Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Constitutional Invalidity of the Bengal Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1930 and West Bengal Security Ordinance, 1949 in Sunil Kumar Bose v. Chief Secretary, West Bengal

Constitutional Invalidity of the Bengal Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1930 and West Bengal Security Ordinance, 1949 in Sunil Kumar Bose v. Chief Secretary, West Bengal

Date: Feb 28, 1950
Constitutional Invalidity of the Bengal Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1930 and West Bengal Security Ordinance, 1949 in Sunil Kumar Bose v. Chief Secretary, West Bengal Introduction Sunil Kumar Bose And...
Proper Recording of Witness Statements under Section 161 CPC: Precedent from Bejoy Chand Patra v. The State

Proper Recording of Witness Statements under Section 161 CPC: Precedent from Bejoy Chand Patra v. The State

Date: Feb 25, 1950
Proper Recording of Witness Statements under Section 161 CPC: Precedent from Bejoy Chand Patra v. The State Introduction The case of Bejoy Chand Patra v. The State adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Waiver of Notice to Quit under Rent Control Act: Insights from Manindra Nath De v. Man Singh

Waiver of Notice to Quit under Rent Control Act: Insights from Manindra Nath De v. Man Singh

Date: Feb 15, 1950
Waiver of Notice to Quit under Rent Control Act: Insights from Manindra Nath De v. Man Singh Introduction The case of Manindra Nath De v. Man Singh, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on February...
Jurisdictional Nullity: Calcutta High Court Sets Precedent on Execution Proceedings and Res Judicata under CPC

Jurisdictional Nullity: Calcutta High Court Sets Precedent on Execution Proceedings and Res Judicata under CPC

Date: Feb 11, 1950
Jurisdictional Nullity: Calcutta High Court Sets Precedent on Execution Proceedings and Res Judicata under CPC Introduction The case of Benoy Krishna Mukerjee v. Mohanlal Goenka, Decree-Holder And...
Calcutta High Court in Haji Ebrahim Kassam Cochinwalla v. Northern Indian Oil Industries Ltd.: Defining the Boundaries of Arbitrator Conduct and Award Validation under the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940

Calcutta High Court in Haji Ebrahim Kassam Cochinwalla v. Northern Indian Oil Industries Ltd.: Defining the Boundaries of Arbitrator Conduct and Award Validation under the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940

Date: Jan 20, 1950
Calcutta High Court in Haji Ebrahim Kassam Cochinwalla v. Northern Indian Oil Industries Ltd.: Defining the Boundaries of Arbitrator Conduct and Award Validation under the Indian Arbitration Act,...
Defining 'Manufacturing Purpose' under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act: Insights from Sati Prasanna Mukherjee v. Md. Fazel

Defining 'Manufacturing Purpose' under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act: Insights from Sati Prasanna Mukherjee v. Md. Fazel

Date: Jan 5, 1950
Defining 'Manufacturing Purpose' under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act: Insights from Sati Prasanna Mukherjee v. Md. Fazel Introduction Sati Prasanna Mukherjee v. Md. Fazel is a landmark...
Mihirlal Mihilal Dig v. Panchkari Santha And Ors: Establishing the Necessity of Proving Auction-Purchaser's Fraud for Limitation Extensions

Mihirlal Mihilal Dig v. Panchkari Santha And Ors: Establishing the Necessity of Proving Auction-Purchaser's Fraud for Limitation Extensions

Date: Dec 16, 1949
Mihirlal Mihilal Dig v. Panchkari Santha And Ors: Establishing the Necessity of Proving Auction-Purchaser's Fraud for Limitation Extensions Introduction The case of Mihirlal Mihilal Dig v. Panchkari...
Clarifying Territorial Jurisdiction: Calcutta High Court in Dominion of India v. R.C.K.C. Nath And Co.

Clarifying Territorial Jurisdiction: Calcutta High Court in Dominion of India v. R.C.K.C. Nath And Co.

Date: Dec 6, 1949
Clarifying Territorial Jurisdiction: Calcutta High Court in Dominion of India v. R.C.K.C. Nath And Co. Introduction Dominion of India v. R.C.K.C. Nath And Co. is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Affidavit Sufficiency and Balance of Convenience in Suit Transfer under Clause 13: Baburam Agarwalla v. Jamunadas Ramji And Co.

Affidavit Sufficiency and Balance of Convenience in Suit Transfer under Clause 13: Baburam Agarwalla v. Jamunadas Ramji And Co.

Date: Dec 2, 1949
Affidavit Sufficiency and Balance of Convenience in Suit Transfer under Clause 13: Baburam Agarwalla v. Jamunadas Ramji And Co. Introduction The case of Baburam Agarwalla v. Jamunadas Ramji And Co....
Determining Provincial Liability for Pre-Partition Contracts under Art. 8(2) of the Indian Independence Order: West Bengal v. Midnapur Zemindary Co., Ltd.

Determining Provincial Liability for Pre-Partition Contracts under Art. 8(2) of the Indian Independence Order: West Bengal v. Midnapur Zemindary Co., Ltd.

Date: Nov 4, 1949
Determining Provincial Liability for Pre-Partition Contracts under Art. 8(2) of the Indian Independence Order: West Bengal v. Midnapur Zemindary Co., Ltd. Introduction The case of Province Of West...
Applicability of Limitation Act in Setting Aside Dismissals Under Civil Procedure Code

Applicability of Limitation Act in Setting Aside Dismissals Under Civil Procedure Code

Date: Sep 22, 1949
Applicability of Limitation Act in Setting Aside Dismissals Under Civil Procedure Code Introduction Debendra Nath Dutt v. Sm. Satyabala Dassi And Ors. is a landmark judgment delivered by the Calcutta...
Province Of West Bengal v. Banamali Sen: Reaffirming Attachment Rights on Security Deposits

Province Of West Bengal v. Banamali Sen: Reaffirming Attachment Rights on Security Deposits

Date: Sep 21, 1949
Province Of West Bengal v. Banamali Sen: Reaffirming Attachment Rights on Security Deposits 1. Introduction Province Of West Bengal v. Banamali Sen is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Calcutta...
Clarifying the Role of 'Acharyya': Dikshaguru Not Considered Heir in Hindu Succession

Clarifying the Role of 'Acharyya': Dikshaguru Not Considered Heir in Hindu Succession

Date: Sep 17, 1949
Clarifying the Role of 'Acharyya': Dikshaguru Not Considered Heir in Hindu Succession Introduction The case of Sadananda Pyne v. Harinam Sha And Another adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Compulsory Winding Up in the Context of Disputed Tax Assessments: Insights from Mohamad Amin Bros Ltd. v. The Dominion Of India And Ors.

Compulsory Winding Up in the Context of Disputed Tax Assessments: Insights from Mohamad Amin Bros Ltd. v. The Dominion Of India And Ors.

Date: Sep 14, 1949
Compulsory Winding Up in the Context of Disputed Tax Assessments: Insights from Mohamad Amin Bros Ltd. v. The Dominion Of India And Ors. Introduction Mohamad Amin Bros Ltd. v. The Dominion Of India...
Calcutta High Court Reinforces Strict Compliance with Section 23(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Calcutta High Court Reinforces Strict Compliance with Section 23(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Date: Sep 13, 1949
Calcutta High Court Reinforces Strict Compliance with Section 23(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Introduction The case of Provat Kumar Kar And Others Accused v. William Trevelyan Curties...
Preservation of Undivided Family Dwelling House: Botokrishna Ghose v. Akshoy Kumar Ghose

Preservation of Undivided Family Dwelling House: Botokrishna Ghose v. Akshoy Kumar Ghose

Date: Sep 10, 1949
Preservation of Undivided Family Dwelling House: Botokrishna Ghose v. Akshoy Kumar Ghose Introduction The case of Botokrishna Ghose v. Akshoy Kumar Ghose adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Interpretation of Risk Note A and Limitation Periods in Railway Compensation Claims: Gangadhar Ram Chandra v. Dominion Of India

Interpretation of Risk Note A and Limitation Periods in Railway Compensation Claims: Gangadhar Ram Chandra v. Dominion Of India

Date: Sep 10, 1949
Interpretation of Risk Note A and Limitation Periods in Railway Compensation Claims: Gangadhar Ram Chandra v. Dominion Of India Introduction The case of Gangadhar Ram Chandra v. Dominion Of India...
Limitation of High Court's Revisional Jurisdiction under Bengal Municipal Act, 1932

Limitation of High Court's Revisional Jurisdiction under Bengal Municipal Act, 1932

Date: Sep 6, 1949
Limitation of High Court's Revisional Jurisdiction under Bengal Municipal Act, 1932 Introduction Jahnabi Prosad Banerjee And Anr. v. Basudeb Paul And Ors. is a pivotal judgment delivered by the...
Calcutta High Court Establishes Strict Adherence to Acquisition Valuation Methods in Province Of Bengal v. Amulya Dhon Addy Receivers

Calcutta High Court Establishes Strict Adherence to Acquisition Valuation Methods in Province Of Bengal v. Amulya Dhon Addy Receivers

Date: Sep 3, 1949
Calcutta High Court Establishes Strict Adherence to Acquisition Valuation Methods in Province Of Bengal v. Amulya Dhon Addy Receivers Introduction The case of Province Of Bengal v. Amulya Dhon Addy...
Compensation under Contract Act Sections 65 and 70 for Void Government Contracts: Ram Nagina Singh v. Governor-General In Council

Compensation under Contract Act Sections 65 and 70 for Void Government Contracts: Ram Nagina Singh v. Governor-General In Council

Date: Sep 3, 1949
Compensation under Contract Act Sections 65 and 70 for Void Government Contracts: Ram Nagina Singh v. Governor-General In Council Introduction Ram Nagina Singh v. Governor-General In Council is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert