Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

State v. Shewalter: Continuous Officer‑Documented Noncompliance Can Extinguish All Elapsed “Street Time”; Detention Credit Is Mandatory and Must Be Precisely Calculated

State v. Shewalter: Continuous Officer‑Documented Noncompliance Can Extinguish All Elapsed “Street Time”; Detention Credit Is Mandatory and Must Be Precisely Calculated

Date: Sep 10, 2025
State v. Shewalter: Continuous Officer‑Documented Noncompliance Can Extinguish All Elapsed “Street Time”; Detention Credit Is Mandatory and Must Be Precisely Calculated Introduction In State v....
State v. Arvidson: Montana Supreme Court Narrows Direct Appellate Review of Ineffective Assistance to “Rare Instances” and Reaffirms the Oral‑Pronouncement Rule

State v. Arvidson: Montana Supreme Court Narrows Direct Appellate Review of Ineffective Assistance to “Rare Instances” and Reaffirms the Oral‑Pronouncement Rule

Date: Sep 10, 2025
State v. Arvidson: Limiting Direct IAC Review to “Rare Instances” and Enforcing the Oral‑Pronouncement Rule Introduction In State v. Arvidson, 2025 MT 200, the Montana Supreme Court addressed two...
Non‑Signatory Client Can Compel Arbitration When a Contractor’s Agreement Incorporates the Client’s MSA and the Worker Assumes the Contractor’s Obligations

Non‑Signatory Client Can Compel Arbitration When a Contractor’s Agreement Incorporates the Client’s MSA and the Worker Assumes the Contractor’s Obligations

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Non‑Signatory Client Can Compel Arbitration When a Contractor’s Agreement Incorporates the Client’s MSA and the Worker Assumes the Contractor’s Obligations Introduction In Ford v. ConocoPhillips, the...
Summary Dissociation by Unanimous Vote Under § 35-8-803(1)(e)(i), MCA Includes Conduct That Would Force Fiduciary Breaches; Fair-Value Buyouts Must Consider Going-Concern Value

Summary Dissociation by Unanimous Vote Under § 35-8-803(1)(e)(i), MCA Includes Conduct That Would Force Fiduciary Breaches; Fair-Value Buyouts Must Consider Going-Concern Value

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Summary Dissociation by Unanimous Vote Under § 35-8-803(1)(e)(i), MCA Includes Conduct That Would Force Fiduciary Breaches; Fair-Value Buyouts Must Consider Going-Concern Value Introduction In Hebert...
Reaffirming Montana’s Postconviction Limits: Claims Raised or Raisable on Direct Appeal Are Barred; Probable Cause Defects Do Not Affect Subject-Matter Jurisdiction

Reaffirming Montana’s Postconviction Limits: Claims Raised or Raisable on Direct Appeal Are Barred; Probable Cause Defects Do Not Affect Subject-Matter Jurisdiction

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Reaffirming Montana’s Postconviction Limits: Claims Raised or Raisable on Direct Appeal Are Barred; Probable Cause Defects Do Not Affect Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Introduction In C. Hardy v. State,...
Bailey’s Spatial Constraint Does Not Bar a Probation Officer from Directing a Supervised-Releasee Home During Execution of a Residential Warrant

Bailey’s Spatial Constraint Does Not Bar a Probation Officer from Directing a Supervised-Releasee Home During Execution of a Residential Warrant

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Bailey’s Spatial Constraint Does Not Bar a Probation Officer from Directing a Supervised-Releasee Home During Execution of a Residential Warrant Introduction In United States v. Matthew Scott Rocco,...
Commissary Purchases as Evidence of Sincerity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity for Removing Inmate from Religious Vegan Diet; Denial of Vegan Shoes/Commissary Not a RLUIPA “Substantial Burden”; Reenrollment Moors Injunctive Relief

Commissary Purchases as Evidence of Sincerity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity for Removing Inmate from Religious Vegan Diet; Denial of Vegan Shoes/Commissary Not a RLUIPA “Substantial Burden”; Reenrollment Moors Injunctive Relief

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Commissary Purchases as Evidence of Sincerity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity for Removing Inmate from Religious Vegan Diet; Denial of Vegan Shoes/Commissary Not a RLUIPA “Substantial...
Timing and Audience as “Guardrails” for Political Purpose: Tenth Circuit Upholds New Mexico’s Pre‑Election Donor Disclosure for Mention‑Only Ads

Timing and Audience as “Guardrails” for Political Purpose: Tenth Circuit Upholds New Mexico’s Pre‑Election Donor Disclosure for Mention‑Only Ads

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Timing and Audience as “Guardrails” for Political Purpose: Tenth Circuit Upholds New Mexico’s Pre‑Election Donor Disclosure for Mention‑Only Ads Introduction In Rio Grande Foundation v. Oliver, the...
Medication Conditions Are Ripe When Tethered to an Unsupported Mandatory Treatment Condition: Fifth Circuit Vacates Mental-Health Special Conditions for Lack of Record Support

Medication Conditions Are Ripe When Tethered to an Unsupported Mandatory Treatment Condition: Fifth Circuit Vacates Mental-Health Special Conditions for Lack of Record Support

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Medication Conditions Are Ripe When Tethered to an Unsupported Mandatory Treatment Condition: Fifth Circuit Vacates Mental-Health Special Conditions for Lack of Record Support Introduction In United...
No Shortcuts to Sovereign Immunity: Nebraska Supreme Court Requires a Developed Record Before Applying PSTCA Due Care or Discretionary Function Immunity at the Pleadings Stage

No Shortcuts to Sovereign Immunity: Nebraska Supreme Court Requires a Developed Record Before Applying PSTCA Due Care or Discretionary Function Immunity at the Pleadings Stage

Date: Sep 9, 2025
No Shortcuts to Sovereign Immunity: Nebraska Supreme Court Requires a Developed Record Before Applying PSTCA Due Care or Discretionary Function Immunity at the Pleadings Stage Introduction In Larsen...
Permanent Waiver of Statutory Speedy-Trial Rights After an Unsuccessful Discharge Motion and Interlocutory Appeal: Commentary on State v. Parks, 319 Neb. 773 (Neb. 2025)

Permanent Waiver of Statutory Speedy-Trial Rights After an Unsuccessful Discharge Motion and Interlocutory Appeal: Commentary on State v. Parks, 319 Neb. 773 (Neb. 2025)

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Permanent Waiver of Statutory Speedy-Trial Rights After an Unsuccessful Discharge Motion and Interlocutory Appeal: State v. Parks (319 Neb. 773) Introduction In State v. Parks, 319 Neb. 773 (Neb....
Post‑Offer Interest Applies to Punitive Damages; “Genuine Dispute” Folded into Nevada Bad‑Faith Standard and May Defeat Refusal‑to‑Defend Claims; Unfair Insurance Practices Liability Limited to Insurers — Commentary on Olson v. Mid‑Century Ins. Co. (Nev. 2025)

Post‑Offer Interest Applies to Punitive Damages; “Genuine Dispute” Folded into Nevada Bad‑Faith Standard and May Defeat Refusal‑to‑Defend Claims; Unfair Insurance Practices Liability Limited to Insurers — Commentary on Olson v. Mid‑Century Ins. Co. (Nev. 2025)

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Post‑Offer Interest Applies to Punitive Damages; “Genuine Dispute” Folded into Nevada Bad‑Faith Standard and May Defeat Refusal‑to‑Defend Claims; Unfair Insurance Practices Liability Limited to...
Mandatory Forfeiture of Unlicensed Food-Vending Vehicles Triggers Excessive Fines Scrutiny: City of New York v. Jones (2025)

Mandatory Forfeiture of Unlicensed Food-Vending Vehicles Triggers Excessive Fines Scrutiny: City of New York v. Jones (2025)

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Mandatory Forfeiture of Unlicensed Food-Vending Vehicles Triggers Excessive Fines Scrutiny: City of New York v. Jones (2025) Introduction City of New York v. Jones (2025 NY Slip Op 04842) is a...
Defective Dolly + Heavy Load = Scaffold Law Liability: Hernandez v. Port Authority (1st Dept 2025) solidifies §240(1) for low-height, high-weight tip-overs and clarifies “arising out of” indemnity and borrowed-equipment exposure

Defective Dolly + Heavy Load = Scaffold Law Liability: Hernandez v. Port Authority (1st Dept 2025) solidifies §240(1) for low-height, high-weight tip-overs and clarifies “arising out of” indemnity and borrowed-equipment exposure

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Defective Dolly + Heavy Load = Scaffold Law Liability Hernandez v. Port Authority of N.Y. & N.J. (2025 NY Slip Op 04843) Introduction In Hernandez v. Port Authority of N.Y. & N.J., the Appellate...
Usury as Malpractice: Drafting Facially Usurious Forbearance Terms Is Negligence; Estoppel Does Not Cure, but Mitigation Fees Are Recoverable

Usury as Malpractice: Drafting Facially Usurious Forbearance Terms Is Negligence; Estoppel Does Not Cure, but Mitigation Fees Are Recoverable

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Usury as Malpractice: Drafting Facially Usurious Forbearance Terms Is Negligence; Estoppel Does Not Cure, but Mitigation Fees Are Recoverable Case: Salamone v. Deily & Glastetter, LLP, 2025 NY Slip...
“Spam Folder” Is Not a Defense: Email Notice, EUO Admissions, and Noncompliance as Independent Bases for Interim Suspension under 22 NYCRR § 1240.9 — Matter of Wells (2025)

“Spam Folder” Is Not a Defense: Email Notice, EUO Admissions, and Noncompliance as Independent Bases for Interim Suspension under 22 NYCRR § 1240.9 — Matter of Wells (2025)

Date: Sep 9, 2025
“Spam Folder” Is Not a Defense: Email Notice, EUO Admissions, and Noncompliance as Independent Bases for Interim Suspension under 22 NYCRR § 1240.9 — Matter of Wells (2025) Introduction In Matter of...
“Applying Means Applying”: Washington Supreme Court Holds No “Bona Fide” Intent Required to Be a “Job Applicant” Under the EPOA’s Pay-Transparency Remedies

“Applying Means Applying”: Washington Supreme Court Holds No “Bona Fide” Intent Required to Be a “Job Applicant” Under the EPOA’s Pay-Transparency Remedies

Date: Sep 9, 2025
“Applying Means Applying”: Washington Supreme Court Holds No “Bona Fide” Intent Required to Be a “Job Applicant” Under the EPOA’s Pay-Transparency Remedies Introduction In Branson v. Washington Fine...
Morris v. State (Wyo. 2025): Polygraph Results Offered to Bolster Credibility Fail Rule 702 and Cannot Establish Strickland Prejudice

Morris v. State (Wyo. 2025): Polygraph Results Offered to Bolster Credibility Fail Rule 702 and Cannot Establish Strickland Prejudice

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Polygraph Results Offered to Bolster Credibility Fail Rule 702 and Cannot Establish Strickland Prejudice Commentary on Randall Bruce Morris v. The State of Wyoming (2025 WY 98) Introduction In 2025...
The Jury Is the Lie Detector: Wyoming Supreme Court Rejects Polygraph-Based Ineffective Assistance Claim Under Rule 702 and Daubert

The Jury Is the Lie Detector: Wyoming Supreme Court Rejects Polygraph-Based Ineffective Assistance Claim Under Rule 702 and Daubert

Date: Sep 9, 2025
The Jury Is the Lie Detector: Wyoming Supreme Court Rejects Polygraph-Based Ineffective Assistance Claim Under Rule 702 and Daubert Introduction In Randall Bruce Morris v. The State of Wyoming (2025...
Finality of Partial Acquittals and Limits on Mistrials After Jury Polling: The South Carolina Supreme Court’s Double-Jeopardy Blueprint in State v. Erb (2025)

Finality of Partial Acquittals and Limits on Mistrials After Jury Polling: The South Carolina Supreme Court’s Double-Jeopardy Blueprint in State v. Erb (2025)

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Finality of Partial Acquittals and Limits on Mistrials After Jury Polling: The South Carolina Supreme Court’s Double-Jeopardy Blueprint in State v. Erb (2025) Introduction In State v. John Joseph...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert