Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Case Title: Arul Daniel and others v. Suganya The subject of whether the provisions of Section 482 CrPC and/or Article 227 of the Constitution apply to invalidate an application under Section 12 of...
Case Title: Rambabu Singh Thakur V. Sunil Arora & Ors. The Supreme Court ordered all political parties to publish the specifics of their candidates' criminal backgrounds in the Lok Sabha and Assembly...
Case Title: Dr. Prakash Borulkar V. State of Maharashtra and Ors. After the government clearly stated that only public health department doctors were to be given extensions of two years in service...
Case Title: Gajanand Burange v. Laxmi Chand Goyal The Supreme Court observed that a cheque bounce complaint filed before the expiry of 15 days from the date of receipt of notice by the drawer of the...
Case Title: Mr Amar Vora v. City Union Bank Ltd., The Hon'ble National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, while adjudicating a matter in the aforementioned case held that a petition can be...
Case Title: Vikas Kishanrao Gawali v. State Of Maharashtra Section 12(2)(c) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961, which allows for the reservation of 27% of seats in...
Case Title: Kolli Satyanarayana (D) v. Valuripalli Kesava Rao Chowdary (D) The Supreme Court observed that time limit(s) specified in the agreement cannot be ignored altogether by the Court while...
Case Title: SK Md Raffique V. Managing Committee, Contai Rehmania High Madrasah and ors The West Bengal Madrasah Service Commission Act of 2008 was maintained as constitutional by the Supreme Court,...
Case Title: Amway India v. Ravindranath Rao and another Although the proprietor is conducting business in India, the Supreme Court has ruled that a sole proprietorship will be subject to...
Case Title: Sahara India v. Shri Nandkishor Vishnupant Deshpande and Another The NCLAT bench, comprising Justices M. Venugopal and Dr Ashok Kumar Mishra, adjudicating in the case held that the NCLT...
Case Title: Anuradha Bhasin V. Union of India and ors The Supreme Court's ruling on the lockdown in Kashmir has significant ramifications, including the statement that freedom of speech and...
Case Title: Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. M/S Navigant Technologies Pvt. Ltd. According to the Supreme Court, the term of limitation for filing the Petition under Section 34 of the...
Case Title: Sankar v. State According to the court, Section 33(5) of the Act was only added to ensure that children shouldn't be summoned to court for examination on a regular basis since doing so...
Case Title: Anamika v. State of Kerala and Others. The Kerala High Court ruled in the Writ Petition that transgender people must be allowed to compete in their preferred category in athletic events...
Case Title: Shilpa Mittal V. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act of 2015's Section 2(33) does not apply to offences that have a maximum punishment of...
Case Title: Kishore K. Lonkar v. Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd. The Hon'ble NCLAT held that the operational debt for the purpose of initiation of CIRP does not go to the extent of leave encashment or...
Case Title: Ayan Mallick v. Pratime Bayal The NCLAT held that a joint auction is permissible under the provisions of IBC, 2016, and SARFAESI, 2002, in order to maximize the value of the assets of...
Case Title: Sushila Aggarwal &Ors. V. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors. According to the Supreme Court, anticipatory bail should not always be confined to a set amount of time. However, the five-judge...
Case Title: New India Assurance Co. Ltd. V. Hilli Multipurpose Cold Storage Pvt Ltd. The Consumer Protection Act's 45-day deadline for providing the opposing party's account of the events in a...
Case Title: ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE v. KAPIL WADHAWAN The Court was hearing an appeal against a Bombay High Court decision which found that the day of remand had to be included in determining the...