Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Strict Adherence to the "Real Controversy" Test in Amendment of Written Statements: Nrisingh Prosad Paul v. Steel Products Ltd.

Strict Adherence to the "Real Controversy" Test in Amendment of Written Statements: Nrisingh Prosad Paul v. Steel Products Ltd.

Date: Sep 4, 1951
Strict Adherence to the "Real Controversy" Test in Amendment of Written Statements: Nrisingh Prosad Paul v. Steel Products Ltd. Introduction The case of Nrisingh Prosad Paul v. Steel Products Ltd....
Clarification of Procedural Requirements under Sections 107 and 192 Cr.P.C. in Sm. Tulsibala Rakshit v. N.N. Ghosal

Clarification of Procedural Requirements under Sections 107 and 192 Cr.P.C. in Sm. Tulsibala Rakshit v. N.N. Ghosal

Date: Sep 1, 1951
Clarification of Procedural Requirements under Sections 107 and 192 Cr.P.C. in Sm. Tulsibala Rakshit v. N.N. Ghosal Introduction The case of Sm. Tulsibala Rakshit v. N.N. Ghosal was adjudicated by...
Calcutta High Court Clarifies Arbitrators’ Obligations in Damages Assessment: Bijoy Singh v. Bilasroy And Co.

Calcutta High Court Clarifies Arbitrators’ Obligations in Damages Assessment: Bijoy Singh v. Bilasroy And Co.

Date: Aug 21, 1951
Calcutta High Court Clarifies Arbitrators’ Obligations in Damages Assessment: Bijoy Singh v. Bilasroy And Co. Introduction The case of Bijoy Singh v. Bilasroy And Co. adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Bansi v. Governor-General In Council: Redefining Jurisdictional Boundaries in Indian Railways Compensation Claims

Bansi v. Governor-General In Council: Redefining Jurisdictional Boundaries in Indian Railways Compensation Claims

Date: Aug 21, 1951
Bansi v. Governor-General In Council: Redefining Jurisdictional Boundaries in Indian Railways Compensation Claims Introduction The case of Bansi v. Governor-General Of India In Council, adjudicated...
Limitations on High Court Intervention Under Article 226 in Civil Service Dismissals

Limitations on High Court Intervention Under Article 226 in Civil Service Dismissals

Date: Aug 17, 1951
Limitations on High Court Intervention Under Article 226 in Civil Service Dismissals Introduction The case of D. Parraju v. General Manager, B.N Rly., And Ors., adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court...
Legal Commentary: Dubar Goala v. Union of India – Defining the Boundaries of Contractual Labor Obligations in Railway Services

Legal Commentary: Dubar Goala v. Union of India – Defining the Boundaries of Contractual Labor Obligations in Railway Services

Date: Aug 14, 1951
Dubar Goala v. Union of India: Defining the Boundaries of Contractual Labor Obligations in Railway Services Introduction The case Dubar Goala and Another v. Union of India Representing E.I Railway...
Right to Fair Dismissal Under Section 240(3) of the Government of India Act: Union Of India v. Someswar Banerjee

Right to Fair Dismissal Under Section 240(3) of the Government of India Act: Union Of India v. Someswar Banerjee

Date: Aug 8, 1951
Right to Fair Dismissal Under Section 240(3) of the Government of India Act: Union Of India v. Someswar Banerjee Introduction Union Of India v. Someswar Banerjee is a landmark judgment delivered by...
Validity of Retrospective Amendments under Rent Control Act Upheld in Iswari Prosad Goenka v. N.R. Sen

Validity of Retrospective Amendments under Rent Control Act Upheld in Iswari Prosad Goenka v. N.R. Sen

Date: Jul 31, 1951
Validity of Retrospective Amendments under Rent Control Act Upheld in Iswari Prosad Goenka v. N.R. Sen 1. Introduction The case of Iswari Prosad Goenka v. N.R. Sen, adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Guardianship of National Security vs. Individual Liberty: Insights from Raman Lal Rathi v. Commissioner Of Police, Calcutta And Others

Guardianship of National Security vs. Individual Liberty: Insights from Raman Lal Rathi v. Commissioner Of Police, Calcutta And Others

Date: Jul 31, 1951
Guardianship of National Security vs. Individual Liberty: Insights from Raman Lal Rathi v. Commissioner Of Police, Calcutta And Others Introduction Raman Lal Rathi v. Commissioner Of Police, Calcutta...
Land Acquisition Validity Affirmed Despite Minimal Public Compensation

Land Acquisition Validity Affirmed Despite Minimal Public Compensation

Date: Jul 28, 1951
Land Acquisition Validity Affirmed Despite Minimal Public Compensation: Insights from Rajendra Kumar Ruia And Anr. v. Government Of West Bengal And Anr. Introduction The case of Rajendra Kumar Ruia...
Pramatha Nath Accused v. The State: Establishing the Necessity of Dishonest Intention in Forgery Abetment

Pramatha Nath Accused v. The State: Establishing the Necessity of Dishonest Intention in Forgery Abetment

Date: Jul 27, 1951
Pramatha Nath Accused v. The State: Establishing the Necessity of Dishonest Intention in Forgery Abetment Introduction The case of Pramatha Nath Accused v. The State, adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Mandamus in Administrative Acts: Insights from Union of India v. Elbridge Watson

Mandamus in Administrative Acts: Insights from Union of India v. Elbridge Watson

Date: Jul 24, 1951
Mandamus in Administrative Acts: Insights from Union of India v. Elbridge Watson Introduction The case of Union of India and Anr. v. Elbridge Watson, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on July...
Strict Compliance for Service of Summons: Analysis of Tripura Modern Bank Ltd. v. Bansen And Co.

Strict Compliance for Service of Summons: Analysis of Tripura Modern Bank Ltd. v. Bansen And Co.

Date: Jul 13, 1951
Strict Compliance for Service of Summons: Analysis of Tripura Modern Bank Ltd. v. Bansen And Co. Introduction The case of Tripura Modern Bank Ltd. v. Bansen And Co., adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Forfeiture of Earnest Money in Breach of Contract: Insight from Naresh Chandra Guha v. Ram Chandra Samanta

Forfeiture of Earnest Money in Breach of Contract: Insight from Naresh Chandra Guha v. Ram Chandra Samanta

Date: Jul 11, 1951
Forfeiture of Earnest Money in Breach of Contract: Insight from Naresh Chandra Guha v. Ram Chandra Samanta Introduction The case of Naresh Chandra Guha v. Ram Chandra Samanta, adjudicated by the...
Calcutta High Court Upholds Validity of Notice to Quit in Jatindra Nath v. Malai Ram Show

Calcutta High Court Upholds Validity of Notice to Quit in Jatindra Nath v. Malai Ram Show

Date: Jun 27, 1951
Calcutta High Court Upholds Validity of Notice to Quit in Jatindra Nath v. Malai Ram Show Introduction The case of Jatindra Nath v. Malai Ram Show adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on June 26,...
Prosecution Protocols Under Sections 195-199 CrPC: Clarifications from Dhirendra Nath Bera v. Nurul Huda

Prosecution Protocols Under Sections 195-199 CrPC: Clarifications from Dhirendra Nath Bera v. Nurul Huda

Date: Jun 23, 1951
Prosecution Protocols Under Sections 195-199 CrPC: Clarifications from Dhirendra Nath Bera v. Nurul Huda Introduction The case of Dhirendra Nath Bera Complainant, v. Nurul Huda And Ors. Accused,...
Change in Business Ownership under Excess Profits Tax Act: Khetra Mohan Sannyasi Charan Sadhukan v. Commissioner Of Excess Profits Tax, West Bengal

Change in Business Ownership under Excess Profits Tax Act: Khetra Mohan Sannyasi Charan Sadhukan v. Commissioner Of Excess Profits Tax, West Bengal

Date: Jun 21, 1951
Change in Business Ownership under Excess Profits Tax Act: Khetra Mohan Sannyasi Charan Sadhukan v. Commissioner Of Excess Profits Tax, West Bengal Introduction The landmark case of Khetra Mohan...
Necessity of Notice under Section 38 for Valid Tax Assessment: Commissioner of Agricultural Income-Tax v. Sultan Ali Gharami

Necessity of Notice under Section 38 for Valid Tax Assessment: Commissioner of Agricultural Income-Tax v. Sultan Ali Gharami

Date: Jun 21, 1951
Necessity of Notice under Section 38 for Valid Tax Assessment Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Agricultural Income-Tax v. Sultan Ali Gharami was adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on June...
Capital vs. Revenue Expenditure: Clarifying Tax Deductions in Assam Bengal Cement Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Capital vs. Revenue Expenditure: Clarifying Tax Deductions in Assam Bengal Cement Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Jun 8, 1951
Capital vs. Revenue Expenditure: Clarifying Tax Deductions in Assam Bengal Cement Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case Assam Bengal Cement Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of...
Radha Debi Jalan v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Clarifying the Distinction Between Casual Receipts and Business Income in Isolated Share Transactions

Radha Debi Jalan v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Clarifying the Distinction Between Casual Receipts and Business Income in Isolated Share Transactions

Date: May 29, 1951
Radha Debi Jalan v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Clarifying the Distinction Between Casual Receipts and Business Income in Isolated Share Transactions Introduction The case of Radha Debi Jalan v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert