Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

state Case Commentaries

State v. Alford (2025 MT 171): Montana Supreme Court Affirms the Constitutionality of Mandatory Minimum Custodial Sentences for 4th-and-Subsequent DUI Offenses

State v. Alford (2025 MT 171): Montana Supreme Court Affirms the Constitutionality of Mandatory Minimum Custodial Sentences for 4th-and-Subsequent DUI Offenses

Date: Aug 7, 2025
State v. Alford (2025 MT 171): Montana Supreme Court Affirms the Constitutionality of Mandatory Minimum Custodial Sentences for 4th-and-Subsequent DUI Offenses 1. Introduction The Montana Supreme...
Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Need for Notice and Hearing Before Trial-Court Determination of Ineffective Assistance

Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Need for Notice and Hearing Before Trial-Court Determination of Ineffective Assistance

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Need for Notice and Hearing Before Trial-Court Determination of Ineffective Assistance Introduction Case: State v. B. Kelsey (2025 MT 173N, DA 23-0230) – non-citable...
State v. Vaska (2025): Consolidating Reasonable-Time Probable-Cause Determinations and Re-Anchoring the “Ability-to-Pay” Rule for Criminal Fines

State v. Vaska (2025): Consolidating Reasonable-Time Probable-Cause Determinations and Re-Anchoring the “Ability-to-Pay” Rule for Criminal Fines

Date: Aug 7, 2025
State v. Vaska (Mont. 2025): Consolidating Reasonable-Time Probable-Cause Determinations and Re-Anchoring the “Ability-to-Pay” Rule for Criminal Fines 1. Introduction In State v. Harlan G. Vaska,...

        “Scrupulous & Meticulous”: The Montana Supreme Court’s Re-affirmation of
        Ability-to-Pay Findings and Accurate Credit for Time Served in State v. M. Sullivan

“Scrupulous & Meticulous”: The Montana Supreme Court’s Re-affirmation of Ability-to-Pay Findings and Accurate Credit for Time Served in State v. M. Sullivan

Date: Aug 7, 2025
“Scrupulous & Meticulous”: The Montana Supreme Court’s Re-affirmation of Ability-to-Pay Findings and Accurate Credit for Time Served in State v. M. Sullivan 1. Introduction The appeal in State v....
State v. Keech (2025): Revocation Sentences, Concurrent–Consecutive Designations, and the “Facial Illegality” Escape Hatch from Res Judicata

State v. Keech (2025): Revocation Sentences, Concurrent–Consecutive Designations, and the “Facial Illegality” Escape Hatch from Res Judicata

Date: Aug 7, 2025
State v. Keech (2025): Revocation Sentences, Concurrent–Consecutive Designations, and the “Facial Illegality” Escape Hatch from Res Judicata Introduction State v. Keech, 2025 MT 169, is a sweeping...
Kirby v. Perkins: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Best-Interests Analysis and Limits Reliance on Third-Party Funding in School-Choice Custody Disputes

Kirby v. Perkins: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Best-Interests Analysis and Limits Reliance on Third-Party Funding in School-Choice Custody Disputes

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Kirby v. Perkins: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Best-Interests Analysis and Limits Reliance on Third-Party Funding in School-Choice Custody Disputes 1. Introduction Kirby v. Perkins, Supreme Court...
Express Severance “Cancellation of All Prior Agreements” Clauses Extinguish Trailing Commission Rights and Bar Later Contract Claims: Commentary on Wagschal v. Ecconergy (2025 NY Slip Op 04595)

Express Severance “Cancellation of All Prior Agreements” Clauses Extinguish Trailing Commission Rights and Bar Later Contract Claims: Commentary on Wagschal v. Ecconergy (2025 NY Slip Op 04595)

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Express Severance “Cancellation of All Prior Agreements” Clauses Extinguish Trailing Commission Rights and Bar Later Contract Claims: Commentary on Wagschal v. Ecconergy (2025 NY Slip Op 04595)...
People v. Lloyd F.: Second Department sets a stringent “extraordinary circumstances” bar under CPL 722.23(1)(d) for retaining adolescent-offender cases in the Youth Part

People v. Lloyd F.: Second Department sets a stringent “extraordinary circumstances” bar under CPL 722.23(1)(d) for retaining adolescent-offender cases in the Youth Part

Date: Aug 7, 2025
People v. Lloyd F.: Second Department sets a stringent “extraordinary circumstances” bar under CPL 722.23(1)(d) for retaining adolescent-offender cases in the Youth Part Introduction In People v....
Moving Scaffolds Under Ceiling Obstacles: Unsecured Materials “Require Securing” — Second Department Revives Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6) Claims and Negligence Against Subcontractor

Moving Scaffolds Under Ceiling Obstacles: Unsecured Materials “Require Securing” — Second Department Revives Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6) Claims and Negligence Against Subcontractor

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Moving Scaffolds Under Ceiling Obstacles: Unsecured Materials “Require Securing” — Second Department Revives Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6) Claims and Negligence Against Subcontractor Introduction...
No Personal Jurisdiction Needed to Domesticate Sister‑State Judgments in New York: Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Simms

No Personal Jurisdiction Needed to Domesticate Sister‑State Judgments in New York: Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Simms

Date: Aug 7, 2025
No Personal Jurisdiction Needed to Domesticate Sister‑State Judgments in New York Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Simms (2025 NY Slip Op 04541), Appellate Division, Second Department Introduction...
COVID-19 Tolling Applies to the CPLR 205(a)/205-a Six-Month Savings Period in Foreclosure Actions; Dismissal for RPAPL 1306 Noncompliance Is Not “On the Merits”

COVID-19 Tolling Applies to the CPLR 205(a)/205-a Six-Month Savings Period in Foreclosure Actions; Dismissal for RPAPL 1306 Noncompliance Is Not “On the Merits”

Date: Aug 7, 2025
COVID-19 Tolling Applies to the CPLR 205(a)/205-a Six-Month Savings Period in Foreclosure Actions; Dismissal for RPAPL 1306 Noncompliance Is Not “On the Merits” Introduction This commentary examines...
Contractual Waiver of Resignation Challenges Does Not Extinguish Right to Seek Religious Accommodation Under DOE Vaccine Mandate

Contractual Waiver of Resignation Challenges Does Not Extinguish Right to Seek Religious Accommodation Under DOE Vaccine Mandate

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Contractual Waiver of Resignation Challenges Does Not Extinguish Right to Seek Religious Accommodation Under DOE Vaccine Mandate Case: Matter of LaBarbera v. New York City Department of Education,...
Imputing Counsel’s Repeated Neglect to the Client: Second Department Narrows “Interest‑of‑Justice” Vacatur and Enforces the One‑Year CPLR 5015(a)(1) Deadline

Imputing Counsel’s Repeated Neglect to the Client: Second Department Narrows “Interest‑of‑Justice” Vacatur and Enforces the One‑Year CPLR 5015(a)(1) Deadline

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Imputing Counsel’s Repeated Neglect to the Client: Second Department Narrows “Interest‑of‑Justice” Vacatur and Enforces the One‑Year CPLR 5015(a)(1) Deadline Introduction In Zlobec v. Bank of N.Y....
Closed A‑Frame Ladder Use, Speculative Lighting Claims, and Recurring Water: The Second Department’s Clarification of §§ 240(1), 241(6), and 200 in Araujo v. Monadnock Construction, Inc.

Closed A‑Frame Ladder Use, Speculative Lighting Claims, and Recurring Water: The Second Department’s Clarification of §§ 240(1), 241(6), and 200 in Araujo v. Monadnock Construction, Inc.

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Closed A‑Frame Ladder Use, Speculative Lighting Claims, and Recurring Water: The Second Department’s Clarification of §§ 240(1), 241(6), and 200 in Araujo v. Monadnock Construction, Inc. Introduction...
Coverage Denial as a Single Breach: Second Department Fixes Accrual at Disclaimer Date and Rejects Continuing‑Wrong Tolling for Excess Workers’ Compensation Policies

Coverage Denial as a Single Breach: Second Department Fixes Accrual at Disclaimer Date and Rejects Continuing‑Wrong Tolling for Excess Workers’ Compensation Policies

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Coverage Denial as a Single Breach: Second Department Fixes Accrual at Disclaimer Date and Rejects Continuing‑Wrong Tolling for Excess Workers’ Compensation Policies Introduction In New York Bus...
The Heckscher Specificity Rule: Under Court of Claims Act §11(b), an Insufficient “Place” Allegation Is a Jurisdictional Defect That Cannot Be Cured by Amendment, Cannot Be Treated as a Claim, and Does Not Extend Time to File

The Heckscher Specificity Rule: Under Court of Claims Act §11(b), an Insufficient “Place” Allegation Is a Jurisdictional Defect That Cannot Be Cured by Amendment, Cannot Be Treated as a Claim, and Does Not Extend Time to File

Date: Aug 7, 2025
The Heckscher Specificity Rule: Under Court of Claims Act §11(b), an Insufficient “Place” Allegation Is a Jurisdictional Defect That Cannot Be Cured by Amendment, Cannot Be Treated as a Claim, and...
State v. Logston (2025): Constitutional Supremacy in Consecutive Sentencing After Probation Revocation

State v. Logston (2025): Constitutional Supremacy in Consecutive Sentencing After Probation Revocation

Date: Aug 6, 2025
State v. Logston (374 Or 101, 2025): Constitutional Supremacy in Consecutive Sentencing After Probation Revocation Introduction State v. Logston presented the Oregon Supreme Court with a narrow, but...
Jeffers and the Harmless-Error Doctrine: When the Absence of a Presentence Report Is Cured by a Mandatory Life-Without-Mercy Sentence

Jeffers and the Harmless-Error Doctrine: When the Absence of a Presentence Report Is Cured by a Mandatory Life-Without-Mercy Sentence

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Jeffers and the Harmless-Error Doctrine: When the Absence of a Presentence Report Is Cured by a Mandatory Life-Without-Mercy Sentence 1. Introduction In State of West Virginia v. Argie L. Jeffers,...
Beyond “Seal or Remove”: The Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Defines the Constitutional Limits of Record-Sealing under HRS § 831-3.2(f)

Beyond “Seal or Remove”: The Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Defines the Constitutional Limits of Record-Sealing under HRS § 831-3.2(f)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Beyond “Seal or Remove”: The Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Defines the Constitutional Limits of Record-Sealing under HRS § 831-3.2(f) Introduction On 4 August 2025 the Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi issued a...
Extending the Moeller Symmetry: Alaska Supreme Court Requires Symmetrical Custody Analysis for Significant In-State Relocations and Re-Affirms the Statutory Preference for Joint Legal Custody

Extending the Moeller Symmetry: Alaska Supreme Court Requires Symmetrical Custody Analysis for Significant In-State Relocations and Re-Affirms the Statutory Preference for Joint Legal Custody

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Extending the Moeller Symmetry: Alaska Supreme Court Requires Symmetrical Custody Analysis for Significant In-State Relocations and Re-Affirms the Statutory Preference for Joint Legal Custody...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert