Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

Pittman v. State: Florida Supreme Court Reaffirms Phillips—Hall Not Retroactive and Procedural Bars Apply to Successive Intellectual-Disability Claims

Pittman v. State: Florida Supreme Court Reaffirms Phillips—Hall Not Retroactive and Procedural Bars Apply to Successive Intellectual-Disability Claims

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Pittman v. State: Florida Supreme Court Reaffirms Phillips—Hall Not Retroactive and Procedural Bars Apply to Successive Intellectual-Disability Claims Court: Supreme Court of Florida Date: September...
Double Deference Reaffirmed: Showing Strickland Prejudice on Competency Claims Requires Proof of Likely Incompetence, Not Just Eligibility for a Competency Trial

Double Deference Reaffirmed: Showing Strickland Prejudice on Competency Claims Requires Proof of Likely Incompetence, Not Just Eligibility for a Competency Trial

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Double Deference Reaffirmed: Showing Strickland Prejudice on Competency Claims Requires Proof of Likely Incompetence, Not Just Eligibility for a Competency Trial Case: Lizcano v. Guerrero Court:...
Waiver of Removal Requires “Clear and Unequivocal” Submission to State Merits; Filing a TCPA Motion and Discovery Stay Do Not Suffice

Waiver of Removal Requires “Clear and Unequivocal” Submission to State Merits; Filing a TCPA Motion and Discovery Stay Do Not Suffice

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Waiver of Removal Requires “Clear and Unequivocal” Submission to State Merits; Filing a TCPA Motion and Discovery Stay Do Not Suffice Introduction In Abraham Watkins Nichols Agosto Aziz & Stogner v....
Pre-enforcement Excessive Fines Challenges to IRA §5000D Excise Tax Are Barred by the Anti-Injunction and Declaratory Judgment Acts; Voluntariness of Medicare Drug Price Negotiations Reaffirmed

Pre-enforcement Excessive Fines Challenges to IRA §5000D Excise Tax Are Barred by the Anti-Injunction and Declaratory Judgment Acts; Voluntariness of Medicare Drug Price Negotiations Reaffirmed

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Pre-enforcement Excessive Fines Challenges to IRA §5000D Excise Tax Are Barred by the Anti-Injunction and Declaratory Judgment Acts; Voluntariness of Medicare Drug Price Negotiations Reaffirmed...
No Country-Conditions Hardship When Children Remain in the U.S.: The Third Circuit’s Post‑Wilkinson Roadmap for Reviewing Cancellation of Removal and Enforcing Exhaustion

No Country-Conditions Hardship When Children Remain in the U.S.: The Third Circuit’s Post‑Wilkinson Roadmap for Reviewing Cancellation of Removal and Enforcing Exhaustion

Date: Sep 12, 2025
No Country-Conditions Hardship When Children Remain in the U.S.: The Third Circuit’s Post‑Wilkinson Roadmap for Reviewing Cancellation of Removal and Enforcing Exhaustion Introduction In Edin Samuel...
Curative Instructions Suffice for Isolated, Inadvertent References to Prior Felony Status: Walker v. State (2025 Ark. 127)

Curative Instructions Suffice for Isolated, Inadvertent References to Prior Felony Status: Walker v. State (2025 Ark. 127)

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Curative Instructions Suffice for Isolated, Inadvertent References to Prior Felony Status: Walker v. State (2025 Ark. 127) Court: Supreme Court of Arkansas Date: September 11, 2025 Citation: 2025...
No Two‑Step Reconsideration Motions under WDCR 12(8)/DCR 13(7) and Sanctionable “Mediation‑as‑Pretext” Deception under RPC 4.1

No Two‑Step Reconsideration Motions under WDCR 12(8)/DCR 13(7) and Sanctionable “Mediation‑as‑Pretext” Deception under RPC 4.1

Date: Sep 12, 2025
No Two‑Step Reconsideration Motions under WDCR 12(8)/DCR 13(7) and Sanctionable “Mediation‑as‑Pretext” Deception under RPC 4.1 Case Controlled Contamination Services, LLC v. Dist. Ct. (Fredericks),...
Reinforcing Strict Rule 65 Compliance and the Apex Doctrine in Emergency Suits Against State Agencies: Commentary on Crook v. South Carolina Election Commission

Reinforcing Strict Rule 65 Compliance and the Apex Doctrine in Emergency Suits Against State Agencies: Commentary on Crook v. South Carolina Election Commission

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Reinforcing Strict Rule 65 Compliance and the Apex Doctrine in Emergency Suits Against State Agencies Case: Crook v. South Carolina Election Commission Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina Date:...
Ray’s Rule: Assault with a Deadly Weapon and Felony Harassment (Threat to Kill) Are Not the Same Offense Under Washington’s Blockburger Analysis

Ray’s Rule: Assault with a Deadly Weapon and Felony Harassment (Threat to Kill) Are Not the Same Offense Under Washington’s Blockburger Analysis

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Ray’s Rule: Assault with a Deadly Weapon and Felony Harassment (Threat to Kill) Are Not the Same Offense Under Washington’s Blockburger Analysis Introduction In State v. Owen Gale Ray, the Washington...
Nakoa III: Dual‑Check Standard for Emergency Proclamations, Mandatory HRS §127A‑27 Process, and Environmental‑Right Standing

Nakoa III: Dual‑Check Standard for Emergency Proclamations, Mandatory HRS §127A‑27 Process, and Environmental‑Right Standing

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Nakoa III: Dual‑Check Standard for Emergency Proclamations, Mandatory HRS §127A‑27 Process, and Environmental‑Right Standing Introduction In Nakoa III v. Governor of the State of Hawai‘i, the Hawai‘i...
Approving the Grievance Undercuts Retaliation; Eighteen Days Without a Mattress Is Not “Objectively Serious” Under the Eighth Amendment

Approving the Grievance Undercuts Retaliation; Eighteen Days Without a Mattress Is Not “Objectively Serious” Under the Eighth Amendment

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Approving the Grievance Undercuts Retaliation; Eighteen Days Without a Mattress Is Not “Objectively Serious” Under the Eighth Amendment Introduction In Eddie James Moultrie v. G. Edwards (11th Cir....
AMP Means the Price Realized: Seventh Circuit Holds Post‑Sale “Clawbacks” Must Be Included and Are Not Bona Fide Service Fees (United States ex rel. Streck v. Eli Lilly)

AMP Means the Price Realized: Seventh Circuit Holds Post‑Sale “Clawbacks” Must Be Included and Are Not Bona Fide Service Fees (United States ex rel. Streck v. Eli Lilly)

Date: Sep 12, 2025
AMP Means the Price Realized: Post‑Sale “Clawbacks” Must Be Included and Are Not Bona Fide Service Fees United States ex rel. Streck v. Eli Lilly and Company (7th Cir. Sept. 11, 2025) Introduction...
Respondent Must Invoke Right to Review Evidence: Second Circuit Reads 8 C.F.R. § 1240.10(a)(4) as Advisory Only and Reaffirms Presumption of Competence in Removal Proceedings

Respondent Must Invoke Right to Review Evidence: Second Circuit Reads 8 C.F.R. § 1240.10(a)(4) as Advisory Only and Reaffirms Presumption of Competence in Removal Proceedings

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Respondent Must Invoke Right to Review Evidence: Second Circuit Reads 8 C.F.R. § 1240.10(a)(4) as Advisory Only and Reaffirms Presumption of Competence in Removal Proceedings Note: This is a summary...
Sixth Circuit: Employees Must Give “Reasonably Specific” Notice of Religious Conflicts; Safety Risks and Testing Logistics Can Create Title VII Undue Hardship

Sixth Circuit: Employees Must Give “Reasonably Specific” Notice of Religious Conflicts; Safety Risks and Testing Logistics Can Create Title VII Undue Hardship

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Sixth Circuit: Employees Must Give “Reasonably Specific” Notice of Religious Conflicts; Safety Risks and Testing Logistics Can Create Title VII Undue Hardship Introduction In Christina Henry v....
No Individualized Dangerousness Assessment for Drug‑Trafficking Felons Under § 922(g)(1): Fifth Circuit Harmonizes Reyes with Kimble in United States v. Orozco

No Individualized Dangerousness Assessment for Drug‑Trafficking Felons Under § 922(g)(1): Fifth Circuit Harmonizes Reyes with Kimble in United States v. Orozco

Date: Sep 12, 2025
No Individualized Dangerousness Assessment for Drug‑Trafficking Felons Under § 922(g)(1): Fifth Circuit Harmonizes Reyes with Kimble in United States v. Orozco Introduction In United States v....
"Hands-On" Is Not "Hands-In": Indiana Supreme Court Permanently Bars Judge for Problem-Solving Court Boundary Violations and Conflicts — In the Matter of Matthew John Elkin

"Hands-On" Is Not "Hands-In": Indiana Supreme Court Permanently Bars Judge for Problem-Solving Court Boundary Violations and Conflicts — In the Matter of Matthew John Elkin

Date: Sep 12, 2025
"Hands-On" Is Not "Hands-In": Permanent Ban for Boundary Violations, Favoritism, and Conflicts in Problem-Solving Courts Introduction In a per curiam decision, the Supreme Court of Indiana...
Wrongful‑Death Beneficiaries Stand in the Shoes of Government Employees: Mississippi Supreme Court Extends MTCA § 11-46-9(1)(l) Immunity to Bar Claims Against Any Governmental Entity and Upholds Statute’s Constitutionality

Wrongful‑Death Beneficiaries Stand in the Shoes of Government Employees: Mississippi Supreme Court Extends MTCA § 11-46-9(1)(l) Immunity to Bar Claims Against Any Governmental Entity and Upholds Statute’s Constitutionality

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Wrongful‑Death Beneficiaries Stand in the Shoes of Government Employees: Mississippi Supreme Court Extends MTCA § 11-46-9(1)(l) Immunity to Bar Claims Against Any Governmental Entity and Upholds...
Issue Preservation in Mississippi Tax Appeals: Chancery Court’s De Novo Review under § 27-77-7 Is Limited to Properly Appealed Questions; No Advisory Opinions

Issue Preservation in Mississippi Tax Appeals: Chancery Court’s De Novo Review under § 27-77-7 Is Limited to Properly Appealed Questions; No Advisory Opinions

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Issue Preservation in Mississippi Tax Appeals: Chancery Court’s De Novo Review under § 27-77-7 Is Limited to Properly Appealed Questions; No Advisory Opinions Case: Watkins Construction, Inc. v....
Cross-Examination That Elicits Corroborative Medical Evidence Does Not Constitute Ineffective Assistance; Demeanor and Consistent Forensic Interviews Can Corroborate Child Hearsay Under FCA § 1046(a)(vi)

Cross-Examination That Elicits Corroborative Medical Evidence Does Not Constitute Ineffective Assistance; Demeanor and Consistent Forensic Interviews Can Corroborate Child Hearsay Under FCA § 1046(a)(vi)

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Cross-Examination That Elicits Corroborative Medical Evidence Does Not Constitute Ineffective Assistance; Demeanor and Consistent Forensic Interviews Can Corroborate Child Hearsay Under FCA §...
AMP Must Include Price-Value Clawbacks: The Seventh Circuit’s plain-meaning rule for Medicaid rebate reporting and the limits of “reasonable assumptions” under the FCA

AMP Must Include Price-Value Clawbacks: The Seventh Circuit’s plain-meaning rule for Medicaid rebate reporting and the limits of “reasonable assumptions” under the FCA

Date: Sep 12, 2025
AMP Must Include Price-Value Clawbacks: The Seventh Circuit’s plain-meaning rule for Medicaid rebate reporting and the limits of “reasonable assumptions” under the FCA Introduction In United States,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert