Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Jurisdictional Nuances in Partition Suits Involving Joint Hindu Families

Jurisdictional Nuances in Partition Suits Involving Joint Hindu Families

Date: Oct 9, 1951
Jurisdictional Nuances in Partition Suits Involving Joint Hindu Families Introduction The landmark case of Shiv Bhagwan Moti Ram Saraoji v. Onkarmal Ishar Dass And Others, adjudicated by the Bombay...
Comprehensive Commentary on Borough Municipality Of Amalner v. Pratap Spinning Weaving And Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

Comprehensive Commentary on Borough Municipality Of Amalner v. Pratap Spinning Weaving And Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

Date: Oct 9, 1951
Municipal Taxation and Procedural Compliance: Analysis of Borough Municipality Of Amalner v. Pratap Spinning Weaving And Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Introduction Borough Municipality Of Amalner v. Pratap...
Legal Commentary: Representation of Parties by Legal Practitioners in Arbitration Proceedings under Rule 36 of the Co-operative Societies Act

Legal Commentary: Representation of Parties by Legal Practitioners in Arbitration Proceedings under Rule 36 of the Co-operative Societies Act

Date: Oct 4, 1951
Representation of Parties by Legal Practitioners in Arbitration Proceedings under Rule 36 of the Co-operative Societies Act Introduction The case of Mulchand Gulabchand v. Mukund Shivram Bhide And...
Forfeiture of Contract Deposits Excluded from Section 74: Insights from Abba Gani And Co. v. Trustees Of The Port Of Bombay

Forfeiture of Contract Deposits Excluded from Section 74: Insights from Abba Gani And Co. v. Trustees Of The Port Of Bombay

Date: Sep 27, 1951
Forfeiture of Contract Deposits Excluded from Section 74: Insights from Abba Gani And Co. v. Trustees Of The Port Of Bombay Introduction The case of Abba Gani And Co. v. Trustees Of The Port Of...
Kirloskar Bros. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Recognition of Cheque as Taxable Income

Kirloskar Bros. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Recognition of Cheque as Taxable Income

Date: Sep 18, 1951
Recognition of Cheque as Taxable Income: Comprehensive Commentary on Kirloskar Bros. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax 1. Introduction Kirloskar Bros. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay...
Cambatta Principle: Distribution of Assessable Income in Private Companies

Cambatta Principle: Distribution of Assessable Income in Private Companies

Date: Sep 11, 1951
Cambatta Principle: Distribution of Assessable Income in Private Companies Introduction The case S.C. Cambatta & Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Central Legislature’s Authority to Tax Capital Gains: A Comprehensive Analysis of Col. Sir J.N. Duggan And Lady Jeena J. Duggan v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Central Legislature’s Authority to Tax Capital Gains: A Comprehensive Analysis of Col. Sir J.N. Duggan And Lady Jeena J. Duggan v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Sep 8, 1951
Central Legislature’s Authority to Tax Capital Gains: A Comprehensive Analysis of Col. Sir J.N. Duggan And Lady Jeena J. Duggan v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Col. Sir J.N....
Trusts for Familial Welfare: Defining Charitable Exemption under Section 4(3)(i) of the Income-tax Act

Trusts for Familial Welfare: Defining Charitable Exemption under Section 4(3)(i) of the Income-tax Act

Date: Sep 5, 1951
Trusts for Familial Welfare: Defining Charitable Exemption under Section 4(3)(i) of the Income-tax Act Introduction The case of Trustees Of Gordhandas Govindram Family Charity Trust, Navalgadh v....
Competency of Appeals to the Tribunal: Insights from K.K. Porbunderwalla v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City

Competency of Appeals to the Tribunal: Insights from K.K. Porbunderwalla v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City

Date: Aug 31, 1951
Competency of Appeals to the Tribunal: Insights from K.K. Porbunderwalla v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City Introduction The case of K.K. Porbunderwalla v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay...
Tribunal's Authority to Rectify Errors Under Section 35 and the Determination of Bad Debts: An Analysis of Sidhramappa Andannapa Manvi Assesses v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay

Tribunal's Authority to Rectify Errors Under Section 35 and the Determination of Bad Debts: An Analysis of Sidhramappa Andannapa Manvi Assesses v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay

Date: Aug 29, 1951
Tribunal's Authority to Rectify Errors Under Section 35 and the Determination of Bad Debts: An Analysis of Sidhramappa Andannapa Manvi Assesses v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay Introduction The...
Authority's Jurisdiction Over Unauthorized Wage Deductions under the Payment of Wages Act: Insights from K.P Mushran v. B.C Patil

Authority's Jurisdiction Over Unauthorized Wage Deductions under the Payment of Wages Act: Insights from K.P Mushran v. B.C Patil

Date: Aug 25, 1951
Authority's Jurisdiction Over Unauthorized Wage Deductions under the Payment of Wages Act: Insights from K.P Mushran v. B.C Patil Introduction The landmark case of K.P Mushran, General Manager B.B &...
Clarification on Cross-Objections Post-Appeal Dismissal under Trade Marks Act: Mohamed Oomer v. S.M Noorudin

Clarification on Cross-Objections Post-Appeal Dismissal under Trade Marks Act: Mohamed Oomer v. S.M Noorudin

Date: Aug 14, 1951
Clarification on Cross-Objections Post-Appeal Dismissal under Trade Marks Act: Mohamed Oomer v. S.M Noorudin Introduction The case of Mohamed Oomer, Mohamed Noorullah v. S.M Noorudin, adjudicated by...
Limitation of Appeals under the Arbitration Act: Insights from Madhavdas Devidas Punekar v. Vithaldas Vasudevdas Punekar

Limitation of Appeals under the Arbitration Act: Insights from Madhavdas Devidas Punekar v. Vithaldas Vasudevdas Punekar

Date: Aug 10, 1951
Limitation of Appeals under the Arbitration Act: Insights from Madhavdas Devidas Punekar v. Vithaldas Vasudevdas Punekar Introduction The case of Madhavdas Devidas Punekar And Others v. Vithaldas...
Jurisdiction of High Court in Winding Up of Banking Companies: Associated Banking Corporation of India v. Nazaralli Kassambhai And Co.

Jurisdiction of High Court in Winding Up of Banking Companies: Associated Banking Corporation of India v. Nazaralli Kassambhai And Co.

Date: Aug 10, 1951
Expansion of High Court Jurisdiction in Banking Company Winding Up Proceedings Introduction The case of Associated Banking Corporation of India, Ltd. v. Nazaralli Kassambhai And Co. adjudicated by...
Judicial Interpretation of Charge Joinder under Sections 233-236 of the Criminal Procedure Code: D.K Chandra v. The State

Judicial Interpretation of Charge Joinder under Sections 233-236 of the Criminal Procedure Code: D.K Chandra v. The State

Date: Aug 4, 1951
Judicial Interpretation of Charge Joinder under Sections 233-236 of the Criminal Procedure Code: D.K Chandra v. The State Introduction The case of D.K Chandra v. The State adjudicated by the Bombay...
Exclusion of Time Between Judgment Pronouncement and Decree Signing Under Section 12(2) of the Indian Limitation Act

Exclusion of Time Between Judgment Pronouncement and Decree Signing Under Section 12(2) of the Indian Limitation Act

Date: Aug 1, 1951
Exclusion of Time Between Judgment Pronouncement and Decree Signing Under Section 12(2) of the Indian Limitation Act Introduction The case of Jayashankar Mulshankar Mehta v. Shah Mayabhai Lalbhai...
The State Of Bombay v. Heman Santlal Alreja: Requisition, Acquisition, and Constitutional Validity

The State Of Bombay v. Heman Santlal Alreja: Requisition, Acquisition, and Constitutional Validity

Date: Jul 25, 1951
Requisition, Acquisition, and Constitutional Validity: An Analysis of The State Of Bombay v. Heman Santlal Alreja (1951) Introduction The State Of Bombay v. Heman Santlal Alreja, adjudicated by the...
Bombay High Court Affirms Constitutionality of the Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, 1946

Bombay High Court Affirms Constitutionality of the Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, 1946

Date: Jul 25, 1951
Bombay High Court Affirms Constitutionality of the Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, 1946 Introduction The landmark case, The State Of Bombay v. Narasu Appa Mali Accused, adjudicated by the...
Trustee Accountability and Bona Fide Purchaser Principles in Property Transactions

Trustee Accountability and Bona Fide Purchaser Principles in Property Transactions

Date: Jul 13, 1951
Trustee Accountability and Bona Fide Purchaser Principles in Property Transactions Introduction The case of Ramabai Govind Gadre v. Raghunath Vasudeo Joshi adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Section 497 IPC and Constitutional Challenges: Insights from Yusuf Abdul Ajiz v. The State

Section 497 IPC and Constitutional Challenges: Insights from Yusuf Abdul Ajiz v. The State

Date: Jun 27, 1951
Section 497 IPC and Constitutional Challenges: Insights from Yusuf Abdul Ajiz v. The State Introduction The case of Yusuf Abdul Ajiz v. The State, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on June 26,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert