Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

state Case Commentaries

Permissible Use of Competitor Names in Attorney Keyword Advertising with Mandatory Disclaimer

Permissible Use of Competitor Names in Attorney Keyword Advertising with Mandatory Disclaimer

Date: May 23, 2025
Permissible Use of Competitor Names in Attorney Keyword Advertising with Mandatory Disclaimer Introduction In In Re Opinion No. 735 of the Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics, 260...
Adult Juvenile-Age Convictions Qualify as Predicate Offenses Under the Illinois Armed Habitual Criminal Statute

Adult Juvenile-Age Convictions Qualify as Predicate Offenses Under the Illinois Armed Habitual Criminal Statute

Date: May 23, 2025
Adult Juvenile-Age Convictions Qualify as Predicate Offenses Under the Illinois Armed Habitual Criminal Statute Introduction People v. Wallace, 2025 IL 130173, is a landmark decision in which the...
Illinois Supreme Court Reaffirms Non-Recognition of Civil Tort for Parental Custody Interference

Illinois Supreme Court Reaffirms Non-Recognition of Civil Tort for Parental Custody Interference

Date: May 23, 2025
Illinois Supreme Court Reaffirms Non-Recognition of Civil Tort for Parental Custody Interference Introduction In Hulsh v. Hulsh (2025 IL 130931), the Supreme Court of Illinois addressed whether...
Clarifying Economic Misconduct: Excluding Potential Income from Marital Estate

Clarifying Economic Misconduct: Excluding Potential Income from Marital Estate

Date: May 23, 2025
Clarifying Economic Misconduct: Excluding Potential Income from Marital Estate Introduction Van Beek v. Van Beek, 2025 ND 96, is a Supreme Court of North Dakota decision handed down on May 22, 2025....
State’s Burden to Disprove Justification and the Definition of Premeditation in Capital Murder – Deric Smith v. Arkansas

State’s Burden to Disprove Justification and the Definition of Premeditation in Capital Murder – Deric Smith v. Arkansas

Date: May 23, 2025
State’s Burden to Disprove Justification and the Definition of Premeditation in Capital Murder Introduction Deric Smith v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 83, is a Supreme Court of Arkansas decision...
Extending Sales-Tax Liability to In-House “Scrip” Used for Private Performances – Commentary on Matter of O’Neill v. New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal

Extending Sales-Tax Liability to In-House “Scrip” Used for Private Performances – Commentary on Matter of O’Neill v. New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal

Date: May 23, 2025
Extending Sales-Tax Liability to In-House “Scrip” Used for Private Performances – Commentary on Matter of O’Neill v. New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal (2025 NY Slip Op 03110) 1. Introduction The...
“Beyond 50-50” – DeCrescenzo v Suslak (2025) and the Reinforced Discretion of New York Courts in Equitable Distribution, Income Imputation, and Contempt Findings

“Beyond 50-50” – DeCrescenzo v Suslak (2025) and the Reinforced Discretion of New York Courts in Equitable Distribution, Income Imputation, and Contempt Findings

Date: May 23, 2025
“Beyond 50-50” – DeCrescenzo v Suslak (2025) and the Reinforced Discretion of New York Courts in Equitable Distribution, Income Imputation, and Contempt Findings 1. Introduction In DeCrescenzo v...
Reclaim the Records v. NYS DOH:  A New FOIL Standard for Vital-Statistics Data

Reclaim the Records v. NYS DOH: A New FOIL Standard for Vital-Statistics Data

Date: May 23, 2025
Reclaim the Records v. New York State Department of Health (2025): A New FOIL Standard for Vital-Statistics Data 1. Introduction In Matter of Reclaim the Records v. New York State Department of...
Preserving Witness Impartiality and Exclusion of Unadjudicated Charges in Criminal Trials

Preserving Witness Impartiality and Exclusion of Unadjudicated Charges in Criminal Trials

Date: May 23, 2025
Preserving Witness Impartiality and Exclusion of Unadjudicated Charges in Criminal Trials Introduction State of West Virginia v. Chad M. Eldredge involved allegations that Chad Eldredge, acting as...
Elevating Ethical Accountability: Heightened Scrutiny of Elected Prosecutors under Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(h)

Elevating Ethical Accountability: Heightened Scrutiny of Elected Prosecutors under Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(h)

Date: May 23, 2025
Elevating Ethical Accountability: Heightened Scrutiny of Elected Prosecutors under Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(h) Introduction Disciplinary Counsel v. Black (Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-1790) addresses the...
Certification Prerequisite for Attorney General Representation Under Ark. Code § 25-16-702

Certification Prerequisite for Attorney General Representation Under Ark. Code § 25-16-702

Date: May 23, 2025
Certification Prerequisite for Attorney General Representation Under Ark. Code § 25-16-702 Introduction In Tim Griffin, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of Arkansas v. Arkansas Board of...
Affirming Virginia’s Public Use Requirement: Invalidity of Private Takings Under Code § 56-16.3

Affirming Virginia’s Public Use Requirement: Invalidity of Private Takings Under Code § 56-16.3

Date: May 23, 2025
Affirming Virginia’s Public Use Requirement: Invalidity of Private Takings Under Code § 56-16.3 Introduction In Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. State Corporation Commission (Record No. 240869, Va....
Presumption of Flight Risk for Unauthorized Aliens Charged with Forcible Felonies under Florida Rule 3.132(f)(2)

Presumption of Flight Risk for Unauthorized Aliens Charged with Forcible Felonies under Florida Rule 3.132(f)(2)

Date: May 23, 2025
Presumption of Flight Risk for Unauthorized Aliens Charged with Forcible Felonies under Florida Rule 3.132(f)(2) Introduction In In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure – 2025...
Ensuring Full and Fair Custody Hearings: Procedural Due Process in Harris v. Tucker

Ensuring Full and Fair Custody Hearings: Procedural Due Process in Harris v. Tucker

Date: May 23, 2025
Ensuring Full and Fair Custody Hearings: Procedural Due Process in Harris v. Tucker Introduction Harris v. Tucker, decided by the Supreme Court of Delaware on May 22, 2025, addresses a father’s...
Presumption of Authenticity for Court Official Signatures and the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal

Presumption of Authenticity for Court Official Signatures and the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal

Date: May 23, 2025
Presumption of Authenticity for Court Official Signatures and the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal Introduction In In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration...
Directory Nature of the 48-Hour Pretrial Detention Hearing Rule under Illinois’ Pretrial Fairness Act

Directory Nature of the 48-Hour Pretrial Detention Hearing Rule under Illinois’ Pretrial Fairness Act

Date: May 23, 2025
Directory Nature of the 48-Hour Pretrial Detention Hearing Rule under Illinois’ Pretrial Fairness Act Introduction People v. Cooper (2025 IL 130946) addresses a key procedural question under the...
Functional Waiver of Right to Counsel Under Sixth Amendment Affirmed in State v. Lewellyn

Functional Waiver of Right to Counsel Under Sixth Amendment Affirmed in State v. Lewellyn

Date: May 23, 2025
Functional Waiver of Right to Counsel Under Sixth Amendment Affirmed in State v. Lewellyn Introduction The Supreme Court of North Dakota’s decision in State v. Lewellyn, 2025 ND 98, addresses the...
Severson v. Gupta: Defining the Limits of the “Obvious Occurrence” Exception and Amendment Standards in North Dakota Medical Malpractice Claims

Severson v. Gupta: Defining the Limits of the “Obvious Occurrence” Exception and Amendment Standards in North Dakota Medical Malpractice Claims

Date: May 23, 2025
Severson v. Gupta: Defining the Limits of the “Obvious Occurrence” Exception and Amendment Standards in North Dakota Medical Malpractice Claims Introduction In Severson v. Gupta, 2025 ND 101, the...
“Substantial-Compliance” Standard for Good-Guy Guaranties – A Commentary on Empanada Fresca LLC v. 1 BK Street Corp. (2025)

“Substantial-Compliance” Standard for Good-Guy Guaranties – A Commentary on Empanada Fresca LLC v. 1 BK Street Corp. (2025)

Date: May 23, 2025
“Substantial-Compliance” Standard for Good-Guy Guaranties Empanada Fresca LLC v. 1 BK Street Corp., 238 A.D.3d 589 (1st Dep’t 2025) I. Introduction Empanada Fresca LLC operated a Colombian restaurant...
Intent Over Consent: Court of Appeals Broadens Admissibility of Molineux Evidence in Consent-Defense Sexual Assault Cases

Intent Over Consent: Court of Appeals Broadens Admissibility of Molineux Evidence in Consent-Defense Sexual Assault Cases

Date: May 23, 2025
Intent Over Consent: Court of Appeals Broadens Admissibility of Molineux Evidence in Consent-Defense Sexual Assault Cases Introduction In People v. Hu Sin, 2025 NY Slip Op 03100, the New York Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert