Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

CESTAT Case Commentaries

Valuation Principles under Central Excise Act: Insights from Cera Boards & Doors v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Calicut

Valuation Principles under Central Excise Act: Insights from Cera Boards & Doors v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Calicut

Date: Mar 25, 2009
Valuation Principles under Central Excise Act: Insights from Cera Boards & Doors v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Calicut Introduction The case of Cera Boards & Doors v. Commissioner Of Central...
Comprehensive Commentary on Commissioner Of C. Ex., Hyderabad-I v. Agarwal Rubber Pvt. Ltd. Judgment

Comprehensive Commentary on Commissioner Of C. Ex., Hyderabad-I v. Agarwal Rubber Pvt. Ltd. Judgment

Date: Jan 13, 2009
Clubbing of Central Excise Clearances: Insights from Commissioner Of C. Ex., Hyderabad-I v. Agarwal Rubber Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of C. Ex., Hyderabad-I v. Agarwal Rubber...
Validity of Reviewing Authorities through Proper Gazette Notification: Commr. Of C. Ex. & Service Tax, Bbsr-II v. Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd.

Validity of Reviewing Authorities through Proper Gazette Notification: Commr. Of C. Ex. & Service Tax, Bbsr-II v. Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd.

Date: Oct 17, 2008
Validity of Reviewing Authorities through Proper Gazette Notification Introduction The case of Commr. Of C. Ex. & Service Tax, Bbsr-II v. Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. adjudicated by the Central Excise...
Settlement Applications Under Section 32E and Cenvat Credit Eligibility: Insights from Bosch Chassis Systems India Ltd. v. C.C.E.

Settlement Applications Under Section 32E and Cenvat Credit Eligibility: Insights from Bosch Chassis Systems India Ltd. v. C.C.E.

Date: Oct 1, 2008
Settlement Applications Under Section 32E and Cenvat Credit Eligibility: Insights from Bosch Chassis Systems India Ltd. v. C.C.E. Introduction The case of Bosch Chassis Systems India Ltd. v. C.C.E,...
Osnar Chemical Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex.: Defining Non-Manufacture in Polymer Modified Bitumen Production

Osnar Chemical Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex.: Defining Non-Manufacture in Polymer Modified Bitumen Production

Date: Sep 26, 2008
Osnar Chemical Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex.: Defining Non-Manufacture in Polymer Modified Bitumen Production Introduction The case of Osnar Chemical Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central...
CESTAT Rules Poha as Specific Rice Product Under Chapter 11.04, Overruling Chapter 19 Classification

CESTAT Rules Poha as Specific Rice Product Under Chapter 11.04, Overruling Chapter 19 Classification

Date: Aug 6, 2008
CESTAT Rules Poha as Specific Rice Product Under Chapter 11.04, Overruling Chapter 19 Classification 1. Introduction The case of Bhagyalakshmi Poha Industries v. Commissioner of C. Ex.-III, Bangalore...
Enforcement of Natural Justice: CESTAT Upholds Right to Cross-Examination in Excise Duty Appeals

Enforcement of Natural Justice: CESTAT Upholds Right to Cross-Examination in Excise Duty Appeals

Date: Aug 2, 2008
Enforcement of Natural Justice: CESTAT Upholds Right to Cross-Examination in Excise Duty Appeals Introduction The case of Metal Gems v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Daman decided by the Central...
Comprehensive Commentary on Bdh Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex. (Appeals), Mumbai-I

Comprehensive Commentary on Bdh Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex. (Appeals), Mumbai-I

Date: Jul 10, 2008
Mandatory Filing of Refund Claims Under Section 11B: Insights from Bdh Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex. (Appeals), Mumbai-I Introduction The case of Bdh Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C....
Classification of ‘White Chocolate’ under Central Excise Tariff: Insights from Nestle India Limited v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Goa

Classification of ‘White Chocolate’ under Central Excise Tariff: Insights from Nestle India Limited v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Goa

Date: Jul 5, 2008
Classification of ‘White Chocolate’ under Central Excise Tariff: Insights from Nestle India Limited v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Goa Introduction The case of Nestle India Limited v....
Remand of Copier Force India Ltd.: Implications for Central Excise Compliance

Remand of Copier Force India Ltd.: Implications for Central Excise Compliance

Date: Jul 3, 2008
Remand of Copier Force India Ltd.: Implications for Central Excise Compliance Introduction The case of Copier Force India Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Chennai adjudicated by the Central...
Ensuring Robust Evidentiary Standards in Central Excise Evasion Cases: Insights from R.K Patel & Co. v. Commissioner Of Customs & Central Excise, Nashik

Ensuring Robust Evidentiary Standards in Central Excise Evasion Cases: Insights from R.K Patel & Co. v. Commissioner Of Customs & Central Excise, Nashik

Date: Jul 2, 2008
Ensuring Robust Evidentiary Standards in Central Excise Evasion Cases: Insights from R.K Patel & Co. v. Commissioner Of Customs & Central Excise, Nashik Introduction The case of R.K Patel & Co. v....
Admissibility of Computer Printouts Under Section 36B: Insights from Shri Ulaganayagi Ammal Steels v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Trichy

Admissibility of Computer Printouts Under Section 36B: Insights from Shri Ulaganayagi Ammal Steels v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Trichy

Date: May 1, 2008
Admissibility of Computer Printouts Under Section 36B: Insights from Shri Ulaganayagi Ammal Steels v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Trichy Introduction The case of Shri Ulaganayagi Ammal Steels v....
CESTAT's Landmark Decision on CENVAT Credit Utilization: Siddharth Tubes Ltd. v. CCE Indore

CESTAT's Landmark Decision on CENVAT Credit Utilization: Siddharth Tubes Ltd. v. CCE Indore

Date: Feb 1, 2008
CESTAT's Landmark Decision on CENVAT Credit Utilization: Siddharth Tubes Ltd. v. CCE Indore Introduction The case of M/S Siddharth Tubes Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Indore) is a...
Physical Retention of Capital Goods in Cenvat Credit Claims: Insights from Dalmia Cements v. Commissioner of C.Ex.

Physical Retention of Capital Goods in Cenvat Credit Claims: Insights from Dalmia Cements v. Commissioner of C.Ex.

Date: Nov 15, 2007
Physical Retention of Capital Goods in Cenvat Credit Claims: Insights from Dalmia Cements (Bharat) Ltd. v. Commissioner of C.Ex., Tiruchirapalli Introduction The case of Dalmia Cements (Bharat) Ltd....
Finality of Customs Assessments: Insights from Vittesse Export Import v. Commissioner Of Customs

Finality of Customs Assessments: Insights from Vittesse Export Import v. Commissioner Of Customs

Date: Nov 1, 2007
Finality of Customs Assessments: Insights from Vittesse Export Import v. Commissioner Of Customs Introduction The case of Vittesse Export Import v. Commissioner Of Customs (Ep), Mumbai adjudicated by...
Establishing Evidentiary Sufficiency in Clandestine Removal: Lucky Dyeing Mills Precedent

Establishing Evidentiary Sufficiency in Clandestine Removal: Lucky Dyeing Mills Precedent

Date: Oct 23, 2007
Establishing Evidentiary Sufficiency in Clandestine Removal: Lucky Dyeing Mills Precedent Introduction The case of Lucky Dyeing Mills P. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise & Customs, Surat...
CESTAT Sets Precedent on Reconciliation of Process Inventory Discrepancies in Castrol India Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Vapi

CESTAT Sets Precedent on Reconciliation of Process Inventory Discrepancies in Castrol India Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Vapi

Date: Oct 13, 2007
CESTAT Sets Precedent on Reconciliation of Process Inventory Discrepancies in Castrol India Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Vapi Introduction In the landmark case of Castrol India Ltd. v....
Clarifying Penalty Provisions under Section 11AC: The Arun Vyapar Udyog Pvt. Ltd. Case

Clarifying Penalty Provisions under Section 11AC: The Arun Vyapar Udyog Pvt. Ltd. Case

Date: Sep 22, 2007
Clarifying Penalty Provisions under Section 11AC: The Arun Vyapar Udyog Pvt. Ltd. Case Introduction The case of M/s Arun Vyapar Udyog Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Visakhapatnam was...
Anti-Manipulation Measures in DEPB Scheme: Upholding Penalties for FOB Overvaluation in Olympia Overseas v. Commissioner Of Customs, Cochin

Anti-Manipulation Measures in DEPB Scheme: Upholding Penalties for FOB Overvaluation in Olympia Overseas v. Commissioner Of Customs, Cochin

Date: Sep 15, 2007
Anti-Manipulation Measures in DEPB Scheme: Upholding Penalties for FOB Overvaluation 1. Introduction The case of Olympia Overseas v. Commissioner Of Customs, Cochin adjudicated by the Cochin Special...
Tex-Age v. Commissioner Of Customs (Exports), Establishing Rigorous Verification on Over-Invoicing Claims

Tex-Age v. Commissioner Of Customs (Exports), Establishing Rigorous Verification on Over-Invoicing Claims

Date: Aug 30, 2007
Tex-Age v. Commissioner Of Customs (Exports), Establishing Rigorous Verification on Over-Invoicing Claims Introduction The case of Tex-Age v. Commissioner Of Customs (Exports), Nhava Sheva...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert