Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Section 326 Compliance and Trial Validity: Precedent Established by The Emperor v. Erman Ali And Ors.

Section 326 Compliance and Trial Validity: Precedent Established by The Emperor v. Erman Ali And Ors.

Date: Jan 10, 1930
Section 326 Compliance and Trial Validity: Precedent Established by The Emperor v. Erman Ali And Ors. Introduction The Emperor v. Erman Ali And Ors. Accused is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Official Receiver as Public Officer and Scope of Section 80 CPC in Prasaddas Sen v. K.S. Bonnerjee (1929)

Official Receiver as Public Officer and Scope of Section 80 CPC in Prasaddas Sen v. K.S. Bonnerjee (1929)

Date: Nov 30, 1929
Official Receiver as Public Officer and Scope of Section 80 CPC in Prasaddas Sen v. K.S. Bonnerjee (1929) Introduction The landmark case of Prasaddas Sen v. K.S. Bonnerjee, adjudicated by the...
Establishing Valid Equitable Charges: Insights from Probodh Chandra Mitra v. Road Oils (India) Ltd.

Establishing Valid Equitable Charges: Insights from Probodh Chandra Mitra v. Road Oils (India) Ltd.

Date: Nov 23, 1929
Establishing Valid Equitable Charges: Insights from Probodh Chandra Mitra v. Road Oils (India) Ltd. Introduction The case of Probodh Chandra Mitra v. Road Oils (India) Ltd., adjudicated by the...
Establishing the Competency of Appeals from Preliminary Decrees Post Final Decree: Taleb Ali and Anr. v. Abdul Aziz and Ors.

Establishing the Competency of Appeals from Preliminary Decrees Post Final Decree: Taleb Ali and Anr. v. Abdul Aziz and Ors.

Date: Sep 3, 1929
Establishing the Competency of Appeals from Preliminary Decrees Post Final Decree Introduction The case of Taleb Ali And Anr. Decree-Holders v. Abdul Aziz And Ors. is a seminal judgment delivered by...
Establishing Privity of Contract and Possessory Rights: Insights from Currimbhoy And Co. Ltd. v. L.A. Creet

Establishing Privity of Contract and Possessory Rights: Insights from Currimbhoy And Co. Ltd. v. L.A. Creet

Date: Aug 24, 1929
Establishing Privity of Contract and Possessory Rights: Insights from Currimbhoy And Co. Ltd. v. L.A. Creet Introduction Currimbhoy And Co. Ltd. v. L.A. Creet is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Gooptu Estates Ltd. Judgment: Interpretation of Salami Income under Section 4(3)(7) of the Income Tax Act

Gooptu Estates Ltd. Judgment: Interpretation of Salami Income under Section 4(3)(7) of the Income Tax Act

Date: Aug 13, 1929
Gooptu Estates Ltd. Judgment: Interpretation of Salami Income under Section 4(3)(7) of the Income Tax Act Introduction The Gooptu Estates Ltd. judgment, delivered by the Calcutta High Court on August...
Admissibility of Uncorroborated Accomplice Evidence: Emperor Prosecutor v. O.A Mathews

Admissibility of Uncorroborated Accomplice Evidence: Emperor Prosecutor v. O.A Mathews

Date: Jul 30, 1929
Admissibility of Uncorroborated Accomplice Evidence: Emperor Prosecutor v. O.A Mathews Introduction The case of Emperor Prosecutor v. O.A Mathews Accused, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Calcutta High Court Establishes Broad Criteria for Granting Succession Certificates in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases

Calcutta High Court Establishes Broad Criteria for Granting Succession Certificates in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases

Date: Jul 30, 1929
Calcutta High Court Establishes Broad Criteria for Granting Succession Certificates in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases Introduction The case of Brojendra Sundar Banerjee v. Niladrinath Mukerjee...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Receiver Appointments: Insights from Raja Pramatha Nath Malia v. H.V Low & Co.

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Receiver Appointments: Insights from Raja Pramatha Nath Malia v. H.V Low & Co.

Date: Jul 18, 1929
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Receiver Appointments: Insights from Raja Pramatha Nath Malia v. H.V Low & Co. Introduction The case of Raja Pramatha Nath Malia v. H.V Low & Co. adjudicated by the...
Promotha Nath Mazumdar v. Nagendra Nath Mazumdar (1929): Clarifying Property Identification in Mortgage Sales

Promotha Nath Mazumdar v. Nagendra Nath Mazumdar (1929): Clarifying Property Identification in Mortgage Sales

Date: Jun 8, 1929
Promotha Nath Mazumdar v. Nagendra Nath Mazumdar (1929): Clarifying Property Identification in Mortgage Sales Introduction The case of Promotha Nath Mazumdar v. Nagendra Nath Mazumdar decided by the...
Calcutta High Court Upholds Jurisdictional Limits in Provas Chandra Sinha v. Ashutosh Mukherji

Calcutta High Court Upholds Jurisdictional Limits in Provas Chandra Sinha v. Ashutosh Mukherji

Date: Apr 30, 1929
Calcutta High Court Upholds Jurisdictional Limits in Provas Chandra Sinha v. Ashutosh Mukherji 1. Introduction Provas Chandra Sinha v. Ashutosh Mukherji is a landmark case adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Gobindakumar Sur v. Mohinimohan Sen: Clarifying Valuation Standards in Ejectment Actions

Gobindakumar Sur v. Mohinimohan Sen: Clarifying Valuation Standards in Ejectment Actions

Date: Apr 11, 1929
Gobindakumar Sur v. Mohinimohan Sen: Clarifying Valuation Standards in Ejectment Actions Introduction Gobindakumar Sur v. Mohinimohan Sen is a landmark judgment delivered by the Calcutta High Court...
Priority of Mortgages Under Section 78 of the Transfer of Property Act: Lloyds Bank, Ltd. v. P.E. Guzdar & Co.

Priority of Mortgages Under Section 78 of the Transfer of Property Act: Lloyds Bank, Ltd. v. P.E. Guzdar & Co.

Date: Apr 11, 1929
Priority of Mortgages Under Section 78 of the Transfer of Property Act: Insights from Lloyds Bank, Ltd. v. P.E. Guzdar & Co. Introduction The case of Lloyds Bank, Ltd. v. P.E. Guzdar & Co....
Bimalacharan Batabyal v. Trustees For The Indian Museum: Establishing Employment Termination Principles for Public Servants

Bimalacharan Batabyal v. Trustees For The Indian Museum: Establishing Employment Termination Principles for Public Servants

Date: Mar 16, 1929
Bimalacharan Batabyal v. Trustees For The Indian Museum: Establishing Employment Termination Principles for Public Servants Introduction The case of Bimalacharan Batabyal v. Trustees For The Indian...
Establishing the Doctrine of Lump Rent Suspension in Tenant Dispossession: Abhoya Charan Sen v. Hem Chandra Pal

Establishing the Doctrine of Lump Rent Suspension in Tenant Dispossession: Abhoya Charan Sen v. Hem Chandra Pal

Date: Mar 6, 1929
Establishing the Doctrine of Lump Rent Suspension in Tenant Dispossession Introduction Abhoya Charan Sen v. Hem Chandra Pal is a landmark 1929 judgment delivered by the Calcutta High Court. This case...
Forfeiture of Deposit in Registrar's Sale: Analysis of Gowal Das Sidany v. Luchmi Chand Jhawar

Forfeiture of Deposit in Registrar's Sale: Analysis of Gowal Das Sidany v. Luchmi Chand Jhawar

Date: Feb 23, 1929
Forfeiture of Deposit in Registrar's Sale: Analysis of Gowal Das Sidany v. Luchmi Chand Jhawar Introduction The case of Gowal Das Sidany v. Luchmi Chand Jhawar adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court...
Reaffirming the Boundaries of Malicious Prosecution: Insights from Nagendra Nath Ray v. Basanta Das Bairagya

Reaffirming the Boundaries of Malicious Prosecution: Insights from Nagendra Nath Ray v. Basanta Das Bairagya

Date: Feb 13, 1929
Reaffirming the Boundaries of Malicious Prosecution: Insights from Nagendra Nath Ray v. Basanta Das Bairagya Introduction The case of Nagendra Nath Ray v. Basanta Das Bairagya, adjudicated by the...
Application of the Limitation Act IX of 1908 in Mortgage Suits Involving Minority

Application of the Limitation Act IX of 1908 in Mortgage Suits Involving Minority

Date: Feb 7, 1929
Application of the Limitation Act IX of 1908 in Mortgage Suits Involving Minority: A Comprehensive Analysis of Khondkar Mahomed Saleh v. Chandra Kumar Mukerji Introduction The case of Khondkar...
Judgment Commentary: Withdrawal of Prosecution Under Section 494 CPC in G.V Raman v. King-Emperor Opposite Party

Judgment Commentary: Withdrawal of Prosecution Under Section 494 CPC in G.V Raman v. King-Emperor Opposite Party

Date: Jan 24, 1929
Withdrawal of Prosecution Under Section 494 CPC in G.V Raman v. King-Emperor Opposite Party Introduction The case of G.V Raman Accused v. King-Emperor Opposite Party adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Monmatha Nath Dutt v. Matilal Mitra: Landmark Rulings on Mesne Profits and Property Transfer

Monmatha Nath Dutt v. Matilal Mitra: Landmark Rulings on Mesne Profits and Property Transfer

Date: Dec 11, 1928
Monmatha Nath Dutt v. Matilal Mitra: Landmark Rulings on Mesne Profits and Property Transfer Introduction The case of Monmatha Nath Dutt v. Matilal Mitra adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert