Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

interpreting-& Case Commentaries

Reaffirming West Virginia’s 50-50 Custody Presumption: Trial Courts Must Apply § 48-9-102a, Analyze § 48-9-209(f) Factors, Enter Written Findings, and Maximize Parenting Time

Reaffirming West Virginia’s 50-50 Custody Presumption: Trial Courts Must Apply § 48-9-102a, Analyze § 48-9-209(f) Factors, Enter Written Findings, and Maximize Parenting Time

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reaffirming West Virginia’s 50-50 Custody Presumption: Trial Courts Must Apply § 48-9-102a, Analyze § 48-9-209(f) Factors, Enter Written Findings, and Maximize Parenting Time Case: In re R.L., No....
Reaffirming the Rule 8(a) Presumption and Tightening Limits on Child Confrontation, Discovery, and Sexual-History Evidence in Abuse-and-Neglect Adjudications

Reaffirming the Rule 8(a) Presumption and Tightening Limits on Child Confrontation, Discovery, and Sexual-History Evidence in Abuse-and-Neglect Adjudications

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reaffirming the Rule 8(a) Presumption and Tightening Limits on Child Confrontation, Discovery, and Sexual-History Evidence in Abuse-and-Neglect Adjudications Introduction In re L.H.-1, B.H., L.H.-2,...
Improvement Period May Be Denied When a Parent’s Promise to a Critical No‑Contact Condition Lacks Credibility, Even Amid Services Compliance

Improvement Period May Be Denied When a Parent’s Promise to a Critical No‑Contact Condition Lacks Credibility, Even Amid Services Compliance

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Improvement Period May Be Denied When a Parent’s Promise to a Critical No‑Contact Condition Lacks Credibility, Even Amid Services Compliance Introduction In In re I.R. and E.B., No. 24-496 (W. Va....
Reaffirmation: Parent’s Nonappearance and Noncompliance Defeat Improvement Period; Termination Proper Absent Reasonable Likelihood of Correction

Reaffirmation: Parent’s Nonappearance and Noncompliance Defeat Improvement Period; Termination Proper Absent Reasonable Likelihood of Correction

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reaffirmation: Parent’s Nonappearance and Noncompliance Defeat Improvement Period; Termination Proper Absent Reasonable Likelihood of Correction Introduction In In re J.H., J.M., T.K., and R.K., No....
Competency Is Not Credibility: First Circuit Upholds Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency Without Vouching, and Reaffirms Strict Timeliness for Appeals from Rule 37 Indicative Rulings

Competency Is Not Credibility: First Circuit Upholds Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency Without Vouching, and Reaffirms Strict Timeliness for Appeals from Rule 37 Indicative Rulings

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Competency Is Not Credibility: First Circuit Upholds Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency Without Vouching, and Reaffirms Strict Timeliness for Appeals from Rule 37 Indicative Rulings...
Competency ≠ Credibility: First Circuit Upholds Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency and Demands Timely Appeals from Rule 37 Indicative Rulings — United States v. Vázquez‑Rijos

Competency ≠ Credibility: First Circuit Upholds Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency and Demands Timely Appeals from Rule 37 Indicative Rulings — United States v. Vázquez‑Rijos

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Competency ≠ Credibility: First Circuit Upholds Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency and Demands Timely Appeals from Rule 37 Indicative Rulings Case: United States v. Vázquez‑Rijos (1st Cir.)...
Reasonable Efforts Clarified: Prior-Case Services and Futility Can Satisfy DHS’s Reunification Duty in Recidivist Neglect Cases

Reasonable Efforts Clarified: Prior-Case Services and Futility Can Satisfy DHS’s Reunification Duty in Recidivist Neglect Cases

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reasonable Efforts Clarified: Prior-Case Services and Futility Can Satisfy DHS’s Reunification Duty in Recidivist Neglect Cases Introduction In re D.G. and L.G., No. 24-620 (W. Va. Sept. 30, 2025),...
In re B.S.: The 15/22-Month Permanency Cap Meaningfully Limits Improvement-Period Extensions; Near-Completion of Treatment Is Not a “Compelling Circumstance”

In re B.S.: The 15/22-Month Permanency Cap Meaningfully Limits Improvement-Period Extensions; Near-Completion of Treatment Is Not a “Compelling Circumstance”

Date: Oct 1, 2025
In re B.S.: The 15/22-Month Permanency Cap Meaningfully Limits Improvement-Period Extensions; Near-Completion of Treatment Is Not a “Compelling Circumstance” Introduction In this memorandum decision,...
In re B.N.: Delineated, Best‑Interest Visitation for Relative Caregivers Without a Grandparent Visitation Act Motion—and Strict Standing Limits for Non‑Intervenor Grandparents

In re B.N.: Delineated, Best‑Interest Visitation for Relative Caregivers Without a Grandparent Visitation Act Motion—and Strict Standing Limits for Non‑Intervenor Grandparents

Date: Oct 1, 2025
In re B.N.: Delineated, Best‑Interest Visitation for Relative Caregivers Without a Grandparent Visitation Act Motion—and Strict Standing Limits for Non‑Intervenor Grandparents Introduction The...
Temporary Guardianship Does Not Defeat Abuse-and-Neglect Jurisdiction; Voluntary Relinquishment Bars Case-Plan Attacks — Commentary on In re A.F. and K.F. (W. Va. Sept. 30, 2025)

Temporary Guardianship Does Not Defeat Abuse-and-Neglect Jurisdiction; Voluntary Relinquishment Bars Case-Plan Attacks — Commentary on In re A.F. and K.F. (W. Va. Sept. 30, 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Temporary Guardianship Does Not Defeat Abuse-and-Neglect Jurisdiction; Voluntary Relinquishment Bars Case-Plan Attacks — Commentary on In re A.F. and K.F. (W. Va. Sept. 30, 2025) Introduction This...
Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and a Rigorous “Substantial Change” Threshold for Post‑Dispositional Improvement Periods: Commentary on In re A.F. and H.J.

Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and a Rigorous “Substantial Change” Threshold for Post‑Dispositional Improvement Periods: Commentary on In re A.F. and H.J.

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and a Rigorous “Substantial Change” Threshold for Post‑Dispositional Improvement Periods: Commentary on In re A.F. and H.J. Introduction This...
Williams v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Broad Trial-Court Discretion to Admit Victims’ Domestic‑Violence Statements Under Rule 807

Williams v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Broad Trial-Court Discretion to Admit Victims’ Domestic‑Violence Statements Under Rule 807

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Williams v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Broad Trial-Court Discretion to Admit Victims’ Domestic‑Violence Statements Under Rule 807 Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date: September 30,...
Eleventh Circuit: Sentencing Statistics Alone Do Not Prove § 3553(a)(6) Disparity; Statutory-Max Upward Variance and Consecutive Revocation Term Upheld for Child-Pornography Recidivist

Eleventh Circuit: Sentencing Statistics Alone Do Not Prove § 3553(a)(6) Disparity; Statutory-Max Upward Variance and Consecutive Revocation Term Upheld for Child-Pornography Recidivist

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Eleventh Circuit: Sentencing Statistics Alone Do Not Prove § 3553(a)(6) Disparity; Statutory-Max Upward Variance and Consecutive Revocation Term Upheld for Child-Pornography Recidivist Introduction...
Direct Admissions as Direct Evidence: Green v. State Reaffirms That OCGA § 24-14-6 Does Not Apply When the State Presents Any Admission by the Accused

Direct Admissions as Direct Evidence: Green v. State Reaffirms That OCGA § 24-14-6 Does Not Apply When the State Presents Any Admission by the Accused

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Direct Admissions as Direct Evidence: Green v. State Reaffirms That OCGA § 24-14-6 Does Not Apply When the State Presents Any Admission by the Accused Introduction In Green v. State, the Supreme...
Separate Offenses Under Georgia’s Gang Act: Subsections (a) and (d) Do Not Merge

Separate Offenses Under Georgia’s Gang Act: Subsections (a) and (d) Do Not Merge

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Separate Offenses Under Georgia’s Gang Act: Subsections (a) and (d) Do Not Merge Introduction In Evans v. State and Miller v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia, Sept. 30, 2025), the Court resolved a...
Compliance with New York’s Health‑Care Vaccine Rule Defeats Title VII Religious-Accommodation Claims Absent a Proposed Duty Change; Short-Term Leave Alone Does Not Plead an ADA Disability

Compliance with New York’s Health‑Care Vaccine Rule Defeats Title VII Religious-Accommodation Claims Absent a Proposed Duty Change; Short-Term Leave Alone Does Not Plead an ADA Disability

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Compliance with New York’s Health‑Care Vaccine Rule Defeats Title VII Religious-Accommodation Claims Absent a Proposed Duty Change; Short-Term Leave Alone Does Not Plead an ADA Disability Case: Cagle...
Second Circuit Reaffirms Permissibility of §2L1.2 “Double Counting” and Deferential Substantive-Reasonableness Review in Illegal-Reentry Sentencing

Second Circuit Reaffirms Permissibility of §2L1.2 “Double Counting” and Deferential Substantive-Reasonableness Review in Illegal-Reentry Sentencing

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Second Circuit Reaffirms Permissibility of §2L1.2 “Double Counting” and Deferential Substantive-Reasonableness Review in Illegal-Reentry Sentencing Introduction In United States v. Garcia-Gonzalez,...
No Maranda T. Enhanced-Efforts Duty Where Parent Is Cognitively Competent; Noncompliance with an Improvement Period and Exposure to Sex Offenders Support Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives

No Maranda T. Enhanced-Efforts Duty Where Parent Is Cognitively Competent; Noncompliance with an Improvement Period and Exposure to Sex Offenders Support Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Maranda T. Enhanced-Efforts Duty Where Parent Is Cognitively Competent; Noncompliance with an Improvement Period and Exposure to Sex Offenders Support Termination Without Less Restrictive...
Confidential Oversight Is Not “Public Disclosure,” and Undersheriffs Receive Absolute Immunity for On‑Duty Statements: A Commentary on Patrick Jones Jr. v. Lake County Sheriff’s Office (7th Cir. 2025)

Confidential Oversight Is Not “Public Disclosure,” and Undersheriffs Receive Absolute Immunity for On‑Duty Statements: A Commentary on Patrick Jones Jr. v. Lake County Sheriff’s Office (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Confidential Oversight Is Not “Public Disclosure,” and Undersheriffs Receive Absolute Immunity for On‑Duty Statements Case: Patrick Jones Jr. v. Lake County Sheriff’s Office & Lawrence Oliver Court:...
No But-For Link: Sixth Circuit Narrows “Relevant Conduct” for Prior-Sentence Points After Amendment 821

No But-For Link: Sixth Circuit Narrows “Relevant Conduct” for Prior-Sentence Points After Amendment 821

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No But-For Link: Sixth Circuit Narrows “Relevant Conduct” for Prior-Sentence Points After Amendment 821 Introduction In United States v. Ronnie Edward Duke, the Sixth Circuit addressed a recurring...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert