Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reaffirming-tellabs:-sixth-circuit-establishes-correct-& Case Commentaries

Derivative Standing via Testamentary Trust Devolution and Temporal Limits on Faithless Servant Disgorgement: Commentary on Owen v. Hurlbut (2025 NY Slip Op 04311)

Derivative Standing via Testamentary Trust Devolution and Temporal Limits on Faithless Servant Disgorgement: Commentary on Owen v. Hurlbut (2025 NY Slip Op 04311)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Derivative Standing via Testamentary Trust Devolution and Temporal Limits on Faithless Servant Disgorgement: Commentary on Owen v. Hurlbut (2025 NY Slip Op 04311) Introduction Owen v. Hurlbut is a...
“High-Seas” Jurisdiction Embraces the Exclusive Economic Zone: A Commentary on United States v. Jose Junior Bailon Franco (11th Cir. 2025)

“High-Seas” Jurisdiction Embraces the Exclusive Economic Zone: A Commentary on United States v. Jose Junior Bailon Franco (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 25, 2025
“High-Seas” Jurisdiction Embraces the Exclusive Economic Zone: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Jose Junior Bailon Franco (11th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction United States v. Jose Junior...
“EEZ = High Seas”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Unpublished Re-affirmation of Congress’s Plenary Power under the MDLEA

“EEZ = High Seas”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Unpublished Re-affirmation of Congress’s Plenary Power under the MDLEA

Date: Jul 25, 2025
“EEZ = High Seas”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Unpublished Re-affirmation of Congress’s Plenary Power under the MDLEA 1. Introduction United States v. Nilson Olaya Grueso, Nos. 22-11929, 22-11932,...

        Sixth Circuit Clarifies Strickland: Impeachment Cross-Examination that Adds Damaging Facts
        Can Still Be “Reasonable Trial Strategy” under AEDPA – Commentary on Mark Hartman v. Dave Yost

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Strickland: Impeachment Cross-Examination that Adds Damaging Facts Can Still Be “Reasonable Trial Strategy” under AEDPA – Commentary on Mark Hartman v. Dave Yost

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Strickland: Impeachment Cross-Examination that Adds Damaging Facts Can Still Be “Reasonable Trial Strategy” under AEDPA Commentary on Mark Hartman v. Dave Yost, Nos....
Reaffirming the “Every Fair-Minded Jurist” Threshold: The Sixth Circuit’s Double-Deference Clarification in Hartman v. Yost

Reaffirming the “Every Fair-Minded Jurist” Threshold: The Sixth Circuit’s Double-Deference Clarification in Hartman v. Yost

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Reaffirming the “Every Fair-Minded Jurist” Threshold: The Sixth Circuit’s Double-Deference Clarification in Hartman v. Yost Introduction In Mark Hartman v. Dave Yost, the United States Court of...
United States v. Taylor: Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms Minimal Explanation Standard for Within-Guidelines Sentences

United States v. Taylor: Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms Minimal Explanation Standard for Within-Guidelines Sentences

Date: Jul 25, 2025
United States v. Taylor: Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms Minimal Explanation Standard for Within-Guidelines Sentences 1. Introduction In United States v. Marty Taylor, No. 25-3022 (6th Cir. July 24, 2025)...
Dangerousness Without Remand: United States v. Meeks Solidifies Williams Framework and Clarifies Sentencing Cross-Reference for Felon-in-Possession Cases

Dangerousness Without Remand: United States v. Meeks Solidifies Williams Framework and Clarifies Sentencing Cross-Reference for Felon-in-Possession Cases

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Dangerousness Without Remand: United States v. Meeks Sixth Circuit further refines the Williams “actual dangerousness” test and endorses robust use of the homicide cross-reference at sentencing I....
Removal Alone Does Not Waive the Right to Arbitrate – A Detailed Commentary on DeLaCruz-Bancroft v. Field Nation, LLC

Removal Alone Does Not Waive the Right to Arbitrate – A Detailed Commentary on DeLaCruz-Bancroft v. Field Nation, LLC

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Removal Alone Does Not Waive the Right to Arbitrate: Tenth Circuit Consolidates the Firm Waiver Rule and Morgan v. Sundance in DeLaCruz-Bancroft v. Field Nation 1. Introduction The Tenth Circuit’s...
Ogden v. Attorney General (10th Cir. 2025): Re-affirming the Non-Applicability of Good-Time Credits to Life Sentences and Clarifying COA Standards

Ogden v. Attorney General (10th Cir. 2025): Re-affirming the Non-Applicability of Good-Time Credits to Life Sentences and Clarifying COA Standards

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Ogden v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico (10th Cir. 2025): Re-affirming the Non-Applicability of Good-Time Credits to Life Sentences and Clarifying the Certificate-of-Appealability...
Tenth Circuit Affirms Broad BIA Discretion to Summarily Dismiss Appeals for Vague NOAs and Late Briefs – Commentary on Pena-Sanchez v. Bondi

Tenth Circuit Affirms Broad BIA Discretion to Summarily Dismiss Appeals for Vague NOAs and Late Briefs – Commentary on Pena-Sanchez v. Bondi

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Tenth Circuit Affirms Broad BIA Discretion to Summarily Dismiss Appeals for Vague NOAs and Late Briefs Pena-Sanchez v. Bondi, 24-9550 (10th Cir. July 24, 2025) I. Introduction In Pena-Sanchez...
United States v. Jumper: Tenth Circuit Affirms Statutory-Maximum Revocation Sentence & Refines Standards for Major Upward Variances

United States v. Jumper: Tenth Circuit Affirms Statutory-Maximum Revocation Sentence & Refines Standards for Major Upward Variances

Date: Jul 25, 2025
United States v. Jumper: Tenth Circuit Affirms Statutory-Maximum Revocation Sentence & Refines Standards for Major Upward Variances in Supervised-Release Cases 1. Introduction On 24 July 2025 the...
Greed-Driven Harm and the Nexus Requirement: Commentary on Cano-Gutierrez v. Bondi (1st Cir. 2025)

Greed-Driven Harm and the Nexus Requirement: Commentary on Cano-Gutierrez v. Bondi (1st Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Greed-Driven Harm and the Nexus Requirement: Cano-Gutierrez v. Bondi Clarifies Asylum Eligibility when Violence Is Motivated by Ordinary Crime Introduction In Cano-Gutierrez v. Bondi, the United...
“Working an Employee Out” after an Accommodation Request: The First Circuit’s Hard-Line on Rule 50 Preservation and Punitive Exposure in Menninger v. PPD Development, L.P.

“Working an Employee Out” after an Accommodation Request: The First Circuit’s Hard-Line on Rule 50 Preservation and Punitive Exposure in Menninger v. PPD Development, L.P.

Date: Jul 25, 2025
“Working an Employee Out” after an Accommodation Request: The First Circuit’s Hard-Line on Rule 50 Preservation and Punitive Exposure in Menninger v. PPD Development, L.P. Introduction In Menninger...
Deadline Discretion in Creditor Joinder: The First Circuit’s Clarification in PCC Rokita S.A. v. HH Technology Corp.

Deadline Discretion in Creditor Joinder: The First Circuit’s Clarification in PCC Rokita S.A. v. HH Technology Corp.

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Deadline Discretion in Creditor Joinder: The First Circuit’s Clarification in PCC Rokita S.A. v. HH Technology Corp. 1. Introduction The First Circuit’s decision in PCC Rokita, S.A. v. HH Technology...
United States v. Gregory: Harmless-Error Treatment of § 3553(a)(6) Omissions and Deference to Major Upward Variances for “Mirror-Image” Recidivism

United States v. Gregory: Harmless-Error Treatment of § 3553(a)(6) Omissions and Deference to Major Upward Variances for “Mirror-Image” Recidivism

Date: Jul 25, 2025
United States v. Gregory: Harmless-Error Treatment of § 3553(a)(6) Omissions and Deference to Major Upward Variances for “Mirror-Image” Recidivism Introduction United States v. Antuane Gregory,...
“Previously Unavailable” Means “Possibly Meritorious”: Fifth Circuit Clarifies § 2244(b)(2)(A) in Johnson v. Guerrero

“Previously Unavailable” Means “Possibly Meritorious”: Fifth Circuit Clarifies § 2244(b)(2)(A) in Johnson v. Guerrero

Date: Jul 25, 2025
“Previously Unavailable” Means “Possibly Meritorious”: Fifth Circuit Clarifies § 2244(b)(2)(A) in Johnson v. Guerrero Introduction Johnson v. Guerrero, No. 23-70002 (5th Cir. 2025) tackles a...
Guaranteeing “Next-Available Position” Reinstatement: The Fifth Circuit’s Expansive Equitable Remedy in McMillian v. Aberdeen School District

Guaranteeing “Next-Available Position” Reinstatement: The Fifth Circuit’s Expansive Equitable Remedy in McMillian v. Aberdeen School District

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Guaranteeing “Next-Available Position” Reinstatement: The Fifth Circuit’s Expansive Equitable Remedy in McMillian v. Aberdeen School District Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the...

        Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Strict Construction of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d) 
        and Rejects Ninth Circuit’s Valdivia-Flores Approach:
        A Commentary on United States v. Ortiz-Rodriguez (2025)

Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Strict Construction of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d) and Rejects Ninth Circuit’s Valdivia-Flores Approach: A Commentary on United States v. Ortiz-Rodriguez (2025)

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Strict Construction of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d) and Rejects the “Later-Change-in-Law” Exception: United States v. Ortiz-Rodriguez 1. Introduction In United States v....
Fifth Circuit Re-Affirms Strict Compliance with 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d) for Collateral Attacks on Expedited Removal Orders Despite Subsequent Changes in Aggravated-Felony Law

Fifth Circuit Re-Affirms Strict Compliance with 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d) for Collateral Attacks on Expedited Removal Orders Despite Subsequent Changes in Aggravated-Felony Law

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Fifth Circuit Re-Affirms Strict Compliance with 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d) for Collateral Attacks on Expedited Removal Orders Despite Subsequent Changes in Aggravated-Felony Law I. Introduction In United...
“Prospective Ineffectiveness” – Hicks v. Frame Sets a Present-Tense Limit on Excusing Habeas Exhaustion for State Delay

“Prospective Ineffectiveness” – Hicks v. Frame Sets a Present-Tense Limit on Excusing Habeas Exhaustion for State Delay

Date: Jul 25, 2025
“Prospective Ineffectiveness” – Hicks v. Frame Sets a Present-Tense Limit on Excusing Habeas Exhaustion for State Delay Introduction Hicks v. Frame, No. 23-6447 (4th Cir. July 23, 2025), is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert