Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

state Case Commentaries

Preserving the Status Quo: Prevailing-Party Attorney Fees for Defending Nonsuited Post-Divorce Petitions under Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-103(c)

Preserving the Status Quo: Prevailing-Party Attorney Fees for Defending Nonsuited Post-Divorce Petitions under Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-103(c)

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Preserving the Status Quo: Prevailing-Party Attorney Fees for Defending Nonsuited Post-Divorce Petitions under Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-103(c) Introduction In Vanessa Colley v. John S. Colley, III, the...
Strict Construction Excludes Occupational Diseases from Preexisting Disabilities under Section 287.220.3(2)(a)(ii)

Strict Construction Excludes Occupational Diseases from Preexisting Disabilities under Section 287.220.3(2)(a)(ii)

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Strict Construction Excludes Occupational Diseases from Preexisting Disabilities under Section 287.220.3(2)(a)(ii) Introduction In Treasurer of the State of Missouri – Custodian of the Second Injury...
Waiver of Jury Trial by Default of Appearance: Plain Error and Constitutional Guarantees

Waiver of Jury Trial by Default of Appearance: Plain Error and Constitutional Guarantees

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Waiver of Jury Trial by Default of Appearance: Plain Error and Constitutional Guarantees Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Montana’s decision in City of Missoula v. S....
Requirement of Expert Testimony for Standard of Care in Specialized Equipment Maintenance

Requirement of Expert Testimony for Standard of Care in Specialized Equipment Maintenance

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Requirement of Expert Testimony for Standard of Care in Specialized Equipment Maintenance Introduction In Seymour v. State, 2025 MT 88, the Supreme Court of Montana addressed whether a plaintiff in a...
Commercial Auto Policies: No Mandatory UIM Offer for Non-Owned Vehicles Under WV Code § 33-6-31

Commercial Auto Policies: No Mandatory UIM Offer for Non-Owned Vehicles Under WV Code § 33-6-31

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Commercial Auto Policies: No Mandatory UIM Offer for Non-Owned Vehicles Under WV Code § 33-6-31 Introduction In Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Co. v. Cooper, 2025 WL ___ (W. Va. Apr. 29, 2025),...
Price v. State: Encirclement of a Vehicle Constitutes Seizure Requiring Reasonable Suspicion

Price v. State: Encirclement of a Vehicle Constitutes Seizure Requiring Reasonable Suspicion

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Price v. State: Encirclement of a Vehicle Constitutes Seizure Requiring Reasonable Suspicion Introduction In Price v. State (Del. 2025), the Delaware Supreme Court, sitting en banc, clarified when a...
Estate of Richard E. Paul: Personal Representative’s Authority to Sell When Settlement Agreement Conditions Are Unmet

Estate of Richard E. Paul: Personal Representative’s Authority to Sell When Settlement Agreement Conditions Are Unmet

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Estate of Richard E. Paul: Personal Representative’s Authority to Sell When Settlement Agreement Conditions Are Unmet Introduction In Estate of Richard E. Paul (2025 MT 86), the Montana Supreme Court...
Defining “In Connection With Your Business” in Non-Owned Auto Insurance Coverage

Defining “In Connection With Your Business” in Non-Owned Auto Insurance Coverage

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Defining “In Connection With Your Business” in Non-Owned Auto Insurance Coverage Introduction This case arises from a fatal collision involving Martin A. Montano Jr., an employee of Casas Custom...
Defining “Reasonable Clarity” in Public Records Requests and the Mootness Doctrine under R.C. 149.43

Defining “Reasonable Clarity” in Public Records Requests and the Mootness Doctrine under R.C. 149.43

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Defining “Reasonable Clarity” in Public Records Requests and the Mootness Doctrine under R.C. 149.43 Introduction This case arises from an original mandamus action brought by Estephen Castellon, a...
Reaffirming Original Jurisdiction and the “Cast Doubt” Standard in Post-Election Ballot Title Challenges

Reaffirming Original Jurisdiction and the “Cast Doubt” Standard in Post-Election Ballot Title Challenges

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Reaffirming Original Jurisdiction and the “Cast Doubt” Standard in Post-Election Ballot Title Challenges Introduction Raymond McCarty and three fellow registered Missouri voters (“Contestants”) filed...
Excess Sentence Is Not a Jurisdictional Defect: Exclusivity of Rule 24.035 in Post-Conviction Relief

Excess Sentence Is Not a Jurisdictional Defect: Exclusivity of Rule 24.035 in Post-Conviction Relief

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Excess Sentence Is Not a Jurisdictional Defect: Exclusivity of Rule 24.035 in Post-Conviction Relief Introduction In In re Robert J. Branson v. Michael Shewmaker, Warden (Missouri Supreme Court,...
Presumption Against Exclusion of Defense Witnesses and Clarified Application of Rule 5-502 and McCarty Balancing in State v. Garcia

Presumption Against Exclusion of Defense Witnesses and Clarified Application of Rule 5-502 and McCarty Balancing in State v. Garcia

Date: Apr 29, 2025
Presumption Against Exclusion of Defense Witnesses and Clarified Application of Rule 5-502 and McCarty Balancing in State v. Garcia Introduction State v. Garcia (2025-NM-SC-40221 consolidated with...
Reaffirming Public Censure for Attorney Misconduct: Obligations of Competence, Diligence, Communication, and Honesty

Reaffirming Public Censure for Attorney Misconduct: Obligations of Competence, Diligence, Communication, and Honesty

Date: Apr 29, 2025
Reaffirming Public Censure for Attorney Misconduct: Obligations of Competence, Diligence, Communication, and Honesty I. Introduction In In the Matter of Michael K. Glucksman, decided April 28, 2025,...
Condition Precedents, Indemnity Notice Forfeitures, and the Excusal Doctrine in Delaware Contract Law

Condition Precedents, Indemnity Notice Forfeitures, and the Excusal Doctrine in Delaware Contract Law

Date: Apr 29, 2025
Condition Precedents, Indemnity Notice Forfeitures, and the Excusal Doctrine in Delaware Contract Law Introduction Thompson Street Capital Partners IV, L.P., acting as Members’ Representative...
Establishing Public Censure as Appropriate Sanction for Repeated Violations of Competence, Diligence, Communication, and Honesty

Establishing Public Censure as Appropriate Sanction for Repeated Violations of Competence, Diligence, Communication, and Honesty

Date: Apr 29, 2025
Establishing Public Censure as Appropriate Sanction for Repeated Violations of Competence, Diligence, Communication, and Honesty Introduction In In the Matter of Michael K. Glucksman (No....
Estate of Morgan v. Union Pacific: FELA Excludes Harassment-Induced Suicide Outside the Zone of Danger

Estate of Morgan v. Union Pacific: FELA Excludes Harassment-Induced Suicide Outside the Zone of Danger

Date: Apr 26, 2025
Estate of Morgan v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.: FELA Excludes Harassment-Induced Suicide Outside the Zone of Danger Introduction This case arises from the tragic death of Phillip Raymond Morgan, a...
Genetic Testing as the Exclusive Rebuttal to the Presumption of Paternity under 23 Pa.C.S. § 5104

Genetic Testing as the Exclusive Rebuttal to the Presumption of Paternity under 23 Pa.C.S. § 5104

Date: Apr 26, 2025
Genetic Testing as the Exclusive Rebuttal to the Presumption of Paternity under 23 Pa.C.S. § 5104 Introduction Sitler v. Jones, 2025 WL ___ (Pa. Apr. 25, 2025), presented the Supreme Court of...
Qualified Psychiatrist Requirement and Evidentiary Compliance in Psychological Workers’ Compensation Claims

Qualified Psychiatrist Requirement and Evidentiary Compliance in Psychological Workers’ Compensation Claims

Date: Apr 26, 2025
Qualified Psychiatrist Requirement and Evidentiary Compliance in Psychological Workers’ Compensation Claims Introduction E.B. v. Alliance Coal, LLC is a 2025 decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals...
Mug Shots as Identifiable Descriptions Under CHRIA – County Dissemination Prohibited

Mug Shots as Identifiable Descriptions Under CHRIA – County Dissemination Prohibited

Date: Apr 26, 2025
Mug Shots as Identifiable Descriptions Under CHRIA – County Dissemination Prohibited Introduction In Mezzacappa v. Northampton County, 2025 PA 40 MAP and 41 MAP, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania...
Arbitration of Derivative Claims Under Alabama’s § 8-1-150: Binding Nonsignatories to Arbitration Agreements

Arbitration of Derivative Claims Under Alabama’s § 8-1-150: Binding Nonsignatories to Arbitration Agreements

Date: Apr 26, 2025
Arbitration of Derivative Claims Under Alabama’s § 8-1-150: Binding Nonsignatories to Arbitration Agreements Introduction In Zynga, Inc. v. Gayla Hamilton Mills (SC-2024-0454) and Huuuge, Inc. v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert