Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Clarifying the Impact of Dishonoured Cheques on Limitation: Chintaman Dhundiraj v. Sadguru Narayan Maharaj Datta Sansthan

Clarifying the Impact of Dishonoured Cheques on Limitation: Chintaman Dhundiraj v. Sadguru Narayan Maharaj Datta Sansthan

Date: Mar 13, 1956
Clarifying the Impact of Dishonoured Cheques on Limitation: Chintaman Dhundiraj v. Sadguru Narayan Maharaj Datta Sansthan Introduction The case of Chintaman Dhundiraj v. Sadguru Narayan Maharaj Datta...
Assessment of Widows as an Association of Persons under Section 9(3) - Indira Balkrishna v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Assessment of Widows as an Association of Persons under Section 9(3) - Indira Balkrishna v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Mar 8, 1956
Assessment of Widows as an Association of Persons under Section 9(3) - Indira Balkrishna v. Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Indira Balkrishna Manager Of Estate Of Balkrishna...
Market Value Principle in Business Profit Assessment – Commissioner of Income Tax v. K. Kooka

Market Value Principle in Business Profit Assessment – Commissioner of Income Tax v. K. Kooka

Date: Mar 7, 1956
Market Value Principle in Business Profit Assessment – Commissioner of Income Tax v. K. Kooka Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income Tax Bombay City I v. Bai Shirinbai K. Kooka, adjudicated...
Recognition of Current Repairs Expenditure under Section 10(2)(v): Insights from New Shorrock Spinning And Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Ahmedabad v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Recognition of Current Repairs Expenditure under Section 10(2)(v): Insights from New Shorrock Spinning And Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Ahmedabad v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Feb 28, 1956
Recognition of Current Repairs Expenditure under Section 10(2)(v): Insights from New Shorrock Spinning And Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Ahmedabad v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of New...
Recognition of Minor Partners Under Section 26A of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Dwarkadas Khetan & Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Recognition of Minor Partners Under Section 26A of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Dwarkadas Khetan & Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Feb 24, 1956
Recognition of Minor Partners Under Section 26A of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Dwarkadas Khetan & Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Dwarkadas Khetan & Co., Bombay v....
Shrinivas Ganesh v. Union of India: Defining the Rights of Temporary Government Servants

Shrinivas Ganesh v. Union of India: Defining the Rights of Temporary Government Servants

Date: Feb 17, 1956
Shrinivas Ganesh v. Union of India: Defining the Rights of Temporary Government Servants Introduction The case of Shrinivas Ganesh v. Union of India (Bombay High Court, 1956) addresses the critical...
Defining "Dealer" Under the Bombay Sales Tax Act: Insights from The State Of Bombay v. The Ahmedabad Education Society

Defining "Dealer" Under the Bombay Sales Tax Act: Insights from The State Of Bombay v. The Ahmedabad Education Society

Date: Feb 4, 1956
Defining "Dealer" Under the Bombay Sales Tax Act: Insights from The State Of Bombay v. The Ahmedabad Education Society Introduction The case of The State Of Bombay v. The Ahmedabad Education Society...
Ratilal Jasraj Accused v. The State: Setting Precedent for Transfer of Proceedings on Reasonable Apprehension of Bias Due to Magistrate's Dual Capacity

Ratilal Jasraj Accused v. The State: Setting Precedent for Transfer of Proceedings on Reasonable Apprehension of Bias Due to Magistrate's Dual Capacity

Date: Jan 19, 1956
Ratilal Jasraj Accused v. The State: Setting Precedent for Transfer of Proceedings on Reasonable Apprehension of Bias Due to Magistrate's Dual Capacity Introduction The case of Ratilal Jasraj Accused...
Affirmation of Wife's Inchoate Share in Unauthorized Alienation of Joint Hindu Family Property

Affirmation of Wife's Inchoate Share in Unauthorized Alienation of Joint Hindu Family Property

Date: Dec 23, 1955
Affirmation of Wife's Inchoate Share in Unauthorized Alienation of Joint Hindu Family Property Introduction The case of Parappa Ningappa Khaded And Another v. Mallappa Kallappa And Others adjudicated...
Non-Applicability of Section 109 and Rent Act in Municipal Possession Cases: Ram Bhagwandas v. Bombay Municipal Corporation

Non-Applicability of Section 109 and Rent Act in Municipal Possession Cases: Ram Bhagwandas v. Bombay Municipal Corporation

Date: Dec 3, 1955
Non-Applicability of Section 109 and Rent Act in Municipal Possession Cases: Ram Bhagwandas v. Bombay Municipal Corporation Introduction The case of Ram Bhagwandas v. Municipal Corporation Of The...
Clarifying Revisional Jurisdiction under the Evacuee Property Act: K.B Sipahimalani v. Fidahussein Vallibhoy

Clarifying Revisional Jurisdiction under the Evacuee Property Act: K.B Sipahimalani v. Fidahussein Vallibhoy

Date: Nov 29, 1955
Clarifying Revisional Jurisdiction under the Evacuee Property Act: K.B Sipahimalani v. Fidahussein Vallibhoy Introduction The case of K.B Sipahimalani v. Fidahussein Vallibhoy was adjudicated by the...
Lay-off Compensation Not Classified as Wages for Special Contributions under ESI Act

Lay-off Compensation Not Classified as Wages for Special Contributions under ESI Act

Date: Nov 24, 1955
Lay-off Compensation Not Classified as Wages for Special Contributions under ESI Act Introduction In the landmark case of Nutan Mills v. Employees State Insurance Corporation, adjudicated by the...
Judicial Clarification on Municipal Taxation Authority and Procedural Compliance under the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act

Judicial Clarification on Municipal Taxation Authority and Procedural Compliance under the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act

Date: Nov 17, 1955
Judicial Clarification on Municipal Taxation Authority and Procedural Compliance under the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act Introduction The case of Gopal Mills Co. Ltd. v. The Broach Borough...
Establishing Panchas as Independent Witnesses: Comprehensive Analysis of Ramchand Khatri v. The State

Establishing Panchas as Independent Witnesses: Comprehensive Analysis of Ramchand Khatri v. The State

Date: Oct 14, 1955
Establishing Panchas as Independent Witnesses: Comprehensive Analysis of Ramchand Khatri v. The State Introduction Ramchand Tolaram Khatri And Another Accused v. The State is a landmark judgment...
Interpretation of Act 33 of 1952 in Tenancy Law: Durlabhai Fakirbhai v. Jhaverbhai Bhikhabhai

Interpretation of Act 33 of 1952 in Tenancy Law: Durlabhai Fakirbhai v. Jhaverbhai Bhikhabhai

Date: Oct 13, 1955
Interpretation of Act 33 of 1952 in Tenancy Law: Durlabhai Fakirbhai v. Jhaverbhai Bhikhabhai 1. Introduction The case of Durlabhai Fakirbhai v. Jhaverbhai Bhikhabhai was adjudicated by the Bombay...
High Court Reinforces Mandatory Death Penalty in Premeditated Murder Cases

High Court Reinforces Mandatory Death Penalty in Premeditated Murder Cases

Date: Oct 11, 1955
High Court Reinforces Mandatory Death Penalty in Premeditated Murder Cases Introduction The case of State v. Pandurang Tatyasaheb Shinde Accused adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on October 10,...
Limitation Periods and Constitutional Validity in Income Tax Assessments: Insights from S.C Prashar v. Vasantsen Dwarkadas (1955)

Limitation Periods and Constitutional Validity in Income Tax Assessments: Insights from S.C Prashar v. Vasantsen Dwarkadas (1955)

Date: Oct 6, 1955
Limitation Periods and Constitutional Validity in Income Tax Assessments: Insights from S.C Prashar v. Vasantsen Dwarkadas And Others (1955) Introduction The case of S.C Prashar And Another v....
Non-Taxability of Self-Directed Share Transfers: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Late Sir Homi Mehta

Non-Taxability of Self-Directed Share Transfers: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Late Sir Homi Mehta

Date: Sep 23, 1955
Non-Taxability of Self-Directed Share Transfers: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Late Sir Homi Mehta Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax Excess Profits Tax, Bombay City v....
Validating Compromise Agreements in Partition Suits: A Commentary on Misrilal Jalamchand v. Sobhachand Jalamchand

Validating Compromise Agreements in Partition Suits: A Commentary on Misrilal Jalamchand v. Sobhachand Jalamchand

Date: Sep 16, 1955
Validating Compromise Agreements in Partition Suits: A Commentary on Misrilal Jalamchand v. Sobhachand Jalamchand Introduction Misrilal Jalamchand and Another v. Sobhachand Jalamchand and Others is a...
Re-defining Section 16(3) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Bhogilal Laherchand v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Re-defining Section 16(3) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Bhogilal Laherchand v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Sep 16, 1955
Re-defining Section 16(3) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Bhogilal Laherchand v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case Bhogilal Laherchand v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert