Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

clarifying-state-action-doctrine:-acgme&amp Case Commentaries

Sullivan v. Graham: Tenth Circuit Clarifies District Courts’ Discretion over Page-Limits, Rule 8 Compliance, and Counsel Appointment for Pro Se Litigants

Sullivan v. Graham: Tenth Circuit Clarifies District Courts’ Discretion over Page-Limits, Rule 8 Compliance, and Counsel Appointment for Pro Se Litigants

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Sullivan v. Graham: Tenth Circuit Clarifies District Courts’ Discretion over Page-Limits, Rule 8 Compliance, and Counsel Appointment for Pro Se Litigants Introduction The consolidated appeals in...
“Reasonable Brevity”: Sullivan v. Hartford Financial Services Group and the Tenth Circuit’s Re-affirmation of District Courts’ Discretion to Impose Page Limits and Dismiss Prolix Pro Se Pleadings

“Reasonable Brevity”: Sullivan v. Hartford Financial Services Group and the Tenth Circuit’s Re-affirmation of District Courts’ Discretion to Impose Page Limits and Dismiss Prolix Pro Se Pleadings

Date: Jul 22, 2025
“Reasonable Brevity”: Sullivan v. Hartford Financial Services Group and the Tenth Circuit’s Re-affirmation of District Courts’ Discretion to Impose Page Limits and Dismiss Prolix Pro Se Pleadings 1....
Jackson v. KA-3 Associates, LLC: Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Landlord Duty to Maintain Common Areas Under ORS 90.320(1)

Jackson v. KA-3 Associates, LLC: Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Landlord Duty to Maintain Common Areas Under ORS 90.320(1)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Jackson v. KA-3 Associates, LLC: Extending Oregon Landlord Habitability Obligations to Common Areas Under ORS 90.320(1) Introduction Citation: Jackson v. KA-3 Associates, LLC, 374 Or 1 (2025),...
Implicit Nondisparagement Clauses Do Not Waive Oregon’s Anti-SLAPP Protections – A Commentary on Lowes v. Thompson, 374 Or 23 (2025)

Implicit Nondisparagement Clauses Do Not Waive Oregon’s Anti-SLAPP Protections – A Commentary on Lowes v. Thompson, 374 Or 23 (2025)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Implicit Nondisparagement Clauses Do Not Waive Oregon’s Anti-SLAPP Protections A Comprehensive Commentary on Lowes v. Thompson, 374 Or 23 (2025) 1. Introduction Lowes v. Thompson is the Oregon...
“The Registered-Owner Inference Rule” – A New Article I, § 9 Benchmark after State v. Betancourt (2025)

“The Registered-Owner Inference Rule” – A New Article I, § 9 Benchmark after State v. Betancourt (2025)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
“The Registered-Owner Inference Rule” – A New Article I, § 9 Benchmark after State v. Betancourt (2025) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Oregon’s en banc decision in State v. Betancourt, 374 Or...
The Supremacy of the Equal Protection Clause over Florida’s Non-Diminishment Mandate

The Supremacy of the Equal Protection Clause over Florida’s Non-Diminishment Mandate

Date: Jul 22, 2025
The Supremacy of the Equal Protection Clause over Florida’s Non-Diminishment Mandate: A Commentary on Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute, Inc. v. Secretary, Florida Department of State...
Williams v. State of Florida: No Constitutional Right to a Court-Appointed Mitigation Specialist for Pro Se Capital Defendants

Williams v. State of Florida: No Constitutional Right to a Court-Appointed Mitigation Specialist for Pro Se Capital Defendants

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Williams v. State of Florida: No Constitutional Right to a Court-Appointed Mitigation Specialist for Pro Se Capital Defendants Introduction In Donald Otis Williams v. State of Florida...
“Deference with Reasoned Explanation” — The Florida Supreme Court’s New Framework for Reviewing Public Service Commission Settlements

“Deference with Reasoned Explanation” — The Florida Supreme Court’s New Framework for Reviewing Public Service Commission Settlements

Date: Jul 22, 2025
“Deference with Reasoned Explanation” — The Florida Supreme Court’s New Framework for Reviewing Public Service Commission Settlements Introduction Florida Rising, Inc. v. Florida Public Service...
“Speak Now or Forever Hold Your Peace” – The Florida Supreme Court Declares Case (Procedural) Jurisdiction Waivable in JJJTB, Inc. v. Schmidt

“Speak Now or Forever Hold Your Peace” – The Florida Supreme Court Declares Case (Procedural) Jurisdiction Waivable in JJJTB, Inc. v. Schmidt

Date: Jul 22, 2025
“Speak Now or Forever Hold Your Peace” – The Florida Supreme Court Declares Case (Procedural) Jurisdiction Waivable in JJJTB, Inc. v. Schmidt 1. Introduction On 17 July 2025, the Supreme Court of...
Fletcher v. State: Florida Supreme Court Rejects “Reverse Jury Nullification” & Clarifies the Mitigation-Burden Framework in Capital Sentencing

Fletcher v. State: Florida Supreme Court Rejects “Reverse Jury Nullification” & Clarifies the Mitigation-Burden Framework in Capital Sentencing

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Fletcher v. State: Florida Supreme Court Rejects “Reverse Jury Nullification” & Clarifies the Mitigation-Burden Framework in Capital Sentencing Introduction Case: Timothy W. Fletcher v. State of...
“Known-but-Unexamined” Evidence and the Due-Diligence Bar in Successive
          Post-Conviction Litigation – A Commentary on Toney Deron Davis v. State of Florida (2025)

“Known-but-Unexamined” Evidence and the Due-Diligence Bar in Successive Post-Conviction Litigation – A Commentary on Toney Deron Davis v. State of Florida (2025)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
“Known-but-Unexamined” Evidence and the Due-Diligence Bar in Successive Post-Conviction Litigation A Commentary on Toney Deron Davis v. State of Florida, Supreme Court of Florida, No. SC2024-1128 (17...
Family–Targeted Violence Equals Direct Persecution: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Nexus and Past-Persecution Standards in Mejia-Hernandez v. Bondi

Family–Targeted Violence Equals Direct Persecution: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Nexus and Past-Persecution Standards in Mejia-Hernandez v. Bondi

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Family-Targeted Violence Equals Direct Persecution: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Nexus and Past-Persecution Standards in Mejia-Hernandez v. Bondi 1. Introduction This commentary examines the United...
“Exhaust First or Lose the Class”: Seventh Circuit Clarifies that PLRA Exhaustion Bars Use of the Inherently-Transitory Exception – Comment on Westmoreland v. Hughes

“Exhaust First or Lose the Class”: Seventh Circuit Clarifies that PLRA Exhaustion Bars Use of the Inherently-Transitory Exception – Comment on Westmoreland v. Hughes

Date: Jul 22, 2025
“Exhaust First or Lose the Class” Seventh Circuit Clarifies that PLRA Exhaustion Bars Use of the Inherently-Transitory Exception Introduction In Eugene Westmoreland v. Latoya Hughes, No. 24-2153 (7th...
“More Than Mere Deference”: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms the Two-Pronged FOIA Clear-Error Review and Approves Non-Security Glomar Responses

“More Than Mere Deference”: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms the Two-Pronged FOIA Clear-Error Review and Approves Non-Security Glomar Responses

Date: Jul 22, 2025
“More Than Mere Deference”: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms the Two-Pronged FOIA Clear-Error Review and Approves Non-Security Glomar Responses 1. Introduction Joel A. Brodsky—an Illinois attorney turned...
The Mahoney Principle: When Representative Signatures and Personal-Liability Clauses Collide under ERISA

The Mahoney Principle: When Representative Signatures and Personal-Liability Clauses Collide under ERISA

Date: Jul 22, 2025
The Mahoney Principle: Representative Signatures vs. Personal-Liability Clauses in ERISA Contribution Actions Introduction R.R. Maintenance & Industrial Health & Welfare Fund v. Clinton Mahoney, Nos....
Mahoney Personal-Liability Ambiguity Doctrine: When Representative Signatures Clash with Personal-Liability Clauses

Mahoney Personal-Liability Ambiguity Doctrine: When Representative Signatures Clash with Personal-Liability Clauses

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Mahoney Personal-Liability Ambiguity Doctrine: When Representative Signatures Clash with Personal-Liability Clauses 1. Introduction In R.R. Maintenance & Industrial Health & Welfare Fund v. Clinton...

        Narrowing Protective Sweeps and Re-ordering Exclusionary-Rule Analysis:
        A Commentary on United States v. Walker, 7th Cir. (2025)

Narrowing Protective Sweeps and Re-ordering Exclusionary-Rule Analysis: A Commentary on United States v. Walker, 7th Cir. (2025)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Narrowing Protective Sweeps and Re-ordering Exclusionary-Rule Analysis: Commentary on United States v. Richard Walker (7th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction United States v. Walker is the Seventh Circuit’s...
“Contingent GDP-Linked Payments Are Not ‘Principal or Interest’” – Commentary on Argentine GDP-Linked Securities Litigation (2d Cir. 2025)

“Contingent GDP-Linked Payments Are Not ‘Principal or Interest’” – Commentary on Argentine GDP-Linked Securities Litigation (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
“Contingent GDP-Linked Payments Are Not ‘Principal or Interest’” Commentary on the Second Circuit’s Argentine GDP-Linked Securities Litigation Summary Order (2025) 1. Introduction The Second...
Re-affirming the “Central Reason” Nexus Standard in Mixed-Motive Asylum Cases: A Commentary on Figueroa-Serrano v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Re-affirming the “Central Reason” Nexus Standard in Mixed-Motive Asylum Cases: A Commentary on Figueroa-Serrano v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Re-affirming the “Central Reason” Nexus Standard in Mixed-Motive Asylum Cases: A Commentary on Figueroa-Serrano v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In Figueroa-Serrano v. Bondi, the United States...
Fredricks v. Shaheen: The Second Circuit Re-emphasizes the Courts’ Dual Duty to Furnish Rule 56 Notice and Verify Service on Pro Se Litigants

Fredricks v. Shaheen: The Second Circuit Re-emphasizes the Courts’ Dual Duty to Furnish Rule 56 Notice and Verify Service on Pro Se Litigants

Date: Jul 22, 2025
Fredricks v. Shaheen: The Second Circuit Re-emphasizes the Courts’ Dual Duty to Furnish Rule 56 Notice and Verify Service on Pro Se Litigants Introduction Fredricks v. Shaheen, No. 22-2480 (2d Cir....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert