DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court properly determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that the appellant abandoned his child during the six-month period prior to the filing of the petition in view of the total absence of contact between the appellant and the child during that period ( see Social Services Law § 384-b; Matter of Julius P., 63 N.Y.2d 477; Matter of Tashara B., 299 A.D.2d 356; Matter of I.R., 153 A.D.2d 559). The appellant's incarceration and his residence in a drug-treatment facility did not prevent him from communicating with the child or the agency by letter or by telephone ( see Matter of Tashara B., supra at 357; Matter of Derrick J., 287 A.D.2d 503; Matter of T. Children, 284 A.D.2d 401; Matter of I.R., supra at 561).
Under the circumstances, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in terminating the appellant's parental rights without conducting a dispositional hearing ( see Matter of Tashara B., supra; Matter of Little Flower Children's Servs. v. Clinton Tracy M., 222 A.D.2d 507; Matter of St. Vincent's Servs. v. Donald D., 205 A.D.2d 785). Finally, the record indicates that the appellant was provided effective assistance of counsel ( see Matter of Tashara B., supra).
SANTUCCI, J.P., FLORIO, S. MILLER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.