Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

CESTAT Case Commentaries

CESTAT Reinforces Substantial Compliance for Service Tax Rebate under Export of Services Rules; Limits Penalty Imposition

CESTAT Reinforces Substantial Compliance for Service Tax Rebate under Export of Services Rules; Limits Penalty Imposition

Date: Sep 14, 2011
CESTAT Reinforces Substantial Compliance for Service Tax Rebate under Export of Services Rules; Limits Penalty Imposition Introduction The case of M/S Convergys India Services Pvt. Limited vs. CST,...
Sujana Metal Products Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex.: Redefining Export for SEZ Developers under Cenvat Credit Rules

Sujana Metal Products Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex.: Redefining Export for SEZ Developers under Cenvat Credit Rules

Date: Sep 6, 2011
Sujana Metal Products Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex.: Redefining Export for SEZ Developers under Cenvat Credit Rules Introduction The case of Sujana Metal Products Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex.,...
CESTAT Affirms Strict Enforcement of Foreign Exchange Regulations: Sidhharth Shankar Roy v. Commissioner Of Customs, Mumbai

CESTAT Affirms Strict Enforcement of Foreign Exchange Regulations: Sidhharth Shankar Roy v. Commissioner Of Customs, Mumbai

Date: Aug 31, 2011
CESTAT Affirms Strict Enforcement of Foreign Exchange Regulations: Sidhharth Shankar Roy v. Commissioner Of Customs, Mumbai Introduction The case of Sidhharth Shankar Roy v. Commissioner Of Customs,...
Clarifying DEPB Benefits and PMV in Export Valuation: Kanak Metal Industries v. Commissioner Of Customs, Jodhpur

Clarifying DEPB Benefits and PMV in Export Valuation: Kanak Metal Industries v. Commissioner Of Customs, Jodhpur

Date: Aug 13, 2011
Clarifying DEPB Benefits and PMV in Export Valuation: Kanak Metal Industries v. Commissioner Of Customs, Jodhpur Introduction The case of Kanak Metal Industries v. Commissioner Of Customs, Jodhpur...
CESTAT Upholds Central Excise Duty on Marketable By-Products of Vegetable Oil Refining: Commissioner of Central Excise v. A.G. Flats Ltd.

CESTAT Upholds Central Excise Duty on Marketable By-Products of Vegetable Oil Refining: Commissioner of Central Excise v. A.G. Flats Ltd.

Date: Jul 26, 2011
CESTAT Upholds Central Excise Duty on Marketable By-Products of Vegetable Oil Refining: Commissioner of Central Excise v. A.G. Flats Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Central Excise,...
Ajinkya Enterprises v. Commissioner of Central Excise: Clarifying 'Manufacture' and CENVAT Credit Reversal

Ajinkya Enterprises v. Commissioner of Central Excise: Clarifying 'Manufacture' and CENVAT Credit Reversal

Date: Jun 24, 2011
Ajinkya Enterprises v. Commissioner of Central Excise: Clarifying 'Manufacture' and CENVAT Credit Reversal Introduction The case of Ajinkya Enterprises v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Pune-III...
CESTAT Upholds Denial of Customs Duty Exemption for Misuse of Import-Approved Helicopter under Condition No.104

CESTAT Upholds Denial of Customs Duty Exemption for Misuse of Import-Approved Helicopter under Condition No.104

Date: Jun 18, 2011
CESTAT Upholds Denial of Customs Duty Exemption for Misuse of Import-Approved Helicopter under Condition No.104 Introduction The case of M/s King Rotors & Air Charter Pvt. Ltd. v. C.C (Acc & Import),...
Central Excise Compliance Standards Established in CESTAT's Ruling on Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik v. Ganesh Agro Steel Industries

Central Excise Compliance Standards Established in CESTAT's Ruling on Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik v. Ganesh Agro Steel Industries

Date: Jun 15, 2011
Central Excise Compliance Standards Established in CESTAT's Ruling on Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik v. Ganesh Agro Steel Industries Introduction The case of Commissioner of Central Excise,...
CESTAT Reinforces the Right to Raise Jurisdictional Objections at Advanced Stages in Customs Adjudications

CESTAT Reinforces the Right to Raise Jurisdictional Objections at Advanced Stages in Customs Adjudications

Date: Jun 8, 2011
CESTAT Reinforces the Right to Raise Jurisdictional Objections at Advanced Stages in Customs Adjudications Introduction The case of M/s. Nylex Traders v. Commissioner Of Customs (Preventive), Mumbai...
Refund of Unutilized Modvat Credit: CESTAT Establishes Strict Compliance with Statutory Provisions

Refund of Unutilized Modvat Credit: CESTAT Establishes Strict Compliance with Statutory Provisions

Date: May 14, 2011
Refund of Unutilized Modvat Credit: CESTAT Establishes Strict Compliance with Statutory Provisions Introduction The case of Steel Strips v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Ludhiana adjudicated by the...
CESTAT Judgment on Brand Name Misuse and Small Scale Exemption Eligibility

CESTAT Judgment on Brand Name Misuse and Small Scale Exemption Eligibility

Date: May 13, 2011
CESTAT Judgment on Brand Name Misuse and Small Scale Exemption Eligibility Introduction The case of M/S. Kich Manufacturers v. M/S. Kich Industries decided by the Central Excise and Service Tax...
Defining 'Manufacture' and 'Marketability': CESTAT's Precedent in Nestle India Ltd. v. CCE Chandigarh-II

Defining 'Manufacture' and 'Marketability': CESTAT's Precedent in Nestle India Ltd. v. CCE Chandigarh-II

Date: Apr 9, 2011
Defining 'Manufacture' and 'Marketability': CESTAT's Precedent in Nestle India Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C.C.E., Chandigarh-II Introduction The case of Nestle India Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central...
Clarifying Valuation Rules for Job Workers Under Central Excise: Advance Surfactants India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise

Clarifying Valuation Rules for Job Workers Under Central Excise: Advance Surfactants India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise

Date: Mar 31, 2011
Clarifying Valuation Rules for Job Workers Under Central Excise: Advance Surfactants India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise Introduction The case of Advance Surfactants India Ltd. v....
Necessity of Corroborative Evidence Beyond Power Consumption Estimates in Duty Evasion Cases: CESTAT's Landmark Ruling

Necessity of Corroborative Evidence Beyond Power Consumption Estimates in Duty Evasion Cases: CESTAT's Landmark Ruling

Date: Feb 26, 2011
Necessity of Corroborative Evidence Beyond Power Consumption Estimates in Duty Evasion Cases: CESTAT's Landmark Ruling Introduction The case of Saravana Alloys Steels Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of...
Global Industries v. Commissioner of Customs Cochin: Upholding Transaction Value in Customs Valuation

Global Industries v. Commissioner of Customs Cochin: Upholding Transaction Value in Customs Valuation

Date: Feb 2, 2011
Global Industries v. Commissioner of Customs Cochin: Upholding Transaction Value in Customs Valuation Introduction The case of M/S. Global Industries v. The Commissioner Of Customs Cochin adjudicated...
CESTAT Upholds Export Duty on Iron Ore Pellets: Classification under Heading No. 11 of the Customs Tariff Act

CESTAT Upholds Export Duty on Iron Ore Pellets: Classification under Heading No. 11 of the Customs Tariff Act

Date: Jan 22, 2011
CESTAT Upholds Export Duty on Iron Ore Pellets: Classification under Heading No. 11 of the Customs Tariff Act Introduction The case of Mandovi Pellets (A Division of Chowgule & Co. Pvt. Ltd.) v....
Ravi Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C.Ex. Hyderabad: Clarification on MRP Valuation and Admissibility of Income Tax Evidence in Central Excise Duty Assessment

Ravi Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C.Ex. Hyderabad: Clarification on MRP Valuation and Admissibility of Income Tax Evidence in Central Excise Duty Assessment

Date: Dec 23, 2010
Ravi Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C.Ex. Hyderabad: Clarification on MRP Valuation and Admissibility of Income Tax Evidence in Central Excise Duty Assessment Introduction The case of Ravi Foods...
Redemption of Confiscated Goods and Proof of Ownership: Insights from Yakub Ibrahim Yusuf v. Commissioner of Customs

Redemption of Confiscated Goods and Proof of Ownership: Insights from Yakub Ibrahim Yusuf v. Commissioner of Customs

Date: Oct 29, 2010
Redemption of Confiscated Goods and Proof of Ownership: Insights from Yakub Ibrahim Yusuf v. Commissioner of Customs Introduction The case of Yakub Ibrahim Yusuf v. Commissioner Of Customs, Mumbai...
Transaction Value as Assessable Value in Excise Duty: ONGC v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad

Transaction Value as Assessable Value in Excise Duty: ONGC v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad

Date: Sep 25, 2010
Transaction Value as Assessable Value in Excise Duty: Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad Introduction The case of Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC)...
Coromandel Paints Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Visakhapatnam: Redefining Job Worker Status in Central Excise Law

Coromandel Paints Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Visakhapatnam: Redefining Job Worker Status in Central Excise Law

Date: Sep 9, 2010
Coromandel Paints Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Visakhapatnam: Redefining Job Worker Status in Central Excise Law Introduction Coromandel Paints Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert