Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

CESTAT Case Commentaries

DTA Clearances under Exim Policy Para 9.10(b) Recognized as On Par with Exports

DTA Clearances under Exim Policy Para 9.10(b) Recognized as On Par with Exports

Date: Aug 24, 2007
DTA Clearances under Exim Policy Para 9.10(b) Recognized as On Par with Exports Introduction The case of Juned Bilal Memon v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Surat-II adjudicated by the Central Excise and...
Cenvat Credit Eligibility Based on Final Product Dutiability at Receipt of Capital Goods

Cenvat Credit Eligibility Based on Final Product Dutiability at Receipt of Capital Goods

Date: Aug 2, 2007
Cenvat Credit Eligibility Based on Final Product Dutiability at Receipt of Capital Goods Introduction The case of Spenta International Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Thane adjudicated by the...
Advance Exports v. Commissioner Of Customs: Landmark Judgment on Customs Valuation and DEPB Credit

Advance Exports v. Commissioner Of Customs: Landmark Judgment on Customs Valuation and DEPB Credit

Date: Aug 2, 2007
Advance Exports v. Commissioner Of Customs: Landmark Judgment on Customs Valuation and DEPB Credit Introduction The case of Advance Exports v. Commissioner Of Customs, Kandla adjudicated by the...
Chandra Impex Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs: Upholding Customs Duty Compliance through Rigorous Investigation

Chandra Impex Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs: Upholding Customs Duty Compliance through Rigorous Investigation

Date: Jun 28, 2007
Chandra Impex Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs: Upholding Customs Duty Compliance through Rigorous Investigation Introduction The case of Chandra Impex Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs, New...
Tejwal Dyestuff Industries v. Commissioner of C.E.X.: Strengthening Evidentiary Standards in Cenvat Credit Fraud Litigation

Tejwal Dyestuff Industries v. Commissioner of C.E.X.: Strengthening Evidentiary Standards in Cenvat Credit Fraud Litigation

Date: Jun 19, 2007
Tejwal Dyestuff Industries v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad: Strengthening Evidentiary Standards in Cenvat Credit Fraud Litigation Introduction The case of Tejwal Dyestuff Industries v....
Basti Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. CCE, Allahabad: Defining Management Agreements vs. Consultancy Services in Service Tax Liability

Basti Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. CCE, Allahabad: Defining Management Agreements vs. Consultancy Services in Service Tax Liability

Date: Apr 25, 2007
Basti Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. CCE, Allahabad: Defining Management Agreements vs. Consultancy Services in Service Tax Liability Introduction The case of Basti Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. CCE, Allahabad...
SRF Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise: Clarifying Modvat Scheme Applicability in Valuation of Intermediate Goods

SRF Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise: Clarifying Modvat Scheme Applicability in Valuation of Intermediate Goods

Date: Mar 14, 2007
SRF Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise: Clarifying Modvat Scheme Applicability in Valuation of Intermediate Goods Introduction The case of SRF Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Chennai-I...
Ownership and Confiscation of Imported Goods: Insights from Worldwide Trade Est. Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs, Chennai

Ownership and Confiscation of Imported Goods: Insights from Worldwide Trade Est. Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs, Chennai

Date: Mar 13, 2007
Ownership and Confiscation of Imported Goods: Insights from Worldwide Trade Est. Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs, Chennai Introduction The case of Worldwide Trade Est. Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner...
Joint Liability for Excise Duty: Sree Aravindh Steels Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Trichy

Joint Liability for Excise Duty: Sree Aravindh Steels Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Trichy

Date: Mar 9, 2007
Joint Liability for Excise Duty: Sree Aravindh Steels Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Trichy Introduction The case of Sree Aravindh Steels Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Trichy...
Rule 4 Prevails Over Rule 8 in Mixed Consumption and Sale of Excisable Goods under Central Excise Valuation Rules: Isp At Industries Ltd. v. CCE

Rule 4 Prevails Over Rule 8 in Mixed Consumption and Sale of Excisable Goods under Central Excise Valuation Rules: Isp At Industries Ltd. v. CCE

Date: Feb 3, 2007
Rule 4 Prevails Over Rule 8 in Mixed Consumption and Sale of Excisable Goods under Central Excise Valuation Rules: Isp At Industries Ltd. v. CCE Introduction The case of Isp At Industries Ltd. v....
Inclusion of Scrap Value in Assessable Value: The Mahindra Ugine Steel Decision

Inclusion of Scrap Value in Assessable Value: The Mahindra Ugine Steel Decision

Date: Jan 24, 2007
Inclusion of Scrap Value in Assessable Value: The Mahindra Ugine Steel Decision 1. Introduction The case of Mahindra Ugine Steel Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Pune adjudicated by the Central...
Proper Issue of Show-Cause Notices in Goods Classification: Carborandum Universal Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Chennai

Proper Issue of Show-Cause Notices in Goods Classification: Carborandum Universal Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Chennai

Date: Nov 29, 2006
Proper Issue of Show-Cause Notices in Goods Classification: Carborandum Universal Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Chennai Introduction The case of Carborandum Universal Ltd. v. Commissioner Of...
Establishing Clandestine Manufacturing Through Corroborated Evidence: Insights from Montex Dyeing & Printing Works v. Commissioner Of C. Ex. & Cus.

Establishing Clandestine Manufacturing Through Corroborated Evidence: Insights from Montex Dyeing & Printing Works v. Commissioner Of C. Ex. & Cus.

Date: Nov 3, 2006
Establishing Clandestine Manufacturing Through Corroborated Evidence: Insights from Montex Dyeing & Printing Works v. Commissioner Of Central Excise & Customs Introduction The case of Montex Dyeing &...
Interpretation of Rule 209A of Central Excise Rules: Reinforcing the Necessity of Knowledge for Penalty Imposition

Interpretation of Rule 209A of Central Excise Rules: Reinforcing the Necessity of Knowledge for Penalty Imposition

Date: Oct 13, 2006
Interpretation of Rule 209A of Central Excise Rules: Reinforcing the Necessity of Knowledge for Penalty Imposition Introduction The case of Steel Tubes Of India Ltd. v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Indore...
Refund of Duty Debited in RG-23A Part-II: Cash Refund Admissible Under Specific Circumstances

Refund of Duty Debited in RG-23A Part-II: Cash Refund Admissible Under Specific Circumstances

Date: Aug 22, 2006
Refund of Duty Debited in RG-23A Part-II: Cash Refund Admissible Under Specific Circumstances Introduction The case of Gauri Plasticulture (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Indore...
Enhanced Scrutiny on Clandestine Removal: Ruby Chlorates (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Trichy

Enhanced Scrutiny on Clandestine Removal: Ruby Chlorates (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Trichy

Date: Aug 15, 2006
Enhanced Scrutiny on Clandestine Removal: Ruby Chlorates (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Trichy 1. Introduction The case of Ruby Chlorates (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Trichy revolves...
Rammapati Exports v. Commissioner Of Customs (Port), Kolkata: Establishing the Finality of Tax Assessments in DEPB Claims

Rammapati Exports v. Commissioner Of Customs (Port), Kolkata: Establishing the Finality of Tax Assessments in DEPB Claims

Date: Aug 8, 2006
Rammapati Exports v. Commissioner Of Customs (Port), Kolkata: Establishing the Finality of Tax Assessments in DEPB Claims Introduction Rammapati Exports v. Commissioner Of Customs (Port), Kolkata is...
Assessment of Drawback Claims and FOB Valuation in Ajay Apparels v. Commissioner of Customs

Assessment of Drawback Claims and FOB Valuation in Ajay Apparels v. Commissioner of Customs

Date: Jul 11, 2006
Assessment of Drawback Claims and FOB Valuation in Ajay Apparels v. Commissioner of Customs Introduction The case of Ajay Apparels v. Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata adjudicated by the CESTAT...
Ensuring Fair and Accurate Customs Valuation: Tech Tronix India v. Commissioner Of Customs, Kolkata-I

Ensuring Fair and Accurate Customs Valuation: Tech Tronix India v. Commissioner Of Customs, Kolkata-I

Date: Jul 5, 2006
Ensuring Fair and Accurate Customs Valuation: Tech Tronix India v. Commissioner Of Customs, Kolkata-I Introduction The case of Tech Tronix India v. Commissioner Of Customs, (Port), Kolkata-I dealt...
Reaffirming Transaction Value in Customs Valuation: Sony Impex v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Customs

Reaffirming Transaction Value in Customs Valuation: Sony Impex v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Customs

Date: Jul 5, 2006
Reaffirming Transaction Value in Customs Valuation: Sony Impex v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Customs Introduction The case of Sony Impex v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Customs adjudicated by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert