Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Division of Liability Between Non-Government Educational Institutions and the State: Insights from MARUDHAR BALIKA VIDYAPEETH VIDYAWADI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Division of Liability Between Non-Government Educational Institutions and the State: Insights from MARUDHAR BALIKA VIDYAPEETH VIDYAWADI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Date: Apr 27, 2023
Division of Liability Between Non-Government Educational Institutions and the State: Insights from Marudhar Balika Vidyapeeth Vidyawadi v. State of Rajasthan Introduction The case of Marudhar Balika...
Madras High Court’s Stance on Condonation of Delays in Appeal Filings: Lingeswaran v. Thirunagalingam

Madras High Court’s Stance on Condonation of Delays in Appeal Filings: Lingeswaran v. Thirunagalingam

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Madras High Court’s Stance on Condonation of Delays in Appeal Filings: Lingeswaran v. Thirunagalingam Introduction The case of Lingeswaran v. Thirunagalingam adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
Mandatory Consideration of Merits in GST Appeals: Insights from Purushottam Stores v. The State of Bihar

Mandatory Consideration of Merits in GST Appeals: Insights from Purushottam Stores v. The State of Bihar

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Mandatory Consideration of Merits in GST Appeals: Insights from Purushottam Stores v. The State of Bihar Introduction Purushottam Stores v. The State of Bihar is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Pension Saraf & Anr. v. State of West Bengal: Directors’ Liability under Section 138 NI Act Post Resignation

Pension Saraf & Anr. v. State of West Bengal: Directors’ Liability under Section 138 NI Act Post Resignation

Date: Apr 21, 2023
Pankaj Saraf & Anr. v. State of West Bengal: Directors’ Liability under Section 138 NI Act Post Resignation Introduction The case of Pankaj Saraf and Another v. State of West Bengal and Anr was...
Crystallization of Increment Entitlement for Government Servants: A Comprehensive Analysis of STATE OF GUJARAT v. PRAHLADBHAI HARIBHAI PATEL

Crystallization of Increment Entitlement for Government Servants: A Comprehensive Analysis of STATE OF GUJARAT v. PRAHLADBHAI HARIBHAI PATEL

Date: Apr 20, 2023
Crystallization of Increment Entitlement for Government Servants: A Comprehensive Analysis of STATE OF GUJARAT v. PRAHLADBHAI HARIBHAI PATEL Introduction The case of State of Gujarat vs. Prahladbhai...
Non-Filing of FSL Report Does Not Entitle Accused to Default Bail: Insights from Arif Khan v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

Non-Filing of FSL Report Does Not Entitle Accused to Default Bail: Insights from Arif Khan v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

Date: Apr 19, 2023
Non-Filing of FSL Report Does Not Entitle Accused to Default Bail: Insights from Arif Khan v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) Introduction The case of Arif Khan v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) (2023 DHC...
Bolstered Protections for Landowners in Slum Rehabilitation: Bharat J. Patel v. The State of Maharashtra

Bolstered Protections for Landowners in Slum Rehabilitation: Bharat J. Patel v. The State of Maharashtra

Date: Apr 14, 2023
Bolstered Protections for Landowners in Slum Rehabilitation: Bharat J. Patel v. The State of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Bharat J. Patel v. The State of Maharashtra and Others (2023 BHC...
Mandatory Filing of FIRs Under Section 154 CrPC: Insights from AKHILESH AGRAWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Mandatory Filing of FIRs Under Section 154 CrPC: Insights from AKHILESH AGRAWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Date: Apr 13, 2023
Mandatory Filing of FIRs Under Section 154 CrPC: Insights from AKHILESH AGRAWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Introduction The case of Akilesh Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh was adjudicated by the...
Judicial Restraint in Arbitration: Analyzing TAHAL Consultants v. PROMAX Power Ltd. (2023 DHC 2424)

Judicial Restraint in Arbitration: Analyzing TAHAL Consultants v. PROMAX Power Ltd. (2023 DHC 2424)

Date: Apr 12, 2023
Judicial Restraint in Arbitration: Analyzing TAHAL Consultants v. PROMAX Power Ltd. (2023 DHC 2424) Introduction The case of TAHAL Consulting Engineers India Pvt. Ltd. v. Promax Power Ltd. (2023 DHC...
Supreme Court Clarifies Abatement of Delhi Land Reforms Act Proceedings Upon Urbanization

Supreme Court Clarifies Abatement of Delhi Land Reforms Act Proceedings Upon Urbanization

Date: Apr 11, 2023
Supreme Court Clarifies Abatement of Delhi Land Reforms Act Proceedings Upon Urbanization Introduction The case of Rajeev Shah (Deceased) through LRs v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors. (2023 DHC...
Limitation on Article 226 Jurisdiction in State-Private Contractual Disputes: Delhi High Court in MEP Infrastructure Developers Ltd v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation

Limitation on Article 226 Jurisdiction in State-Private Contractual Disputes: Delhi High Court in MEP Infrastructure Developers Ltd v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation

Date: Apr 11, 2023
Limitation on Article 226 Jurisdiction in State-Private Contractual Disputes: Delhi High Court in MEP Infrastructure Developers Ltd v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation Introduction The case of MEP...
Delhi High Court Rules Compensation for Spectrum Surrender Not Chargeable to Service Tax under Section 66E(e)

Delhi High Court Rules Compensation for Spectrum Surrender Not Chargeable to Service Tax under Section 66E(e)

Date: Apr 7, 2023
Delhi High Court Rules Compensation for Spectrum Surrender Not Chargeable to Service Tax under Section 66E(e) Introduction In the case of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL) v. Union of India and...
Ensuring Procedural Fairness in Examination Assessments: Rathore v. State of Rajasthan

Ensuring Procedural Fairness in Examination Assessments: Rathore v. State of Rajasthan

Date: Apr 7, 2023
Ensuring Procedural Fairness in Examination Assessments: Rathore v. State of Rajasthan Introduction The case of Hirendra Singh Rathore v. State of Rajasthan revolves around a series of writ petitions...
Rajasthan High Court Orders Re-examination of PTI Examination Results: Setting a New Precedent

Rajasthan High Court Orders Re-examination of PTI Examination Results: Setting a New Precedent

Date: Apr 7, 2023
Rajasthan High Court Orders Re-examination of PTI Examination Results: Setting a New Precedent Introduction The case of Mahendra Meena v. State of Rajasthan, adjudicated by the Rajasthan High Court...
Admissibility of Electronic Evidence: A Landmark Decision in 'MD Tauqueer vs. The State of Jharkhand'

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence: A Landmark Decision in 'MD Tauqueer vs. The State of Jharkhand'

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Admissibility of Electronic Evidence: A Landmark Decision in 'MD Tauqueer vs. The State of Jharkhand' Introduction The case of MD Tauqueer alias MD Touqeer v. The State of Jharkhand marks a...
Enhancing the Integrity of Electronic Evidence: Insights from SHIVSHANKAR PASWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Enhancing the Integrity of Electronic Evidence: Insights from SHIVSHANKAR PASWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Enhancing the Integrity of Electronic Evidence: Insights from SHIVSHANKAR PASWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Introduction The case of Shivshankar Paswan v. The State of Jharkhand, adjudicated by the...
Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B: Analysis of Basudeo Mahto v. State of Jharkhand

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B: Analysis of Basudeo Mahto v. State of Jharkhand

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B: Analysis of Basudeo Mahto v. State of Jharkhand Introduction The case of Basudeo Mahto alias Basu Dev Mahato v. The State of Jharkhand...
Strict Adherence to Section 65B for Electronic Evidence Admissibility: Insights from AJIT DAS ALIAS CHOTTA DAS v. The State of Jharkhand

Strict Adherence to Section 65B for Electronic Evidence Admissibility: Insights from AJIT DAS ALIAS CHOTTA DAS v. The State of Jharkhand

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Strict Adherence to Section 65B for Electronic Evidence Admissibility: Insights from AJIT DAS ALIAS CHOTTA DAS v. The State of Jharkhand Introduction The case of AJIT DAS ALIAS CHOTTA DAS v. The...
High Court of Jharkhand Sets Precedent on Authentication of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act

High Court of Jharkhand Sets Precedent on Authentication of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act

Date: Apr 6, 2023
High Court of Jharkhand Sets Precedent on Authentication of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act Introduction The case of Sharat Gope alias Sarat Gope v. The State of Jharkhand...
Jharkhand High Court Establishes Strict Admissibility Standards for Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act

Jharkhand High Court Establishes Strict Admissibility Standards for Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Jharkhand High Court Establishes Strict Admissibility Standards for Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act Introduction In the landmark case of Sonu Lal v. The State of Jharkhand,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert