DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the notice of appeal from the fact-finding order is deemed to be a premature notice of appeal from the order of disposition ( see CPLR 5520[c]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court properly determined that there was clear and convincing proof of the appellant's abandonment of her children during the six-month period before the filing of the petitions, in view of the total absence of contact between the appellant and the children during that period ( see Social Services Law § 384-b[a], [b]; Matter of Tashara B., 299 A.D.2d 356, 357; Matter of Derrick J., 287 A.D.2d 503; Matter of Ronald D., Jr., 282 A.D.2d 533). Neither the order of protection which directed the appellant to stay away from a caseworker employed by the petitioner, nor the appellant's incarceration, prevented her from otherwise contacting her children or the petitioner by telephone or by letter ( see Matter of Thomas Z., 4 A.D.3d 372; Matter of Derrick J., supra; Matter of Ronald D., Jr., supra). The record further demonstrates that the petitioner attempted to arrange for visitation, and it did not prevent or discourage contact between the appellant and her children ( see Matter of Derrick J., supra).
SMITH, J.P., S. MILLER, CRANE and RIVERA, JJ., concur.