Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

clarifying-the-& Case Commentaries

“No Advisement, No Waiver” – The Indiana Supreme Court’s Mandatory Advisement Rule in D.W. v. State (2025)

“No Advisement, No Waiver” – The Indiana Supreme Court’s Mandatory Advisement Rule in D.W. v. State (2025)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
“No Advisement, No Waiver” – The Indiana Supreme Court’s Mandatory Advisement Rule in D.W. v. State (2025) Introduction The Indiana Supreme Court’s decision in D.W. v. State, 25S-JV-190 (July 23...
“Specificity Over Abstraction” – The Third Circuit’s Clarification of Clearly-Established Law in Qualified-Immunity Cases (Urda v. Sokso, 2025)

“Specificity Over Abstraction” – The Third Circuit’s Clarification of Clearly-Established Law in Qualified-Immunity Cases (Urda v. Sokso, 2025)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
“Specificity Over Abstraction” – The Third Circuit’s Clarification of Clearly-Established Law in Qualified-Immunity Cases (Adam Urda v. Jeffrey Sokso, 68 F.4th ___, 3d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Adam...
“Substance-over-Form” Direct Regulation:  The Third Circuit’s New Functional Test for Intergovernmental Immunity in CoreCivic Inc. v. Governor of New Jersey

“Substance-over-Form” Direct Regulation: The Third Circuit’s New Functional Test for Intergovernmental Immunity in CoreCivic Inc. v. Governor of New Jersey

Date: Jul 24, 2025
“Substance-over-Form” Direct Regulation: The Third Circuit’s New Functional Test for Intergovernmental Immunity in CoreCivic Inc. v. Governor of New Jersey 1. Introduction The United States Court of...
Patel v. Attorney General: Re-affirming the “Severe Harm + Relocation” Threshold in Political-Opinion Asylum Claims

Patel v. Attorney General: Re-affirming the “Severe Harm + Relocation” Threshold in Political-Opinion Asylum Claims

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Patel v. Attorney General: Re-affirming the “Severe Harm + Relocation” Threshold in Political-Opinion Asylum Claims Introduction Diptiben Dipakkumar Patel, her husband, and their minor son petitioned...
Continuous-Diligence Doctrine for Equitable Tolling in Immigration Appeals: A Commentary on Hernandez-Garcia v. Attorney General

Continuous-Diligence Doctrine for Equitable Tolling in Immigration Appeals: A Commentary on Hernandez-Garcia v. Attorney General

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Continuous-Diligence Doctrine for Equitable Tolling in Immigration Appeals Commentary on Rene Hernandez-Garcia v. Attorney General, United States (3d Cir., 22 July 2025) 1. Introduction The Third...
United States v. Cammarata: Defrauded Classes as Singular MVRA Victims and the Boundaries of Appellate Enhancement Without a Government Cross-Appeal

United States v. Cammarata: Defrauded Classes as Singular MVRA Victims and the Boundaries of Appellate Enhancement Without a Government Cross-Appeal

Date: Jul 24, 2025
United States v. Joseph Cammarata (3d Cir. 2025) – Commentary Introduction This Third Circuit decision grows out of a spectacular fraud perpetrated against hundreds of securities-class-action...
Fifth Circuit Tightens the Clock: Doe v. City View ISD and the Strict Two-Year Limitations Period for Title IX Claims

Fifth Circuit Tightens the Clock: Doe v. City View ISD and the Strict Two-Year Limitations Period for Title IX Claims

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Fifth Circuit Tightens the Clock: Doe v. City View ISD and the Strict Two-Year Limitations Period for Title IX Claims Introduction Jane Doe 1 v. City View Independent School District (Doe v. City...
Fifth Circuit Clarifies Effect of 2023 Guidelines Amendment: Texas Robbery Still a “Crime of Violence”

Fifth Circuit Clarifies Effect of 2023 Guidelines Amendment: Texas Robbery Still a “Crime of Violence”

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Fifth Circuit Clarifies Effect of 2023 Guidelines Amendment: Texas Robbery Still a “Crime of Violence” Introduction United States v. Wickware, No. 24-10519 (5th Cir. July 22 2025), addresses how a...
When “Applicable Law” Isn’t Enough: Fifth Circuit Clarifies the Limits of State Law in Federal Enclaves – A Commentary on Vinales v. AETC II

When “Applicable Law” Isn’t Enough: Fifth Circuit Clarifies the Limits of State Law in Federal Enclaves – A Commentary on Vinales v. AETC II

Date: Jul 24, 2025
When “Applicable Law” Isn’t Enough: Fifth Circuit Clarifies the Limits of State Law in Federal Enclaves – A Commentary on Vinales v. AETC II Introduction Vinales v. AETC II, No. 24-50113 (5th Cir....
Strategic Use of Genetic Predisposition Evidence in Capital Sentencing:  Wells v. Guerrero and the Scope of Ineffective-Assistance Challenges

Strategic Use of Genetic Predisposition Evidence in Capital Sentencing: Wells v. Guerrero and the Scope of Ineffective-Assistance Challenges

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Strategic Use of Genetic Predisposition Evidence in Capital Sentencing: Wells v. Guerrero and the Scope of Ineffective-Assistance Challenges Introduction In Wells v. Guerrero, No. 24-70002 (5th Cir....
The Turner Rule: How Temporal Gaps and Intervening Misconduct Defeat Causation in ADA & FMLA Retaliatory-Termination Claims

The Turner Rule: How Temporal Gaps and Intervening Misconduct Defeat Causation in ADA & FMLA Retaliatory-Termination Claims

Date: Jul 24, 2025
The Turner Rule: How Temporal Gaps and Intervening Misconduct Defeat Causation in ADA & FMLA Retaliatory-Termination Claims 1. Introduction Annette Turner, a Wal-Mart stocker suffering from...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Reliance under North Carolina UDTPA and Punitive-Damages Cap: CPI Security Systems, Inc. v. Vivint Smart Home, Inc.

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Reliance under North Carolina UDTPA and Punitive-Damages Cap: CPI Security Systems, Inc. v. Vivint Smart Home, Inc.

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Reliance Requirement under North Carolina UDTPA and How to Apply the Statutory Cap on Punitive Damages in Multi-Claim Actions I. Introduction In CPI Security Systems, Inc. v....
The “Robertson Rule” – When Federal Sovereign Immunity Mirrors State Workers’ Compensation Exclusivity

The “Robertson Rule” – When Federal Sovereign Immunity Mirrors State Workers’ Compensation Exclusivity

Date: Jul 24, 2025
The “Robertson Rule” – When Federal Sovereign Immunity Mirrors State Workers’ Compensation Exclusivity Introduction Katrina Robertson v. United States (4th Cir. July 22 2025) squarely addresses the...
Coffman v. Nexstar (4th Cir. 2025): Clarifying that Only “Objectively Reasonable” Accommodation Requests Trigger Protection under the WVHRA

Coffman v. Nexstar (4th Cir. 2025): Clarifying that Only “Objectively Reasonable” Accommodation Requests Trigger Protection under the WVHRA

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Coffman v. Nexstar Media Inc. (4th Cir. 2025): Clarifying that Only “Objectively Reasonable” Accommodation Requests Trigger Protection under the WVHRA Introduction Leanna Coffman, an Account...
Holt v. Hull: Fourth Circuit Clarifies that Pre-Trial Detention Credits Do Not Transfer Across Unrelated Virginia Jurisdictions Absent a “Same-Act” Nexus

Holt v. Hull: Fourth Circuit Clarifies that Pre-Trial Detention Credits Do Not Transfer Across Unrelated Virginia Jurisdictions Absent a “Same-Act” Nexus

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Holt v. Hull: Fourth Circuit Clarifies that Pre-Trial Detention Credits Do Not Transfer Across Unrelated Virginia Jurisdictions Absent a “Same-Act” Nexus 1. Introduction Michael Warren Holt brought a...
Rise for Animals v. Washington: Fourth Circuit Re-calibrates Informational-Standing—Plausible Statutory Entitlement to Specific Information Now a Threshold Requirement

Rise for Animals v. Washington: Fourth Circuit Re-calibrates Informational-Standing—Plausible Statutory Entitlement to Specific Information Now a Threshold Requirement

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Rise for Animals v. Washington: Fourth Circuit Re-calibrates Informational Standing— “A Plausible Statutory Entitlement to the Specific Information Sought” as an Article III Gatekeeper 1....
United States v. Booker: The Fourth Circuit Upholds the Anti-Kickback Statute, Narrows “Merger” Concerns in Money-Laundering, and Re-Affirms Post-Kisor Loss-Calculation Principles

United States v. Booker: The Fourth Circuit Upholds the Anti-Kickback Statute, Narrows “Merger” Concerns in Money-Laundering, and Re-Affirms Post-Kisor Loss-Calculation Principles

Date: Jul 24, 2025
United States v. Booker: The Fourth Circuit Upholds the Anti-Kickback Statute, Narrows “Merger” Concerns in Money-Laundering, and Re-Affirms Post-Kisor Loss-Calculation Principles Introduction On 22...
“From Wheels to Wires” – The Fourth Circuit Clarifies Ambiguous Appeal Waivers and Rejects Wiretap-Act Analogies for GPS & Cell-Site TrackingA Commentary on United States v. Reginald Twitty, 4th Cir. (2025)

“From Wheels to Wires” – The Fourth Circuit Clarifies Ambiguous Appeal Waivers and Rejects Wiretap-Act Analogies for GPS & Cell-Site TrackingA Commentary on United States v. Reginald Twitty, 4th Cir. (2025)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
“From Wheels to Wires” – The Fourth Circuit Clarifies Ambiguous Appeal Waivers and Rejects Wiretap-Act Analogies for GPS & Cell-Site Tracking A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Reginald...
Bellinsky v. Galan: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms “Sprint Gatekeeping” for Younger Abstention and Tightens Rooker-Feldman in Domestic-Relations Civil-Rights Suits

Bellinsky v. Galan: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms “Sprint Gatekeeping” for Younger Abstention and Tightens Rooker-Feldman in Domestic-Relations Civil-Rights Suits

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Bellinsky v. Galan: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms “Sprint Gatekeeping” for Younger Abstention and Tightens Rooker-Feldman in Domestic-Relations Civil-Rights Suits 1. Introduction Bellinsky v. Galan, United...
Sprint-Gatekeeping Reinforced: Domestic-Relations Suits Alone Do Not Trigger Younger Abstention – A Commentary on Bellinsky v. Galan (10th Cir. 2025)

Sprint-Gatekeeping Reinforced: Domestic-Relations Suits Alone Do Not Trigger Younger Abstention – A Commentary on Bellinsky v. Galan (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Sprint-Gatekeeping Reinforced: Domestic-Relations Suits Alone Do Not Trigger Younger Abstention – A Commentary on Bellinsky v. Galan (10th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In Bellinsky v. Galan, the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert