Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Clarifying the Court’s Discretion to Allow Additional Written Statements Beyond the 120-Day Limit in Commercial Suits

Clarifying the Court’s Discretion to Allow Additional Written Statements Beyond the 120-Day Limit in Commercial Suits

Date: Jan 9, 2025
Clarifying the Court’s Discretion to Allow Additional Written Statements Beyond the 120-Day Limit in Commercial Suits I. Introduction The Judgment rendered in Novartis AG & Anr. v. Natco Pharma...
“Reaffirming Arbitral Autonomy: Limited Judicial Interference with Expert Arbitrators”

“Reaffirming Arbitral Autonomy: Limited Judicial Interference with Expert Arbitrators”

Date: Jan 9, 2025
Reaffirming Arbitral Autonomy: Limited Judicial Interference with Expert Arbitrators I. Introduction The Delhi High Court decision in Center for Research Planning and Action v. National Medicinal...
Mandatory Submission of the Arbitration Award: A New Paradigm in Section 34 Challenges

Mandatory Submission of the Arbitration Award: A New Paradigm in Section 34 Challenges

Date: Jan 9, 2025
Mandatory Submission of the Arbitration Award: A New Paradigm in Section 34 Challenges Introduction The judgment in KGF COTTONS PVT LTD v. HALDIRAM SNACKS PVT LTD presents a crucial legal development...
Establishing the Legitimacy of Mutation on the Basis of a Will in Municipal Records

Establishing the Legitimacy of Mutation on the Basis of a Will in Municipal Records

Date: Jan 9, 2025
Establishing the Legitimacy of Mutation on the Basis of a Will in Municipal Records Introduction In the case of Gopal Das v. The State Of Madhya Pradesh decided on January 8, 2025, the Madhya Pradesh...
Clarification of Appellate Powers in Section 153A Proceedings: Delhi High Court’s New Precedent

Clarification of Appellate Powers in Section 153A Proceedings: Delhi High Court’s New Precedent

Date: Jan 9, 2025
Clarification of Appellate Powers in Section 153A Proceedings: Delhi High Court’s New Precedent Introduction This case, Divine Infracon Pvt Ltd v. PR Commissioner of Income Tax 3, was decided by the...
Ensuring Prompt Investigation for UAPA Detention Extension: The Uttarakhand High Court’s New Principle

Ensuring Prompt Investigation for UAPA Detention Extension: The Uttarakhand High Court’s New Principle

Date: Jan 9, 2025
Ensuring Prompt Investigation for UAPA Detention Extension: The Uttarakhand High Court’s New Principle Introduction This commentary examines the recent decision of the Uttarakhand High Court in the...
Bombay High Court Ensures Minor’s Right to Passport Despite Parental Dispute

Bombay High Court Ensures Minor’s Right to Passport Despite Parental Dispute

Date: Jan 9, 2025
Bombay High Court Ensures Minor’s Right to Passport Despite Parental Dispute Introduction The Judgment stems from a case before the Bombay High Court involving a minor named Miss Yushika, opposed by...
Precedent on Guardianship: Affirming the Limited Guardianship Framework Under the Disabilities Act

Precedent on Guardianship: Affirming the Limited Guardianship Framework Under the Disabilities Act

Date: Jan 9, 2025
Precedent on Guardianship: Affirming the Limited Guardianship Framework Under the Disabilities Act Introduction This Judgment, delivered by the Kerala High Court on January 8, 2025, in the matter of...
Precedent on Statutory Transfer Procedures in Cadre and Recruitment Regulations: Insights from SHRIPATI MARIYAPPA DODDALINGANNAVAR v. THE CHIEF PERSONNEL MANAGER

Precedent on Statutory Transfer Procedures in Cadre and Recruitment Regulations: Insights from SHRIPATI MARIYAPPA DODDALINGANNAVAR v. THE CHIEF PERSONNEL MANAGER

Date: Jan 9, 2025
Precedent on Statutory Transfer Procedures in Cadre and Recruitment Regulations Introduction The case of Shri Shripati Mariyappa Doddalingannavar v. The Chief Personnel Manager marks a significant...
Reaffirming the Requirement of a Written Complaint for Cognizance Under Section 188 IPC

Reaffirming the Requirement of a Written Complaint for Cognizance Under Section 188 IPC

Date: Jan 8, 2025
Reaffirming the Requirement of a Written Complaint for Cognizance Under Section 188 IPC 1. Introduction In the case of Bijay Kumar @ Bijay Kumar Bimal v. State of Bihar and Anr (Criminal...
Reaffirming the Power to Summon Non-Charge-Sheeted Persons Under Section 319 Cr.PC

Reaffirming the Power to Summon Non-Charge-Sheeted Persons Under Section 319 Cr.PC

Date: Jan 8, 2025
Reaffirming the Power to Summon Non-Charge-Sheeted Persons Under Section 319 Cr.PC Introduction In the case of Draupadi Kunwar @ Draupati Kunwar v. The State of Bihar, before the Patna High Court...
Court Upholds Management Discretion in NRI Quota Allocation: A Commentary on Dr. Ojus Yadav v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

Court Upholds Management Discretion in NRI Quota Allocation: A Commentary on Dr. Ojus Yadav v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Jan 8, 2025
Court Upholds Management Discretion in NRI Quota Allocation Introduction The case of Dr. Ojus Yadav v. The State of Madhya Pradesh and Others, decided by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on January 7,...
Ensuring Employment Rights for Disabled Service Members: Mandate for Alternative Light Duty under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016

Ensuring Employment Rights for Disabled Service Members: Mandate for Alternative Light Duty under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016

Date: Jan 8, 2025
Ensuring Employment Rights for Disabled Service Members: Mandate for Alternative Light Duty under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 Introduction The case of Ganesan v. The Commandant,...
Interchangeability of Children's Court and Sessions Court in Juvenile Justice Appeals: Upholding Statutory Safeguards for Child Offenders

Interchangeability of Children's Court and Sessions Court in Juvenile Justice Appeals: Upholding Statutory Safeguards for Child Offenders

Date: Jan 8, 2025
Interchangeability of Children's Court and Sessions Court in Juvenile Justice Appeals: Upholding Statutory Safeguards for Child Offenders Introduction The judgment in XXXXXX v. THE STATE OF KERALA...

      Revisional Jurisdiction under Section 263: Mandating Diligence in Assessing Officer Orders

Revisional Jurisdiction under Section 263: Mandating Diligence in Assessing Officer Orders

Date: Jan 8, 2025
Revisional Jurisdiction under Section 263: Mandating Diligence in Assessing Officer Orders Introduction In the case of Cochin International Airport Ltd. v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,...
Clarifying TRAI’s Limits Under RTI: No Obligation to Acquire or Interpret Third-Party Information

Clarifying TRAI’s Limits Under RTI: No Obligation to Acquire or Interpret Third-Party Information

Date: Jan 8, 2025
Clarifying TRAI’s Limits Under RTI: No Obligation to Acquire or Interpret Third-Party Information Introduction This judgment from the Delhi High Court in Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI)...
Doctrine of Limited Judicial Interference with APAR Evaluations: Ajit Kumar v. Union of India & Anr. (2025)

Doctrine of Limited Judicial Interference with APAR Evaluations: Ajit Kumar v. Union of India & Anr. (2025)

Date: Jan 8, 2025
Doctrine of Limited Judicial Interference with APAR Evaluations: Ajit Kumar v. Union of India & Anr. (2025) 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court decision in Ajit Kumar v. Union of India & Anr....
Reaffirming Constitutional Protections: Custodial Interrogation and the Right Against Self-Incrimination

Reaffirming Constitutional Protections: Custodial Interrogation and the Right Against Self-Incrimination

Date: Jan 8, 2025
Reaffirming Constitutional Protections: Custodial Interrogation and the Right Against Self-Incrimination Introduction This commentary discusses the Punjab & Haryana High Court’s decision in Rajpal...
Denial of Bail Under POCSO When DNA Evidence Confirms Paternity: A Strengthened Judicial Stance

Denial of Bail Under POCSO When DNA Evidence Confirms Paternity: A Strengthened Judicial Stance

Date: Jan 8, 2025
Denial of Bail Under POCSO When DNA Evidence Confirms Paternity: A Strengthened Judicial Stance 1. Introduction The case of Arvind v. State of U.P. and 3 Others (Allahabad High Court, decided on...
Establishing Age as the Decisive Tie-Breaker in CISF Promotions: A Landmark Precedent

Establishing Age as the Decisive Tie-Breaker in CISF Promotions: A Landmark Precedent

Date: Jan 8, 2025
Establishing Age as the Decisive Tie-Breaker in CISF Promotions: A Landmark Precedent Introduction The case of Kalu Ram Saini v. Union of India and Ors. represents a significant judicial intervention...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert