Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

strict-enforcement-of-probation-conditions:-a-landmark-decision-in-in-re:-michael-thomas-joseph, Case Commentaries

Curing Real-Party-in-Interest Defects Post-Filing through Equitable Remedies: The Wallace / C-Spine Doctrine

Curing Real-Party-in-Interest Defects Post-Filing through Equitable Remedies: The Wallace / C-Spine Doctrine

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Curing Real-Party-in-Interest Defects Post-Filing through Equitable Remedies: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Wallace / C-Spine Doctrine Introduction In a consolidated opinion released 3 July...
Urbonas v. Gullison: Rhode Island Supreme Court Re-defines the Reach of the Acquiescence Doctrine and Affirms Appellate Re-Characterisation Power

Urbonas v. Gullison: Rhode Island Supreme Court Re-defines the Reach of the Acquiescence Doctrine and Affirms Appellate Re-Characterisation Power

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Urbonas v. Gullison: Rhode Island Supreme Court Re-defines the Reach of the Acquiescence Doctrine and Affirms Appellate Re-Characterisation Power 1. Introduction In Kristina Urbonas v. John Gullison,...
Stratoberdha v. Clements Properties, LLC –  
           Finality of Un-Appealed Family Court Orders and the
           Extension of § 9-24-7 Interlocutory-Appeal Rights

Stratoberdha v. Clements Properties, LLC – Finality of Un-Appealed Family Court Orders and the Extension of § 9-24-7 Interlocutory-Appeal Rights

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Stratoberdha v. Clements Properties, LLC (R.I. 2025) Finality of Un-Appealed Family Court Orders and the Extension of § 9-24-7 Interlocutory-Appeal Rights 1. Introduction Robert and Etleva...
Precision in Objections: State v. Lantigua Establishes a Specificity Requirement for Challenging Expert “Bolstering” Testimony in Rhode Island

Precision in Objections: State v. Lantigua Establishes a Specificity Requirement for Challenging Expert “Bolstering” Testimony in Rhode Island

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Precision in Objections: State v. Jose Lantigua (R.I. 2025) Establishes a Specificity Requirement for Challenging Expert “Bolstering” Testimony 1. Introduction State v. Lantigua, decided by the Rhode...
Clarifying “Accumulated Depreciation”: Rhode Island Supreme Court Mandates Uniform Financial-Accounting Depreciation for Telecommunications Tangible Personal Property Tax

Clarifying “Accumulated Depreciation”: Rhode Island Supreme Court Mandates Uniform Financial-Accounting Depreciation for Telecommunications Tangible Personal Property Tax

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Clarifying “Accumulated Depreciation”: Rhode Island Supreme Court Mandates Uniform Financial-Accounting Depreciation for Telecommunications Tangible Personal Property Tax Introduction On 3 July 2025,...

        “All Means ALL”: Michigan Supreme Court Mandates Post-July 1, 2020
        Bodily-Injury Minimums in Every Auto Policy Delivered After June 11, 2019

“All Means ALL”: Michigan Supreme Court Mandates Post-July 1, 2020 Bodily-Injury Minimums in Every Auto Policy Delivered After June 11, 2019

Date: Jul 7, 2025
“All Means ALL”: Michigan Supreme Court Mandates Post-July 1, 2020 Bodily-Injury Minimums in Every Auto Policy Delivered After June 11, 2019 1. Introduction Bonter v. Progressive Marathon Insurance...
Cumulative Conveyances Exceeding 50 % of a Corporation’s Shares Trigger Uncapping under Michigan’s GPTA – Commentary on Resort Properties Co-operative v. Waterloo Township (2025)

Cumulative Conveyances Exceeding 50 % of a Corporation’s Shares Trigger Uncapping under Michigan’s GPTA – Commentary on Resort Properties Co-operative v. Waterloo Township (2025)

Date: Jul 7, 2025
Cumulative Conveyances Exceeding 50 % of a Corporation’s Shares Trigger Uncapping under Michigan’s GPTA Commentary on Resort Properties Co-operative v. Waterloo Township, Supreme Court of Michigan, 2...
Contractual Examples as Plain-Language Clarifiers: Guilmette v. PHH Mortgage and the Rhode Island Supreme Court’s New Guidance on Integrated Disclosure Statements

Contractual Examples as Plain-Language Clarifiers: Guilmette v. PHH Mortgage and the Rhode Island Supreme Court’s New Guidance on Integrated Disclosure Statements

Date: Jul 7, 2025
Contractual Examples as Plain-Language Clarifiers: Guilmette v. PHH Mortgage Services (R.I. 2025) 1. Introduction Dino J. Guilmette v. PHH Mortgage Services F/K/A Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC et al....
State v. McLean: Plea-Agreement Waivers of Rule 35 Relief Held Non-Dispositive & High Bar for Judicial Recusal

State v. McLean: Plea-Agreement Waivers of Rule 35 Relief Held Non-Dispositive & High Bar for Judicial Recusal

Date: Jul 7, 2025
State v. McLean: Plea-Agreement Waivers of Rule 35 Relief Held Non-Dispositive & High Bar for Judicial Recusal Introduction The Rhode Island Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Andrew McLean,...
State v. Hang – Codefendant Objections and the “Raise-or-Waive” Rule: Rhode Island Supreme Court Clarifies Preservation Requirements

State v. Hang – Codefendant Objections and the “Raise-or-Waive” Rule: Rhode Island Supreme Court Clarifies Preservation Requirements

Date: Jul 7, 2025
State v. Hang – Codefendant Objections and the “Raise-or-Waive” Rule: Rhode Island Supreme Court Clarifies Preservation Requirements 1. Introduction On 2 July 2025 the Rhode Island Supreme Court...
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Recasts Punitive-Damages Doctrine and Rejects “Kinship” Fiduciary Duty – A Commentary on Guieb v. Guieb (2025)

Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Recasts Punitive-Damages Doctrine and Rejects “Kinship” Fiduciary Duty – A Commentary on Guieb v. Guieb (2025)

Date: Jul 7, 2025
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Recasts Punitive-Damages Doctrine and Rejects “Kinship” Fiduciary Duty – A Commentary on Guieb v. Guieb (2025) 1. Introduction Guieb v. Guieb, SCWC-20-0000727 (July 1 2025), is...
State v. Stetzer: Continuous Applicability of the Coercion Defence and Admissibility of Personal-History Evidence

State v. Stetzer: Continuous Applicability of the Coercion Defence and Admissibility of Personal-History Evidence

Date: Jul 7, 2025
State v. Stetzer (2025 WI 34): Continuous Applicability of the Coercion Defence and Admissibility of Personal-History Evidence in Assessing Reasonableness Introduction In State v. Joan L. Stetzer,...
The Pena Principle: Legislative Attorney-Fee Caps Cannot Bind New Mexico Courts in Workers’ Compensation Appeals

The Pena Principle: Legislative Attorney-Fee Caps Cannot Bind New Mexico Courts in Workers’ Compensation Appeals

Date: Jul 7, 2025
The Pena Principle: Legislative Attorney-Fee Caps Cannot Bind New Mexico Courts in Workers’ Compensation Appeals 1. Introduction Pena v. State (2025-NMSC-___) confronts a long-standing tension in New...
“Necessary Means Necessary” – The New Mexico Supreme Court Grafts Rule 1-019’s
          “Complete Relief” Test onto Children’s Court Joinder under Rule 10-121(B)(4)

“Necessary Means Necessary” – The New Mexico Supreme Court Grafts Rule 1-019’s “Complete Relief” Test onto Children’s Court Joinder under Rule 10-121(B)(4)

Date: Jul 7, 2025
“Necessary Means Necessary” — Incorporating the Civil “Necessary-Party” Standard into Abuse-and-Neglect Proceedings: A Commentary on State ex rel. CYFD v. Calvin T. 1. Introduction In State ex rel....
Bazile v. State (2025 ND 128): Defining the Boundaries of “Pattern” Prosecutorial Misconduct, Newly-Discovered Evidence, and Res Judicata in North Dakota Post-Conviction Relief

Bazile v. State (2025 ND 128): Defining the Boundaries of “Pattern” Prosecutorial Misconduct, Newly-Discovered Evidence, and Res Judicata in North Dakota Post-Conviction Relief

Date: Jul 7, 2025
Bazile v. State (2025 ND 128): Defining the Boundaries of “Pattern” Prosecutorial Misconduct, Newly-Discovered Evidence, and Res Judicata in North Dakota Post-Conviction Relief Introduction Bazile v....
“Beyond the Wellhead” – The North Dakota Supreme Court Declares Salt-Water Gathering a Post-Production Cost Outside NDIC Adjudicatory Jurisdiction

“Beyond the Wellhead” – The North Dakota Supreme Court Declares Salt-Water Gathering a Post-Production Cost Outside NDIC Adjudicatory Jurisdiction

Date: Jul 7, 2025
“Beyond the Wellhead” – The North Dakota Supreme Court Declares Salt-Water Gathering a Post-Production Cost Outside NDIC Adjudicatory Jurisdiction Citation: Equinor Energy v. North Dakota Industrial...
Implied Intent & Logical Limits on Time-Distance in Disorderly Conduct Restraining Orders – A Commentary on Fagnon v. Ngaima, 2025 ND 122

Implied Intent & Logical Limits on Time-Distance in Disorderly Conduct Restraining Orders – A Commentary on Fagnon v. Ngaima, 2025 ND 122

Date: Jul 7, 2025
Implied Intent & Logical Limits on Time-Distance in Disorderly Conduct Restraining Orders Comprehensive Commentary on Fagnon v. Ngaima, 2025 ND 122 (N.D. Sup. Ct.) 1. Introduction The North Dakota...
Gomez v. State (2025): Reinforcing the Strict Two-Year Limitation and “Newly-Discovered-Evidence” Exception in North Dakota Post-Conviction Relief

Gomez v. State (2025): Reinforcing the Strict Two-Year Limitation and “Newly-Discovered-Evidence” Exception in North Dakota Post-Conviction Relief

Date: Jul 7, 2025
Gomez v. State (2025): Reinforcing the Strict Two-Year Limitation and “Newly-Discovered-Evidence” Exception in North Dakota Post-Conviction Relief Introduction Gomez v. State, 2025 ND 125, is the...
Affidavits, Defaults, and Vacatur in Termination of Parental Rights: North Dakota Supreme Court Clarifies the Governing Standard (Interest of B.F. & I.F., 2025 ND 127)

Affidavits, Defaults, and Vacatur in Termination of Parental Rights: North Dakota Supreme Court Clarifies the Governing Standard (Interest of B.F. & I.F., 2025 ND 127)

Date: Jul 7, 2025
Affidavits, Defaults, and Vacatur in Termination of Parental Rights: North Dakota Supreme Court Clarifies the Governing Standard (Interest of B.F. & I.F., 2025 ND 127) 1. Introduction In Interest of...
Commingled Inheritance, Dissipation, and the Boundaries of Premarital Agreements: Commentary on Sanda v. Sanda, 2025 ND 120

Commingled Inheritance, Dissipation, and the Boundaries of Premarital Agreements: Commentary on Sanda v. Sanda, 2025 ND 120

Date: Jul 7, 2025
Commingled Inheritance, Dissipation, and the Boundaries of Premarital Agreements: Commentary on Sanda v. Sanda, 2025 ND 120 1. Introduction The North Dakota Supreme Court’s decision in Sanda v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert