Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Criteria for Agreement to Lease under the Indian Stamp Act: Insights from Maneklal Manilal, In Re

Criteria for Agreement to Lease under the Indian Stamp Act: Insights from Maneklal Manilal, In Re

Date: Jul 13, 1928
Criteria for Agreement to Lease under the Indian Stamp Act: Insights from Maneklal Manilal, In Re Introduction The case of Maneklal Manilal, In Re, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on July 12,...
Election of Remedies under the Specific Relief Act, 1877: The Principle Established in Ardeshir H. Mama v. Flora Sassoon

Election of Remedies under the Specific Relief Act, 1877: The Principle Established in Ardeshir H. Mama v. Flora Sassoon

Date: May 22, 1928
Election of Remedies under the Specific Relief Act, 1877: The Principle Established in Ardeshir H. Mama v. Flora Sassoon Introduction The case of Ardeshir H. Mama v. Flora Sassoon adjudicated by the...
Resulting Trusts and Presumption of Advancement in Indian Law: Insights from Guran Ditta v. T. Ram Ditta

Resulting Trusts and Presumption of Advancement in Indian Law: Insights from Guran Ditta v. T. Ram Ditta

Date: Apr 25, 1928
Resulting Trusts and Presumption of Advancement in Indian Law: Insights from Guran Ditta v. T. Ram Ditta Introduction The landmark case of Guran Ditta v. T. Ram Ditta adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Defining the Boundaries of Police Accountability: A Comprehensive Commentary on Narayan Hari Tarkunde v. Yeshwant Raoji Naik (1928) and Section 80 of the Bombay District Police Act, 1890

Defining the Boundaries of Police Accountability: A Comprehensive Commentary on Narayan Hari Tarkunde v. Yeshwant Raoji Naik (1928) and Section 80 of the Bombay District Police Act, 1890

Date: Mar 31, 1928
Defining the Boundaries of Police Accountability: A Comprehensive Commentary on Narayan Hari Tarkunde v. Yeshwant Raoji Naik (1928) and Section 80 of the Bombay District Police Act, 1890 Introduction...
Mandatory Compliance with Section 80 of the CPC in Suits Involving State Parties: Insights from Hirachand S. Gandhy v. G.I.P. Railway Company (1928)

Mandatory Compliance with Section 80 of the CPC in Suits Involving State Parties: Insights from Hirachand S. Gandhy v. G.I.P. Railway Company (1928)

Date: Mar 20, 1928
Mandatory Compliance with Section 80 of the CPC in Suits Involving State Parties: Insights from Hirachand S. Gandhy v. G.I.P. Railway Company (1928) Introduction The case of Hirachand Succaram Gandhy...
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bombay Trust Corporation: Establishing Agent Liability in Cross-Jurisdictional Taxation

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bombay Trust Corporation: Establishing Agent Liability in Cross-Jurisdictional Taxation

Date: Mar 13, 1928
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bombay Trust Corporation: Establishing Agent Liability in Cross-Jurisdictional Taxation Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay v. Bombay Trust...
Personal Liability on Negotiable Instruments: Padhye v. Fatehchand

Personal Liability on Negotiable Instruments: Padhye v. Fatehchand

Date: Feb 16, 1928
Personal Liability on Negotiable Instruments: Padhye v. Fatehchand Introduction The case of Sitaram Krishna Padhye v. Chimandas Fatehchand adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on February 15, 1928,...
Limitation of Suits in Family Debt Recovery: Insights from Maganlal Harjibhai v. Amichand Gulabji

Limitation of Suits in Family Debt Recovery: Insights from Maganlal Harjibhai v. Amichand Gulabji

Date: Feb 15, 1928
Limitation of Suits in Family Debt Recovery: Insights from Maganlal Harjibhai v. Amichand Gulabji Introduction The case of Maganlal Harjibhai v. Amichand Gulabji adjudicated by the Bombay High Court...
Executor Liability for Time-Barred Debts and Surety Considerations in Pestonji Manekji Mody v. Bai Meherbai

Executor Liability for Time-Barred Debts and Surety Considerations in Pestonji Manekji Mody v. Bai Meherbai

Date: Jan 25, 1928
Executor Liability for Time-Barred Debts and Surety Considerations in Pestonji Manekji Mody v. Bai Meherbai Introduction Pestonji Manekji Mody v. Bai Meherbai, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Liability of Sons for Paternal Debts in Joint Hindu Families: Analysis of Annabhat Shankarbhat Alvandi v. Shivappa Dundappa Manvi

Liability of Sons for Paternal Debts in Joint Hindu Families: Analysis of Annabhat Shankarbhat Alvandi v. Shivappa Dundappa Manvi

Date: Jan 20, 1928
Liability of Sons for Paternal Debts in Joint Hindu Families: Analysis of Annabhat Shankarbhat Alvandi v. Shivappa Dundappa Manvi Introduction The landmark case of Annabhat Shankarbhat Alvandi v....
Reinforcement of Joint Family Succession in Impartible Estates: Konammal v. Annadana Jadaya Gounder

Reinforcement of Joint Family Succession in Impartible Estates: Konammal v. Annadana Jadaya Gounder

Date: Dec 16, 1927
Reinforcement of Joint Family Succession in Impartible Estates: Konammal v. Annadana Jadaya Gounder Introduction The case of Konammal v. Annadana Jadaya Gounder was adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Ramanandi Kuer v. Kalawati Kuer: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Probate Revocation

Ramanandi Kuer v. Kalawati Kuer: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Probate Revocation

Date: Nov 12, 1927
Ramanandi Kuer v. Kalawati Kuer: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Probate Revocation Introduction The case of Ramanandi Kuer v. Kalawati Kuer adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on November 11,...
Defining Jurisdiction and Intent under Section 216 IPC: Insights from Shripad G. Chandavarkar, In Re

Defining Jurisdiction and Intent under Section 216 IPC: Insights from Shripad G. Chandavarkar, In Re

Date: Oct 11, 1927
Defining Jurisdiction and Intent under Section 216 IPC: Insights from Shripad G. Chandavarkar, In Re Introduction The case of Shripad G. Chandavarkar, In Re adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Enforcing Arbitration Awards: Standards for Reasonable Timeliness Established in Bhogilal Purshottam Shah v. Chimanlal Amritlal Shah

Enforcing Arbitration Awards: Standards for Reasonable Timeliness Established in Bhogilal Purshottam Shah v. Chimanlal Amritlal Shah

Date: Sep 30, 1927
Enforcing Arbitration Awards: Standards for Reasonable Timeliness Established in Bhogilal Purshottam Shah v. Chimanlal Amritlal Shah Introduction The case of Bhogilal Purshottam Shah v. Chimanlal...
Enforceability of Unregistered Surety Bonds and Scope of Liability: Insights from Jayappa Lokappa Narsinganawar v. Shivangouda Dyamangouda Patil

Enforceability of Unregistered Surety Bonds and Scope of Liability: Insights from Jayappa Lokappa Narsinganawar v. Shivangouda Dyamangouda Patil

Date: Aug 26, 1927
Enforceability of Unregistered Surety Bonds and Scope of Liability: Insights from Jayappa Lokappa Narsinganawar v. Shivangouda Dyamangouda Patil Introduction The case of Jayappa Lokappa Narsinganawar...
Finality of Section 5 Decisions in Probate Duty Matters: Gangaram Tillockchand v. The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority

Finality of Section 5 Decisions in Probate Duty Matters: Gangaram Tillockchand v. The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority

Date: Aug 16, 1927
Finality of Section 5 Decisions in Probate Duty Matters: Gangaram Tillockchand v. The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority Introduction The case of Gangaram Tillockchand v. The Chief Controlling...
Enforcement of Bill of Lading Terms under the Bills of Lading Act, 1856: An Analysis of Bombay Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. v. Vasudev Baburao Kamat

Enforcement of Bill of Lading Terms under the Bills of Lading Act, 1856: An Analysis of Bombay Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. v. Vasudev Baburao Kamat

Date: Aug 16, 1927
Enforcement of Bill of Lading Terms under the Bills of Lading Act, 1856: An Analysis of Bombay Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. v. Vasudev Baburao Kamat Introduction The case of Bombay Steam Navigation...
Establishing the Burden of Proof in Succession Disputes: Sardar Gurbaksh Singh v. Gurdial Singh

Establishing the Burden of Proof in Succession Disputes: Sardar Gurbaksh Singh v. Gurdial Singh

Date: Jul 20, 1927
Establishing the Burden of Proof in Succession Disputes: Sardar Gurbaksh Singh v. Gurdial Singh Introduction The case of Sardar Gurbaksh Singh v. Gurdial Singh adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Establishing the Parameters of a De Facto Guardian in Property Transactions: Insights from Harilal Ranchhod v. Gordhan Keshav

Establishing the Parameters of a De Facto Guardian in Property Transactions: Insights from Harilal Ranchhod v. Gordhan Keshav

Date: Jul 19, 1927
Establishing the Parameters of a De Facto Guardian in Property Transactions: Insights from Harilal Ranchhod v. Gordhan Keshav Introduction The case of Harilal Ranchhod v. Gordhan Keshav, adjudicated...
Alienability of Impartible Raj Estates by Will: Insights from Protap Chandra Deo v. Jagadish Chandra Deo

Alienability of Impartible Raj Estates by Will: Insights from Protap Chandra Deo v. Jagadish Chandra Deo

Date: May 4, 1927
Alienability of Impartible Raj Estates by Will: Insights from Protap Chandra Deo v. Jagadish Chandra Deo Introduction The case of Protap Chandra Deo v. Jagadish Chandra Deo adjudicated by the Bombay...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert