Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Clarifying Section 263 Revisional Powers: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax Central-III v. Shri Nirav Modi

Clarifying Section 263 Revisional Powers: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax Central-III v. Shri Nirav Modi

Date: Jun 17, 2016
Clarifying Section 263 Revisional Powers: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax Central-III v. Shri Nirav Modi 1. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-III v. Shri Nirav Modi...
Prospective Application of Amended Section 36 in Arbitration Act: Balancing Award Enforcement and Challenges

Prospective Application of Amended Section 36 in Arbitration Act: Balancing Award Enforcement and Challenges

Date: Jun 15, 2016
Prospective Application of Amended Section 36 in Arbitration Act: Balancing Award Enforcement and Challenges Introduction The case of Rendezvous Sports World v. Board Of Control For Cricket In India...
Court Upholds Continued Registration of Trust Despite Commercial Activities

Court Upholds Continued Registration of Trust Despite Commercial Activities

Date: Jun 7, 2016
Court Upholds Continued Registration of Trust Despite Commercial Activities Introduction The case of Dit (Exemptions) v. M/S. Khar Gymkhana was adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on June 6, 2016....
Exclusion of Criminal Proceedings Under Section 138 N.I. Act from 'Suit or Other Proceedings' in Section 446(1) Companies Act

Exclusion of Criminal Proceedings Under Section 138 N.I. Act from 'Suit or Other Proceedings' in Section 446(1) Companies Act

Date: May 7, 2016
Exclusion of Criminal Proceedings Under Section 138 N.I. Act from 'Suit or Other Proceedings' in Section 446(1) Companies Act Introduction The case of Indorama Synthetics (I) Ltd., Nagpur v. State Of...
Mandatory NOC from Defence Authorities for Development Near Military Installations: Union Of India v. State Of Maharashtra

Mandatory NOC from Defence Authorities for Development Near Military Installations: Union Of India v. State Of Maharashtra

Date: Apr 30, 2016
Mandatory NOC from Defence Authorities for Development Near Military Installations: Union Of India v. State Of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Union Of India v. State Of Maharashtra adjudicated...
Service Date Interpretation in TBPS and ACPS Schemes: Bombay High Court Upholds Counting from Initial Appointment

Service Date Interpretation in TBPS and ACPS Schemes: Bombay High Court Upholds Counting from Initial Appointment

Date: Apr 29, 2016
Service Date Interpretation in TBPS and ACPS Schemes: Bombay High Court Upholds Counting from Initial Appointment Introduction In the landmark case of The State Of Maharashtra Petitioner v. Smt....
Interest Calculation in Land Acquisition: Insights from State Of Maharashtra v. Kailash Shiva Rangari

Interest Calculation in Land Acquisition: Insights from State Of Maharashtra v. Kailash Shiva Rangari

Date: Apr 19, 2016
Interest Calculation in Land Acquisition: Insights from State Of Maharashtra v. Kailash Shiva Rangari Introduction The case of State Of Maharashtra v. Kailash Shiva Rangari adjudicated by the Bombay...
Edit II Productions v. Standard Chartered Bank: Establishing Robust Measures Against Corporate Fraud

Edit II Productions v. Standard Chartered Bank: Establishing Robust Measures Against Corporate Fraud

Date: Apr 14, 2016
Edit II Productions v. Standard Chartered Bank: Establishing Robust Measures Against Corporate Fraud Introduction Edit II Productions, a Bombay High Court case decided on April 13, 2016, addresses...
Affirmation of Broad Arbitrability in Multi-Party Agreements under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Eros v Telemax

Affirmation of Broad Arbitrability in Multi-Party Agreements under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Eros v Telemax

Date: Apr 13, 2016
Affirmation of Broad Arbitrability in Multi-Party Agreements under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Eros v Telemax Introduction The case of Eros International Media Limited v. Telemax Links...
Bombay High Court Affirms Civil Court Jurisdiction Over MOFA Conveyance Disputes

Bombay High Court Affirms Civil Court Jurisdiction Over MOFA Conveyance Disputes

Date: Apr 12, 2016
Bombay High Court Affirms Civil Court Jurisdiction Over MOFA Conveyance Disputes Introduction The case Eksar Laxmi Narayan (Building No. 1) Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. v. M/S. Laxmi Narayan...
Legitimacy of Children in Compassionate Appointments: Union of India vs V.R. Tripathi

Legitimacy of Children in Compassionate Appointments: Union of India vs V.R. Tripathi

Date: Apr 2, 2016
Legitimacy of Children in Compassionate Appointments: Union of India vs V.R. Tripathi Introduction The case of Union of India and Another v. V.R. Tripathi adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Finality of Judicial Decisions Precludes SARFAESI Enforcement: Shivabassappa I. Kankanwadi v. Mapusa Urban Co-Operative Bank Of Goa Ltd.

Finality of Judicial Decisions Precludes SARFAESI Enforcement: Shivabassappa I. Kankanwadi v. Mapusa Urban Co-Operative Bank Of Goa Ltd.

Date: Mar 18, 2016
Finality of Judicial Decisions Precludes SARFAESI Enforcement: Shivabassappa I. Kankanwadi v. Mapusa Urban Co-Operative Bank Of Goa Ltd. Introduction In the landmark case of Shivabassappa I....
Doctrine of Acquiescence in Trademark Law: Essel Propack Ltd. v. Essel Kitchenware Ltd. – A Comprehensive Analysis

Doctrine of Acquiescence in Trademark Law: Essel Propack Ltd. v. Essel Kitchenware Ltd. – A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Mar 12, 2016
Doctrine of Acquiescence in Trademark Law: Essel Propack Ltd. v. Essel Kitchenware Ltd. – A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of Essel Propack Ltd. v. Essel Kitchenware Ltd. adjudicated by...
Ganesh Pandurang Jadhao v. State Of Maharashtra: Clarifying the Scope of FSS Act 2006 and IPC Provisions

Ganesh Pandurang Jadhao v. State Of Maharashtra: Clarifying the Scope of FSS Act 2006 and IPC Provisions

Date: Mar 5, 2016
Ganesh Pandurang Jadhao v. State Of Maharashtra: Clarifying the Scope of FSS Act 2006 and IPC Provisions Introduction In the landmark case of Ganesh Pandurang Jadhao v. State Of Maharashtra, the...
Maharashtra High Court Expands Pension Entitlements for Transitioning Daily Wage Employees

Maharashtra High Court Expands Pension Entitlements for Transitioning Daily Wage Employees

Date: Mar 4, 2016
Maharashtra High Court Expands Pension Entitlements for Transitioning Daily Wage Employees Introduction The case of Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth v. Ganpat adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Doctrine of Precedent Reinforced in HDFC Bank Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Doctrine of Precedent Reinforced in HDFC Bank Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Date: Feb 26, 2016
Doctrine of Precedent Reinforced in HDFC Bank Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Introduction The case of HDFC Bank Ltd. Mumbai vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-2(3), Mumbai & Ors....
Bombay High Court Upholds Expeditious Trial Procedures Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Bombay High Court Upholds Expeditious Trial Procedures Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Date: Feb 13, 2016
Bombay High Court Upholds Expeditious Trial Procedures Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Introduction In the case of Dr. Rajul Ketan Raj v. Reliance Capital Ltd. And Another,...
Deletion of Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c): Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. Shri. Hiralal Doshi

Deletion of Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c): Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. Shri. Hiralal Doshi

Date: Feb 10, 2016
Deletion of Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c): Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. Shri. Hiralal Doshi Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 v. Shri. Hiralal Doshi...
Compassionate Appointment Rights under Government Resolutions: A Comprehensive Analysis of The Chief Officer v. The Director

Compassionate Appointment Rights under Government Resolutions: A Comprehensive Analysis of The Chief Officer v. The Director

Date: Feb 10, 2016
Compassionate Appointment Rights under Government Resolutions: A Comprehensive Analysis of The Chief Officer v. The Director Introduction The Chief Officer v. The Director is a landmark case...
Mrb Roadconst. Pvt. Ltd. v. Rupee Co-Op. Bank Ltd.: Defining the Scope of 'Debt' Under SARFAESI Act

Mrb Roadconst. Pvt. Ltd. v. Rupee Co-Op. Bank Ltd.: Defining the Scope of 'Debt' Under SARFAESI Act

Date: Feb 6, 2016
Mrb Roadconst. Pvt. Ltd. v. Rupee Co-Op. Bank Ltd.: Defining the Scope of 'Debt' Under SARFAESI Act Introduction The case of Mrb Roadconst. Pvt. Ltd. v. Rupee Co-Op. Bank Ltd. adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert