Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Enhanced Guidelines for Transfer Pricing Comparable Selection in Income Tax Assessments

Enhanced Guidelines for Transfer Pricing Comparable Selection in Income Tax Assessments

Date: Sep 27, 2016
Enhanced Guidelines for Transfer Pricing Comparable Selection in Income Tax Assessments Introduction In the landmark case of Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Pune v. PTC Software (I) Pvt. Ltd., the...
Enhanced Compensation Standards in Land Acquisition: The Precedent of Koli-Kopar v. State of Maharashtra

Enhanced Compensation Standards in Land Acquisition: The Precedent of Koli-Kopar v. State of Maharashtra

Date: Sep 23, 2016
Enhanced Compensation Standards in Land Acquisition: The Precedent of Koli-Kopar v. State of Maharashtra Introduction The case of State of Maharashtra v. M.R. Koli by His Heirs and Others is a...
Bombay High Court Sets Compensation for Land Acquisition at ₹25 per Sq.M in Koli-Kopar

Bombay High Court Sets Compensation for Land Acquisition at ₹25 per Sq.M in Koli-Kopar

Date: Sep 23, 2016
Bombay High Court Sets Compensation for Land Acquisition at ₹25 per Sq.M in Koli-Kopar Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Maharashtra v. Shri. Atmaram Kashinath Pawar, the Bombay High...
Rs.25/sqm Compensation Rate Established for Land Acquisition in Adjacent Areas: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. GOPAL ARJUN PATIL (DECD.) BY HEIRS

Rs.25/sqm Compensation Rate Established for Land Acquisition in Adjacent Areas: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. GOPAL ARJUN PATIL (DECD.) BY HEIRS

Date: Sep 23, 2016
Rs.25/sqm Compensation Rate Established for Land Acquisition in Adjacent Areas: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. GOPAL ARJUN PATIL (DECD.) BY HEIRS Introduction The case of The State of Maharashtra v....
Establishing Rs.25/sqm Compensation in Land Acquisition: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. CHANGA H.PATIL

Establishing Rs.25/sqm Compensation in Land Acquisition: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. CHANGA H.PATIL

Date: Sep 23, 2016
Establishing Rs.25/sqm Compensation in Land Acquisition: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. CHANGA H.PATIL Introduction The case of The State of Maharashtra v. Changa H. Patil adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Bombay High Court Establishes Rs.25/sq.m Compensation Standard in Land Acquisition for New Bombay Satellite City

Bombay High Court Establishes Rs.25/sq.m Compensation Standard in Land Acquisition for New Bombay Satellite City

Date: Sep 23, 2016
Bombay High Court Establishes Rs.25/sq.m Compensation Standard in Land Acquisition for New Bombay Satellite City Introduction The case of The State of Maharashtra v. Janardhan S. Naik heard by the...
Multi-Member Ward System Upholds Constitutional Principles in Ambedkarite Party Of India v. State Of Maharashtra

Multi-Member Ward System Upholds Constitutional Principles in Ambedkarite Party Of India v. State Of Maharashtra

Date: Sep 17, 2016
Multi-Member Ward System Upholds Constitutional Principles in Ambedkarite Party Of India v. State Of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Ambedkarite Party Of India, Nagpur v. State Of Maharashtra...
Defining Domain Name Distinctiveness: Insights from People Interactive (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Vivek Pahwa

Defining Domain Name Distinctiveness: Insights from People Interactive (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Vivek Pahwa

Date: Sep 15, 2016
Defining Domain Name Distinctiveness: Insights from People Interactive (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Vivek Pahwa, Bombay High Court Introduction The case of People Interactive (India) Private Limited v. Vivek...
Strict Compliance with Section 5(1) of MEPS Act: Landmark Decision in Vasant Shikshan Prasarak Mandal v. State of Maharashtra

Strict Compliance with Section 5(1) of MEPS Act: Landmark Decision in Vasant Shikshan Prasarak Mandal v. State of Maharashtra

Date: Sep 1, 2016
Strict Compliance with Section 5(1) of MEPS Act: Landmark Decision in Vasant Shikshan Prasarak Mandal v. State of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Vasant Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Through Its...
Protection Against Arbitrary Withdrawal of Appointment Approvals: Bombay High Court Upholds Inclusive Education Standards

Protection Against Arbitrary Withdrawal of Appointment Approvals: Bombay High Court Upholds Inclusive Education Standards

Date: Aug 26, 2016
Protection Against Arbitrary Withdrawal of Appointment Approvals: Bombay High Court Upholds Inclusive Education Standards Introduction The case of Shaikhoddin Hasnoddin Shaikh v. The Union of India...
Groundbreaking Ruling: Payment of Gratuity Act Applicability to Daily Wage Workers and Interest for Delayed Payments

Groundbreaking Ruling: Payment of Gratuity Act Applicability to Daily Wage Workers and Interest for Delayed Payments

Date: Aug 13, 2016
Groundbreaking Ruling: Payment of Gratuity Act Applicability to Daily Wage Workers and Interest for Delayed Payments Introduction The case of Chandrabhaga Machindra Dudhade Died through LRS Machindra...
Bombay High Court Establishes Limits on Specific Performance in Development Agreements

Bombay High Court Establishes Limits on Specific Performance in Development Agreements

Date: Aug 10, 2016
Bombay High Court Establishes Limits on Specific Performance in Development Agreements Introduction The case of Amisha Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. v. Jidnyasa Co-Operative Housing Society was heard in the...
Application of Natural Justice and Proportionality in Contractor Blacklisting: Sarku Engineering Services v. Union Of India

Application of Natural Justice and Proportionality in Contractor Blacklisting: Sarku Engineering Services v. Union Of India

Date: Aug 9, 2016
Application of Natural Justice and Proportionality in Contractor Blacklisting: Sarku Engineering Services v. Union Of India Introduction In the landmark case of Sarku Engineering ServicesSDN BHD v....
Establishing Victim's Age in POCSO Cases: Insights from Ravi Anandrao Gurpude v. State Of Maharashtra

Establishing Victim's Age in POCSO Cases: Insights from Ravi Anandrao Gurpude v. State Of Maharashtra

Date: Aug 2, 2016
Establishing Victim's Age in POCSO Cases: Insights from Ravi Anandrao Gurpude v. State Of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Ravi Anandrao Gurpude v. State Of Maharashtra, adjudicated by the Bombay...
Regularization of Daily Wagers under Clause 4C of Model Standing Orders: Insights from Municipal Council, Tirora v. Bindhade

Regularization of Daily Wagers under Clause 4C of Model Standing Orders: Insights from Municipal Council, Tirora v. Bindhade

Date: Jul 23, 2016
Regularization of Daily Wagers under Clause 4C of Model Standing Orders: Insights from Municipal Council, Tirora v. Bindhade Introduction The case of Municipal Council, Tirora And Another v. Tulsidas...
Re-Development Disputes in Cooperative Housing Societies: Jurisdictional Clarity under Section 91 of MCSA

Re-Development Disputes in Cooperative Housing Societies: Jurisdictional Clarity under Section 91 of MCSA

Date: Jul 14, 2016
Re-Development Disputes in Cooperative Housing Societies: Jurisdictional Clarity under Section 91 of MCSA Introduction The case of Maya Developers v. Neelam R. Thakkar & Ors. was adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Natural Justice in Tax Reassessment: H.R. Mehta v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai

Affirmation of Natural Justice in Tax Reassessment: H.R. Mehta v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai

Date: Jul 1, 2016
Affirmation of Natural Justice in Tax Reassessment: H.R. Mehta v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai Introduction The case of H.R. Mehta v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai...
Capital Nature of Renovation Expenditure by Tenants Affirmed in RPG Enterprises Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

Capital Nature of Renovation Expenditure by Tenants Affirmed in RPG Enterprises Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Jun 30, 2016
Capital Nature of Renovation Expenditure by Tenants Affirmed in RPG Enterprises Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of RPG Enterprises Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner Of...
Clarifying 'Aghadi' and 'Original Political Party' under the Disqualification Act: Insights from Shah Faruq Shabir v. Govindrao Ramu Vasave

Clarifying 'Aghadi' and 'Original Political Party' under the Disqualification Act: Insights from Shah Faruq Shabir v. Govindrao Ramu Vasave

Date: Jun 30, 2016
Clarifying 'Aghadi' and 'Original Political Party' under the Disqualification Act: Insights from Shah Faruq Shabir v. Govindrao Ramu Vasave Introduction The case of Shah Faruq Shabir And Others v....
Non-Service of Summons as a Special Circumstance under Order 37 Rule 4, CPC - Recalling Ex-Parte Decree

Non-Service of Summons as a Special Circumstance under Order 37 Rule 4, CPC - Recalling Ex-Parte Decree

Date: Jun 24, 2016
Non-Service of Summons as a Special Circumstance under Order 37 Rule 4, CPC - Recalling Ex-Parte Decree Introduction The case of Ganpatraj K. Sanghvi v. Vishal Udyog was adjudicated in the Bombay...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert