Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

restricting-general-jurisdiction:-second-circuit& Case Commentaries

Mandatory Vacatur of Expired PLRA Preliminary Injunctions: Voice of the Experienced v. Westcott

Mandatory Vacatur of Expired PLRA Preliminary Injunctions: Voice of the Experienced v. Westcott

Date: Aug 12, 2025
Mandatory Vacatur of Expired PLRA Preliminary Injunctions: Voice of the Experienced v. Westcott Introduction The Fifth Circuit’s unpublished but precedentially significant decision in Voice of the...
“More Than One Motive”: The Fifth Circuit Confirms that Mixed-Motive Religious Objections Trigger Title VII Protection – Commentary on Wright v. Honeywell International

“More Than One Motive”: The Fifth Circuit Confirms that Mixed-Motive Religious Objections Trigger Title VII Protection – Commentary on Wright v. Honeywell International

Date: Aug 12, 2025
“More Than One Motive” – The Fifth Circuit Confirms that Mixed-Motive Religious Objections Trigger Title VII Protection A Comprehensive Commentary on Wright v. Honeywell International, No. 24-30667...
Guardado v. Bondi: The Fourth Circuit’s New Mandate for Substantive Anti-Circularity Analysis of Particular Social Groups

Guardado v. Bondi: The Fourth Circuit’s New Mandate for Substantive Anti-Circularity Analysis of Particular Social Groups

Date: Aug 12, 2025
Guardado v. Bondi: The Fourth Circuit’s New Mandate for Substantive Anti-Circularity Analysis of Particular Social Groups 1. Introduction Ana Cecilia Hernandez Guardado – a Salvadoran national who...
United States v. Johnson: Fourth Circuit Holds Warrantless Dog Sniff in Common Apartment Hallway Is Not a Fourth-Amendment “Search”

United States v. Johnson: Fourth Circuit Holds Warrantless Dog Sniff in Common Apartment Hallway Is Not a Fourth-Amendment “Search”

Date: Aug 12, 2025
United States v. Johnson: Fourth Circuit Holds Warrantless Dog Sniff in a Common Apartment Hallway Is Not a Fourth-Amendment “Search” Introduction The published Fourth-Circuit decision in United...
“Use” v. “Brandishing” Re-Defined: The Fourth Circuit Adopts the “Imminent-Threat” Test for § 2A4.1(b)(3) Dangerous-Weapon Enhancements

“Use” v. “Brandishing” Re-Defined: The Fourth Circuit Adopts the “Imminent-Threat” Test for § 2A4.1(b)(3) Dangerous-Weapon Enhancements

Date: Aug 12, 2025
“Use” v. “Brandishing” Re-Defined: The Fourth Circuit Adopts the “Imminent-Threat” Test for § 2A4.1(b)(3) Dangerous-Weapon Enhancements Introduction United States v. Thomas Faulls, Sr., No. 23-4532...
Zimmer v. Nichols: Delineating Temporal Boundaries for Equitable Fee-Shifting in Delaware Family Litigation

Zimmer v. Nichols: Delineating Temporal Boundaries for Equitable Fee-Shifting in Delaware Family Litigation

Date: Aug 12, 2025
Zimmer v. Nichols: Delineating Temporal Boundaries for Equitable Fee-Shifting in Delaware Family Litigation Introduction Zimmer v. Nichols, decided by the Supreme Court of Delaware on 11 August 2025,...
Stevens v. State: Expert Testimony as a Sufficient Foundation for LC-MS/MS Blood-Toxicology Evidence

Stevens v. State: Expert Testimony as a Sufficient Foundation for LC-MS/MS Blood-Toxicology Evidence

Date: Aug 12, 2025
Stevens v. State: Expert Testimony as a Sufficient Foundation for LC-MS/MS Blood-Toxicology Evidence Introduction In Stevens v. State, the Supreme Court of Delaware addressed whether the State must...
The “Brewster Rule”: Exceptions Remain a Mandatory Prerequisite to Appellate Review After the 2024 Amendments to Court of Chancery Rule 144

The “Brewster Rule”: Exceptions Remain a Mandatory Prerequisite to Appellate Review After the 2024 Amendments to Court of Chancery Rule 144

Date: Aug 9, 2025
The “Brewster Rule”: Exceptions Remain a Mandatory Prerequisite to Appellate Review After the 2024 Amendments to Court of Chancery Rule 144 1. Introduction In In the Matter of Rolf D. Brewster, a...
People v. Goberdhan: VTL § 600 Applies Off‑Highway; Use of Juror Numbers/Initials Is Not a Mode‑of‑Proceedings Error Absent Objection

People v. Goberdhan: VTL § 600 Applies Off‑Highway; Use of Juror Numbers/Initials Is Not a Mode‑of‑Proceedings Error Absent Objection

Date: Aug 8, 2025
People v. Goberdhan: VTL § 600 Applies Off‑Highway; Use of Juror Numbers/Initials Is Not a Mode‑of‑Proceedings Error Absent Objection Introduction This commentary examines the Appellate Division,...
People v. Reinfurt: Marijuana Legalization Does Not Retroactively Nullify Prior Out‑of‑State Marijuana Convictions for Second Felony Offender Status; Attempted Felony Assault under PL 120.10(4) Is Not Cognizable

People v. Reinfurt: Marijuana Legalization Does Not Retroactively Nullify Prior Out‑of‑State Marijuana Convictions for Second Felony Offender Status; Attempted Felony Assault under PL 120.10(4) Is Not Cognizable

Date: Aug 8, 2025
People v. Reinfurt: Marijuana Legalization Does Not Retroactively Nullify Prior Out‑of‑State Marijuana Convictions for Second Felony Offender Status; Attempted Felony Assault under PL 120.10(4) Is...
Reaffirming the One-Continuous-Transaction Doctrine and the M’Naghten Insanity Standard in Capital Cases: Commentary on Martez Abram v. State of Mississippi (2025)

Reaffirming the One-Continuous-Transaction Doctrine and the M’Naghten Insanity Standard in Capital Cases: Commentary on Martez Abram v. State of Mississippi (2025)

Date: Aug 8, 2025
Reaffirming the One-Continuous-Transaction Doctrine and the M’Naghten Insanity Standard in Capital Cases Comprehensive Commentary on Martez Abram a/k/a Martez Tarrell Abram v. State of Mississippi,...
Post‑Commencement CARES Act Stimulus Is Separate Property and Not Child Support: Commentary on Ricky SS. v. Christine SS. (2025 NY Slip Op 04602)

Post‑Commencement CARES Act Stimulus Is Separate Property and Not Child Support: Commentary on Ricky SS. v. Christine SS. (2025 NY Slip Op 04602)

Date: Aug 8, 2025
Post‑Commencement CARES Act Stimulus Is Separate Property and Not Child Support: The Third Department’s Clarification in Ricky SS. v. Christine SS. Case: Ricky SS. v. Christine SS. (2025 NY Slip Op...
Covenant Not to Execute ≠ Release: First Department Adopts Majority Rule Preserving Insurer’s Indemnity Exposure After Consent Judgment with Assignment

Covenant Not to Execute ≠ Release: First Department Adopts Majority Rule Preserving Insurer’s Indemnity Exposure After Consent Judgment with Assignment

Date: Aug 8, 2025
Covenant Not to Execute ≠ Release: First Department Adopts Majority Rule Preserving Insurer’s Indemnity Exposure After Consent Judgment with Assignment Introduction In Geiger v. Hudson Excess...
Mere-Continuation Successor Liability Can Reach Multiple Asset Purchasers at the Pleading Stage: Commentary on Avamer 57 Fee LLC v. Hunter Boot USA LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 04607)

Mere-Continuation Successor Liability Can Reach Multiple Asset Purchasers at the Pleading Stage: Commentary on Avamer 57 Fee LLC v. Hunter Boot USA LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 04607)

Date: Aug 8, 2025
Mere-Continuation Successor Liability Can Reach Multiple Asset Purchasers at the Pleading Stage Commentary on Avamer 57 Fee LLC v. Hunter Boot USA LLC (App Div, 1st Dept, Aug. 7, 2025) Executive...

        Streamlining the “Vexatious Litigator” Designation in Ohio:
        An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s 08 / 05 / 2025 Case Announcements (2025-Ohio-2749)

Streamlining the “Vexatious Litigator” Designation in Ohio: An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s 08 / 05 / 2025 Case Announcements (2025-Ohio-2749)

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Streamlining the “Vexatious Litigator” Designation in Ohio: An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s 08 / 05 / 2025 Case Announcements (2025-Ohio-2749) Introduction The Supreme Court of Ohio’s Case...
State v. Rushing (2025): Clarifying Fundamental-Error Review for Visible Restraints in Capital Sentencing

State v. Rushing (2025): Clarifying Fundamental-Error Review for Visible Restraints in Capital Sentencing

Date: Aug 7, 2025
State v. Rushing (2025): Clarifying Fundamental-Error Review for Visible Restraints in Capital Sentencing Introduction State of Arizona v. Jasper Phillip Rushing is the Arizona Supreme Court’s most...
Voluntary Dismissal No Longer a “Failure”: Wyoming Supreme Court Narrows the Savings Statute in Ellis v. Hiser (2025 WY 87)

Voluntary Dismissal No Longer a “Failure”: Wyoming Supreme Court Narrows the Savings Statute in Ellis v. Hiser (2025 WY 87)

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Voluntary Dismissal No Longer a “Failure”: Wyoming Supreme Court Narrows the Savings Statute in Ellis v. Hiser (2025 WY 87) Dianna Ellis, as Wrongful Death Representative for the Estate of Burke...
“No-Waiver Veto”: The Supreme Court of Montana Affirms an Absolute Parental Veto over ICWA Transfer Requests

“No-Waiver Veto”: The Supreme Court of Montana Affirms an Absolute Parental Veto over ICWA Transfer Requests

Date: Aug 7, 2025
“No-Waiver Veto”: The Supreme Court of Montana Affirms an Absolute Parental Veto over ICWA Transfer Requests Introduction In Matter of J.B., YINC, 2025 MT 170 (DA 24-0516), the Supreme Court of...
State v. Alford (2025 MT 171): Montana Supreme Court Affirms the Constitutionality of Mandatory Minimum Custodial Sentences for 4th-and-Subsequent DUI Offenses

State v. Alford (2025 MT 171): Montana Supreme Court Affirms the Constitutionality of Mandatory Minimum Custodial Sentences for 4th-and-Subsequent DUI Offenses

Date: Aug 7, 2025
State v. Alford (2025 MT 171): Montana Supreme Court Affirms the Constitutionality of Mandatory Minimum Custodial Sentences for 4th-and-Subsequent DUI Offenses 1. Introduction The Montana Supreme...
Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Need for Notice and Hearing Before Trial-Court Determination of Ineffective Assistance

Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Need for Notice and Hearing Before Trial-Court Determination of Ineffective Assistance

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Need for Notice and Hearing Before Trial-Court Determination of Ineffective Assistance Introduction Case: State v. B. Kelsey (2025 MT 173N, DA 23-0230) – non-citable...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert