Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Equal Apportionment of Trust Income for Multiple Deities Established in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Pulin Behari Dey [1949]

Equal Apportionment of Trust Income for Multiple Deities Established in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Pulin Behari Dey [1949]

Date: Sep 2, 1949
Equal Apportionment of Trust Income for Multiple Deities Established in Commissioner Of Income-Tax, West Bengal v. Pulin Behari Dey [1949] Introduction The landmark case of Commissioner Of...
Incorporation of Arbitration Clauses in Subsequent Contracts: Dwarkadas And Co. v. Daluram Goganmull

Incorporation of Arbitration Clauses in Subsequent Contracts: Dwarkadas And Co. v. Daluram Goganmull

Date: Aug 31, 1949
Incorporation of Arbitration Clauses in Subsequent Contracts Introduction The case of Dwarkadas And Co. v. Daluram Goganmull adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on August 30, 1949, addresses the...
Bona Fide Requirement for Rebuilding: Bhulan Singh v. Roy Chowdhury

Bona Fide Requirement for Rebuilding: Bhulan Singh v. Roy Chowdhury

Date: Aug 24, 1949
Bona Fide Requirement for Rebuilding: Bhulan Singh v. Roy Chowdhury Introduction Case Title: Bhulan Singh And Others v. Ganendra Kumar Roy Chowdhury Court: Calcutta High Court Date: August 23, 1949...
Libertarian Approach to Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act: Insights from Ashutosh Bhadra v. Jatindra Mohan Seal

Libertarian Approach to Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act: Insights from Ashutosh Bhadra v. Jatindra Mohan Seal

Date: Aug 24, 1949
Libertarian Approach to Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act: Insights from Ashutosh Bhadra v. Jatindra Mohan Seal Introduction The case of Ashutosh Bhadra and Another v. Jatindra Mohan Seal and...
Unregistered Firms Retain Arbitration Rights Despite Section 69 Limitations

Unregistered Firms Retain Arbitration Rights Despite Section 69 Limitations

Date: Aug 13, 1949
Unregistered Firms Retain Arbitration Rights Despite Section 69 Limitations Introduction The case Babulal Dhandhania v. Messrs Gauttam & Co., adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on August 12,...
Golam Rahman v. The King: Upholding Misjoinder of Charges and Validating Fingerprint Evidence under Section 239(d), Cr PC

Golam Rahman v. The King: Upholding Misjoinder of Charges and Validating Fingerprint Evidence under Section 239(d), Cr PC

Date: Aug 13, 1949
Golam Rahman v. The King: Upholding Misjoinder of Charges and Validating Fingerprint Evidence under Section 239(d), Cr PC Introduction The case of Golam Rahman And Others Accused v. The King was...
Basant Lal Saha v. P.C Chakravarty: Clarifying Bona Fide Requirement for Landlord's Own Occupation under the West Bengal Premises Rent Control Act, 1948

Basant Lal Saha v. P.C Chakravarty: Clarifying Bona Fide Requirement for Landlord's Own Occupation under the West Bengal Premises Rent Control Act, 1948

Date: Aug 11, 1949
Basant Lal Saha v. P.C Chakravarty: Clarifying Bona Fide Requirement for Landlord's Own Occupation under the West Bengal Premises Rent Control Act, 1948 Introduction The case of Basant Lal Saha v....
Arbitrator Jurisdiction Commencement and Legal Conduct Standards in Arbitration as Set by Bajranglal Laduram v. Ganesh Commercial Co., Ltd.

Arbitrator Jurisdiction Commencement and Legal Conduct Standards in Arbitration as Set by Bajranglal Laduram v. Ganesh Commercial Co., Ltd.

Date: Aug 5, 1949
Arbitrator Jurisdiction Commencement and Legal Conduct Standards in Arbitration as Set by Bajranglal Laduram v. Ganesh Commercial Co., Ltd. Introduction Bajranglal Laduram v. Ganesh Commercial Co.,...
Calcutta High Court Establishes Strict Standards for Arbitration Awards in Chhogmal Rawatmal v. Sankalchand G. Shah

Calcutta High Court Establishes Strict Standards for Arbitration Awards in Chhogmal Rawatmal v. Sankalchand G. Shah

Date: Jul 12, 1949
Calcutta High Court Establishes Strict Standards for Arbitration Awards in Chhogmal Rawatmal v. Sankalchand G. Shah Introduction The case of Chhogmal Rawatmal v. Sankalchand G. Shah adjudicated by...
Enforceability of Unregistered Lease Agreements: Insights from Ram Protap Kayan v. National Petroleum Co. Ltd.

Enforceability of Unregistered Lease Agreements: Insights from Ram Protap Kayan v. National Petroleum Co. Ltd.

Date: Jul 1, 1949
Enforceability of Unregistered Lease Agreements: Insights from Ram Protap Kayan v. National Petroleum Co. Ltd. Introduction The case of Ram Protap Kayan v. National Petroleum Co. Ltd. adjudicated by...
Jurisdictional Boundaries Post-Independence: Dominion of India v. Hiralal Bathra

Jurisdictional Boundaries Post-Independence: Dominion of India v. Hiralal Bathra

Date: May 13, 1949
Jurisdictional Boundaries Post-Independence: Dominion of India v. Hiralal Bathra Introduction The case of Dominion Of India v. Hiralal Bathra Opposite Party was adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court...
Rupendra Deb Raikut v. Ashrumati Debi: Judicial Discretion in Suit Transfer for Fair Trial

Rupendra Deb Raikut v. Ashrumati Debi: Judicial Discretion in Suit Transfer for Fair Trial

Date: Apr 26, 1949
Rupendra Deb Raikut v. Ashrumati Debi: Judicial Discretion in Suit Transfer for Fair Trial Introduction The case of Rupendra Deb Raikut v. Ashrumati Debi was adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Ezra Proprietary Estates Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Interpretation of Section 23A in Property-Owned Companies

Ezra Proprietary Estates Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Interpretation of Section 23A in Property-Owned Companies

Date: Apr 13, 1949
Ezra Proprietary Estates Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Interpretation of Section 23A in Property-Owned Companies Introduction The case of Ezra Proprietary Estates, Ltd. v. Commissioner Of...
Affirming the Court's Power to Amend Pleadings under Order 7, Rule 11: Insights from Ahmed Hossein v. Chembelli

Affirming the Court's Power to Amend Pleadings under Order 7, Rule 11: Insights from Ahmed Hossein v. Chembelli

Date: Apr 13, 1949
Affirming the Court's Power to Amend Pleadings under Order 7, Rule 11: Insights from Ahmed Hossein v. Chembelli Introduction The landmark case of Ahmed Hossein v. Chembelli, adjudicated by the...
Calcutta High Court Establishes Executors' Liability in Execution Proceedings in Sachindra Kumar Basu v. Ushaprabha De

Calcutta High Court Establishes Executors' Liability in Execution Proceedings in Sachindra Kumar Basu v. Ushaprabha De

Date: Apr 13, 1949
Calcutta High Court Establishes Executors' Liability in Execution Proceedings Introduction The case Sachindra Kumar Basu v. Ushaprabha De adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on April 12, 1949,...
East India Prospecting Syndicate v. Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax: Defining 'Business' under the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940

East India Prospecting Syndicate v. Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax: Defining 'Business' under the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940

Date: Apr 9, 1949
East India Prospecting Syndicate v. Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax: Defining 'Business' under the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940 Introduction The case of East India Prospecting Syndicate, Calcutta...
Duty of Disclosure in Property Sales: Precedent Set in Parul Bala Ray Chaudhuri v. Srinibash Chowmal

Duty of Disclosure in Property Sales: Precedent Set in Parul Bala Ray Chaudhuri v. Srinibash Chowmal

Date: Feb 26, 1949
Duty of Disclosure in Property Sales: Precedent Set in Parul Bala Ray Chaudhuri v. Srinibash Chowmal Introduction The case of Parul Bala Ray Chaudhuri v. Srinibash Chowmal, adjudicated by the...
Kartik Chandra Pal Judgment: Establishing Comprehensive Scope in Specific Performance Suits

Kartik Chandra Pal Judgment: Establishing Comprehensive Scope in Specific Performance Suits

Date: Feb 25, 1949
Kartik Chandra Pal Judgment: Establishing Comprehensive Scope in Specific Performance Suits Introduction The Kartik Chandra Pal Judgment delivered by the Calcutta High Court on February 24, 1949,...
Recognition of Annuity Payments as Revenue Expenditure: Piggot Chapman & Co. Judgment

Recognition of Annuity Payments as Revenue Expenditure: Piggot Chapman & Co. Judgment

Date: Feb 23, 1949
Recognition of Annuity Payments as Revenue Expenditure: Piggot Chapman & Co. Judgment 1. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Piggot Chapman And Co. adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Valid Forfeiture of Shares Beyond Non-Payment of Calls: Establishing Boundaries in Company Law

Valid Forfeiture of Shares Beyond Non-Payment of Calls: Establishing Boundaries in Company Law

Date: Feb 3, 1949
Valid Forfeiture of Shares Beyond Non-Payment of Calls: Establishing Boundaries in Company Law Introduction The case of Calcutta Stock Exchange Association, Ltd. v. S.N Nundy & Co. adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert