Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Suing the State: Insights from Calcutta Motor Cycle Co. v. Union of India

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Suing the State: Insights from Calcutta Motor Cycle Co. v. Union of India

Date: Mar 19, 1952
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Suing the State: Insights from Calcutta Motor Cycle Co. v. Union of India Introduction The case of Calcutta Motor Cycle Co. v. Union Of India adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Damodar Valley Corporation: Distinct Legal Entity and Implications on Employment Dismissals

Damodar Valley Corporation: Distinct Legal Entity and Implications on Employment Dismissals

Date: Mar 8, 1952
Damodar Valley Corporation: Distinct Legal Entity and Implications on Employment Dismissals Introduction The case of Bibhuti Bhusan Ghosh v. Damodar Valley Corporation And Others Opposite Party...
Jurisdiction and Adequate Notice: Analysis of Bimal Singh Kothari v. Muir Mills Co., Ltd., Calcutta High Court, 1952

Jurisdiction and Adequate Notice: Analysis of Bimal Singh Kothari v. Muir Mills Co., Ltd., Calcutta High Court, 1952

Date: Mar 6, 1952
Jurisdiction and Adequate Notice: Analysis of Bimal Singh Kothari v. Muir Mills Co., Ltd., Calcutta High Court, 1952 Introduction The case of Bimal Singh Kothari v. Muir Mills Co., Ltd. adjudicated...
Calcutta High Court Upholds Jurisdiction Despite Procedural Irregularities under Section 145 Cr.P.C

Calcutta High Court Upholds Jurisdiction Despite Procedural Irregularities under Section 145 Cr.P.C

Date: Feb 27, 1952
Calcutta High Court Upholds Jurisdiction Despite Procedural Irregularities under Section 145 Cr.P.C Introduction The case of Khudiram Mandal, 2nd Party v. Jitendra Nath Mandal And Anr, 1st Party,...
Quasi-Judicial Functions and Natural Justice: Assistant Collector Of Customs v. Soorajmull Nagarmull And Anr.

Quasi-Judicial Functions and Natural Justice: Assistant Collector Of Customs v. Soorajmull Nagarmull And Anr.

Date: Feb 20, 1952
Quasi-Judicial Functions and Natural Justice: Assistant Collector Of Customs v. Soorajmull Nagarmull And Anr. Introduction The case of Assistant Collector Of Customs v. Soorajmull Nagarmull And Anr....
Reinforcing Fair Trial Standards: A Comprehensive Commentary on Dhirendra Nath Bera v. State

Reinforcing Fair Trial Standards: A Comprehensive Commentary on Dhirendra Nath Bera v. State

Date: Feb 19, 1952
Reinforcing Fair Trial Standards: A Comprehensive Commentary on Dhirendra Nath Bera v. State Introduction The case of Dhirendra Nath Bera v. State adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on February...
Ensuring Natural Justice in Academic Disciplinary Proceedings: Insights from Dipa Pal v. University of Calcutta

Ensuring Natural Justice in Academic Disciplinary Proceedings: Insights from Dipa Pal v. University of Calcutta

Date: Feb 19, 1952
Ensuring Natural Justice in Academic Disciplinary Proceedings: Insights from Dipa Pal v. University of Calcutta Introduction The case of Dipa Pal v. University of Calcutta (1952) marks a significant...
Revocation of Examination Cancellation: Bijoy Ranjan v. B.C Das Gupta Judgment Analysis

Revocation of Examination Cancellation: Bijoy Ranjan v. B.C Das Gupta Judgment Analysis

Date: Feb 5, 1952
Revocation of Examination Cancellation: Bijoy Ranjan v. B.C Das Gupta Judgment Analysis Introduction The case of Bijoy Ranjan v. B.C Das Gupta, President, Governing Body, State Medical Faculty Of...
Validation of Notice to Quit Addressed to Corporate Managing Director: Tulsiram Shaw v. R.C. Pal Ltd.

Validation of Notice to Quit Addressed to Corporate Managing Director: Tulsiram Shaw v. R.C. Pal Ltd.

Date: Jan 30, 1952
Validation of Notice to Quit Addressed to Corporate Managing Director: Tulsiram Shaw v. R.C. Pal Ltd. Introduction Tulsiram Shaw v. R.C. Pal Ltd. is a landmark judgment delivered by the Calcutta High...
Clarification on Multifariousness and Misjoinder of Parties under CPC: Insights from Sm. Nagendra Bala Debi v. Provash Chandra

Clarification on Multifariousness and Misjoinder of Parties under CPC: Insights from Sm. Nagendra Bala Debi v. Provash Chandra

Date: Jan 30, 1952
Clarification on Multifariousness and Misjoinder of Parties under CPC: Insights from Sm. Nagendra Bala Debi And Others v. Provash Chandra And Others Introduction The case of Sm. Nagendra Bala Debi...
Succession of Shebaiti Rights and Procedural Suitability of Originating Summons: Analysis of Gokul Chand De v. Gopi Nath Dey

Succession of Shebaiti Rights and Procedural Suitability of Originating Summons: Analysis of Gokul Chand De v. Gopi Nath Dey

Date: Jan 17, 1952
Succession of Shebaiti Rights and Procedural Suitability of Originating Summons: Analysis of Gokul Chand De And Others v. Gopi Nath Dey And Others Introduction The case of Gokul Chand De And Others...
Administrative Authority’s Judicial Responsibilities: Debendra Bandhu Lahiri Case Analysis

Administrative Authority’s Judicial Responsibilities: Debendra Bandhu Lahiri Case Analysis

Date: Jan 16, 1952
Administrative Authority’s Judicial Responsibilities: Debendra Bandhu Lahiri Case Analysis Introduction The case of Debendra Bandhu Lahiri v. The State of West Bengal and Others adjudicated by the...
Finality of Preliminary Decree Upon Voluntary Partition: Insights from Tara Pada Roy v. Shyama Pada Roy

Finality of Preliminary Decree Upon Voluntary Partition: Insights from Tara Pada Roy v. Shyama Pada Roy

Date: Jan 15, 1952
Finality of Preliminary Decree Upon Voluntary Partition: Insights from Tara Pada Roy v. Shyama Pada Roy Introduction Tara Pada Roy v. Shyama Pada Roy is a landmark judgment delivered by the Calcutta...
Rights of Supreme Court Advocates to Practice on the Original Side of High Courts: Commentary on Aswini Kumar Ghose And Anr. v. Arabindo Bose And Anr.

Rights of Supreme Court Advocates to Practice on the Original Side of High Courts: Commentary on Aswini Kumar Ghose And Anr. v. Arabindo Bose And Anr.

Date: Dec 22, 1951
Rights of Supreme Court Advocates to Practice on the Original Side of High Courts: Commentary on Aswini Kumar Ghose And Anr. v. Arabindo Bose And Anr. Introduction The case of Aswini Kumar Ghose And...
Proper Procedure for Contempt Proceedings Against Government Officials: A Comprehensive Commentary on Tarafatullah Mandal v. S.N Maitra

Proper Procedure for Contempt Proceedings Against Government Officials: A Comprehensive Commentary on Tarafatullah Mandal v. S.N Maitra

Date: Dec 22, 1951
Proper Procedure for Contempt Proceedings Against Government Officials: A Comprehensive Commentary on Tarafatullah Mandal v. S.N Maitra Introduction The case of Tarafatullah Mandal And 2 Ors. v. S.N...
Misdirection in Jury Trials and Admissibility of Section 288 Depositions: A Comprehensive Analysis of Amalesh Chandra And Others Accused v. The State

Misdirection in Jury Trials and Admissibility of Section 288 Depositions: A Comprehensive Analysis of Amalesh Chandra And Others Accused v. The State

Date: Dec 14, 1951
Misdirection in Jury Trials and Admissibility of Section 288 Depositions: A Comprehensive Analysis of Amalesh Chandra And Others Accused v. The State Introduction The case of Amalesh Chandra And...
Limitation Period for Objections to Arbitration Awards: Insights from Bholanath Mullick v. Mahadev Mullick

Limitation Period for Objections to Arbitration Awards: Insights from Bholanath Mullick v. Mahadev Mullick

Date: Sep 7, 1951
Limitation Period for Objections to Arbitration Awards: Insights from Bholanath Mullick v. Mahadev Mullick Introduction The case of Bholanath Mullick v. Mahadev Mullick adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Comprehensive Commentary on Nitish Chandra Ghosh v. Promode Kumar Ghosh: Reaffirming the Scope of section 3 of the Partition Act

Comprehensive Commentary on Nitish Chandra Ghosh v. Promode Kumar Ghosh: Reaffirming the Scope of section 3 of the Partition Act

Date: Sep 6, 1951
Reaffirming the Scope of section 3 of the Partition Act: Insights from Nitish Chandra Ghosh v. Promode Kumar Ghosh Introduction The case of Nitish Chandra Ghosh And Ors. v. Promode Kumar Ghosh And...
Mahadeo Jew v. Balkrishna Vyas: Affirming Juristic Person Rights and Trustee Limitations in Trust Administration

Mahadeo Jew v. Balkrishna Vyas: Affirming Juristic Person Rights and Trustee Limitations in Trust Administration

Date: Sep 5, 1951
Mahadeo Jew v. Balkrishna Vyas: Affirming Juristic Person Rights and Trustee Limitations in Trust Administration Introduction Mahadeo Jew v. Balkrishna Vyas is a seminal case adjudicated by the...
Calcutta High Court Expands Superintendence under Article 227 to Quasi-Judicial Tribunals: Haripada Dutta v. Ananta Mandal Analysis

Calcutta High Court Expands Superintendence under Article 227 to Quasi-Judicial Tribunals: Haripada Dutta v. Ananta Mandal Analysis

Date: Sep 5, 1951
Calcutta High Court Expands Superintendence under Article 227 to Quasi-Judicial Tribunals: Haripada Dutta v. Ananta Mandal Analysis Introduction The landmark case of Haripada Dutta v. Ananta Mandal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert