra Bhusan Ray v. Gobinda Bandhu...
Mandatory Notice under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code: Dakshina Ranjan Ghose v. Omar Chand Oswal

Mandatory Notice under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code: Dakshina Ranjan Ghose v. Omar Chand Oswal

Date: Jun 27, 1923
Mandatory Notice under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code: Dakshina Ranjan Ghose v. Omar Chand Oswal Introduction The case of Dakshina Ranjan Ghose v. Omar Chand Oswal adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Comprehensive Commentary on Section 342 CPC in Dibakanta Chatterjee v. Gour Gopal Mukherjee

Comprehensive Commentary on Section 342 CPC in Dibakanta Chatterjee v. Gour Gopal Mukherjee

Date: May 22, 1923
Comprehensive Commentary on Section 342 CPC in Dibakanta Chatterjee v. Gour Gopal Mukherjee Introduction The case of Dibakanta Chatterjee v. Gour Gopal Mukherjee was adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Raja Peary Mohan Mookerjee v. Manohar Mookerjee: Defining Trust Trustee Liability and Decree Classification

Raja Peary Mohan Mookerjee v. Manohar Mookerjee: Defining Trust Trustee Liability and Decree Classification

Date: May 10, 1923
Raja Peary Mohan Mookerjee v. Manohar Mookerjee: Defining Trust Trustee Liability and Decree Classification Introduction The case of Raja Peary Mohan Mookerjee v. Manohar Mookerjee is a landmark...
Recognition of Individual Partners Over Firm Entities in Partnership Law: Seodoyal Khemka v. Joharmull Manmull

Recognition of Individual Partners Over Firm Entities in Partnership Law: Seodoyal Khemka v. Joharmull Manmull

Date: Feb 4, 1923
Recognition of Individual Partners Over Firm Entities in Partnership Law: Seodoyal Khemka v. Joharmull Manmull Introduction The case of Seodoyal Khemka v. Joharmull Manmull, adjudicated by the...
Calcutta High Court Establishes Illegality of Lease Agreements Contravening Rent Act Provisions

Calcutta High Court Establishes Illegality of Lease Agreements Contravening Rent Act Provisions

Date: Feb 1, 1923
Calcutta High Court Establishes Illegality of Lease Agreements Contravening Rent Act Provisions Introduction The case of Saleh Abraham v. Manekji Cowasji adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Mahamad Mazaharal Ahad v. Mahamad Azimuddin Bhuian: Affirmation of Art.116 Applicability to Registered Dower Deed Suits

Mahamad Mazaharal Ahad v. Mahamad Azimuddin Bhuian: Affirmation of Art.116 Applicability to Registered Dower Deed Suits

Date: Nov 15, 1922
Affirmation of Art.116 Applicability to Registered Dower Deed Suits Introduction The case of Mahamad Mazaharal Ahad v. Mahamad Azimuddin Bhuian adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on November 14,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert