Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

state Case Commentaries

People v. Cruz: Endorsing Nonevidentiary Remittal Hearings and Expanded Deference to Trial-Court Demeanor Findings in Batson Step-Three Analysis

People v. Cruz: Endorsing Nonevidentiary Remittal Hearings and Expanded Deference to Trial-Court Demeanor Findings in Batson Step-Three Analysis

Date: May 16, 2025
People v. Cruz: Endorsing Nonevidentiary Remittal Hearings and Expanded Deference to Trial-Court Demeanor Findings in Batson Step-Three Analysis Introduction In People v. Cruz, 238 A.D.3d 1327 (3d...
911 Citizen Tips and the Dual Requirement of Factual Basis and Basis of Knowledge for Reasonable Suspicion

911 Citizen Tips and the Dual Requirement of Factual Basis and Basis of Knowledge for Reasonable Suspicion

Date: May 16, 2025
911 Citizen Tips and the Dual Requirement of Factual Basis and Basis of Knowledge for Reasonable Suspicion Introduction City of Wenatchee v. Stearns (No. 102680-3) is a 2025 Supreme Court of...
Reaffirming UPCCRA Procedural Bars in Capital Post-Conviction Relief: Chamberlin v. Mississippi

Reaffirming UPCCRA Procedural Bars in Capital Post-Conviction Relief: Chamberlin v. Mississippi

Date: May 16, 2025
Reaffirming UPCCRA Procedural Bars in Capital Post-Conviction Relief: Chamberlin v. Mississippi Introduction The Supreme Court of Mississippi’s en banc decision in Lisa Jo Chamberlin v. State of...
Prohibition of Third-Party Cause-of-Action Purchases in Bankruptcy under Mississippi’s Champerty Statute

Prohibition of Third-Party Cause-of-Action Purchases in Bankruptcy under Mississippi’s Champerty Statute

Date: May 16, 2025
Prohibition of Third-Party Cause-of-Action Purchases in Bankruptcy under Mississippi’s Champerty Statute Introduction This commentary examines Crabtree v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance...
Unenforced or Repealed Ordinance Cannot Support Arkansas Civil Rights Act Liability

Unenforced or Repealed Ordinance Cannot Support Arkansas Civil Rights Act Liability

Date: May 16, 2025
Unenforced or Repealed Ordinance Cannot Support Arkansas Civil Rights Act Liability Introduction In Boyle Ventures, LLC v. City of Fayetteville (2025 Ark. 71), the Supreme Court of Arkansas addressed...
Privilege for U-Visa and T-Visa Applications in Criminal Discovery: Ramirez v. Marsh

Privilege for U-Visa and T-Visa Applications in Criminal Discovery: Ramirez v. Marsh

Date: May 16, 2025
Privilege for U-Visa and T-Visa Applications in Criminal Discovery: Ramirez v. Marsh Introduction Ramirez v. Marsh (2025) is a landmark New Mexico Supreme Court decision consolidating two original...
Presumptive Suspension for Attorney Criminal Misconduct Involving Domestic Violence

Presumptive Suspension for Attorney Criminal Misconduct Involving Domestic Violence

Date: May 16, 2025
Presumptive Suspension for Attorney Criminal Misconduct Involving Domestic Violence Introduction This commentary examines the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in The Florida Bar v. Ryan F. C....
Boyce v. State: Eliminating Separate “Mere Presence” Jury Instructions Where Instructions Suffice

Boyce v. State: Eliminating Separate “Mere Presence” Jury Instructions Where Instructions Suffice

Date: May 16, 2025
Boyce v. State: Eliminating Separate “Mere Presence” Jury Instructions Where Instructions Suffice Introduction This commentary examines the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Boyce v. State, 2025...
Requirement of Comprehensive Credibility Findings in Child Abuse and Neglect Adjudications

Requirement of Comprehensive Credibility Findings in Child Abuse and Neglect Adjudications

Date: May 15, 2025
Requirement of Comprehensive Credibility Findings in Child Abuse and Neglect Adjudications Introduction In In re J.E., the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia reviewed a circuit‐court order...
Establishing Objective Cardiac Activity as the Definitive “Fetal Heartbeat” Under the 2023 South Carolina Fetal Heartbeat Act

Establishing Objective Cardiac Activity as the Definitive “Fetal Heartbeat” Under the 2023 South Carolina Fetal Heartbeat Act

Date: May 15, 2025
Establishing Objective Cardiac Activity as the Definitive “Fetal Heartbeat” Under the 2023 South Carolina Fetal Heartbeat Act Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of South...
Case-Specific Necessity and Ineffective Assistance in Confrontation Clause Claims: Johnston v. Ames

Case-Specific Necessity and Ineffective Assistance in Confrontation Clause Claims: Johnston v. Ames

Date: May 15, 2025
Case-Specific Necessity and Ineffective Assistance in Confrontation Clause Claims: Johnston v. Ames Introduction In Henry Wayne Johnston v. Donald F. Ames, Superintendent, Mt. Olive Correctional...
Expert Nexus Required for Admissibility of Drug-Use Evidence: State v. Hundley Standard

Expert Nexus Required for Admissibility of Drug-Use Evidence: State v. Hundley Standard

Date: May 15, 2025
Expert Nexus Required for Admissibility of Drug-Use Evidence: The New Standard Established in State of West Virginia v. Hundley Introduction State of West Virginia v. Scott Michael Andrew Hundley,...
People v. Thomison (2025): Strengthening the “Basis-of-Knowledge” Requirement for Informant Tips and Re-limiting Intrusive Detentions Following Routine Traffic Stops

People v. Thomison (2025): Strengthening the “Basis-of-Knowledge” Requirement for Informant Tips and Re-limiting Intrusive Detentions Following Routine Traffic Stops

Date: May 15, 2025
People v. Thomison (2025): Strengthening the “Basis-of-Knowledge” Requirement for Informant Tips and Re-limiting Intrusive Detentions Following Routine Traffic Stops Introduction People v. Thomison,...
Union Standing Beyond Active Membership & Retiree Grievance Exemption: The Precedential Effect of Chappaqua Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education (2025)

Union Standing Beyond Active Membership & Retiree Grievance Exemption: The Precedential Effect of Chappaqua Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education (2025)

Date: May 15, 2025
Union Standing Beyond Active Membership & Retiree Grievance Exemption: The Precedential Effect of Chappaqua Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education (2025) 1. Introduction The Appellate Division,...
Overcoming Statutory Grandparent Placement Preference: Continuity of Care and Child Welfare in In re A.H. & G.H.

Overcoming Statutory Grandparent Placement Preference: Continuity of Care and Child Welfare in In re A.H. & G.H.

Date: May 15, 2025
Overcoming Statutory Grandparent Placement Preference: Continuity of Care and Child Welfare in In re A.H. & G.H. Introduction In the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia’s memorandum decision In...
Notice of Pendency Insufficient to Upset Good-Faith Foreclosure Purchaser’s Title after Reversal – A Commentary on Yesmin v. Aliobaba, LLC (2025)

Notice of Pendency Insufficient to Upset Good-Faith Foreclosure Purchaser’s Title after Reversal – A Commentary on Yesmin v. Aliobaba, LLC (2025)

Date: May 15, 2025
“Lis Pendens versus Good-Faith Foreclosure Purchaser” – The New Rule from Yesmin v. Aliobaba, LLC 1. Introduction Yesmin v. Aliobaba, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 02964, presented the New York Appellate...
Williams v. Levine: Elevating XLIF to Accepted Neurosurgical Practice and Tightening Expert‐Affidavit Standards on Summary Judgment

Williams v. Levine: Elevating XLIF to Accepted Neurosurgical Practice and Tightening Expert‐Affidavit Standards on Summary Judgment

Date: May 15, 2025
Williams v. Levine: Elevating XLIF to Accepted Neurosurgical Practice and Tightening Expert-Affidavit Standards on Summary Judgment Introduction In Williams v. Levine, 2025 NY Slip Op 02962, the...
Weekes v. Tishman Technologies Corp.: Construction-Manager Liability and Ancillary Scaffold Removal under New York Labor Law §240(1)

Weekes v. Tishman Technologies Corp.: Construction-Manager Liability and Ancillary Scaffold Removal under New York Labor Law §240(1)

Date: May 15, 2025
Weekes v. Tishman Technologies Corp.: Construction-Manager Liability and Ancillary Scaffold Removal under New York Labor Law §240(1) I. Introduction In Weekes v. Tishman Technologies Corporation, 238...

        “A Legal Nullity Without Leave” –  
        Raiola v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and the Dual Thresholds for (1) Adding New Defendants and (2) CPLR 3211(a)(7) Dismissals

“A Legal Nullity Without Leave” – Raiola v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and the Dual Thresholds for (1) Adding New Defendants and (2) CPLR 3211(a)(7) Dismissals

Date: May 15, 2025
“A Legal Nullity Without Leave” – Raiola v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and the Dual Thresholds for (1) Adding New Defendants and (2) CPLR 3211(a)(7) Dismissals Introduction Raiola v. Roman...
“Harassment Is Not Fraud”: People v. Wilson and the Refined Standard for Intent to Defraud under N.Y. Penal Law § 175.10

“Harassment Is Not Fraud”: People v. Wilson and the Refined Standard for Intent to Defraud under N.Y. Penal Law § 175.10

Date: May 15, 2025
“Harassment Is Not Fraud”: People v. Wilson and the Refined Standard for Intent to Defraud under N.Y. Penal Law § 175.10 Introduction People v. Wilson (2025 NY Slip Op 02940) arises from a modern...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert