Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

juvenile-sentencing-guidelines:-iowa-supreme-court Case Commentaries

Angarita-Quezada v. Garland: Clarifying Persecution and Government Protection Standards in LGBTQ Asylum Claims

Angarita-Quezada v. Garland: Clarifying Persecution and Government Protection Standards in LGBTQ Asylum Claims

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Angarita-Quezada v. Garland: Clarifying Persecution and Government Protection Standards in LGBTQ Asylum Claims Introduction This case involves Diana Fernanda Angarita-Quezada, a Colombian national,...
Mutual Assent and Arbitration: Parisi v. GreenSky Clarifies Formation of Valid Arbitration Agreements

Mutual Assent and Arbitration: Parisi v. GreenSky Clarifies Formation of Valid Arbitration Agreements

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Mutual Assent and Arbitration: Parisi v. GreenSky Clarifies Formation of Valid Arbitration Agreements Introduction Parisi v. GreenSky, LLC et al., decided June 6, 2025 by the United States Court of...
Life Sentencing Beyond the Guidelines for Second-Degree Murder in Indian Country:  Clarifying the Role of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in United States v. Washington

Life Sentencing Beyond the Guidelines for Second-Degree Murder in Indian Country: Clarifying the Role of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in United States v. Washington

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Life Sentencing Beyond the Guidelines for Second-Degree Murder in Indian Country: Clarifying the Role of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in United States v. Washington Introduction United States v. Washington,...
Discretion and Limits in Recruiting Pro Bono Counsel Under §1915(e) in Civil Rights Litigation

Discretion and Limits in Recruiting Pro Bono Counsel Under §1915(e) in Civil Rights Litigation

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Discretion and Limits in Recruiting Pro Bono Counsel Under §1915(e) in Civil Rights Litigation 1. Introduction Lazerek Austin v. Cheryl Hansen is a Seventh Circuit decision addressing for the first...
SSA v. AFSCME (2025): The Supreme Court Softens the Irreparable-Harm Requirement for Governmental Stay Applications

SSA v. AFSCME (2025): The Supreme Court Softens the Irreparable-Harm Requirement for Governmental Stay Applications

Date: Jun 10, 2025
SSA v. AFSCME (605 U.S. ____ (2025)): The Supreme Court Softens the Irreparable-Harm Requirement for Governmental Stay Applications 1. Introduction SSA v. AFSCME concerns an “emergency-docket”...
Definitive Scope Requirement for Final § 1782 Discovery Orders

Definitive Scope Requirement for Final § 1782 Discovery Orders

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Definitive Scope Requirement for Final § 1782 Discovery Orders Introduction In Amgen Inc. v. Celltrion USA Inc., the Third Circuit addressed a threshold jurisdictional question under 28 U.S.C. §...
Limiting Public Employee First Amendment Retaliation: Public Concern and Employer Knowledge Requirements

Limiting Public Employee First Amendment Retaliation: Public Concern and Employer Knowledge Requirements

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Limiting Public Employee First Amendment Retaliation: Public Concern and Employer Knowledge Requirements Introduction Nancy E. Lewen v. Pennsylvania Soldiers and Sailors Home presented the Third...
Non-Finality of Denial Without Prejudice of Motion to Dissolve Writ of Garnishment Under 28 U.S.C. §1291

Non-Finality of Denial Without Prejudice of Motion to Dissolve Writ of Garnishment Under 28 U.S.C. §1291

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Non-Finality of Denial Without Prejudice of Motion to Dissolve Writ of Garnishment Under 28 U.S.C. §1291 Introduction Natour v. Bank of America, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Reasonable Limits on Discovery Access for Pro Se Incarcerated Defendants: United States v. Black

Reasonable Limits on Discovery Access for Pro Se Incarcerated Defendants: United States v. Black

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Reasonable Limits on Discovery Access for Pro Se Incarcerated Defendants: United States v. Black Introduction United States v. Black (5th Cir. 2025) arises from the conviction of Brian Deboris Black...
Aiding-and-Abetting Liability under the Anti-Kickback Statute for Pharmaceutical Marketers – United States v. Cockerell (5th Cir. 2025)

Aiding-and-Abetting Liability under the Anti-Kickback Statute for Pharmaceutical Marketers – United States v. Cockerell (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Aiding-and-Abetting Liability under the Anti-Kickback Statute for Pharmaceutical Marketers Introduction United States v. Cockerell is a Fifth Circuit decision handed down on June 5, 2025, affirming...
Circumstantial Inference of Recklessness in Aircraft Laser Offenses: United States v. Roberson

Circumstantial Inference of Recklessness in Aircraft Laser Offenses: United States v. Roberson

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Circumstantial Inference of Recklessness in Aircraft Laser Offenses: United States v. Roberson Introduction United States v. Roberson (5th Cir. 2025) addresses the sentencing enhancement under...
Receivership Supersession of Turnover Orders and Mootness in Post-Judgment Proceedings

Receivership Supersession of Turnover Orders and Mootness in Post-Judgment Proceedings

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Receivership Supersession of Turnover Orders and Mootness in Post-Judgment Proceedings Introduction In Weslease 2018 Operating, L.P. v. Behan, 24-10246 (5th Cir. June 5, 2025), the Fifth Circuit...
Post-Appeal Receivership Appointments Moot Turnover and Enforcement Order Appeals

Post-Appeal Receivership Appointments Moot Turnover and Enforcement Order Appeals

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Post-Appeal Receivership Appointments Moot Turnover and Enforcement Order Appeals Introduction This commentary examines the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Weslease 2018 Operating, L.P. v. Behan (No....
Supersession of Turnover and Enforcement Orders by Subsequent Receivership Appointment

Supersession of Turnover and Enforcement Orders by Subsequent Receivership Appointment

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Supersession of Turnover and Enforcement Orders by Subsequent Receivership Appointment Introduction This commentary examines the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s per curiam...
Receivership Supersession as a Mootness Rule: Weslease 2018 v. Behan

Receivership Supersession as a Mootness Rule: Weslease 2018 v. Behan

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Receivership Supersession as a Mootness Rule: Weslease 2018 v. Behan Introduction In Weslease 2018 Operating, L.P. v. Behan, the Fifth Circuit addressed the interplay between turnover orders under...
Receivership Supersession Doctrine: Superseding Turnover Orders and Mootness in Fifth Circuit

Receivership Supersession Doctrine: Superseding Turnover Orders and Mootness in Fifth Circuit

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Receivership Supersession Doctrine: Superseding Turnover Orders and Mootness in Fifth Circuit Introduction In Weslease 2018 Operating, L.P. v. Behan, Nos. 24-10246 et al., the United States Court of...
Clarifying the Governmental-Action Exclusion and Appraisal Rights in Homeowner’s Insurance Policies: Wright v. ASI Lloyds

Clarifying the Governmental-Action Exclusion and Appraisal Rights in Homeowner’s Insurance Policies: Wright v. ASI Lloyds

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Clarifying the Governmental-Action Exclusion and Appraisal Rights in Homeowner’s Insurance Policies: Wright v. ASI Lloyds 1. Introduction Wright v. ASI Lloyds, decided June 5, 2025 by the Fifth...
Municipal Demolition and the Governmental-Action Exclusion in Homeowner Policies

Municipal Demolition and the Governmental-Action Exclusion in Homeowner Policies

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Municipal Demolition and the Governmental-Action Exclusion in Homeowner Policies Introduction Wright v. ASI Lloyds (5th Cir. June 5, 2025) establishes that a homeowner’s insurer may invoke a...
The Zook Principle Reaffirmed: Parallel State Laws Incorporating Federal Standards Are Not Preempted

The Zook Principle Reaffirmed: Parallel State Laws Incorporating Federal Standards Are Not Preempted

Date: Jun 10, 2025
The Zook Principle Reaffirmed: Parallel State Laws Incorporating Federal Standards Are Not Preempted 1. Introduction In Zyla Life Sciences, L.L.C. v. Wells Pharma of Houston, L.L.C. (No. 23-20533,...
Release-of-Past-Conduct Clause by Monopolists Not an Anticompetitive Practice Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act

Release-of-Past-Conduct Clause by Monopolists Not an Anticompetitive Practice Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Release-of-Past-Conduct Clause by Monopolists Not an Anticompetitive Practice Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act Introduction This commentary examines the Fourth Circuit’s decision in 2311 Racing LLC...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert