Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now

India Columns

Recalling Witnesses for Further Cross-Examination in Indian Law

Recalling Witnesses for Further Cross-Examination in Indian Law

Date: Dec 12, 2022
Recalling Witnesses for Further Cross-Examination in Indian Law: A Comprehensive Analysis of Judicial Discretion and Procedural Fairness Introduction The power of a court to recall a witness who has...
In case of offences under the UAPA, Magistrate's jurisdiction to extend time under Section 43-D(2)(b) is non-existent: Supreme Court

In case of offences under the UAPA, Magistrate's jurisdiction to extend time under Section 43-D(2)(b) is non-existent: Supreme Court

Date: Dec 9, 2022
Case Title: Sadique v. State of Madhya Pradesh In UAPA cases, the Supreme Court ruled that magistrates lacked the authority to extend the deadline for completing investigations. According to the...
Right to promotion of Persons with Disabilities under the 1995 Act: Supreme Court

Right to promotion of Persons with Disabilities under the 1995 Act: Supreme Court

Date: Dec 9, 2022
Case Title: State of Kerala and others v. Leesamma Joseph The Supreme Court ruled that people with physical disabilities had the right to preferential treatment in promotions as well. A two-judge...
People not named in FIR cannot be added as Additional Accused based on disclosure of their names by witnesses: Supreme Court

People not named in FIR cannot be added as Additional Accused based on disclosure of their names by witnesses: Supreme Court

Date: Dec 9, 2022
Case Title: Periyasami and Ors v. S. Nallasamy According to the Supreme Court, Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code does not allow for the summoning of witnesses based solely on the disclosure...
Only when Life Imprisonment appears to be an utterly Inappropriate Punishment, a Capital Punishment may be enforced: Supreme Court

Only when Life Imprisonment appears to be an utterly Inappropriate Punishment, a Capital Punishment may be enforced: Supreme Court

Date: Dec 9, 2022
Case Title: Sachin Kumar Singhraha v. State of Madhya Pradesh The Supreme Court observed that the death penalty should only be used when life imprisonment seems to be an entirely inappropriate...
Any single circumstance cannot be said to have a perpetual validity in necessarily justifying the grant or refusal of bail: Supreme Court

Any single circumstance cannot be said to have a perpetual validity in necessarily justifying the grant or refusal of bail: Supreme Court

Date: Dec 9, 2022
Case Title: High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan v. The State of Rajasthan and Another The Supreme Court has rejected the blanket orders issued by a single judge of the Rajasthan High Court to not...
Investigation by the CBI is appropriate even when there is no wrongdoing by the Police: Supreme Court

Investigation by the CBI is appropriate even when there is no wrongdoing by the Police: Supreme Court

Date: Dec 9, 2022
Case Title: Rhea Chakraborty Petitioner V. State of Bihar & Ors. The Supreme Court noted that there was no evidence to support any "wrongdoing on the side of Mumbai police" while clearing the ongoing...
Once Section 139 Negotiable Instruments Act's presumption is drawn, the complainant does not need to provide evidence of the source of funds until the accused has discharged his burden: Supreme Court

Once Section 139 Negotiable Instruments Act's presumption is drawn, the complainant does not need to provide evidence of the source of funds until the accused has discharged his burden: Supreme Court

Date: Dec 9, 2022
Case Title: Rohitbhai Jivanlal Patel v. State of Gujrat & Anr. According to the Supreme Court, if the accused is unable to disprove the presumption that a legally enforceable debt exists in...
Judicial Officers Cannot Apply for Direct Recruitment to District Judge Positions against posts designated for Advocates: Supreme Court

Judicial Officers Cannot Apply for Direct Recruitment to District Judge Positions against posts designated for Advocates: Supreme Court

Date: Dec 9, 2022
Case Title: DHEERAJ MOR V. HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court ruled that civil judges were ineligible for direct recruitment to District Judge positions under the...
Permanent Disability from Leg Amputation: Compensation in India

Permanent Disability from Leg Amputation: Compensation in India

Date: Dec 9, 2022
Permanent Disability Arising from Leg Amputation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Compensation Jurisprudence in India Introduction The amputation of a leg is a catastrophic event, inflicting profound...
Significant guidelines for Maintenance Payment in Matrimonial Cases: Supreme Court

Significant guidelines for Maintenance Payment in Matrimonial Cases: Supreme Court

Date: Dec 9, 2022
Case Title: Rajnesh V. Neha The Supreme Court had announced rules on the payment of support in marital cases in a key ruling. Justices Indu Malhotra and R. Subhash Reddy's bench ruled that...
A Homebuyer's entitlement begins on the date of the contract, not when RERA registration is made: Supreme Court

A Homebuyer's entitlement begins on the date of the contract, not when RERA registration is made: Supreme Court

Date: Dec 9, 2022
Case Title: IMPERIA STRUCTURES LTD. v. ANIL PATNI According to the Supreme Court, the time frame for allotting a flat to a homebuyer should be calculated starting from the date of the buyer agreement...
One-sided clauses are an unfair trade practice in builder-buyer agreements:  Supreme Court

One-sided clauses are an unfair trade practice in builder-buyer agreements: Supreme Court

Date: Dec 9, 2022
Case Title: Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. v. Govindan Raghavan Incorporating one-sided stipulations into a builder-buyer agreement is considered as an unfair commercial conduct under...
Examining witnesses without the accused being present is a Curable Inconsistency: Supreme Court

Examining witnesses without the accused being present is a Curable Inconsistency: Supreme Court

Date: Dec 9, 2022
Case Title: Atma Ram and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan The Supreme Court found that the Hon’ble High Court’s decision ordering a new trial in a murder case did not invalidate the trial simply because...
When the testimony is neither wholly reliable or unreliable, corroboration is required: Supreme Court

When the testimony is neither wholly reliable or unreliable, corroboration is required: Supreme Court

Date: Dec 8, 2022
Case Title: Khema Alias Khem Chandra Etc. (S) v. State Of Uttar Pradesh (S) The Supreme Court noted that when an ocular testimony falls into the category of "neither entirely untrustworthy nor wholly...
Merely because an arrest is lawful in a particular case does not mandate that arrest must be made: Supreme Court

Merely because an arrest is lawful in a particular case does not mandate that arrest must be made: Supreme Court

Date: Dec 8, 2022
Case Title: Siddharth v. State of Uttar Pradesh The Supreme Court ruled that Section 170 of the Criminal Procedure Code does not require the Officer-in-Charge to arrest every accused person at the...
Government has the power to appoint a person as Director of Enforcement for more than two years: Supreme Court

Government has the power to appoint a person as Director of Enforcement for more than two years: Supreme Court

Date: Dec 8, 2022
Case Title: Common Cause (A Registered Society) v. Union of India According to the Supreme Court, the procedure outlined in Section 25 of the Central Vigilance Commission Act of 2003 can be used to...
The buyer cannot be made to wait endlessly for possession and is entitled to reimbursement from developer:  Supreme Court

The buyer cannot be made to wait endlessly for possession and is entitled to reimbursement from developer: Supreme Court

Date: Dec 8, 2022
Case Title: Kolkata West International City Private Ltd. v. Devidas Rudra The Supreme Court upheld the Consumer Commission's decision instructing the developer to reimburse the customer's money and...
A petition under section 7 IBC is maintainable even if the Credit Facility Agreement is unstamped: NCLAT

A petition under section 7 IBC is maintainable even if the Credit Facility Agreement is unstamped: NCLAT

Date: Dec 8, 2022
Case Title:- Mr. Aashish Kadam & Anr. v. Nagpur Nagarik Sahakari Bank Ltd. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench while hearing an appeal observed that an unstamped credit...
The only courtroom where a lawyer cannot appear is the one where a relative sits as the Presiding Judge: Delhi High Court

The only courtroom where a lawyer cannot appear is the one where a relative sits as the Presiding Judge: Delhi High Court

Date: Dec 8, 2022
Case Title: Mathews J. Nedumpara and Ors. v. Shri Fali S. Nariman and Ors. The Delhi High Court rejected Attorney Mathews J. Nedumpara's request to "dismiss" Senior Advocate Fali S. Nariman from...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert