Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

state Case Commentaries

Eric Overton v. State of Arkansas: Uncorroborated Minor Testimony Sufficiency & Voir Dire Instruction Limits

Eric Overton v. State of Arkansas: Uncorroborated Minor Testimony Sufficiency & Voir Dire Instruction Limits

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Eric Overton v. State of Arkansas: Uncorroborated Minor Testimony Sufficiency & Voir Dire Instruction Limits Introduction This commentary analyzes the Supreme Court of Arkansas’s decision in Eric...
Amendment 33 Enforcement: Safeguarding Constitutional Boards’ Powers Against Usurpation

Amendment 33 Enforcement: Safeguarding Constitutional Boards’ Powers Against Usurpation

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Amendment 33 Enforcement: Safeguarding Constitutional Boards’ Powers Against Usurpation Introduction The Supreme Court of Arkansas’s decision in Sarah Sanders et al. v. Arkansas Board of Corrections...
Fair and Just Reasons for Pre-Sentencing Plea Withdrawal: State v. Walter

Fair and Just Reasons for Pre-Sentencing Plea Withdrawal: State v. Walter

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Fair and Just Reasons for Pre-Sentencing Plea Withdrawal: State v. Walter Introduction State v. Walter is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi, filed June 5, 2025, that clarifies and...
People v. Smart (2025 IL 130127): Admissibility of Other-Acts Evidence to Prove Intent in Specific-Intent Crimes and Harmless-Error in Bench Trials

People v. Smart (2025 IL 130127): Admissibility of Other-Acts Evidence to Prove Intent in Specific-Intent Crimes and Harmless-Error in Bench Trials

Date: Jun 10, 2025
People v. Smart (2025 IL 130127): Admissibility of Other-Acts Evidence to Prove Intent in Specific-Intent Crimes and Harmless-Error in Bench Trials Introduction This Supreme Court of Illinois...
Parole Review Statute for Emerging Adults Precludes De Facto Life Sentences: People v. Spencer

Parole Review Statute for Emerging Adults Precludes De Facto Life Sentences: People v. Spencer

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Parole Review Statute for Emerging Adults Precludes De Facto Life Sentences: People v. Spencer Introduction People v. Spencer, 2025 IL 130015, is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Illinois...
Clarifying the Scope of “Managing or General Agent” for Corporate Service of Process Under Utah Rule 4(d)(1)(E)

Clarifying the Scope of “Managing or General Agent” for Corporate Service of Process Under Utah Rule 4(d)(1)(E)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Clarifying the Scope of “Managing or General Agent” for Corporate Service of Process Under Utah Rule 4(d)(1)(E) Introduction Griffin v. Snow Christensen & Martineau (2025 UT 16) presented the Utah...
Revised GIA Damages Cap Requires Independent Constitutional Analysis: Limited Reach of Condemarin

Revised GIA Damages Cap Requires Independent Constitutional Analysis: Limited Reach of Condemarin

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Revised GIA Damages Cap Requires Independent Constitutional Analysis: Limited Reach of Condemarin Introduction This commentary examines the Utah Supreme Court’s decision in University of Utah...
Establishing a Claim-of-Right Defense in Criminal Trespass: The Objective Evidence Threshold

Establishing a Claim-of-Right Defense in Criminal Trespass: The Objective Evidence Threshold

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Establishing a Claim-of-Right Defense in Criminal Trespass: The Objective Evidence Threshold Introduction In Commonwealth v. Kartozia, the Supreme Court of Virginia addressed whether a defendant...
Reinforcing the Strickland Two-Prong Test in Rule 37.1 Postconviction Proceedings: Turnbo v. Arkansas

Reinforcing the Strickland Two-Prong Test in Rule 37.1 Postconviction Proceedings: Turnbo v. Arkansas

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Reinforcing the Strickland Two-Prong Test in Rule 37.1 Postconviction Proceedings: Turnbo v. Arkansas Introduction Clarence Turnbo v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 106 addresses the scope and...
Strict Preservation of Objections to Prosecutorial Closing Arguments Established in Raymond Lovett v. State of Arkansas

Strict Preservation of Objections to Prosecutorial Closing Arguments Established in Raymond Lovett v. State of Arkansas

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Strict Preservation of Objections to Prosecutorial Closing Arguments Established in Raymond Lovett v. State of Arkansas Introduction Raymond Lovett v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 100, is a Supreme...
Reasonably Calculated Notice Meets Due Process in Tax Sales; Sovereign Immunity Bars Invalid Claims

Reasonably Calculated Notice Meets Due Process in Tax Sales; Sovereign Immunity Bars Invalid Claims

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Reasonably Calculated Notice Meets Due Process in Tax Sales; Sovereign Immunity Bars Invalid Claims Introduction This case arises from Tommy Land’s role as Arkansas Commissioner of State Lands and...
In re C.N. et al.: Mandating Specific Factual Findings and Proper Dispositional Standards in Child Abuse and Neglect Proceedings

In re C.N. et al.: Mandating Specific Factual Findings and Proper Dispositional Standards in Child Abuse and Neglect Proceedings

Date: Jun 10, 2025
In re C.N., D.N., H.N-1, I.P. & H.N-2: Mandating Specific Factual Findings and Proper Dispositional Standards in Child Abuse & Neglect Proceedings Introduction In this appeal, the Supreme Court of...
Stipulating ‘Court May Impose’ Consecutive Sentences: Resolving Ambiguities in Oregon Plea Agreements

Stipulating ‘Court May Impose’ Consecutive Sentences: Resolving Ambiguities in Oregon Plea Agreements

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Stipulating ‘Court May Impose’ Consecutive Sentences: Resolving Ambiguities in Oregon Plea Agreements Introduction In State of Oregon v. James Clare Walsh IV (373 Or 712, June 5, 2025), the Oregon...
Irrevocability Requirement for Government-Granted Property Interests under Florida’s Takings Clause

Irrevocability Requirement for Government-Granted Property Interests under Florida’s Takings Clause

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Irrevocability Requirement for Government-Granted Property Interests under Florida’s Takings Clause Introduction In Gustavo Bojorquez, et al. v. State of Florida, the Supreme Court of Florida...
Mandating Multilingual Residential Eviction Summons: Enhancing Procedural Fairness under Florida Rule 1.923(a)

Mandating Multilingual Residential Eviction Summons: Enhancing Procedural Fairness under Florida Rule 1.923(a)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Mandating Multilingual Residential Eviction Summons: Enhancing Procedural Fairness under Florida Rule 1.923(a) Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Florida’s per curiam decision...
Unambiguous Plat Dedications: Private Rights of Way Preclude Extrinsic Evidence

Unambiguous Plat Dedications: Private Rights of Way Preclude Extrinsic Evidence

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Unambiguous Plat Dedications: Private Rights of Way Preclude Extrinsic Evidence Introduction In Arthur Behm v. John Ketchum and the Matanuska-Susitna Borough (Supreme Court No. S-18872, June 4,...
Reaffirmation of Substantial-Change and Procedural Compliance in Child Custody Modifications

Reaffirmation of Substantial-Change and Procedural Compliance in Child Custody Modifications

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Reaffirmation of Substantial-Change and Procedural Compliance in Child Custody Modifications Introduction In Edward H. v. Sarah B., No. S-19072 (Alaska Sup. Ct. June 4, 2025), the Alaska Supreme...
Dram Shop Immunity Extends to Non-Serving Entities and Limits Restatement §324A Liability

Dram Shop Immunity Extends to Non-Serving Entities and Limits Restatement §324A Liability

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Dram Shop Immunity Extends to Non-Serving Entities and Limits Restatement §324A Liability Introduction Barnes v. Hooper and Harrington Raceway, Inc. d/b/a Harrington Raceway & Casino is a landmark...
No Duty of West Virginia DHS to Fund Services for Children under Private Guardianship Absent Statutory Authority

No Duty of West Virginia DHS to Fund Services for Children under Private Guardianship Absent Statutory Authority

Date: Jun 10, 2025
No Duty of West Virginia DHS to Fund Services for Children under Private Guardianship Absent Statutory Authority Introduction State ex rel. West Virginia Department of Human Services v. The Honorable...
Clarification of Rule 52(c) Judgment as a Matter of Law and Attorneys’ Fees Under § 9-1-45

Clarification of Rule 52(c) Judgment as a Matter of Law and Attorneys’ Fees Under § 9-1-45

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Clarification of Rule 52(c) Judgment as a Matter of Law and Attorneys’ Fees Under § 9-1-45 Introduction Cashman Equipment Corporation, Inc. v. Cardi Corporation, Inc. (2025) is a landmark Rhode...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert