Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

CESTAT Case Commentaries

CESTAT's Landmark Decision on Customs Classification of Multi-purpose Support Vessels

CESTAT's Landmark Decision on Customs Classification of Multi-purpose Support Vessels

Date: Nov 8, 2012
CESTAT's Landmark Decision on Customs Classification of Multi-purpose Support Vessels Introduction The case of Hal Offshore Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai adjudicated by the...
CESTAT Establishes Flexibility in Conversion of Shipping Bills Under Section 149 of Customs Act, 1962

CESTAT Establishes Flexibility in Conversion of Shipping Bills Under Section 149 of Customs Act, 1962

Date: Sep 14, 2012
CESTAT Establishes Flexibility in Conversion of Shipping Bills Under Section 149 of Customs Act, 1962 Introduction The case of Diamond Engg. (Chennai) P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs,...
CESTAT Validates Proper Utilization of Cenvat Credit through Input Service Distributor: Castrol India Limited v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Vapi

CESTAT Validates Proper Utilization of Cenvat Credit through Input Service Distributor: Castrol India Limited v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Vapi

Date: Sep 11, 2012
CESTAT Validates Proper Utilization of Cenvat Credit through Input Service Distributor: Castrol India Limited v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Vapi Introduction The case of Castrol India Limited v....
CESTAT Establishes Jurisdictional Parameters for Imported vs. Smuggled Goods in Passenger Baggage under Customs Act

CESTAT Establishes Jurisdictional Parameters for Imported vs. Smuggled Goods in Passenger Baggage under Customs Act

Date: Aug 3, 2012
CESTAT Establishes Jurisdictional Parameters for Imported vs. Smuggled Goods in Passenger Baggage under Customs Act Introduction The case of Shri Prakash Chandra Shantilal v. Cc Ahmedabad adjudicated...
Strict Compliance with Regulatory Timeframes in CHA Licence Suspension: Sharp Logistics Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs

Strict Compliance with Regulatory Timeframes in CHA Licence Suspension: Sharp Logistics Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs

Date: Jul 28, 2012
Strict Compliance with Regulatory Timeframes in CHA Licence Suspension: Sharp Logistics Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs Introduction The case of Sharp Logistics Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of...
Under-Valuation of Imported Goods: Insights from A.G. Incorporation v. Commissioner Of Customs, Delhi

Under-Valuation of Imported Goods: Insights from A.G. Incorporation v. Commissioner Of Customs, Delhi

Date: Jun 29, 2012
Under-Valuation of Imported Goods: Insights from A.G. Incorporation v. Commissioner Of Customs, Delhi Introduction The case of A.G. Incorporation v. Commissioner Of Customs, Delhi adjudicated by the...
Enhanced Valuation Methodology for Aluminium Scrap Imports: Commissioner Of Customs v. Bharathi Rubber Lining

Enhanced Valuation Methodology for Aluminium Scrap Imports: Commissioner Of Customs v. Bharathi Rubber Lining

Date: Jun 5, 2012
Enhanced Valuation Methodology for Aluminium Scrap Imports: Commissioner Of Customs v. Bharathi Rubber Lining Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Customs (Import), Nhava Sheva v. Bharathi Rubber...
CESTAT Establishes Rigorous Evidentiary Standards for Confirmation of Duty in Clandestine Removal Allegations

CESTAT Establishes Rigorous Evidentiary Standards for Confirmation of Duty in Clandestine Removal Allegations

Date: May 24, 2012
CESTAT Establishes Rigorous Evidentiary Standards for Confirmation of Duty in Clandestine Removal Allegations Introduction The case of M/S Pan Parag India Ltd. (Formerly M/S Kothari Products Ltd.) v....
Clandestine Clearance and Presumption of Fact: Insights from Commissioner Of Central Excise v. Pithampur Alloys Casting Ltd.

Clandestine Clearance and Presumption of Fact: Insights from Commissioner Of Central Excise v. Pithampur Alloys Casting Ltd.

Date: May 16, 2012
Clandestine Clearance and Presumption of Fact: Insights from Commissioner Of Central Excise v. Pithampur Alloys Casting Ltd. 1. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Central Excise, Indore v. M/S....
Adc India Communications Ltd. v. The Commissioner Of Central Excise Bangalore: Establishing CENVAT Credit Eligibility Criteria

Adc India Communications Ltd. v. The Commissioner Of Central Excise Bangalore: Establishing CENVAT Credit Eligibility Criteria

Date: Apr 28, 2012
Adc India Communications Ltd. v. The Commissioner Of Central Excise Bangalore: Establishing CENVAT Credit Eligibility Criteria Introduction The case of Adc India Communications Ltd. (Formerly Known...
Enhancement of Import Restrictions on Secondhand Photocopier Machines: Unitech Enterprises v. Commissioner Of Customs, Chennai

Enhancement of Import Restrictions on Secondhand Photocopier Machines: Unitech Enterprises v. Commissioner Of Customs, Chennai

Date: Mar 3, 2012
Enhancement of Import Restrictions on Secondhand Photocopier Machines Unitech Enterprises v. Commissioner Of Customs, Chennai CESTAT Judgment, March 2, 2012 Introduction The case of Unitech...
Ensuring Evidentiary Robustness in Duty Evasion Cases: Kuber Tobacco v. Commissioner of C.EX., Delhi

Ensuring Evidentiary Robustness in Duty Evasion Cases: Kuber Tobacco v. Commissioner of C.EX., Delhi

Date: Feb 4, 2012
Ensuring Evidentiary Robustness in Duty Evasion Cases: Kuber Tobacco v. Commissioner of C.EX., Delhi Introduction The case of Kuber Tobacco Products Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C.EX., Delhi adjudicated...
CESTAT Clarifies Validity of Export Valuation within DEPB Circular Parameters in Colourtex v. Commissioner of Customs

CESTAT Clarifies Validity of Export Valuation within DEPB Circular Parameters in Colourtex v. Commissioner of Customs

Date: Jan 19, 2012
CESTAT Clarifies Validity of Export Valuation within DEPB Circular Parameters in Colourtex v. Commissioner of Customs Introduction The case of Colourtex v. Commissioner Of Customs, Kandla adjudicated...
CENVAT Credit and Job Work: Analyzing the Federal Mogul Goetze Decision

CENVAT Credit and Job Work: Analyzing the Federal Mogul Goetze Decision

Date: Jan 13, 2012
CENVAT Credit and Job Work: Analyzing the Federal Mogul Goetze Decision Introduction The Federal Mogul Goetze India Ltd. v. Shri. M. Subramani case, adjudicated by the Central Excise and Service Tax...
Pushpak Metal Corpn. v. Commissioner of Customs: Upholding Transaction Value in Customs Valuation

Pushpak Metal Corpn. v. Commissioner of Customs: Upholding Transaction Value in Customs Valuation

Date: Nov 25, 2011
Pushpak Metal Corpn. v. Commissioner of Customs: Upholding Transaction Value in Customs Valuation Introduction The case of Pushpak Metal Corpn. v. Commissioner of Customs, Kandla adjudicated by the...
Affirming the Burden of Proof and Evidentiary Standards in Clandestine Removal Cases: Insights from Vishwa Traders Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Vadodara

Affirming the Burden of Proof and Evidentiary Standards in Clandestine Removal Cases: Insights from Vishwa Traders Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Vadodara

Date: Nov 2, 2011
Affirming the Burden of Proof and Evidentiary Standards in Clandestine Removal Cases: Insights from Vishwa Traders Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Vadodara Introduction The case of Vishwa...
CESTAT Establishes Applicability of Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 to Supplies Made to 100% EOUs: Implications for Cash Refunds

CESTAT Establishes Applicability of Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 to Supplies Made to 100% EOUs: Implications for Cash Refunds

Date: Oct 14, 2011
CESTAT Establishes Applicability of Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 to Supplies Made to 100% EOUs: Implications for Cash Refunds Introduction The case of Elcomponics Sales Pvt. Ltd. v....
Clarification on Sales Tax Excess and Excise Duty Liability for Public Sector Undertakings: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise

Clarification on Sales Tax Excess and Excise Duty Liability for Public Sector Undertakings: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise

Date: Sep 30, 2011
Clarification on Sales Tax Excess and Excise Duty Liability for Public Sector Undertakings Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad Court: Central Excise and Service...
Valuation of Job-Worked Goods: Rolastar Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Daman

Valuation of Job-Worked Goods: Rolastar Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Daman

Date: Sep 30, 2011
Valuation of Job-Worked Goods: Rolastar Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Daman Introduction The case of Rolastar Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Daman was adjudicated by the...
Clubbing of Separate Legal Entities for Central Excise Duty Rejected: CESTAT's Landmark Decision in Balsara Hygiene Products Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Vapi

Clubbing of Separate Legal Entities for Central Excise Duty Rejected: CESTAT's Landmark Decision in Balsara Hygiene Products Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Vapi

Date: Sep 21, 2011
Clubbing of Separate Legal Entities for Central Excise Duty Rejected: CESTAT's Landmark Decision in Balsara Hygiene Products Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Vapi Introduction The case of Balsara...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert