Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Clarifying the Timeframes for Reopening Assessments Under Section 153C Post 01 April 2021

Clarifying the Timeframes for Reopening Assessments Under Section 153C Post 01 April 2021

Date: Dec 12, 2024
Clarifying the Timeframes for Reopening Assessments Under Section 153C Post 01 April 2021 1. Introduction In ATS Township Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(1) Delhi & Ors.,...
Reaffirming the Primacy of Statutory Remedies over Writ Jurisdiction in Debt Recovery Matters

Reaffirming the Primacy of Statutory Remedies over Writ Jurisdiction in Debt Recovery Matters

Date: Dec 12, 2024
Reaffirming the Primacy of Statutory Remedies over Writ Jurisdiction in Debt Recovery Matters Introduction The judgment in BODDU PRASAD RAO v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK delivered on December 11, 2024, by...
No Second Claim on Compassionate Appointments: A New Judicial Precedent

No Second Claim on Compassionate Appointments: A New Judicial Precedent

Date: Dec 11, 2024
No Second Claim on Compassionate Appointments: A New Judicial Precedent 1. Introduction This commentary examines the recent decision by the Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case Sobia Mujib v....
Adopting DGPS for Precise Property Demarcation: A New Legal Precedent

Adopting DGPS for Precise Property Demarcation: A New Legal Precedent

Date: Dec 11, 2024
Adopting DGPS for Precise Property Demarcation: A New Legal Precedent I. Introduction In Kuldeep Kumar Sharma v. Randeep Rana, the Punjab & Haryana High Court addressed a crucial dispute surrounding...
NCVT Salary Payment Guidelines Declared Directory: A Landmark Clarification by Chhattisgarh High Court

NCVT Salary Payment Guidelines Declared Directory: A Landmark Clarification by Chhattisgarh High Court

Date: Dec 11, 2024
NCVT Salary Payment Guidelines Declared Directory: A Landmark Clarification by Chhattisgarh High Court 1. Introduction The case of Abhishek Bhaskar v. State of Chhattisgarh arises from a recruitment...
Balancing Punitive and Compensatory Objectives in Cheque Dishonour Cases: A Discretionary Approach

Balancing Punitive and Compensatory Objectives in Cheque Dishonour Cases: A Discretionary Approach

Date: Dec 11, 2024
Balancing Punitive and Compensatory Objectives in Cheque Dishonour Cases: A Discretionary Approach Introduction The judgment in the case of MR. SUSHIL KUMAR CHURIWALA v. MR. AKSHAY BANSAL delivered...
Reaffirming Procedural Fairness in Termination of Contractual Anganwari Supervisors

Reaffirming Procedural Fairness in Termination of Contractual Anganwari Supervisors

Date: Dec 10, 2024
Reaffirming Procedural Fairness in Termination of Contractual Anganwari Supervisors 1. Introduction This commentary examines the recent decision of the Patna High Court in Kiran Devi v. The State of...
Clarifying the Requirements for Stalking and House Trespass Under IPC and POCSO: Insights From the Bombay High Court

Clarifying the Requirements for Stalking and House Trespass Under IPC and POCSO: Insights From the Bombay High Court

Date: Dec 6, 2024
Clarifying the Requirements for Stalking and House Trespass Under IPC and POCSO: Insights From the Bombay High Court 1. Introduction The case of Amit S/o Gopal Chavan v. State of Maharashtra thr....
The Acquittal Precedent in POCSO Cases: Balancing Presumptions with Evidentiary Scrutiny

The Acquittal Precedent in POCSO Cases: Balancing Presumptions with Evidentiary Scrutiny

Date: Dec 6, 2024
The Acquittal Precedent in POCSO Cases: Balancing Presumptions with Evidentiary Scrutiny Introduction The case of Surendra S/o Dayaram Bobde v. The State of Maharashtra decided by the Bombay High...
Clarifying the Requirement for Subsequent Local Inspection in Eviction Suits: A Landmark Ruling in BIMAL CHANDRA SARKAR v. DIPALI DUTTA ROY (PAUL)

Clarifying the Requirement for Subsequent Local Inspection in Eviction Suits: A Landmark Ruling in BIMAL CHANDRA SARKAR v. DIPALI DUTTA ROY (PAUL)

Date: Dec 6, 2024
Clarifying the Requirement for Subsequent Local Inspection in Eviction Suits: A Landmark Ruling in BIMAL CHANDRA SARKAR v. DIPALI DUTTA ROY (PAUL) I. Introduction In this case, Bimal Chandra Sarkar &...
Upholding the Imperative of Separate Trials from a Common FIR

Upholding the Imperative of Separate Trials from a Common FIR

Date: Dec 5, 2024
Upholding the Imperative of Separate Trials from a Common FIR 1. Introduction The judgment in Phool Singh etc. v. State of Haryana, delivered on December 4, 2024, by the Punjab and Haryana High...
No Unilateral Rejection by Court Staff: Mandate for Judicial Determination

No Unilateral Rejection by Court Staff: Mandate for Judicial Determination

Date: Dec 5, 2024
No Unilateral Rejection by Court Staff: Mandate for Judicial Determination Introduction The case of Smt. Yashika Shah v. The Registrar (W.P. No. 36223 of 2024) was recently decided by the Hon’ble...
Strict Enforcement of Review Limitations under CPC: Chhattisgarh High Court’s New Directive

Strict Enforcement of Review Limitations under CPC: Chhattisgarh High Court’s New Directive

Date: Dec 4, 2024
Strict Enforcement of Review Limitations under CPC: Chhattisgarh High Court’s New Directive 1. Introduction The Judgment under discussion is STATE OF CHHATTISGARH v. KU. KIRTI KUMARI KANWAR,...
Clarifying Deductions and Revising the Interest Rate in Motor Accident Compensation Cases

Clarifying Deductions and Revising the Interest Rate in Motor Accident Compensation Cases

Date: Dec 4, 2024
Clarifying Deductions and Revising the Interest Rate in Motor Accident Compensation Cases Introduction This commentary examines the decision of the Jharkhand High Court in “The Oriental Insurance Co....
Reaffirming the Requirement of Corroborative Evidence Beyond Section 67 NDPS Statements

Reaffirming the Requirement of Corroborative Evidence Beyond Section 67 NDPS Statements

Date: Dec 4, 2024
Reaffirming the Requirement of Corroborative Evidence Beyond Section 67 NDPS Statements Introduction The present commentary analyzes the Judgment of the High Court of Karnataka in the case RAGINI...
Restricting Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27: No Evidence Beyond Pleadings

Restricting Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27: No Evidence Beyond Pleadings

Date: Dec 3, 2024
Restricting Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27: No Evidence Beyond Pleadings Introduction This commentary examines the Jharkhand High Court’s decision in the case of Motilal Agarwal v. Ram...
Exclusion of Limitation Constraints on Arbitration under the National Highways Act: A Landmark Ruling

Exclusion of Limitation Constraints on Arbitration under the National Highways Act: A Landmark Ruling

Date: Dec 3, 2024
Exclusion of Limitation Constraints on Arbitration under the National Highways Act: A Landmark Ruling Introduction This Judgment by the Kerala High Court in the matter of National Highways Authority...
Mandatory Compliance with Structural Stability and Fire Safety Standards for Recognized Schools

Mandatory Compliance with Structural Stability and Fire Safety Standards for Recognized Schools

Date: Dec 3, 2024
Mandatory Compliance with Structural Stability and Fire Safety Standards for Recognized Schools 1. Introduction The case of Organisation for Unaided Recognised Schools (R) (OUR Schools) v. State of...
Reassessing Corruption Charges: The Imperative of Dishonest Intention in Framing Offences under the PC Act

Reassessing Corruption Charges: The Imperative of Dishonest Intention in Framing Offences under the PC Act

Date: Nov 30, 2024
Reassessing Corruption Charges: The Imperative of Dishonest Intention in Framing Offences under the PC Act Introduction The judgment in Dalip Thusu and Another v. U T of J and K Th SSP Anti...
Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act and Its Limitations: Insights from Union Bank of India v. State of Karnataka

Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act and Its Limitations: Insights from Union Bank of India v. State of Karnataka

Date: Nov 18, 2024
Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act and Its Limitations: Insights from Union Bank of India v. State of Karnataka Introduction The case of Union Bank of India v. State of Karnataka adjudicated...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert