Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

CESTAT Case Commentaries

CESTAT's Decision on Tax Classification and HSN Alignment in A.B. Mauri India Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE

CESTAT's Decision on Tax Classification and HSN Alignment in A.B. Mauri India Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE

Date: Aug 20, 2010
CESTAT's Decision on Tax Classification and HSN Alignment in A.B. Mauri India Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE Introduction The case of A.B. Mauri India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-II...
CESTAT Establishes Precedent on Penalty Imposition under Central Excise Rules 209/209A in Duty Evasion Cases

CESTAT Establishes Precedent on Penalty Imposition under Central Excise Rules 209/209A in Duty Evasion Cases

Date: Aug 7, 2010
CESTAT Establishes Precedent on Penalty Imposition under Central Excise Rules 209/209A in Duty Evasion Cases Introduction The case of Devi Dass Garg v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-I...
Revenue Neutrality in Valuation Disputes: Insights from Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai v. Special Steel Ltd.

Revenue Neutrality in Valuation Disputes: Insights from Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai v. Special Steel Ltd.

Date: Aug 5, 2010
Revenue Neutrality in Valuation Disputes: Insights from Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai v. Special Steel Ltd. Introduction The case of The Commissioner Of Central Excise, Mumbai v. Special...
Galaxy Indo Fab Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise: Landmark Ruling on Burden of Proof and Evidence in Excise Duty Disputes

Galaxy Indo Fab Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise: Landmark Ruling on Burden of Proof and Evidence in Excise Duty Disputes

Date: Jul 15, 2010
Galaxy Indo Fab Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise: Landmark Ruling on Burden of Proof and Evidence in Excise Duty Disputes Introduction The case of Galaxy Indo Fab. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of...
Exclusion of Cement and Steel Structural Supports from Capital Goods and Inputs under CENVAT: Vandana Global Ltd. v. CCE, Raipur

Exclusion of Cement and Steel Structural Supports from Capital Goods and Inputs under CENVAT: Vandana Global Ltd. v. CCE, Raipur

Date: May 1, 2010
Exclusion of Cement and Steel Structural Supports from Capital Goods and Inputs under CENVAT: Vandana Global Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur (CESTAT, 2010) Introduction The case of...
Sarla Performance Fibers Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C.E.X., Vapi (2010): Principle on Limiting Education Cess for 100% EOUs in Clearances to DTA

Sarla Performance Fibers Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C.E.X., Vapi (2010): Principle on Limiting Education Cess for 100% EOUs in Clearances to DTA

Date: Feb 27, 2010
Sarla Performance Fibers Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C.E.X., Vapi (2010): Principle on Limiting Education Cess for 100% EOUs in Clearances to DTA Introduction The case of Sarla Performance Fibers Ltd. v....
Clarification on Definition of Similar Goods for DTA Clearances Under Central Excise Notification

Clarification on Definition of Similar Goods for DTA Clearances Under Central Excise Notification

Date: Jan 6, 2010
Clarification on Definition of Similar Goods for DTA Clearances Under Central Excise Notification Introduction The case of M/S. Meghmani Industries Limited (S) v. Commissioner, C. Excise Ahmedabad-I...
Valuation Principles for Post-Clearance Processing Under Central Excise: CESTAT's Ruling in Commissioner of Central Excise, Nasik v. M/S Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.

Valuation Principles for Post-Clearance Processing Under Central Excise: CESTAT's Ruling in Commissioner of Central Excise, Nasik v. M/S Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.

Date: Nov 27, 2009
Valuation Principles for Post-Clearance Processing Under Central Excise: CESTAT's Ruling in Commissioner of Central Excise, Nasik v. M/S Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner...
CESTAT Upholds Binding Nature of Tribunal Decisions in Customs Import Licensing Disputes: Videocon International Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai

CESTAT Upholds Binding Nature of Tribunal Decisions in Customs Import Licensing Disputes: Videocon International Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai

Date: Nov 26, 2009
CESTAT Upholds Binding Nature of Tribunal Decisions in Customs Import Licensing Disputes: Videocon International Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai Introduction The case of Videocon...
CESTAT Judgment in V.K. Enterprises v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Panchkula: Reinforcing Compliance in CENVAT Credit Utilization

CESTAT Judgment in V.K. Enterprises v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Panchkula: Reinforcing Compliance in CENVAT Credit Utilization

Date: Sep 5, 2009
CESTAT Judgment in V.K. Enterprises v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Panchkula: Reinforcing Compliance in CENVAT Credit Utilization Introduction The case of V.K. Enterprises v. Commissioner of Central...
Prem Fabricators v. Commissioner of Central Excise: Defining Manufacture in SEZ Exemptions

Prem Fabricators v. Commissioner of Central Excise: Defining Manufacture in SEZ Exemptions

Date: Sep 4, 2009
Prem Fabricators v. Commissioner of Central Excise: Defining Manufacture in SEZ Exemptions Introduction The case of Prem Fabricators v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad-II revolves around...
Affirming Transaction Value and Evidentiary Standards in Customs Valuation: Sahil Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs, Ahmedabad [CESTAT, 2009]

Affirming Transaction Value and Evidentiary Standards in Customs Valuation: Sahil Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs, Ahmedabad [CESTAT, 2009]

Date: Aug 8, 2009
Affirming Transaction Value and Evidentiary Standards in Customs Valuation Introduction The case of Sahil Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs, Ahmedabad, adjudicated by the Customs, Excise...
Eligibility for Customs Exemption of Ventilators Integrated with Anaesthesia Apparatus: Wipro GE Medical Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore

Eligibility for Customs Exemption of Ventilators Integrated with Anaesthesia Apparatus: Wipro GE Medical Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore

Date: Jul 30, 2009
Eligibility for Customs Exemption of Ventilators Integrated with Anaesthesia Apparatus: Wipro GE Medical Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore Introduction The case of Wipro GE...
CESTAT Reinforces Strict Evidentiary Standards in Modvat Credit Cases: Rutvi Steel Decision

CESTAT Reinforces Strict Evidentiary Standards in Modvat Credit Cases: Rutvi Steel Decision

Date: Jul 2, 2009
CESTAT Reinforces Strict Evidentiary Standards in Modvat Credit Cases: Rutvi Steel Decision Introduction The case of Rutvi Steel And Alloys v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Rajkot adjudicated by...
Dual Pricing Practices and Transaction Value under the Central Excise Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nasik

Dual Pricing Practices and Transaction Value under the Central Excise Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nasik

Date: Jun 18, 2009
Dual Pricing Practices and Transaction Value under the Central Excise Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nasik Introduction The case...
CESTAT Upholds Judicial Discipline and Procedural Integrity in Referral to Larger Bench: Vandana Global Ltd. Case

CESTAT Upholds Judicial Discipline and Procedural Integrity in Referral to Larger Bench: Vandana Global Ltd. Case

Date: May 28, 2009
CESTAT Upholds Judicial Discipline and Procedural Integrity in Referral to Larger Bench: Vandana Global Ltd. Case Introduction The case of Vandana Global Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise,...
CESTAT Upholds Rebate Eligibility for Export Service Providers Despite Procedural Lapses and Broad Interpretation of Input Services

CESTAT Upholds Rebate Eligibility for Export Service Providers Despite Procedural Lapses and Broad Interpretation of Input Services

Date: May 19, 2009
CESTAT Upholds Rebate Eligibility for Export Service Providers Despite Procedural Lapses and Broad Interpretation of Input Services Introduction The case of Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi v....
CESTAT Hyderabad Upholds Classification of Soap Stock as Waste in Refining Operations

CESTAT Hyderabad Upholds Classification of Soap Stock as Waste in Refining Operations

Date: May 14, 2009
CESTAT Hyderabad Upholds Classification of Soap Stock as Waste in Refining Operations Introduction The case of Commissioner Of C. Ex., Hyderabad v. Priyanka Refineries Ltd. adjudicated by the Central...
Recognition of Construction as a Service Industry for Concessional Duty Rates: Mysore Cements Ltd. v. CCE, Bangalore-II

Recognition of Construction as a Service Industry for Concessional Duty Rates: Mysore Cements Ltd. v. CCE, Bangalore-II

Date: May 7, 2009
Recognition of Construction as a Service Industry for Concessional Duty Rates Introduction The case of Mysore Cements Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Bangalore-II addresses the eligibility of...
Pre-June 2007 Works Contracts Exempt from Service Tax: Commentary on Cemex Engineers v. Commissioner of Service Tax, Cochin

Pre-June 2007 Works Contracts Exempt from Service Tax: Commentary on Cemex Engineers v. Commissioner of Service Tax, Cochin

Date: Apr 1, 2009
Pre-June 2007 Works Contracts Exempt from Service Tax Comprehensive Commentary on Cemex Engineers v. Commissioner of Service Tax, Cochin 1. Introduction The case of Cemex Engineers v. Commissioner of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert