Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

state Case Commentaries

“No Entity, No Title”: Wyoming Affirms That Estoppel-by-Deed Cannot Validate a Conveyance to a Non-Existent Corporation

“No Entity, No Title”: Wyoming Affirms That Estoppel-by-Deed Cannot Validate a Conveyance to a Non-Existent Corporation

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“No Entity, No Title”: Wyoming Affirms That Estoppel-by-Deed Cannot Validate a Conveyance to a Non-Existent Corporation Introduction In Kenneth R. Minshall v. Robin Griffin & Joy Osbon, 2025 WY 90,...
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies a 20-Year Statute of Limitations for Mortgage Foreclosure Actions

Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies a 20-Year Statute of Limitations for Mortgage Foreclosure Actions

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies a 20-Year Statute of Limitations for Mortgage Foreclosures Introduction In The Bank of New York Mellon v. White, SCWC-21-0000400 (Aug. 7 2025), the Hawaiʻi Supreme...
Smith v. Fontes: Cementing the “Exactly-15 %” Initiative Signature Standard and Barring Double-Counting of Invalid Signatures

Smith v. Fontes: Cementing the “Exactly-15 %” Initiative Signature Standard and Barring Double-Counting of Invalid Signatures

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Smith v. Fontes: Cementing the “Exactly-15 %” Initiative Signature Standard and Barring Double-Counting of Invalid Signatures Introduction Smith v. Fontes, decided by the Arizona Supreme Court on 6...
Shift-Differential & Premium Pay as “Earnable Compensation” under the South Carolina Retirement System:  A Commentary on William M. Luce v. Lexington County Health Services District, Inc.

Shift-Differential & Premium Pay as “Earnable Compensation” under the South Carolina Retirement System: A Commentary on William M. Luce v. Lexington County Health Services District, Inc.

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Shift-Differential & Premium Pay Are “Earnable Compensation” under the South Carolina Retirement System Introduction In William M. Luce v. Lexington County Health Services District, Inc., the Supreme...
“Maturity Means Due”: The Wyoming Supreme Court’s Definitive Test for Shareholder Promissory Notes in Aristatek, Inc. v. Sheesley (2025 WY 89)

“Maturity Means Due”: The Wyoming Supreme Court’s Definitive Test for Shareholder Promissory Notes in Aristatek, Inc. v. Sheesley (2025 WY 89)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Maturity Means Due”: The Wyoming Supreme Court’s Definitive Test for Shareholder Promissory Notes Aristatek, Inc. v. Sheesley, 2025 WY 89 (Wyo. Aug. 6, 2025) 1. Introduction The consolidated appeal...
“Maturity-Date Rules Supreme”: Wyoming Clarifies that Fixed-Term Promissory Notes Are Payable at Expiration Without a Separate “On-Demand” Clause

“Maturity-Date Rules Supreme”: Wyoming Clarifies that Fixed-Term Promissory Notes Are Payable at Expiration Without a Separate “On-Demand” Clause

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Maturity-Date Rules Supreme”: Wyoming Clarifies that Fixed-Term Promissory Notes Are Payable at Expiration Without a Separate “On-Demand” Clause Introduction The consolidated appeal of Jeffry v....
When Maturity Means Payable: Wyoming Supreme Court Clarifies the Status of Shareholder Promissory Notes and Rejects Re-Characterisation as Capital Contributions

When Maturity Means Payable: Wyoming Supreme Court Clarifies the Status of Shareholder Promissory Notes and Rejects Re-Characterisation as Capital Contributions

Date: Aug 13, 2025
When Maturity Means Payable: Wyoming Supreme Court Clarifies the Status of Shareholder Promissory Notes and Rejects Re-Characterisation as Capital Contributions 1. Introduction In Samuel Bruce King...
“Knowingly” Re-defined: Fitzwater v. State of Wyoming and the Duty to Disclose Household Members & Joint Assets in Welfare Applications

“Knowingly” Re-defined: Fitzwater v. State of Wyoming and the Duty to Disclose Household Members & Joint Assets in Welfare Applications

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Knowingly” Re-defined: Fitzwater v. State of Wyoming and the Duty to Disclose Household Members & Joint Assets in Welfare Applications Introduction Sarah Renee Fitzwater appealed her 18 felony...
“No Lay Representation & No Straw-Man”:  Skurdal v. Walker and the Supreme Court of Montana’s Firm Reaffirmation of Judicial Immunity and Rejection of Sovereign-Citizen Arguments

“No Lay Representation & No Straw-Man”: Skurdal v. Walker and the Supreme Court of Montana’s Firm Reaffirmation of Judicial Immunity and Rejection of Sovereign-Citizen Arguments

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“No Lay Representation & No Straw-Man”: Skurdal v. Walker and the Supreme Court of Montana’s Firm Reaffirmation of Judicial Immunity and Rejection of Sovereign-Citizen Arguments 1. Introduction In R....
Privileged Records Are Categorically Exempt; Original Payment Records Must Be Disclosed: Keene Publishing Corp. v. Fall Mountain Reg’l Sch. Dist. (2025)

Privileged Records Are Categorically Exempt; Original Payment Records Must Be Disclosed: Keene Publishing Corp. v. Fall Mountain Reg’l Sch. Dist. (2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Privileged Records Are Categorically Exempt; Original Payment Records Must Be Disclosed: Keene Publishing Corp. v. Fall Mountain Reg’l Sch. Dist. (2025) Introduction In Keene Publishing Corporation...
Bates v. Florida: Reaffirming Strict Procedural Bars and Narrow Warrant‑Period Rights in Capital Postconviction Practice

Bates v. Florida: Reaffirming Strict Procedural Bars and Narrow Warrant‑Period Rights in Capital Postconviction Practice

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Bates v. Florida: Reaffirming Strict Procedural Bars and Narrow Warrant‑Period Rights in Capital Postconviction Practice Introduction In Kayle B. Bates v. State of Florida and Kayle B. Bates v....
Interlocutory Appeals from Preliminary Injunctions Do Not Trigger Missouri Supreme Court Exclusive Jurisdiction Absent a Preserved Statute-Validity Ruling

Interlocutory Appeals from Preliminary Injunctions Do Not Trigger Missouri Supreme Court Exclusive Jurisdiction Absent a Preserved Statute-Validity Ruling

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Interlocutory Appeals from Preliminary Injunctions Do Not Trigger Missouri Supreme Court Exclusive Jurisdiction Absent a Preserved Statute-Validity Ruling 1. Introduction In Comprehensive Health of...
Prejudice, Not Error: New Hampshire Supreme Court Reaffirms That Cumulative Outcry and Treating-Physician Testimony Do Not Establish Ineffective Assistance Absent a Reasonable Probability of a Different Result

Prejudice, Not Error: New Hampshire Supreme Court Reaffirms That Cumulative Outcry and Treating-Physician Testimony Do Not Establish Ineffective Assistance Absent a Reasonable Probability of a Different Result

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Prejudice, Not Error: New Hampshire Supreme Court Reaffirms That Cumulative Outcry and Treating-Physician Testimony Do Not Establish Ineffective Assistance Absent a Reasonable Probability of a...
Prior Threats as Intrinsic Evidence of "Present Threat" Coercion in AFSA: The New Hampshire Supreme Court’s Clarification in State v. Rinaldi

Prior Threats as Intrinsic Evidence of "Present Threat" Coercion in AFSA: The New Hampshire Supreme Court’s Clarification in State v. Rinaldi

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Prior Threats as Intrinsic Evidence of "Present Threat" Coercion in AFSA: The New Hampshire Supreme Court’s Clarification in State v. Rinaldi Introduction In State of New Hampshire v. Matthew Rinaldi...
Colorado’s Anti-SLAPP Catchall: Two-Step “Public Issue/Public Interest” Test and Motive-Irrelevance Rule

Colorado’s Anti-SLAPP Catchall: Two-Step “Public Issue/Public Interest” Test and Motive-Irrelevance Rule

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Colorado’s Anti-SLAPP Catchall: Two-Step “Public Issue/Public Interest” Test and Motive-Irrelevance Rule 1. Introduction In Lind-Barnett v. Tender Care Veterinary Center, Inc., 2025 CO 62 (Colo. Aug....
Variance Scope Is Defined by Applicant Representations; Public Rentals and Simulator Uses Exceed Accessory-Use Variances, and Redevelopment Abandons Prior Nonconforming Use — 135 NSS, LLC v. City of Concord (N.H. 2025)

Variance Scope Is Defined by Applicant Representations; Public Rentals and Simulator Uses Exceed Accessory-Use Variances, and Redevelopment Abandons Prior Nonconforming Use — 135 NSS, LLC v. City of Concord (N.H. 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Variance Scope Is Defined by Applicant Representations; Public Rentals and Simulator Uses Exceed Accessory-Use Variances, and Redevelopment Abandons Prior Nonconforming Use — 135 NSS, LLC v. City of...
“Only the Named Insured May Exhaust the SIR” – Delaware Supreme Court’s Definitive Guidance in In Re Aearo Technologies LLC Insurance Appeals

“Only the Named Insured May Exhaust the SIR” – Delaware Supreme Court’s Definitive Guidance in In Re Aearo Technologies LLC Insurance Appeals

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Only the Named Insured May Exhaust the SIR” – Delaware Supreme Court’s Definitive Guidance in In Re Aearo Technologies LLC Insurance Appeals 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Delaware, sitting en...
Deterring Strategic Nonpayment Without Automatic Forfeiture: California Supreme Court Upholds CCP § 1281.98 Against FAA Preemption by Incorporating Relief-from-Forfeiture Doctrines

Deterring Strategic Nonpayment Without Automatic Forfeiture: California Supreme Court Upholds CCP § 1281.98 Against FAA Preemption by Incorporating Relief-from-Forfeiture Doctrines

Date: Aug 12, 2025
Deterring Strategic Nonpayment Without Automatic Forfeiture: California Supreme Court Upholds CCP § 1281.98 Against FAA Preemption by Incorporating Relief-from-Forfeiture Doctrines Introduction In...
Zimmer v. Nichols: Delineating Temporal Boundaries for Equitable Fee-Shifting in Delaware Family Litigation

Zimmer v. Nichols: Delineating Temporal Boundaries for Equitable Fee-Shifting in Delaware Family Litigation

Date: Aug 12, 2025
Zimmer v. Nichols: Delineating Temporal Boundaries for Equitable Fee-Shifting in Delaware Family Litigation Introduction Zimmer v. Nichols, decided by the Supreme Court of Delaware on 11 August 2025,...
Stevens v. State: Expert Testimony as a Sufficient Foundation for LC-MS/MS Blood-Toxicology Evidence

Stevens v. State: Expert Testimony as a Sufficient Foundation for LC-MS/MS Blood-Toxicology Evidence

Date: Aug 12, 2025
Stevens v. State: Expert Testimony as a Sufficient Foundation for LC-MS/MS Blood-Toxicology Evidence Introduction In Stevens v. State, the Supreme Court of Delaware addressed whether the State must...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert