Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

CESTAT Case Commentaries

Bona Fide Belief Exempts Assessees from Extended Limitation Period in Central Excise Cases: Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner of C.Ex. & S.T., Raipur

Bona Fide Belief Exempts Assessees from Extended Limitation Period in Central Excise Cases: Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner of C.Ex. & S.T., Raipur

Date: May 8, 2014
Bona Fide Belief Exempts Assessees from Extended Limitation Period in Central Excise Cases Introduction The case Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Raipur...
CESTAT Reinforces Unjust Enrichment Doctrine in Duty Refunds

CESTAT Reinforces Unjust Enrichment Doctrine in Duty Refunds

Date: Apr 26, 2014
CESTAT Reinforces Unjust Enrichment Doctrine in Duty Refunds Introduction The case of M/S Daimler Chrysler India Pvt. Ltd. (formerly Mercedes Benz India Ltd.) vs. CCE, Pune I, adjudicated by the...
Mahesh Silk Mills v. Commissioner of Central Excise: Reinforcing Evidentiary Standards in Clandestine Manufacturing Cases

Mahesh Silk Mills v. Commissioner of Central Excise: Reinforcing Evidentiary Standards in Clandestine Manufacturing Cases

Date: Apr 1, 2014
Mahesh Silk Mills v. Commissioner of Central Excise: Reinforcing Evidentiary Standards in Clandestine Manufacturing Cases Introduction The case of Mahesh Silk Mills v. Commissioner of Central Excise,...
CESTAT Reinforces Individual Adjudication and Procedural Compliance in Central Excise Cases

CESTAT Reinforces Individual Adjudication and Procedural Compliance in Central Excise Cases

Date: Mar 7, 2014
CESTAT Reinforces Individual Adjudication and Procedural Compliance in Central Excise Cases Introduction The case of Golden Tobacco Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi I adjudicated by the...
Confirmation of Duty Demand Based on Confessional Statements: Insights from S.M. Steel Ropes v. Balkrishna Agarwal

Confirmation of Duty Demand Based on Confessional Statements: Insights from S.M. Steel Ropes v. Balkrishna Agarwal

Date: Feb 14, 2014
Confirmation of Duty Demand Based on Confessional Statements: Insights from S.M. Steel Ropes v. Balkrishna Agarwal Introduction The case of S.M. Steel Ropes v. Balkrishna Agarwal was adjudicated by...
FOB Price Not a Cum-Duty Price for Export Duty Assessment: Sesa Goa Ltd. v. CESTAT

FOB Price Not a Cum-Duty Price for Export Duty Assessment: Sesa Goa Ltd. v. CESTAT

Date: Dec 13, 2013
FOB Price Not a Cum-Duty Price for Export Duty Assessment: Sesa Goa Ltd. v. CESTAT 1. Introduction Sesa Goa Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Cus. & S.T., Bhubaneswar-I is a pivotal judgment delivered...
Relating Back of Additional SEZ Notification to Original Appointed Day: Precedent on Duty Exemption

Relating Back of Additional SEZ Notification to Original Appointed Day: Precedent on Duty Exemption

Date: Oct 30, 2013
Relating Back of Additional SEZ Notification to Original Appointed Day: Precedent on Duty Exemption Introduction The case of Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Rajkot...
Admissibility of Cenvat Credit Based on Documentary Evidence: Chandan Steel Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise & S.T., Vapi

Admissibility of Cenvat Credit Based on Documentary Evidence: Chandan Steel Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise & S.T., Vapi

Date: Oct 11, 2013
Admissibility of Cenvat Credit Based on Documentary Evidence: Chandan Steel Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise & S.T., Vapi Introduction The case of Chandan Steel Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central...
Reaffirming Natural Justice and Evidentiary Standards in Central Excise Adjudications: Arya Fibres Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Ahmedabad-II

Reaffirming Natural Justice and Evidentiary Standards in Central Excise Adjudications: Arya Fibres Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Ahmedabad-II

Date: Sep 27, 2013
Reaffirming Natural Justice and Evidentiary Standards in Central Excise Adjudications: Arya Fibres Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Ahmedabad-II Introduction The case of Arya Fibres Pvt. Ltd. v....
CESTAT Judgment on Limitation Period for Cash Refund under Cenvat Credit Rules

CESTAT Judgment on Limitation Period for Cash Refund under Cenvat Credit Rules

Date: Sep 17, 2013
CESTAT Judgment on Limitation Period for Cash Refund under Cenvat Credit Rules Introduction The case of M/S. Deepak Spinners Ltd. v. CCE, Indore was adjudicated by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax...
Exclusion of Free Supplies in Gross Amount Charged for Service Tax under Section 67: Bhayana Builders Decision

Exclusion of Free Supplies in Gross Amount Charged for Service Tax under Section 67: Bhayana Builders Decision

Date: Sep 7, 2013
Exclusion of Free Supplies in Gross Amount Charged for Service Tax under Section 67: Bhayana Builders Decision Introduction The case of Bhayana Builders (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Service Tax, Delhi...
Insufficient Evidence Standards in Excise Duty Demands: Takshila Spinners v. CCE

Insufficient Evidence Standards in Excise Duty Demands: Takshila Spinners v. CCE

Date: Aug 24, 2013
Insufficient Evidence Standards in Excise Duty Demands: Takshila Spinners v. CCE Introduction The case of Takshila Spinners v. CCE adjudicated by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal...
Establishing the Necessity of Corroborative Evidence in Cladestine Removal Cases: Insights from Sakeen Alloys Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Ahmedabad

Establishing the Necessity of Corroborative Evidence in Cladestine Removal Cases: Insights from Sakeen Alloys Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Ahmedabad

Date: Jul 16, 2013
Establishing the Necessity of Corroborative Evidence in Cladestine Removal Cases: Insights from Sakeen Alloys Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Ahmedabad Introduction The case of Sakeen Alloys...
CESTAT’s Interpretation of Rule 5 Cenvat Credit Rules: Refund of Accumulated AED (T&TA) Credit for Exempted Exported Goods

CESTAT’s Interpretation of Rule 5 Cenvat Credit Rules: Refund of Accumulated AED (T&TA) Credit for Exempted Exported Goods

Date: Jun 18, 2013
CESTAT’s Interpretation of Rule 5 Cenvat Credit Rules: Refund of Accumulated AED (T&TA) Credit for Exempted Exported Goods Introduction The case of Commissioner of C. Ex., Jalandhar v. JCT Ltd....
Reliance on Corroborative Evidence in Clandestine Manufacturing Cases: Centurian Laboratories v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Vadodara

Reliance on Corroborative Evidence in Clandestine Manufacturing Cases: Centurian Laboratories v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Vadodara

Date: May 4, 2013
Reliance on Corroborative Evidence in Clandestine Manufacturing Cases: Centurian Laboratories v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Vadodara Introduction The case of Centurian Laboratories v. Commissioner Of C....
Business Auxiliary Services and Service Tax: Insights from Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-I v. Sai Service Station Ltd.

Business Auxiliary Services and Service Tax: Insights from Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-I v. Sai Service Station Ltd.

Date: Apr 17, 2013
Business Auxiliary Services and Service Tax: Insights from Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-I v. Sai Service Station Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-I vs. Sai...
Agarvanshi Aluminium Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs: Reinforcing Section 138C Standards for Admissibility of Computer Printouts

Agarvanshi Aluminium Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs: Reinforcing Section 138C Standards for Admissibility of Computer Printouts

Date: Apr 17, 2013
Agarvanshi Aluminium Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs: Reinforcing Section 138C Standards for Admissibility of Computer Printouts Introduction The case of Agarvanshi Aluminium Ltd. v. Commissioner of...
CESTAT Establishes Single Application of Education and S&H Cess on Duties for 100% EOUs Clearing into DTA

CESTAT Establishes Single Application of Education and S&H Cess on Duties for 100% EOUs Clearing into DTA

Date: Feb 23, 2013
CESTAT Establishes Single Application of Education and S&H Cess on Duties for 100% EOUs Clearing into DTA 1. Introduction The case of Kumar Arch Tech Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Jaipur-II...
CESTAT Establishes Strict Burden of Proof for Denial of SSI Exemption in Hindustan Machines v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Delhi

CESTAT Establishes Strict Burden of Proof for Denial of SSI Exemption in Hindustan Machines v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Delhi

Date: Feb 15, 2013
CESTAT Establishes Strict Burden of Proof for Denial of SSI Exemption in Hindustan Machines v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Delhi Introduction The case of Hindustan Machines v. Commissioner Of...
Clubbing of Clearances in Family-Owned Business Units: Insights from Commissioner Of Central Excise v. Sharad Industries

Clubbing of Clearances in Family-Owned Business Units: Insights from Commissioner Of Central Excise v. Sharad Industries

Date: Feb 7, 2013
Clubbing of Clearances in Family-Owned Business Units: Insights from Commissioner Of Central Excise v. Sharad Industries Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Central Excise, Kanpur v. Sharad...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert