Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

The “Orabona Rule”: When Any Determination of Liability or Damages Requires Reference to an ERISA Plan, All Parallel State-Law Termination Claims Are Pre-empted

The “Orabona Rule”: When Any Determination of Liability or Damages Requires Reference to an ERISA Plan, All Parallel State-Law Termination Claims Are Pre-empted

Date: Jun 18, 2025
The “Orabona Rule”: When Any Determination of Liability or Damages Requires Reference to an ERISA Plan, All Parallel State-Law Termination Claims Are Pre-empted Introduction In Orabona v. Santander...
“From Vouching to Variables” –  State v. Molde Recognizes Purely Statistical Evidence on False Reporting as Permissible Expert Testimony

“From Vouching to Variables” – State v. Molde Recognizes Purely Statistical Evidence on False Reporting as Permissible Expert Testimony

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“From Vouching to Variables” – State v. Molde Recognizes Purely Statistical Evidence on False Reporting as Permissible Expert Testimony 1. Introduction State v. Jobert L. Molde, 2025 WI 21, presented...
No Presumed Confidentiality in Remote Hearings – State v. Grady (2025 WI 22)

No Presumed Confidentiality in Remote Hearings – State v. Grady (2025 WI 22)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
No Presumed Confidentiality in Remote Hearings: The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Ruling in State v. Kordell L. Grady (2025 WI 22) Key Holding: During remote or hybrid court proceedings, a circuit court...
Clarifying “Pattern of Strip Development” under Vermont Act 250 – Supreme Court Defines the Test and Affirms Farm-Store Permit

Clarifying “Pattern of Strip Development” under Vermont Act 250 – Supreme Court Defines the Test and Affirms Farm-Store Permit

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Clarifying “Pattern of Strip Development” under Vermont Act 250 – Supreme Court Defines the Test and Affirms Farm-Store Permit 1. Introduction In In re SM Farms Shop, LLC Permit Appeal, 2025 VT 33,...
“Particularity & Puffery”: Vermont Supreme Court Tightens Pleading Standards for Fraud and Negligent Misrepresentation in Corporate Mergers – Commentary on Shayne Lynn v. Slang Worldwide, Inc., 2025 VT 30

“Particularity & Puffery”: Vermont Supreme Court Tightens Pleading Standards for Fraud and Negligent Misrepresentation in Corporate Mergers – Commentary on Shayne Lynn v. Slang Worldwide, Inc., 2025 VT 30

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Particularity & Puffery”: Vermont Supreme Court Tightens Pleading Standards for Fraud and Negligent Misrepresentation in Corporate Mergers Commentary on Shayne Lynn v. Slang Worldwide, Inc., 2025 VT...
“Take the Money, Lose the Appeal” – Gentele v. Gentele Clarifies the Boundaries of Nebraska’s Acceptance-of-Benefits Rule

“Take the Money, Lose the Appeal” – Gentele v. Gentele Clarifies the Boundaries of Nebraska’s Acceptance-of-Benefits Rule

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Take the Money, Lose the Appeal” – Gentele v. Gentele Clarifies the Boundaries of Nebraska’s Acceptance-of-Benefits Rule Introduction Gentele v. Gentele, 319 Neb. 182 (2025), is the Nebraska Supreme...
“State v. Scott” and the Stringent Threshold for the Joint-Venture Exception in Foreign Searches

“State v. Scott” and the Stringent Threshold for the Joint-Venture Exception in Foreign Searches

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“State v. Scott” and the Stringent Threshold for the Joint-Venture Exception in Foreign Searches Introduction In State v. Scott, 319 Neb. 153 (2025), the Nebraska Supreme Court tackled two distinct...
Bernard v. State: Wyoming Supreme Court Reinforces Res Judicata Limits on Rule 35(a) Motions and Requires Conformity Between Oral and Written Sentences

Bernard v. State: Wyoming Supreme Court Reinforces Res Judicata Limits on Rule 35(a) Motions and Requires Conformity Between Oral and Written Sentences

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Bernard v. State: Wyoming Supreme Court Reinforces Res Judicata Limits on Rule 35(a) Motions and Requires Conformity Between Oral and Written Sentences Introduction In David P. Bernard, Jr. v. State...
Wyoming Supreme Court Clarifies Finality & Voting Standards for Municipal Planning Decisions

Wyoming Supreme Court Clarifies Finality & Voting Standards for Municipal Planning Decisions

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Wyoming Supreme Court Clarifies Finality & Voting Standards for Municipal Planning Decisions Introduction Case: Preserve Our Cody Neighborhoods et al. v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day...
Reinforcing the “Harm-Threshold”: Galvan v. Malone (2025) Clarifies Evidentiary Burden for Grandparent Visitation in Wyoming

Reinforcing the “Harm-Threshold”: Galvan v. Malone (2025) Clarifies Evidentiary Burden for Grandparent Visitation in Wyoming

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Reinforcing the “Harm-Threshold”: Salvador Galvan v. Sandra Malone, 2025 WY 65 1. Introduction This commentary analyzes the Wyoming Supreme Court’s recent decision in Galvan v. Malone, 2025 WY 65, a...
Johnson v. Albin Carlson (Alaska 2025): Mandatory Consideration of Less-Severe Discovery Sanctions & Flexible Proof of Construction Damages

Johnson v. Albin Carlson (Alaska 2025): Mandatory Consideration of Less-Severe Discovery Sanctions & Flexible Proof of Construction Damages

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Johnson v. Albin Carlson (Alaska 2025): Mandatory Consideration of Less-Severe Discovery Sanctions & Flexible Proof of Construction Damages Introduction The Alaska Supreme Court’s opinion in Morris...
State v. Molde (2025): Wisconsin Supreme Court Declares Statistical False-Report Evidence Does Not Breach the Haseltine Anti-Vouching Rule

State v. Molde (2025): Wisconsin Supreme Court Declares Statistical False-Report Evidence Does Not Breach the Haseltine Anti-Vouching Rule

Date: Jun 18, 2025
State v. Molde (2025): Wisconsin Supreme Court Declares Statistical False-Report Evidence Does Not Breach the Haseltine Anti-Vouching Rule Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Jobert L. Molde In 2025...
“Speak Up or Waive It” – The Wisconsin Supreme Court Narrows Due-Process Protection for Confidential Attorney–Client Consultation in Remote Hearings

“Speak Up or Waive It” – The Wisconsin Supreme Court Narrows Due-Process Protection for Confidential Attorney–Client Consultation in Remote Hearings

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Speak Up or Waive It” – The New Wisconsin Rule on Confidential Attorney–Client Communications During Remote Proceedings Introduction In State v. Kordell L. Grady, 2025 WI 22, the Wisconsin Supreme...
Prospective Constitutional Notice Rights for Junior Judgment Lienholders – A Commentary on Winn v. Brady (2025)

Prospective Constitutional Notice Rights for Junior Judgment Lienholders – A Commentary on Winn v. Brady (2025)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Prospective Constitutional Notice Rights for Junior Judgment Lienholders: An In-Depth Commentary on Winn v. Brady (Haw. 2025) Introduction The Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi’s decision in Winn v. Brady,...
Forfeiture of Unraised Issues and Judicial Authority to Enjoin Vexatious Litigants – Commentary on Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Commonwealth of Westmoreland County

Forfeiture of Unraised Issues and Judicial Authority to Enjoin Vexatious Litigants – Commentary on Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Commonwealth of Westmoreland County

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Forfeiture of Unraised Issues and Judicial Authority to Enjoin Vexatious Litigants: A Commentary on Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Commonwealth of Westmoreland County 1. Introduction In a...
Martinez v. Westmoreland Courts: Re-affirming Standards for Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions and Judicial Recusal

Martinez v. Westmoreland Courts: Re-affirming Standards for Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions and Judicial Recusal

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Martinez v. Westmoreland Courts: Re-affirming Standards for Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions and Judicial Recusal Introduction Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez, a prolific pro se litigant, filed seven...
Martinez v. Obarto (3d Cir. 2025): Reinforcing Objective Standards for Judicial Recusal and Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions

Martinez v. Obarto (3d Cir. 2025): Reinforcing Objective Standards for Judicial Recusal and Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Martinez v. Obarto (3d Cir. 2025): Reinforcing Objective Standards for Judicial Recusal and Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions I. Introduction The consolidated appeal Justin Juan De la Cruz Martinez v....
Martinez v. Westmoreland County et al.: Third Circuit Reaffirms Forfeiture Doctrine and High Bar for Judicial Recusal & Vexatious-Litigant Designations

Martinez v. Westmoreland County et al.: Third Circuit Reaffirms Forfeiture Doctrine and High Bar for Judicial Recusal & Vexatious-Litigant Designations

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Martinez v. Westmoreland County et al. Third Circuit Reaffirms Forfeiture Doctrine and High Bar for Judicial Recusal & Vexatious-Litigant Designations Introduction Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez, a...
Martinez v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania: Re-affirming Standards for Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions and Judicial Recusal

Martinez v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania: Re-affirming Standards for Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions and Judicial Recusal

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Martinez v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania: Re-affirming Standards for Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions and Judicial Recusal 1. Introduction The consolidated appeal of Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez v....

        “Unfounded Allegations Do Not Compel Recusal” – Third Circuit Commentary on 
        Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

“Unfounded Allegations Do Not Compel Recusal” – Third Circuit Commentary on Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Unfounded Allegations Do Not Compel Recusal” – Third Circuit Commentary on Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania 1. Introduction In a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert