Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Limits on Reopening Tax Assessments: Il & FS Investment Managers Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officer

Limits on Reopening Tax Assessments: Il & FS Investment Managers Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officer

Date: Nov 28, 2006
Limits on Reopening Tax Assessments: Il & FS Investment Managers Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officer Introduction The case of Il & FS Investment Managers Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officer And Others adjudicated by...
No Change in Character in Development Plan – Mihir Yadunath Thatte v. State Of Maharashtra & Ors.

No Change in Character in Development Plan – Mihir Yadunath Thatte v. State Of Maharashtra & Ors.

Date: Nov 22, 2006
No Change in Character in Development Plan – Mihir Yadunath Thatte v. State Of Maharashtra & Ors. Introduction In the case of Mihir Yadunath Thatte v. State Of Maharashtra & Ors., adjudicated by the...
Determining Teacher Seniority in Promotions: Qualification Date Over Initial Appointment

Determining Teacher Seniority in Promotions: Qualification Date Over Initial Appointment

Date: Nov 16, 2006
Determining Teacher Seniority in Promotions: Qualification Date Over Initial Appointment Vaijanath v. Secretary, Marathwada Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Devgiri College Campus, Aurangabad (Bombay High...
Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act: Insights from Kamalbai v. Ganpat

Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act: Insights from Kamalbai v. Ganpat

Date: Nov 16, 2006
Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act: Insights from Kamalbai v. Ganpat Introduction The case of Kamalbai v. Ganpat adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Minimum Cadre Strength for Reservation: Interpretation of 24% Quota under MEPS Rules

Minimum Cadre Strength for Reservation: Interpretation of 24% Quota under MEPS Rules

Date: Nov 15, 2006
Minimum Cadre Strength for Reservation: Interpretation of 24% Quota under MEPS Rules 1. Introduction The case of New English High School Association, Nagpur v. Baldev adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Enhanced Compensation Framework in Land Acquisition: Special Land Acquisition Officer, M.I.W, Jalgaon v. Chindha Fakira Patil

Enhanced Compensation Framework in Land Acquisition: Special Land Acquisition Officer, M.I.W, Jalgaon v. Chindha Fakira Patil

Date: Nov 10, 2006
Enhanced Compensation Framework in Land Acquisition: Special Land Acquisition Officer, M.I.W, Jalgaon v. Chindha Fakira Patil Introduction The case of Special Land Acquisition Officer, M.I.W, Jalgaon...
Disqualification of Councillors Based on Invalidated Caste Certificates: Insights from Ramesh Suresh Kamble v. State Of Maharashtra And Others

Disqualification of Councillors Based on Invalidated Caste Certificates: Insights from Ramesh Suresh Kamble v. State Of Maharashtra And Others

Date: Oct 21, 2006
Disqualification of Councillors Based on Invalidated Caste Certificates: Insights from Ramesh Suresh Kamble v. State Of Maharashtra And Others Introduction The case of Ramesh Suresh Kamble v. State...
Amendment of Pleadings Post-Trial Commencement: Insights from Bharat Petroleum v. Precious Finance

Amendment of Pleadings Post-Trial Commencement: Insights from Bharat Petroleum v. Precious Finance

Date: Oct 21, 2006
Amendment of Pleadings Post-Trial Commencement: Insights from Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Precious Finance Investment Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v....
Scoop Industries P. Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officer: Mandating Depreciation Before Chapter VI-A Deductions

Scoop Industries P. Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officer: Mandating Depreciation Before Chapter VI-A Deductions

Date: Oct 11, 2006
Scoop Industries P. Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officer: Mandating Depreciation Before Chapter VI-A Deductions Introduction The case of Scoop Industries P. Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officer adjudicated by the Bombay...
Sharad Namdeorao Shirbhate v. State Of Maharashtra: Establishing Stringent Standards for Corruption Convictions

Sharad Namdeorao Shirbhate v. State Of Maharashtra: Establishing Stringent Standards for Corruption Convictions

Date: Oct 11, 2006
Sharad Namdeorao Shirbhate v. State Of Maharashtra: Establishing Stringent Standards for Corruption Convictions Introduction The case of Sharad Namdeorao Shirbhate v. State Of Maharashtra,...
Gopinath v. State Of Maharashtra: High Court Clarifies Jurisdiction Over Unauthorized Revenue Actions

Gopinath v. State Of Maharashtra: High Court Clarifies Jurisdiction Over Unauthorized Revenue Actions

Date: Oct 7, 2006
Gopinath v. State Of Maharashtra: High Court Clarifies Jurisdiction Over Unauthorized Revenue Actions Introduction In the landmark case of Gopinath v. State of Maharashtra, adjudicated by the Bombay...
Authority to File Complaints Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Insights from Mrs. Alka Toraskar v. The Vaishya Urban Co-Op. Credit Society Ltd.

Authority to File Complaints Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Insights from Mrs. Alka Toraskar v. The Vaishya Urban Co-Op. Credit Society Ltd.

Date: Oct 5, 2006
Authority to File Complaints Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Insights from Mrs. Alka Toraskar v. The Vaishya Urban Co-Op. Credit Society Ltd. Introduction In the landmark case of...
Reasonable Time Constraints on Variation of Land Consolidation Schemes: Insights from Dattu Appa Patil Vs. State Of Maharashtra

Reasonable Time Constraints on Variation of Land Consolidation Schemes: Insights from Dattu Appa Patil Vs. State Of Maharashtra

Date: Oct 4, 2006
Reasonable Time Constraints on Variation of Land Consolidation Schemes: Insights from Dattu Appa Patil Vs. State Of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Dattu Appa Patil Since Deceased By Lrs. Ananda...
Valuation of Physicians Free Samples under Rule 4: Insights from Indian Drugs Manufacturer's Association v. Union of India

Valuation of Physicians Free Samples under Rule 4: Insights from Indian Drugs Manufacturer's Association v. Union of India

Date: Sep 29, 2006
Valuation of Physicians Free Samples under Rule 4: Insights from Indian Drugs Manufacturer's Association v. Union of India Introduction In the landmark case of Indian Drugs Manufacturer's Association...
Non-Retrospective Application of Penal Amendments: Adamji Lookmanji & Co. v. State Of Maharashtra

Non-Retrospective Application of Penal Amendments: Adamji Lookmanji & Co. v. State Of Maharashtra

Date: Sep 27, 2006
Non-Retrospective Application of Penal Amendments: Adamji Lookmanji & Co. v. State Of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Adamji Lookmanji & Co. & Ors. v. State Of Maharashtra & Anr. adjudicated by...
Judgment Analysis: Manohar Dhonde v. State of Maharashtra - Scrutiny of PIL and Upholding Natural Justice in Sexual Harassment Cases

Judgment Analysis: Manohar Dhonde v. State of Maharashtra - Scrutiny of PIL and Upholding Natural Justice in Sexual Harassment Cases

Date: Sep 27, 2006
Judgment Analysis: Manohar Dhonde v. State of Maharashtra - Scrutiny of PIL and Upholding Natural Justice in Sexual Harassment Cases Introduction The case of Manohar Dhonde (Prof.) & Ors. v. State Of...
Rajendra v. State Of Maharashtra: Upholding Separate Trials and Sequential Sentencing in Section 138 NI Act Offenses

Rajendra v. State Of Maharashtra: Upholding Separate Trials and Sequential Sentencing in Section 138 NI Act Offenses

Date: Sep 20, 2006
Rajendra v. State Of Maharashtra: Upholding Separate Trials and Sequential Sentencing in Section 138 NI Act Offenses Introduction Rajendra v. State Of Maharashtra is a significant judgment delivered...
Strengthening Presumptions under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Purushottam v. Deshmukh

Strengthening Presumptions under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Purushottam v. Deshmukh

Date: Sep 20, 2006
Strengthening Presumptions under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Purushottam v. Manohar K. Deshmukh Introduction The case of Purushottam v. Manohar K. Deshmukh, adjudicated by the...
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd v. Manoj S. Deshpande: Reinforcing Individual Assessment in Unfair Labour Practice Cases under MRTU Act

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd v. Manoj S. Deshpande: Reinforcing Individual Assessment in Unfair Labour Practice Cases under MRTU Act

Date: Sep 20, 2006
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd v. Manoj S. Deshpande: Reinforcing Individual Assessment in Unfair Labour Practice Cases under MRTU Act Introduction In the landmark case of Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd v. Manoj...
Reaffirmation of Principles in Disciplinary Proceedings: Ramchandra Govindrao Gaidhani v. Union Of India And Others

Reaffirmation of Principles in Disciplinary Proceedings: Ramchandra Govindrao Gaidhani v. Union Of India And Others

Date: Sep 19, 2006
Reaffirmation of Principles in Disciplinary Proceedings: Ramchandra Govindrao Gaidhani v. Union Of India And Others Introduction The case of Ramchandra Govindrao Gaidhani v. Union Of India And Others...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert