Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

CESTAT Case Commentaries

CESTAT Judgment on Duty Assessment and Penalty in M/s. Key Locks (India) v. Union of India

CESTAT Judgment on Duty Assessment and Penalty in M/s. Key Locks (India) v. Union of India

Date: Mar 21, 2015
CESTAT Judgment on Duty Assessment and Penalty in M/s. Key Locks (India) v. Union of India 1. Introduction The case of M/s. Key Locks (India) & Shri Ravi Jain v. Union of India was adjudicated by the...
Strengthening Evidential Standards for Electronic Records under Section 36B: Insights from M/S. Ambica Organics v. Shri Anil Kumar Gupta

Strengthening Evidential Standards for Electronic Records under Section 36B: Insights from M/S. Ambica Organics v. Shri Anil Kumar Gupta

Date: Mar 5, 2015
Strengthening Evidential Standards for Electronic Records under Section 36B: Insights from M/S. Ambica Organics v. Shri Anil Kumar Gupta 1. Introduction The case of M/S. Ambica Organics v. Shri Anil...
Rishi Bakers Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE: Establishing Standards for Sugar Syrup Classification and Marketability under Central Excise Law

Rishi Bakers Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE: Establishing Standards for Sugar Syrup Classification and Marketability under Central Excise Law

Date: Mar 4, 2015
Rishi Bakers Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE: Establishing Standards for Sugar Syrup Classification and Marketability under Central Excise Law Introduction The case of Rishi Bakers Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of...
Impact of Declaration Filing Date on Exemption Eligibility: Maha Lakshmi Packagers v. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Impact of Declaration Filing Date on Exemption Eligibility: Maha Lakshmi Packagers v. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Date: Feb 26, 2015
Impact of Declaration Filing Date on Exemption Eligibility: Maha Lakshmi Packagers v. Commissioner of C. Ex. Introduction The case of Maha Lakshmi Packagers v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Chandigarh-I...
CESTAT Establishes Precedent on Valuation of Used Goods and Redemption Fines under Customs Act: Omex International v. Commissioner of Customs

CESTAT Establishes Precedent on Valuation of Used Goods and Redemption Fines under Customs Act: Omex International v. Commissioner of Customs

Date: Feb 19, 2015
CESTAT Establishes Precedent on Valuation of Used Goods and Redemption Fines under Customs Act Introduction The case of Omex International v. Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi adjudicated by the...
CESTAT Rules in Favor of Duty Exemption for Packaged Potato Chips under Chapter 20

CESTAT Rules in Favor of Duty Exemption for Packaged Potato Chips under Chapter 20

Date: Jan 7, 2015
CESTAT Rules in Favor of Duty Exemption for Packaged Potato Chips under Chapter 20 Introduction The case of Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise & S.T., Chandigarh-I...
Exemption under Business Auxiliary Services for Export-Oriented Textile Manufacturers: Texyard International v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Trichy

Exemption under Business Auxiliary Services for Export-Oriented Textile Manufacturers: Texyard International v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Trichy

Date: Jan 1, 2015
Exemption under Business Auxiliary Services for Export-Oriented Textile Manufacturers: Texyard International v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Trichy Introduction The case of Texyard International...
CESTAT Upholds Limitation in Service Tax Demand: Rochem Separation Systems Case Analysis

CESTAT Upholds Limitation in Service Tax Demand: Rochem Separation Systems Case Analysis

Date: Dec 11, 2014
CESTAT Upholds Limitation in Service Tax Demand: Rochem Separation Systems Case Analysis Introduction The case of Rochem Separation Systems (India) P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of S.T., Mumbai-I,...
Enforcement of CHALR Regulations on CHA License Revocation: Insights from D.M Mehta & Bros. v. Commissioner Of Customs

Enforcement of CHALR Regulations on CHA License Revocation: Insights from D.M Mehta & Bros. v. Commissioner Of Customs

Date: Nov 18, 2014
Enforcement of CHALR Regulations on CHA License Revocation: Insights from D.M Mehta & Bros. v. Commissioner Of Customs Introduction The case of D.M Mehta & Bros. v. Commissioner Of Customs (General),...
Affirming Anti-Dumping Duties on SKD/CKD Imports under Rule 2(a): Wood Polymer Ltd v. Bengal Hotels Limited

Affirming Anti-Dumping Duties on SKD/CKD Imports under Rule 2(a): Wood Polymer Ltd v. Bengal Hotels Limited

Date: Oct 31, 2014
Affirming Anti-Dumping Duties on SKD/CKD Imports under Rule 2(a): Wood Polymer Ltd v. Bengal Hotels Limited Introduction The case of Wood Polymer Ltd v. Bengal Hotels Limited, adjudicated by the...
Enhancement of Customs Valuation Based on NIDB Data: Eicher Tractors Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs

Enhancement of Customs Valuation Based on NIDB Data: Eicher Tractors Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs

Date: Oct 30, 2014
Enhancement of Customs Valuation Based on NIDB Data: Eicher Tractors Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs 1. Introduction The case of Eicher Tractors Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs adjudicated by the...
M/S Bhilosa Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE Vapi: Clarifying 'His Factory' in Exemption Notifications

M/S Bhilosa Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE Vapi: Clarifying 'His Factory' in Exemption Notifications

Date: Oct 28, 2014
M/S Bhilosa Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE Vapi: Clarifying 'His Factory' in Exemption Notifications Introduction The case of M/S Bhilosa Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE Vapi adjudicated by the Central...
Ensuring Natural Justice in CENVAT Credit Adjudication: Insights from Meerut v. Parmarth Iron Pvt Ltd

Ensuring Natural Justice in CENVAT Credit Adjudication: Insights from Meerut v. Parmarth Iron Pvt Ltd

Date: Oct 22, 2014
Ensuring Natural Justice in CENVAT Credit Adjudication: Insights from Meerut v. Parmarth Iron Pvt Ltd Introduction The case of Meerut v. Parmarth Iron Pvt Ltd adjudicated by the Customs, Excise &...
Dual Use of Capital Goods and Eligibility for Cenvat Credit: Insights from M/S Brindavan Beverages Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Meerut

Dual Use of Capital Goods and Eligibility for Cenvat Credit: Insights from M/S Brindavan Beverages Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Meerut

Date: Sep 24, 2014
Dual Use of Capital Goods and Eligibility for Cenvat Credit: Insights from M/S Brindavan Beverages Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Meerut Introduction The case of M/S Brindavan Beverages Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Meerut...
Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Kolkata-VI: Landmark Ruling on Refund Claims Under Section 11B CEA, 1944

Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Kolkata-VI: Landmark Ruling on Refund Claims Under Section 11B CEA, 1944

Date: Aug 13, 2014
Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Kolkata-VI: Landmark Ruling on Refund Claims Under Section 11B CEA, 1944 Introduction The case of Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C....
Judgment Analysis: Duty Imposition Based on Electricity Consumption in SRJ Peety Steel Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Aurangabad

Judgment Analysis: Duty Imposition Based on Electricity Consumption in SRJ Peety Steel Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Aurangabad

Date: Jul 31, 2014
Duty Imposition Based on Electricity Consumption in SRJ Peety Steel Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Aurangabad Introduction The case of SRJ Peety Steel Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central...
CESTAT Establishes Revenue Neutrality as Grounds for Limiting Interest Liability under Section 11AB of Central Excise Act

CESTAT Establishes Revenue Neutrality as Grounds for Limiting Interest Liability under Section 11AB of Central Excise Act

Date: Jul 17, 2014
CESTAT Establishes Revenue Neutrality as Grounds for Limiting Interest Liability under Section 11AB of Central Excise Act Introduction The case of M/S Alembic Ltd., M/S Nirayu (P) Ltd. v. CCE...
CESTAT Establishes SAD Refund Eligibility Without Mandatory Invoice Endorsement in Chowgule & Co. v. Customs

CESTAT Establishes SAD Refund Eligibility Without Mandatory Invoice Endorsement in Chowgule & Co. v. Customs

Date: Jun 25, 2014
CESTAT Establishes SAD Refund Eligibility Without Mandatory Invoice Endorsement in Chowgule & Co. v. Customs Introduction The case of Chowgule & Company Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs & C. Ex....
CESTAT Establishes Distinction Between Head Office and Branch Office in Service Tax Liability: British Airways v. Commissioner of Central Excise

CESTAT Establishes Distinction Between Head Office and Branch Office in Service Tax Liability: British Airways v. Commissioner of Central Excise

Date: May 24, 2014
CESTAT Establishes Distinction Between Head Office and Branch Office in Service Tax Liability: British Airways v. Commissioner of Central Excise Introduction The case of British Airways v....
CESTAT v. Arsh Casting Pvt Limited: Framework for Determining Clandestine Manufacture and Duty Calculations

CESTAT v. Arsh Casting Pvt Limited: Framework for Determining Clandestine Manufacture and Duty Calculations

Date: May 23, 2014
CESTAT v. Arsh Casting Pvt Limited: Framework for Determining Clandestine Manufacture and Duty Calculations Introduction The case of CCE v. Arsh Casting Pvt Limited adjudicated by the Customs, Excise...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert