Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Contempt of Court and Media Prejudice: Insights from Ananta Lal Singh v. Watson

Contempt of Court and Media Prejudice: Insights from Ananta Lal Singh v. Watson

Date: Nov 22, 1930
Contempt of Court and Media Prejudice: Insights from Ananta Lal Singh v. Watson Introduction The case of Ananta Lal Singh and Others Accused v. Alfred Henry Watson and Others Opposite Parties...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Decree Execution: Insights from Sreenath Chakravarti v. Priyanath Bandopadhya

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Decree Execution: Insights from Sreenath Chakravarti v. Priyanath Bandopadhya

Date: Aug 27, 1930
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Decree Execution: Insights from Sreenath Chakravarti And Others Decree-Holders v. Priyanath Bandopadhya And Others Judgment-Debtors Introduction The case of Sreenath...
Holder Exclusivity in Promissory Note Litigation: Insights from Harkishore Barua v. Gura Mia Chowdhry

Holder Exclusivity in Promissory Note Litigation: Insights from Harkishore Barua v. Gura Mia Chowdhry

Date: Aug 15, 1930
Holder Exclusivity in Promissory Note Litigation: Insights from Harkishore Barua v. Gura Mia Chowdhry Introduction The case of Harkishore Barua v. Gura Mia Chowdhry, adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Tea Financing Syndicate Ltd. v. Bez Barua: Affirming Mutual Accounts under Article 85, Limitation Act

Tea Financing Syndicate Ltd. v. Bez Barua: Affirming Mutual Accounts under Article 85, Limitation Act

Date: Jul 26, 1930
Tea Financing Syndicate Ltd. v. Chandra Kamal Bez Barua: Affirming Mutual, Open, and Current Accounts under Article 85, Limitation Act Introduction Tea Financing Syndicate Ltd. v. Chandra Kamal Bez...
Purna Chandra Sarkar v. Radharani Dassya: Defining Receiver Status under Section 80 of CPC

Purna Chandra Sarkar v. Radharani Dassya: Defining Receiver Status under Section 80 of CPC

Date: Jul 24, 1930
Interpreting Section 80 of the CPC: The Status of Receivers as Public Officers in Purna Chandra Sarkar v. Radharani Dassya Introduction The case of Purna Chandra Sarkar v. Radharani Dassya And Others...
Validity and Appeal of Arbitration Awards Without Full Party Consent: Srimati Golnur Bibi v. Sheikh Abdus Samad

Validity and Appeal of Arbitration Awards Without Full Party Consent: Srimati Golnur Bibi v. Sheikh Abdus Samad

Date: Jul 18, 1930
Validity and Appeal of Arbitration Awards Without Full Party Consent Introduction Srimati Golnur Bibi v. Sheikh Abdus Samad And Others is a significant judgment delivered by the Calcutta High Court...
Defining Mutual, Open, and Current Accounts under Article 85: Tea Financing Syndicate v. Chandrakamal Bezbaruah

Defining Mutual, Open, and Current Accounts under Article 85: Tea Financing Syndicate v. Chandrakamal Bezbaruah

Date: Jul 16, 1930
Defining Mutual, Open, and Current Accounts under Article 85: Tea Financing Syndicate v. Chandrakamal Bezbaruah Introduction The case of Tea Financing Syndicate, Ltd. v. Chandrakamal Bezbaruah,...
Establishing Agency Authority and Misconduct Standards in Railway Carriage: B.N Ry. Co. v. Moolji Sicka & Co.

Establishing Agency Authority and Misconduct Standards in Railway Carriage: B.N Ry. Co. v. Moolji Sicka & Co.

Date: Jul 11, 1930
Establishing Agency Authority and Misconduct Standards in Railway Carriage: B.N Ry. Co. v. Moolji Sicka & Co. Introduction The case of B.N Ry. Co. v. Moolji Sicka & Co., adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Conscious Possession Under the Opium Act: Cyril C. Baker v. Emperor

Conscious Possession Under the Opium Act: Cyril C. Baker v. Emperor

Date: Jul 3, 1930
Conscious Possession Under the Opium Act: Cyril C. Baker v. Emperor Introduction The case of Cyril C. Baker v. Emperor, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on July 2, 1930, presents a pivotal...
Extension of Appeal Period Under Section 5, Limitation Act: The Landmark Judgment in Karali Charan Sarma v. Apurba Krishna Bajpeyi

Extension of Appeal Period Under Section 5, Limitation Act: The Landmark Judgment in Karali Charan Sarma v. Apurba Krishna Bajpeyi

Date: Jun 27, 1930
Extension of Appeal Period Under Section 5, Limitation Act: The Landmark Judgment in Karali Charan Sarma v. Apurba Krishna Bajpeyi Introduction The case of Karali Charan Sarma v. Apurba Krishna...
Defining 'Cause of Action' for Jurisdiction in Contract Breaches: Insights from Engineering Supplies, Ltd. v. Dhandhania & Co.

Defining 'Cause of Action' for Jurisdiction in Contract Breaches: Insights from Engineering Supplies, Ltd. v. Dhandhania & Co.

Date: Jun 25, 1930
Defining 'Cause of Action' for Jurisdiction in Contract Breaches: Insights from Engineering Supplies, Ltd. v. Dhandhania & Co. Introduction The case of Engineering Supplies, Ltd. v. Dhandhania & Co....
Substantive Nature of the Right to Appeal Confirmed: Nagendra Nath Bose v. Mon Mohan Singha Roy

Substantive Nature of the Right to Appeal Confirmed: Nagendra Nath Bose v. Mon Mohan Singha Roy

Date: Jun 14, 1930
Substantive Nature of the Right to Appeal Confirmed: Nagendra Nath Bose v. Mon Mohan Singha Roy Introduction The case of Nagendra Nath Bose v. Mon Mohan Singha Roy And Ors. adjudicated by the...
Jagadish Nath Roy v. Najar Chandra Paramanik: Establishing Boundaries on Execution Applications for Khas Possession

Jagadish Nath Roy v. Najar Chandra Paramanik: Establishing Boundaries on Execution Applications for Khas Possession

Date: Jun 13, 1930
Jagadish Nath Roy v. Najar Chandra Paramanik: Establishing Boundaries on Execution Applications for Khas Possession Introduction The case of Jagadish Nath Roy v. Najar Chandra Paramanik adjudicated...
Agricultural Lease and Occupancy Rights: Surendra Kumar Sen Choudhury v. Chandratara Nath

Agricultural Lease and Occupancy Rights: Surendra Kumar Sen Choudhury v. Chandratara Nath

Date: May 23, 1930
Agricultural Lease and Occupancy Rights: Surendra Kumar Sen Choudhury v. Chandratara Nath Introduction The case of Surendra Kumar Sen Choudhury v. Chandratara Nath was adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Mohit Krishna Kundu v. Pranab Chandra Ghose: Redefining Partition Principles in Property Disputes

Mohit Krishna Kundu v. Pranab Chandra Ghose: Redefining Partition Principles in Property Disputes

Date: May 14, 1930
Mohit Krishna Kundu v. Pranab Chandra Ghose: Redefining Partition Principles in Property Disputes Introduction Mohit Krishna Kundu v. Pranab Chandra Ghose is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Valuation of Relief and Court Fees: Insights from Court-fees Act and Kalipada Mukharjee, In Re

Valuation of Relief and Court Fees: Insights from Court-fees Act and Kalipada Mukharjee, In Re

Date: Apr 29, 1930
Valuation of Relief and Court Fees: Insights from Court-fees Act and Kalipada Mukharjee, In Re Introduction The case of Court-fees Act and Kalipada Mukharjee, In Re adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Res Judicata Clarified in Manomohan Das v. Shib Chandra Saha

Res Judicata Clarified in Manomohan Das v. Shib Chandra Saha

Date: Mar 20, 1930
Res Judicata Clarified in Manomohan Das v. Shib Chandra Saha Introduction Manomohan Das v. Shib Chandra Saha is a landmark 1930 decision by the Calcutta High Court that addresses crucial aspects of...
Imperial Bank of India v. Bengal National Bank: Clarifying Registration Requirements for Debenture Charges on Immovable Property

Imperial Bank of India v. Bengal National Bank: Clarifying Registration Requirements for Debenture Charges on Immovable Property

Date: Mar 19, 1930
Imperial Bank of India v. Bengal National Bank: Clarifying Registration Requirements for Debenture Charges on Immovable Property Introduction The landmark case of Imperial Bank of India v. Bengal...
Presumption of Guilt in Circumstantial Evidence: Emperor v. Chintamoni Shahu Accused

Presumption of Guilt in Circumstantial Evidence: Emperor v. Chintamoni Shahu Accused

Date: Mar 18, 1930
Presumption of Guilt in Circumstantial Evidence: Emperor v. Chintamoni Shahu Accused Introduction The case of Emperor v. Chintamoni Shahu Accused pertains to a significant legal decision delivered by...
Specific Performance in Multi-Party Contracts: Insights from Kafiladdin v. Samiraddin

Specific Performance in Multi-Party Contracts: Insights from Kafiladdin v. Samiraddin

Date: Feb 25, 1930
Specific Performance in Multi-Party Contracts: Insights from Kafiladdin v. Samiraddin Introduction The case of Kafiladdin v. Samiraddin, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on February 24, 1930,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert