Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Impact of Res Judicata on Income-Tax Tribunal Decisions: Analysis of Messrs H.A. Shah & Co. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Impact of Res Judicata on Income-Tax Tribunal Decisions: Analysis of Messrs H.A. Shah & Co. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Sep 14, 1955
Impact of Res Judicata on Income-Tax Tribunal Decisions: Analysis of Messrs H.A. Shah & Co. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Messrs H.A. Shah & Co. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax...
Ad Valorem Court Fees on Appeals Under the Displaced Persons (Debts Adjustment) Act: A Landmark Judgment

Ad Valorem Court Fees on Appeals Under the Displaced Persons (Debts Adjustment) Act: A Landmark Judgment

Date: Sep 13, 1955
Ad Valorem Court Fees on Appeals Under the Displaced Persons (Debts Adjustment) Act: A Landmark Judgment Introduction This commentary examines the judicial decision in Taxing Officer, High Court...
Bombay High Court Rules Against Additional Tax on Excess Dividends for Loss-Making Company

Bombay High Court Rules Against Additional Tax on Excess Dividends for Loss-Making Company

Date: Sep 10, 1955
Bombay High Court Rules Against Additional Tax on Excess Dividends for Loss-Making Company Introduction The case of Elphinstone Spinning & Weaving Mills Company, Ltd., Bombay v. Commissioner Of...
Limitation of Defenses in Execution Proceedings Against Firm Partners Under Order 21, Rule 50(2) of the Civil Procedure Code

Limitation of Defenses in Execution Proceedings Against Firm Partners Under Order 21, Rule 50(2) of the Civil Procedure Code

Date: Aug 20, 1955
Limitation of Defenses in Execution Proceedings Against Firm Partners Under Order 21, Rule 50(2) of the Civil Procedure Code Introduction The case of Rana Harkishandas Lallubhai And Others v. Rana...
Reduced Customs Duty on Fountain Pens: Collector Of Customs, Bombay v. Ramchand Sobhraj Wadhwani

Reduced Customs Duty on Fountain Pens: Collector Of Customs, Bombay v. Ramchand Sobhraj Wadhwani

Date: Aug 20, 1955
Reduced Customs Duty on Fountain Pens: Collector Of Customs, Bombay v. Ramchand Sobhraj Wadhwani Introduction The case of Collector Of Customs, Bombay v. Ramchand Sobhraj Wadhwani deals with the...
Clarification on Contingent Contracts under the Bombay Securities Contracts Control Act: Jethalal C. Thakkar v. R.N. Kapur

Clarification on Contingent Contracts under the Bombay Securities Contracts Control Act: Jethalal C. Thakkar v. R.N. Kapur

Date: Aug 13, 1955
Clarification on Contingent Contracts under the Bombay Securities Contracts Control Act Jethalal C. Thakkar v. R.N. Kapur (Bombay High Court, 1955) Introduction The case of Jethalal C. Thakkar v....
Jurisdictional Clarity in Loan Recovery: Insights from Bharumal Udhomal v. Sakhawatmal Veshomal

Jurisdictional Clarity in Loan Recovery: Insights from Bharumal Udhomal v. Sakhawatmal Veshomal

Date: Jul 28, 1955
Jurisdictional Clarity in Loan Recovery: Insights from Bharumal Udhomal v. Sakhawatmal Veshomal Introduction The case of Bharumal Udhomal And Others v. Sakhawatmal Veshomal And Others, adjudicated by...
Prosecutorial Discretion in Multi-Enactment Offences: A Comprehensive Analysis of State v. Pandurang Sangare

Prosecutorial Discretion in Multi-Enactment Offences: A Comprehensive Analysis of State v. Pandurang Sangare

Date: Apr 23, 1955
Prosecutorial Discretion in Multi-Enactment Offences: A Comprehensive Analysis of State v. Pandurang Sangare Introduction The case of State v. Pandurang Sangare, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court...
Clarifying the Scope of Section 12(2): Deductibility of Interest on Borrowed Funds for Personal Expenditures - Bai Bhuriben Lallubhai v. The Commissioner of Income Tax

Clarifying the Scope of Section 12(2): Deductibility of Interest on Borrowed Funds for Personal Expenditures - Bai Bhuriben Lallubhai v. The Commissioner of Income Tax

Date: Apr 22, 1955
Clarifying the Scope of Section 12(2): Deductibility of Interest on Borrowed Funds for Personal Expenditures Introduction Bai Bhuriben Lallubhai v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Bombay North is a...
Strict Interpretation of Limitation Periods: Charity Commissioner v. Padmavati And Others

Strict Interpretation of Limitation Periods: Charity Commissioner v. Padmavati And Others

Date: Apr 16, 1955
Strict Interpretation of Limitation Periods: Charity Commissioner v. Padmavati And Others Introduction The case of Charity Commissioner v. Padmavati And Others was adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Authority of Counsel in Compromise: Insights from Laxmidas Ranchhoddas v. Savitribai Hargovandas Shah

Authority of Counsel in Compromise: Insights from Laxmidas Ranchhoddas v. Savitribai Hargovandas Shah

Date: Apr 1, 1955
Authority of Counsel in Compromise: Insights from Laxmidas Ranchhoddas v. Savitribai Hargovandas Shah Introduction The case of Laxmidas Ranchhoddas v. Savitribai Hargovandas Shah adjudicated by the...
Section 86 CPI: Immunity of Former Indian State Rulers Limited to Suits

Section 86 CPI: Immunity of Former Indian State Rulers Limited to Suits

Date: Mar 18, 1955
Section 86 CPI: Immunity of Former Indian State Rulers Limited to Suits Introduction The case of Maharaj Indrajitsinghji Vijaysinghji v. H.H Maharaja Rajendrasinghji Vijaysinghji, adjudicated by the...
Comprehensive Analysis of Bapubhai Ratanchand Shah v. The State of Bombay: Upholding Agricultural Market Regulations

Comprehensive Analysis of Bapubhai Ratanchand Shah v. The State of Bombay: Upholding Agricultural Market Regulations

Date: Mar 4, 1955
Comprehensive Analysis of Bapubhai Ratanchand Shah v. The State of Bombay: Upholding Agricultural Market Regulations Introduction The case of Bapubhai Ratanchand Shah and Another v. The State of...
Alimony to Deserting Wives under the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hormusji M. Kalapesi v. Dinbai H. Kalapesi (1955)

Alimony to Deserting Wives under the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hormusji M. Kalapesi v. Dinbai H. Kalapesi (1955)

Date: Feb 26, 1955
Alimony to Deserting Wives under the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hormusji M. Kalapesi v. Dinbai H. Kalapesi (1955) Introduction The case of Hormusji M. Kalapesi v....
No Tax Deduction for Expenses Arising from Unlawful Acts: Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hahi Aziz & Abdul Sakoor Brothers

No Tax Deduction for Expenses Arising from Unlawful Acts: Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hahi Aziz & Abdul Sakoor Brothers

Date: Feb 26, 1955
No Tax Deduction for Expenses Arising from Unlawful Acts: Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bombay City, Ii v. Hahi Aziz & Abdul Sakoor Brothers, Bombay Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax,...
Balabhau Manaji v. Nandanvar: Safeguarding Constitutional Equality in Retrospective Legislation

Balabhau Manaji v. Nandanvar: Safeguarding Constitutional Equality in Retrospective Legislation

Date: Feb 24, 1955
Balabhau Manaji v. Bapuji Satwaji Nandanvar: Safeguarding Constitutional Equality in Retrospective Legislation Introduction The landmark case of Balabhau Manaji v. Bapuji Satwaji Nandanvar And Others...
Presumption of Due Execution in Mortgage Deeds: Kashibai Martand Wadekar v. Vinayak Ganesh Malwadkar

Presumption of Due Execution in Mortgage Deeds: Kashibai Martand Wadekar v. Vinayak Ganesh Malwadkar

Date: Feb 23, 1955
Presumption of Due Execution in Mortgage Deeds: Kashibai Martand Wadekar v. Vinayak Ganesh Malwadkar (1955) Introduction The case of Kashibai Martand Wadekar v. Vinayak Ganesh Malwadkar adjudicated...
Assessment of Partners in Unregistered Firms under Section 3 of the Income Tax Act – Commentary on J.C. Thakkar v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Assessment of Partners in Unregistered Firms under Section 3 of the Income Tax Act – Commentary on J.C. Thakkar v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Feb 19, 1955
Assessment of Partners in Unregistered Firms under Section 3 of the Income Tax Act Commentary on J.C. Thakkar v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central, Bombay Introduction The case of J.C. Thakkar v....
Recognition of Employee Embezzlement as Trading Loss under Income Tax Act: Lord'S Dairy Farm, Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Recognition of Employee Embezzlement as Trading Loss under Income Tax Act: Lord'S Dairy Farm, Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Feb 18, 1955
Recognition of Employee Embezzlement as Trading Loss under Income Tax Act: Lord'S Dairy Farm, Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Lord'S Dairy Farm, Ltd. v. Commissioner Of...
Adopted Son's Right to Divest Vested Property: Insights from Ramchandra Hanmant Kulkarni v. Balaji Datto Kulkarni

Adopted Son's Right to Divest Vested Property: Insights from Ramchandra Hanmant Kulkarni v. Balaji Datto Kulkarni

Date: Feb 3, 1955
Adopted Son's Right to Divest Vested Property: Insights from Ramchandra Hanmant Kulkarni v. Balaji Datto Kulkarni Introduction The case of Ramchandra Hanmant Kulkarni v. Balaji Datto Kulkarni was...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert