Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Indivisibility of Mortgage and Redemption Rights: Insights from Motilal Jadav v. Samal Bechar

Indivisibility of Mortgage and Redemption Rights: Insights from Motilal Jadav v. Samal Bechar

Date: Mar 29, 1930
Indivisibility of Mortgage and Redemption Rights: Insights from Motilal Jadav v. Samal Bechar 1. Introduction Motilal Jadav v. Samal Bechar is a landmark judgment delivered by the Bombay High Court...
Confirmation of Joint Tenancy Principles in Hindu Law: Martand Pandharinath Chaudhari v. Radhabai Krishnarao Deshmukh

Confirmation of Joint Tenancy Principles in Hindu Law: Martand Pandharinath Chaudhari v. Radhabai Krishnarao Deshmukh

Date: Mar 25, 1930
Confirmation of Joint Tenancy Principles in Hindu Law: Martand Pandharinath Chaudhari v. Radhabai Krishnarao Deshmukh Introduction The case of Martand Pandharinath Chaudhari v. Radhabai Krishnarao...
Conclusive Effect of Foreign Judgments and Scope of Attorney Powers: Ephrayim H. Ephrayim v. Turner Morrison & Co.

Conclusive Effect of Foreign Judgments and Scope of Attorney Powers: Ephrayim H. Ephrayim v. Turner Morrison & Co.

Date: Feb 28, 1930
Conclusive Effect of Foreign Judgments and Scope of Attorney Powers: Ephrayim H. Ephrayim v. Turner Morrison & Co. Introduction The case of Ephrayim H. Ephrayim v. Turner Morrison & Co. was...
Protecting Creditor Equality: Insights from Tulsidas Jasraj Parekh v. Industrial and Imperial Banks

Protecting Creditor Equality: Insights from Tulsidas Jasraj Parekh v. Industrial and Imperial Banks

Date: Feb 28, 1930
Protecting Creditor Equality: Insights from Tulsidas Jasraj Parekh v. Industrial and Imperial Banks Introduction The case of Tulsidas Jasraj Parekh v. (1) The Industrial Bank Of Western India, (2)...
Presumption of Lawful Origin in Wakf Istimrari Tenure: Mahammad Mazaffar Al Musavi v. Jabeda Khatun

Presumption of Lawful Origin in Wakf Istimrari Tenure: Mahammad Mazaffar Al Musavi v. Jabeda Khatun

Date: Jan 22, 1930
Presumption of Lawful Origin in Wakf Istimrari Tenure: Mahammad Mazaffar Al Musavi v. Jabeda Khatun Introduction The case of Mahammad Mazaffar Al Musavi v. Jabeda Khatun was adjudicated by the Bombay...
Rambaksh Lachmandas v. Bombay Cotton Company: Affirming Arbitration Jurisdiction in Cotton Transactions

Rambaksh Lachmandas v. Bombay Cotton Company: Affirming Arbitration Jurisdiction in Cotton Transactions

Date: Jan 11, 1930
Rambaksh Lachmandas v. Bombay Cotton Company: Affirming Arbitration Jurisdiction in Cotton Transactions Introduction The case of Rambaksh Lachmandas v. Bombay Cotton Company adjudicated by the Bombay...
Govind Narayan Kakade v. Rangnath Gopal Rajopadhye: A Landmark on Director Liability and Misfeasance in Banking

Govind Narayan Kakade v. Rangnath Gopal Rajopadhye: A Landmark on Director Liability and Misfeasance in Banking

Date: Nov 21, 1929
Govind Narayan Kakade v. Rangnath Gopal Rajopadhye: A Landmark on Director Liability and Misfeasance in Banking Introduction The case of Govind Narayan Kakade v. Rangnath Gopal Rajopadhye adjudicated...
Defining the Scope of Personal Law in Civil Marriages: Peter Philip Saldanha v. Anne Grace Saldanha

Defining the Scope of Personal Law in Civil Marriages: Peter Philip Saldanha v. Anne Grace Saldanha

Date: Sep 20, 1929
Defining the Scope of Personal Law in Civil Marriages: Peter Philip Saldanha v. Anne Grace Saldanha Introduction The case of Peter Philip Saldanha v. Anne Grace Saldanha adjudicated by the Bombay...
Emperor v. Ismail Hirji: Establishing Cognizability under the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887

Emperor v. Ismail Hirji: Establishing Cognizability under the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887

Date: Sep 5, 1929
Emperor v. Ismail Hirji: Establishing Cognizability under the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Introduction Emperor v. Ismail Hirji is a landmark judgment delivered by the Bombay High Court on...
Bhimji N. Dalal v. The Bombay Trust Corporation, Ltd.: Establishing Clear Boundaries in Hire-Purchase Agreements

Bhimji N. Dalal v. The Bombay Trust Corporation, Ltd.: Establishing Clear Boundaries in Hire-Purchase Agreements

Date: Jul 21, 1929
Bhimji N. Dalal v. The Bombay Trust Corporation, Ltd.: Establishing Clear Boundaries in Hire-Purchase Agreements Introduction The case Bhimji N. Dalal v. The Bombay Trust Corporation, Ltd....
Vallabhdas Naranji v. The Development Officer: Establishing Rights Over Government-Erected Structures in Land Acquisition Cases

Vallabhdas Naranji v. The Development Officer: Establishing Rights Over Government-Erected Structures in Land Acquisition Cases

Date: Apr 17, 1929
Vallabhdas Naranji v. The Development Officer: Establishing Rights Over Government-Erected Structures in Land Acquisition Cases Introduction Vallabhdas Naranji v. The Development Officer is a...
Abdulsakur Haji Rahimtulla v. Abubakkar Haji Abba: Upholding Residual Bequests under Mahomedan Law

Abdulsakur Haji Rahimtulla v. Abubakkar Haji Abba: Upholding Residual Bequests under Mahomedan Law

Date: Mar 28, 1929
Abdulsakur Haji Rahimtulla v. Abubakkar Haji Abba: Upholding Residual Bequests under Mahomedan Law Introduction The case of Abdulsakur Haji Rahimtulla And Others v. Abubakkar Haji Abba And Others...
Jurisdiction and Interpretation of Inam Grants under the Madras Estates Land Act: V. Seethayya v. P. Subramanya Somayajulu

Jurisdiction and Interpretation of Inam Grants under the Madras Estates Land Act: V. Seethayya v. P. Subramanya Somayajulu

Date: Feb 15, 1929
Jurisdiction and Interpretation of Inam Grants under the Madras Estates Land Act: V. Seethayya v. P. Subramanya Somayajulu Introduction V. Seethayya v. P. Subramanya Somayajulu is a seminal judgment...
Defining the Scope of Executing Courts: Insights from Lakshmibai Anant v. Ravji Bhikaji

Defining the Scope of Executing Courts: Insights from Lakshmibai Anant v. Ravji Bhikaji

Date: Nov 22, 1928
Defining the Scope of Executing Courts: Insights from Lakshmibai Anant v. Ravji Bhikaji 1. Introduction The landmark case of Lakshmibai Anant v. Ravji Bhikaji adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Ragho v. Zaga Ekoba: Guardianship and the Limits of Alienation of Minor's Property

Ragho v. Zaga Ekoba: Guardianship and the Limits of Alienation of Minor's Property

Date: Nov 20, 1928
Ragho v. Zaga Ekoba: Guardianship and the Limits of Alienation of Minor's Property Introduction Ragho v. Zaga Ekoba is a landmark judgment delivered by the Bombay High Court on November 19, 1928. The...
Madhavrao Anandrao Raste v. Omkareshvar Ghat: Clarifying the Scope of Section 92 CPC

Madhavrao Anandrao Raste v. Omkareshvar Ghat: Clarifying the Scope of Section 92 CPC

Date: Oct 31, 1928
Madhavrao Anandrao Raste v. Omkareshvar Ghat: Clarifying the Scope of Section 92 CPC Introduction Madhavrao Anandrao Raste v. Omkareshvar Ghat is a landmark case decided by the Bombay High Court on...
Rabia v. Agent, G.I.P. Railway: Clarifying Liability under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923

Rabia v. Agent, G.I.P. Railway: Clarifying Liability under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923

Date: Oct 2, 1928
Rabia v. Agent, G.I.P. Railway: Clarifying Liability under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 Introduction The case of Rabia v. Agent, G.I.P. Railway adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on October...
Establishing Easement by Prescription: Insights from Ramchandra Trimbak Joshi v. Hari Martand Joshi

Establishing Easement by Prescription: Insights from Ramchandra Trimbak Joshi v. Hari Martand Joshi

Date: Sep 29, 1928
Establishing Easement by Prescription: Insights from Ramchandra Trimbak Joshi v. Hari Martand Joshi Introduction The case of Ramchandra Trimbak Joshi v. Hari Martand Joshi, adjudicated by the Bombay...
Clarifying the Applicability of Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act: Punjabhai v. Bhagwandas Kisandas

Clarifying the Applicability of Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act: Punjabhai v. Bhagwandas Kisandas

Date: Sep 15, 1928
Clarifying the Applicability of Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act: Punjabhai v. Bhagwandas Kisandas Introduction The case of Punjabhai v. Bhagwandas Kisandas, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court...
Annamalai Chetty v. Subramanian Chetty: Clarifying Joint Family Property Rights Under Mitakshara Law

Annamalai Chetty v. Subramanian Chetty: Clarifying Joint Family Property Rights Under Mitakshara Law

Date: Sep 12, 1928
Annamalai Chetty v. Subramanian Chetty: Clarifying Joint Family Property Rights Under Mitakshara Law Introduction The case of Annamalai Chetty v. Subramanian Chetty was adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert